Fantasy and Science Fiction are alike in that each requires the creation of a complete new world. Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, The Avengers and Planet of the Apes each occupies its own imaginary universe.Fantasy and Sci-Fi are great for entertainment but not so great for selling most products and services.The process of selling requires a reality hook, something that gives us, here in this world, a handle on the impossible. Would you like to sit and listen as John Lennon writes the lyrics and melody to Imagine, one of the most popular songs of all time? It’s easy to go there. All you need is the white Steinway piano on which John composed the song. You can see the cigarette burn on it from a moment when he got distracted and forgot it was there. That cigarette burn is a reality hook, a point of focus that brings an abstract moment from yesterday into the black and white of now.The power of any message – particularly an advertisement – is increased when you add a detail easily imagined by the listener. It was easy to see that cigarette burn on the white Steinway, wasn’t it? This piano exists, not in fantasy, but in the residence of Yoko Ono in Manhattan’s famous Dakota building. John gave it to her on her birthday in 1971.If you are a writer, a real one, you need to study magical thinking. Unlike science fiction and fantasy, the world of magical thinking is this world and all its impossible events happen in this, our own all-too-familiar universe. The writing style created by magical thinking is called Magical Realism and you’ll need to be good at it if you want to gain and hold the attention of 21st century America.Fortunately, a new book was just published about it. The 7 Laws of Magical Thinking     by Matthew Hutson1. Objects Carry Essences: Cooties, Contagion, and Historicity“John Lennon sat at this piano.”2. Symbols Have Power: Spells, Ceremonies, and the Law of SimilarityA Red Sox jersey bearing the name and number of Dave Ortiz was buried by a construction worker under the foundation of the new 1.5 billion dollar stadium of the New York Yankees. Yankee management took this curse seriously enough to consider filing criminal charges.3. Actions Have Distant Consequences: Using Superstition to Make Luck Work for You.A ‘lucky fisherman’s hat’ makes you feel different. Consequently, you make better decisions.4. The Mind Knows No Bounds: Psychokinesis, ESP, and TranscendenceAt the root of the bestselling book, The Secret, is a bit of magical thinking called The Law of Attraction which says if you focus on a thing and see it in your mind and believe it is yours, you will have it. The book has sold more than 19 million copies.5. The Soul Lives On: Death Is Not the End of Us.We think of a thousand different ways to say it and believe it. “There is a land of the living and a land of the dead and the bridge is love, the only survival, the only meaning.” – Thornton Wilder, last lines of The Bridge of San Luis Rey6. The World is Alive: Animals, Objects, and Gods are People, Too.In her award-winning book, The Year of Magical Thinking, Joan Didion speaks of coping with the death of her husband. “I stopped at the door to the room. I could not give away the rest of his shoes. I stood there a moment, then realized why: he would need shoes if he was to return.” Likewise, most of us never delete the telephone numbers of close friends who have died. We leave them on our cell phones because there is part of us...

The average person would rather be angry than bored. Anger is exciting.Likewise, love and hate are not opposites. The opposite of both is indifference.I’m not suggesting that you be angry all the time. I’m suggesting only that you care enough to take action. No, that’s not it either. I’m suggesting that you take action even when you don’t care. Curiosity and action are the only cures for boredom.“I’ve an idea. Why don’t we have a little game? Let’s pretend that we’re human beings and that we’re actually alive. Just for a while. What do you say?”– Jimmy Porter in John Osborne’s 1956 play, Look Back in AngerBoredom and indifference are deadly poisons. “Just go with the flow,” “Don’t make waves,” and “Whatever…” are the mantras of the walking dead.Don’t be dead. Be alive. Make a choice. Commit. Hold your ground. Stand, chin in the air, ready to endure the coming storm or be utterly blown away by it to a strange and different land.Welcome to Oz, Dorothy. Where did you get those shoes?I grow weary of people who speak endlessly about goal setting. It’s like listening to someone agonize over where to take their vacation. I feel like shouting, “Just pick a place and GO there! Choose! Go! There’s cool stuff to do EVERYWHERE.”“I just can’t find my passion.”Whiner, I’ve got news for you: Passion does not trigger commitment. Commitment triggers passion.Feelings follow actions. So make a choice. Commit irrevocably. Take action. Passion will explode like a flame, giving you energy and lighting your way. Congratulations! You’re about to embark on an adventure called Life.Knowing how to do a thing is not the same as actually doing it. “Many times after one of my six-week classes is completed, a student, excited by what he or she has just learned, has said to me, ‘You should teach an advanced class!’ I am always flattered, but always a little surprised. Advanced? I know for a fact that they have not mastered the most basic principles, and yet they feel that they are ready to move on to the next level.” – Brian McDonaldWizard Academy equips people who have chosen a purpose. We don’t help you find a purpose; you’ve got to aim that arrow on your own. And then you’ve got to act. You’ve got to release that arrow and ride it.We just help you hit the bullseye.I like committed people. I avoid people who are not committed. They waste my time and frustrate me with sad stories and soft sighs as they sing the song of the weasel. You’ve heard the song. All its verses begin with the words “If only”:“If only I had the money.”“If only I had gone to college.”“If only I had chosen differently.”A committed person paints a picture of a possible future and then works to bring that picture to life. They see it before it happens. They believe it before it’s true. And they take action.Weasels are dreamers. They see possibilities and sigh wistfully, “If only.”Committed people are dreamers, too. But they see possibilities and take action. When that action doesn’t work they take another. And another. And another and another and another and…Weasels believe success and failure to be permanent. Committed people know both to be flickering moments, points on scoreboards that are constantly changing, tiny adventures called victories and defeats.What are you trying to make happen?Do you have the courage to say it out loud?Do you believe in the future you see in your mind?“You must believe and not doubt, because the one who doubts is like a wave of the sea, blown and...

“You know me; I find a crowd all headed in the same direction and call it my parade.”– Roy Laughlin, April 26, 2012Brother Laughlin uttered this phrase as he was telling me of his involvement in the development of two new daily radio shorts involving a couple of well-known celebrities. Living as he does in Los Angeles, Laughlin sees crowds headed in the same direction long before these crowds are visible to the rest of us.Laughlin managed KISS-FM during its glory years under the ownership of Gannett, then Jacor, then Clear Channel. I’ll never forget the day in 2004 when “Other Roy” called to say, “I’m thinking about replacing Rick Dees with this new kid, Ryan Seacrest. Do you think I’m nuts?” Laughlin often thinks out loud in my ear. It helps him, somehow, to hear himself say what he’s thinking. He finds it useful. I find it interesting.Last week was a classic Laughlin moment.“Music is everywhere,” he said, “you can get it everywhere. All kinds of services, all kinds of devices, we’re swimming in an ocean of music. Radio is headed to the spoken word. Live talk is just gonna get bigger and bigger and bigger. You won’t be able to get it on these other devices.”I hadn’t really thought about it but I instantly knew he was right. (Calm down, music radio junkies. Evolutions like this don’t happen overnight but I do believe we’ll see a steady trend toward FM talk for at least the next 10 years.)My confidence in the correctness of Laughlin’s prediction is rooted in my study of Society’s 40-Year Pendulum, a theory that says public opinion is driven by the energies of a duality, the “Me” and the “We.” Each of these, when balanced by the other, is a good thing. But we always take a good thing too far. Then, suffering the consequences of our own mania, we hunger for what we left behind and begin a 40-year journey to the other extreme.Moving from its central, balanced position (1963,) the Pendulum swung upward 20 years to the “Me” zenith (1983,) then down 20 years to return to the central point (2003,) now we’re headed up the other side toward the zenith of “We” (2023.)These are the opposing values that drive the Pendulum:“Me,” the individual, unique and special and possessing unlimited potential1. demands freedom of expression2. applauds personal liberty3. believes one man is wiser than a million men, “A camel is a racehorse designed by a committee.”4. wants to achieve a better life5. is about big dreams6. desires to be Number One. “I came, I saw, I conquered.”7. admires individual confidence and is attracted to decisive persons8. believes leadership is, “Look at me. Admire me. Emulate me if you can.”9. strengthens a society’s sense of identity as it elevates attractive heroes.The most recent 20-year upswing of the Pendulum into “Me” values began in 1963 with the Beatles song “I Want to Hold Your Hand.” Self-indulgence and freedom of expression reached their zenith in 1983 with Michael Jackson’s “Thriller.” Every zenith of “Me” is marked by plastic, hollow posing and outlandish costumes as each of us struggles to be unique.The 20 years from 1983 to 2003 marked the downswing of the “Me” as it began to deflate and lose energy. We called these “the Gen-X years.”We’re currently at the halfway point in an upswing into the “We” perspective (2003 to 2023.)“We,” the group, the team, the tribe, the collective1. demands conformity for the common good2. applauds personal responsibility3. believes a million men are...

She jumped from the window of a building on New York’s East Side on January 19, 1981. Her face was erased by the fall.I’m not sure what I was doing that day but I did not kill myself.No one knew her name so her body remained unclaimed until she was reported missing. She was identified by her clothes.Suicide troubles me. I get it but I don’t.I think I’ve known more people who killed themselves than the average person. This, too, troubles me.Francesca often denied the camera her face, turning away from it as though she didn’t want to be photographed. But Francesca was a photographer, the very photographer, in fact, who was taking her picture.I think Francesca Woodman was hiding from herself. And one day she hid so very well that she never found herself again.Francesca was a profoundly artistic photographer. Had she not hidden herself so completely she might have enjoyed a visit to 1071 Fifth Avenue. The photographs she made during the 9 years following her 13th birthday have become the feature attraction of the Guggenheim, one of the world’s most prestigious museums. I put a few of her photographs in the rabbit hole for you. (Just click the photo of Francesca hanging from the lintel of the door above the title of today’s Monday Morning Memo. Each click of a photo beyond that portal will take you one step deeper.)Francesca Woodman was born when I was 5 days old. Steve was a couple of years older.I remember Steve because he and I often prayed together when I was 22. One day he and his wife asked Pennie and me to have dinner in their home. On a different day, his wife asked Steve for a divorce. Steve moved out, as requested.On a final day, Steve broke into his house while his wife and young son were out. He went into his son’s room. I remember that room. You know what happened next.I don’t know why I’m telling you this.Steve was a lineman for the telephone company.He had a life and then he didn’t.Maybe I’m telling you this because one of you is thinking of quitting early.All I can say is this and it’s probably the wrong thing to say; decades of sadness and confusion are the legacy left by those who quit early, the bitter inheritance you give to those who created a place for you in their hearts.Not everyone is showcased by the Guggenheim.Roy H. Williams

Guilt is about what you have done.Shame is about who you are.I’ve always been attracted to people who are guilty, but unashamed. Guilt without shame is audacity, a special kind of courage.  It’s what we admire in the little boy who shouted, “The king is naked! Right there in the middle of the street! Naked!”Everyone was thinking it, but no one was willing to say it.I’ll bet that kid was in trouble when he got home. His mom probably even used all three of his middle names, “Oscar Fingal O’Flahertie Wills Wilde, what were you thinking?”“Well Mom, I was thinking the king was naked.”“Oscar, what you did was unacceptable… inappropriate… inexcusable.”The boy was guilty of speaking a socially unacceptable truth. His mother knew the danger of it. “Oscar, people are rarely thankful when you pull aside their veils of pretense to reveal their grand delusions.”Oscar Wilde died 112 years ago but we still recall the piercing observations of his stiletto wit.“The worst vice of a fanatic is his sincerity.”“And he goes through life, his mouth open, and his mind closed.”“He has no enemies, but is intensely disliked by his friends.”“Women are never disarmed by compliments. Men always are. That is the difference between the sexes.”“Men always want to be a woman’s first love. Women have a more subtle instinct: What they like is to be a man’s last romance.”“When bankers get together for dinner, they discuss art. When artists get together for dinner, they discuss money.”“Bad artists always admire each other’s work.”“Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.” If you are committed to speaking the truth, it will be your choice of tools that defines you.  Oscar Wilde was a playwright. He put his words, like a ventriloquist, into the mouths of actors on the stage. Ad writers, screenwriters and novelists differ only in their ventriloquist’s dummies, the masks they hide behind.Dorothy Parker was just 7 when Oscar Wilde died but he left her his stiletto wit. Dorothy became a journalist. No dummy. No mask.When a Broadway play was interrupted to announce the death of Calvin Coolidge, Dorothy leaned over and whispered to a friend, “How do they know?”When reviewing The Autobiography of Margot Asquith for the Oct. 22, 1927 issue of The New Yorker, Dorothy wrote, “The affair between Margot Asquith and Margot Asquith will live as one of the prettiest love stories of all literature.”In another review, she said, “This wasn’t just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it.”Dorothy Parker had the audacity to speak the truth.“All those writers who write about their childhood! Gentle God, if I wrote about mine you wouldn’t sit in the same room with me.” Not even the church was safe. “But as for helping me in the outside world, the convent taught me only that if you spit on a pencil, it will erase ink.”In later years, she said, “I had been fed, in my youth, a lot of old wives’ tales about how men would instantly forsake a beautiful woman to flock around a brilliant one. It is but fair to say that, after getting out in the world, I have never seen this happen.”The bright clarity of her observations earned her a place on the infamous Hollywood Blacklists of Senator Joseph McCarthy and the House Committee on Un-American Activities. But Dorothy was not dismayed. She said: “They sicken of the calm who know the storm.”In other words, bring it on.If it’s a crime to pull back the veil of public pretense and name the...

He seems to have been crazy.Seems to have been.Bubbling, babbling in bits of broken English, Sam was a cantankerously crazy old man.But what he left behind was beautiful.He worked on it alone from 1921 to 1954, then signed the deed over to a neighbor and disappeared.Never came back.The Beatles put his face next to Bob Dylan’s on the album cover ofSgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band in 1967.The surreal structure Sam left behind was declared a National Historic Monument in 1990.He was crazy like Leonardo Da Vinci. Crazy like Buckminster Fuller. Crazy like Antoni Gaudi. If Sam could illustrate what he saw, he would have been crazy like Dr. Seuss. But his paints were not liquid. They were broken bits of glazed pottery and colored glass embedded in concrete over wire-covered steel.AIn Sam’s fingers a shattered 7-Up bottle became a splash of sparkling green in the sky above Los Angeles. Milk of Magnesia bottles offered Sam the riches of cobalt blue. The sea placed at his feet the whitewashed shells of underwater creatures and the dumpster of a pottery factory gave him the Sunflowers yellow of Vincent Van Gogh and the red blood of an Italian saint.Spain’s Antoni Gaudi began the Sagrada Familia in Barcelona in 1883.America’s Sam Rodia began Watts Towers in south central L.A. in 1921.He finished and vanished before I was born.Sam made bas relief murals in colored cement by pressing his tools into the mix when it was still young and impressionable. He made an impression on me as well and I am no longer young.Three weeks ago I asked Paul Sherman for the money to build a winding sidewalk from Wizard Academy’s tower down to where the chapel path meets the Garden of Joy. Paul granted us the cash because Paul is a generous man who appreciates what he has learned during his visits to the Academy and the difference this knowledge has made in his business. And now I’m asking you to help build an archway, a portal on Paul’s sidewalk, in the manner of Sam Rodia. This archway, this portal to adventure, will be built by Pennie and me from the objects you send us along with the fifty dollars or more you donate to Wizard Academy. Sam’s style and method of building from found objects has been called naïve art, outsider art, folk art and junkitecture.I call it enchanting, inspiring and crazy.Are you in?Roy H. Williams

How tall is your brand?As long as we’re on the subject of brand identity and reputation, how are brands created in the first place? Is a brand merely the sum total of all the things a company says about itself?Of course not.Ads do, of course, play a big part in branding. Brand personality is communicated by:1. what you say,2. how you say it, and3. what you leave out. That’s right. What you leave out says as much as what you shout. This is because our minds read between the lines. Consider boxing legend Mike Tyson’s rebuttal to a statement made by sportswriter Wallace Matthews: “He called me a rapist and a recluse. I’m not a recluse.”What you leave out says as much as what you shout.Now back to the idea that a brand is the sum total of all its ads. The simple truth is this:1. Some ads have more relevance than others.2. Some ads have more credibility than others.3. Our opinion of a brand is not just a reflection of that brand’s current ad.4. Our opinion of a brand is not just a reflection of that brand’s advertising during the past 30, 60, or 180 days.5. A two-year rolling window seems to be the interval of primary influence. (Notice that we said primary influence, not total.)6. Thus, it can be loosely said – to the degree that ads communicate a brand – brand identity is largely a composite of the previous 24 months’ advertising. Ads older than 24 months fade into the mist of yesterday’s truth. You might remember an ad from 30 years ago but it’s not likely to greatly influence your opinion of that brand today. 7. Sleep erases advertising. The less relevant the message, the more quickly it is erased.8. “Save 30 Percent, This Week Only,” becomes utterly irrelevant next week except for one little tidbit that sticks in the mind of the customer: “Wait, and they’ll put it on sale.” Our minds read between the lines. There are two factors beyond advertising that greatly inform our opinion about a brand:1. Our own experience. “What you are doing shouts so loud I cannot hear what you are saying.”2. The opinions of others. News stories (the result of a good P.R. campaign) and word-of-mouth (the result of the experiences of others) influence brand reputation and thus, brand identity. News stories are tricky to get. Word-of-mouth is not. The problem with word-of-mouth is that it’s much more likely to be negative than positive. This is because:1. Rage is a stronger motivator than joy. (Not a stronger emotion; a stronger motivator. Rage demands action. Joy does not.)2. Most people “play it safe” when it comes to word-of-mouth. If they tell you, “It was a great movie,” you’ll think less of them if you see the movie and don’t like it. But if they say, “It was horrible. Don’t go,” you’ll be grateful they saved you from making a mistake. Positive word-of-mouth is risky to the recommender. Negative word-of-mouth is not. Do you want to know the secret to generating positive word-of-mouth? Never promise everything you intend to deliver. Keep an ace up your sleeve. The bigger the happy surprise you deliver when your customer comes into contact with you, the stronger the positive word-of-mouth that will follow. And this...

Elijah, according to the Bible, was a Tishbite.Google “meaning of Tishbite” and the first page of results will give you a glimpse of the grand sweep of opinions we have when it comes to things religious.Tishbite means “stranger” according to some sources but Wikipedia says Tishbe was a place, thus, “The phrasing can be reworded as ‘Elijah the Tishbite of Tishbe in Gilead.’”Churchages.com says, “If we translate the word Tishbite, it means ‘a converter.’” But meaning-of-names.com lets us know, “In Israeli, the name Tishbite means ‘that makes captive’ and is most commonly given to girls.” (Israeli is a language? I thought Israelis spoke mostly Hebrew. – RHW)What this tells us is that you can “prove” anything you want if only you choose the right sources to quote. People give authority to the written word. “Right there it is in black and white. See it? Right there it is.”Elijah lived about 2,900 years ago and his specialty, it would seem, was calling down fire from heaven. We’re told of 3 times Elijah did this. The first time was epic.“At the time of sacrifice, the prophet Elijah stepped forward and prayed: ‘LORD, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel, let it be known today that you are God in Israel and that I am your servant and have done all these things at your command. Answer me, LORD, answer me, so these people will know that you, LORD, are God, and that you are turning their hearts back again.’ Then the fire of the LORD fell and burned up the sacrifice, the wood, the stones and the soil, and also licked up the water in the trench.”– 1st Kings ch. 18To the consternation and amazement of my friends, I am one of those inexplicable people who believe there really was a guy named Elijah and that he really did the things ascribed to him in the books of 1st and 2nd Kings in the Old Testament. Jesus, too, speaks of Elijah in the New Testament as though he was a real person and believe it or not, the Qur’an refers to this same Elijah in chapters 6 and 37.But I don’t believe Elijah was a real person merely because a few ancient texts refer to him as a real person. I believe the Elijah story – all of it – because I have chosen to believe it.Belief is not mandated by facts or by the lack of them. You believe what you choose to believe. Belief is always a choice. Consequently, you can believe Tishbe was a place and Elijah was from there, or you can believe Tishbite means “stranger” or that it means “a converter” or that Israeli is a language and people who speak it commonly give their daughters the unfortunate name of “Tishbite.”You might even choose to believe that a nameless storyteller invented Elijah 2900 years ago and that Jesus was duped by this Elijah fiction 900 years later and Muhammad was likewise duped 600 years after that. This would be a perfectly reasonable belief.It’s just not the belief I have chosen.As I said, Elijah’s specialty was calling down fire from heaven.You, too, can call fire down from heaven. What kind of fire do you call? Is it musical fire? Is it shapes and colors? Do you call down poetry or analysis or compassion or strategic planning? There is a thing you do extremely well. You know what it is. You have a knack for it. It just comes to you. You’ve always been good at it. What is it?I believe in Elijah, but I also believe in you.You have doubts about your own abilities.Self-doubt is part of the human experience. Elijah, immediately after calling down the fire of chapter 18 in 1st Kings, ran from an angry woman and hid in a cave in Mount Horeb. During the night, the word of the LORD came to him:“‘Go out and stand on the mountain in the presence of the LORD, for the LORD is about to pass by.’ Then

“‘Hunches,’ his mother used to call them. The boy was beginning to understand that intuition is really just a sudden immersion of the soul into the universal current of life, where the histories of all people are connected, and we are able to know everything, because it’s all written there.”– The Alchemist, by Paulo Coelho, an allegorical tale about an Andalusian shepherd boy, written in only two weeks in 1987 because according to the author, “the story was already written in my soul.” It has since become one of the twelve best-selling books of all time.Hunches – premonitions – gut feelings – intuition – are just different names we give to that wordless logic of the brain’s right hemisphere. Look at any list of the functions of the right hemisphere of the brain and you’ll notice that each is simply a different form of pattern recognition. You’ll find no book that says what I just said; it’s merely my own observation. But I’m quite certain I am right. The left and right brains don’t work independently of each other, though it often seems like they do since they contribute very different kinds of perceptions to the final mental image. The left brain looks for the discrepancy, the flaw, the mistake, the anomaly, always asking, “Where is the difference?” And then it focuses on that difference. The left brain zooms in like a microscope, forever seeking additional details.  The left brain rejoices “when it all adds up.” The danger of the left is that it often makes mountains out of molehills in the mistaken belief that anything that is true must also be relevant to the problem at hand. The left brain is legalistic, seeing everything as either correct or incorrect, right or wrong, true or false. The left brain can be astoundingly petty. Rational, sequential, deductive reasoning – classical logic – is the contribution of the brain’s left hemisphere. But the logic of the right brain is intuition. The right brain looks for similarities, patterns, systems and relationships, always asking, “Where are the connections?” And then it uses the ripple effect to give it systemic leverage within highly complex systems; “a small change here yields a big difference way over there.” The right brain pulls back further and further, forever seeking the bigger picture. The danger of the right is that it often sees patterns that aren’t really there, resulting in an unproductive goose chase into the unknown and irrelevant. The right brain is amoral. Morals are the left brain’s job. And the right brain makes no distinction between fact and fiction. Real and imaginary are one and the same in the shadowland of the subconscious right brain. The right hungers only for the complexity of skillfully woven patterns and relationships between shapes, colors and symbols in art; contour, interval, pitch, key, tempo and rhythm in music; motives, relationships, actions and reactions in people; and form, function, component and composite in machines of every kind, even the relational machinery of human organizations. The right brain seeks the metaphors, universal laws and archetypal patterns that link all experience into a grand unified theory, the final solution to the puzzle of existence; the biggest picture of all. The right brain rejoices in the complexity of the pattern. The left brain seeks and provides information.The right brain seeks and provides perspective, choosing a particular angle of view. People never really change their minds. Provide them with the...

To Radio AdvertisersBefore we begin, you need to know that a “3.0 frequency” is RadioSpeak for reaching the same listener 3 times. TSL means “Time Spent Listening” and PPM is “Portable People Meter.”Hi Roy,  I’m sure that you receive this question often, but I didn’t find your personal response to it online. How do you believe the reduction in frequency realized through the implementation of PPM should affect media planning? The obvious response is that PPM derives a more accurate measure of TSL, and therefore these “new” metrics should now be the benchmark…but what does that say about the “old” 3.0 frequency? Previous studies showed the “old 3.0” was effective. In the end, the PPM 3.0 is clearly a safe bet for results…but the question is whether old schedules, previously deemed effective, should be shifted to reduce reach and increase frequency…and whether that change will further enhance results or not.Thank You!Ashley Alexandra Testa Ashley, you ask a good question.For those who aren’t completely up-to-speed on Arbitron’s new Portable People Meter (PPM) technology for radio measurement, here are the basics:1. Arbitron survey respondents now carry a device that records which stations they’re actually listening to, not just the ones they think they’re listening to, as was often the case in the old “diary” based method.2. This means radio stations get credit for actual listening time rather than just how well they imprint their station slogans and taglines onto our memories.3. Consequently, lots of “favorite” radio stations are being revealed to have smaller audiences than was previously believed, while lots of second and third-favorite stations are finally able to prove what they’ve always known: listeners were listening to their stations and then reporting to Arbitron they were listening to the “brand name” leader.4. The average person listens to a larger number of different stations than they realize.5. This makes it harder than ever to achieve frequency (repetition.)Now back to Ashley’s question, which was, effectively, “Since PPM shows us a schedule that yielded a diary-based 3.0 frequency yesterday yields only a 2.5 when measured with PPM today, should we start targeting a 2.5 frequency instead of 3.0?”Ashley, the short answer would be “Yes” if short answers weren’t so dangerous. Our dilemma lies in the premise stated in your note: “In the end, the PPM 3.0 is clearly a safe bet for results…”A 3.0 frequency is not, and never was, a safe bet.Results in radio are based on three things:(1.) Relevance. Does the listener care? And if so, how much?(2.) Credibility. Does the listener believe the claims made by the advertiser?(3.) Frequency. (Repetition.) How often is the listener exposed to this message?Relevance without credibility is the definition of hype.Credibility without relevance is the answer to a question no one was asking. A message with high relevance and high credibility for a product or service with a short purchase cycle is the perfect Direct Response ad. For such an ad, a frequency of 1.0 will work just fine.But very few ads have such relevance and credibility that they need to be heard only once.Insufficient repetition kills a lot of radio campaigns. But radio people often blame poor results on insufficient frequency, saying, “The advertiser just didn’t spend enough money,” when the real problem was in the

And Don's Single Biggest MistakeThis isn’t what Richard Exley said last week, but rather what I took from it:If you want to be truly happy,1. Commit to a cause greater than yourself.2. Value people rather than things.3. Give thanks for what you have instead of complaining about what you don’t have.4. Celebrate the ordinary. Find joy in life’s daily pleasures. I see Richard’s Recipe for Happiness as the perfect checklist for conducting a Blind Spot Self-Examination. Each of us has a blind spot. You disagree? Consider this: if you knew it was there, it wouldn’t be called a blind spot.Are you willing to do a self-examination with me? I’ll go first:1. Commit to a cause? Check. I’m committed to building a school for business owners with fewer than 100 employees. I’m committed to the little guy, the underdog, the misfit, maverick, renegade, disruptor, entrepreneur: the visionary with an impossible dream.2. Value people? Blind Spot. I love my CrazySmart Friends but I’m profoundly annoyed by lazy people, frightened people, self-righteous people, whiners, complainers and professional victims. This is obviously where I need to grow. As much as I believe these people to be a tragic waste of skin, a little voice tells me I’m wrong.3-4. Give thanks? Celebrate? Check. Check. I live in a constant state of amazement over my extraordinary good fortune. If I ever need money, I’ll buy a lottery ticket because I honestly believe I’ll win. Each morning when I get behind the wheel of my 11 year-old pickup truck with 100,000 miles, I remember how incredibly fond I am of it. And brown beans. And Fuji apples. And of looking at my wife when she doesn’t know I’m looking. Good things happen to me that I do not deserve. And for these things, I am thankful.Number 2 is my blind spot; the people thing. Which one is yours?Don Kuhl publishes behavior-change journals. His clients include the Justice Department and more than 6,000 correctional institutions and rehab centers.Don shared something profound with me recently when I asked him if there is a specific turning point that leads broken people to recovery and rehabilitation. I’m not quoting Don exactly; I’m just sharing what I think I remember:“The single biggest mistake people make is their refusal to own their circumstances. When something bad happens, they say, ‘I’ve been wronged. I didn’t choose this. Someone else did this to me, so someone else needs to fix it.’”“This someone else, by the way, is usually1. family2. religious organization3. employer4. medical community, or5. government.”“But if someone else can’t or won’t ‘fix it,’ these people become miserable. They feel like victims, angry and helpless. This victim mentality causes their life to begin spinning out of control.”“The turning point toward happiness is when a person takes ownership of their circumstances. When something bad happens, they learn to say, ‘I’ve been wronged. I didn’t choose this. But these are my circumstances. Now what am I going to do to change them?”New beliefs lead to new choices.New choices lead to new actions.New actions lead to new circumstances. If you don’t like your circumstances, examine your beliefs. What do you believe? Does “someone else” need to fix it? Or do you need to fix it yourself?Roy H. Williams

In 1605, Quixote’s fearsome giants were windmills and Dulcinea1 was his beautiful, impossible dream.“What giants?” said Sancho Panza.“Those you see there,” answered his master, “with the long arms, and some have them nearly two leagues long.”“Look, your worship,” said Sancho. “What we see there are not giants but windmills, and what seem to be their arms are the vanes that turn by the wind and make the millstone go.”“It is easy to see,” replied Don Quixote, “that you are not used to this business of adventures.”—Miguel de Cervantes, Don Quixote, 1605In 1765, Patrick Henry’s giant was tyranny and Liberty was his dream. He said, “Give me Dulcinea2, or give me death.”In 1845, Henry David Thoreau’s giant was a distracted life and Purpose was his dream:“I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what Dulcinea3 had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived.”But it was September 23, 1798, during the idyllic years between the American Revolution and Walden Pond that a newly graduated Mr. Bronson of New Haven scribbled a note to his classmate, Thomas Lewis of Glastonbury:“Yesterday Morning, just after I got out of bed I looked out at the window and saw a young gentleman on horseback riding round a rock at the corner of the meeting house, who, after surrounding it three times, I discovered was Wilcokson. I suppose he was playing Don Quixote to it. I just bid him good morrow and saw him proceed, with his Rocinante, towards Glastonbury…”A young man named Wilcokson found some fascination in a rock at the corner of a meeting house 214 years ago. He circled it thrice, judged it unworthy to be his giant, then rode onward in search of adventure.Have you found a giant worthy of your attention or are you just riding in circles ‘round a rock?I am often asked, “What is your fascination with Don Quixote?” The question is a fair one, so today I will attempt to answer it. I love Don Quixote because:1. he saw beauty where others did not.(In the eyes of others, his Lady Dulcinea was a common village girl.)2. he saw adventure where others did not.(“What giants?” said Sancho Panza…)3. he was utterly committed to his quest.(Quixote never gave up, never backed down. He was willing to suffer hardship for what he believed.)Are you able to see beauty in the ordinary?Are you willing to find adventure in the daily?Are you prepared to commit completely to what you believe?Sancho Panza didn’t always understand Don Quixote, but he never left his side. Sancho encouraged Quixote, advised Quixote, and helped Quixote to mend each time he was broken. Sancho and Don had such a marvelous time together that we continue to speak of them after 400 years.Wizard Academy is Sancho Panza to every dreamer of an impossible dream. Can you name your Dulcinea?Come, we will help you fight giants.Roy H. Williams

My back is against the wall&nbsp;and I don’t know what to do. The vortex of this crisis is pulling me into a toxic blue quicksand of the soul. I struggle until hope is gone. The light is growing dim. I have no one to blame but myself.As I lift my weary eyes&nbsp;one last time, an unexpected angel steps quickly from the shadows. I feel his fingers tighten around my forearm.I am surprised when I see his face.“When a friend&nbsp;is in trouble, don’t annoy him by asking if there is anything you can do. Think up something appropriate and do it.”– E.W. HoweRichard Kessler, Jeffrey Eisenberg and Chad Prosser&nbsp;have never met, yet each of them has gripped my forearm when I desperately needed a friend, which is why it may surprise you that I recently pushed Chad into the fight of his life.The telephone rings.&nbsp;Caller ID says it’s Chad Prosser.“What up, Chadbo?”I hear a weary sigh&nbsp;before Chad begins to speak. This startles me. Chad is not a sighing sort of fellow.&nbsp;“I’m getting a lot of pressure and I need the perspective of someone outside the situation.”“What situation?”“South Carolina.”“Pressure?”“A lot of people are pushing me to run for Congress.”&nbsp;The telephone line remains silent until Chad says,&nbsp;“You there?”“Chad…”“Yes?”“You called the wrong friend.”Before I continue,&nbsp;I’d like to make four things clear:(1.) It’s important to me that you understand how deeply I hate politics. I feel the average politician to be a big ego in an empty suit, a cardboard cutout, a talking doll who delivers pre-recorded platitudes whenever you pull his string.(2.) The Monday Morning Memo is NOT a publication of Wizard Academy. The Memo is, was, and forever will be the public ramblings of a private citizen, Roy H. Williams.(3.) Wizard Academy will never have a political opinion, alliance or affiliation.&nbsp;No political meetings will ever be held on Academy property.(4.) Pennie and I are supporting two different persons running for Congress this year.&nbsp;Dan Grant&nbsp;is a Democrat. Chad Prosser is a Republican. We love them both because they are incredibly good men with the best possible motives.I yelled at Chad for half an hour.&nbsp;He was reluctant to run for office for all the same reasons that you or I or any other sane person would be reluctant. Exasperated, I said,&nbsp;“Chad, when you served as director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism for South Carolina, I saw you turn away from anything that might benefit you personally. You always said you just didn’t feel it would be right,&nbsp;even when it was perfectly legal and above board. I saw you put the needs of the people of South Carolina ahead of your own needs day after day. I know you to be a true public servant.”“Roy,&nbsp;you’re making my case for me! I did my time. I served my state.”“Chad,&nbsp;now it’s time for you to serve the whole country.”Before I let him off the phone,&nbsp;I made Chad promise to watch a 2-minute video David Rehr recorded in Sunpop Studios 3 years ago. When David was a junior in high school, he became a congressional page on Capitol Hill. He was later hired to be President and CEO of the National Association of Broadcasters. David Rehr knows Washington, DC like no one I’ve ever met.Chad watched&nbsp;the David Rehr video.&nbsp;The next day he announced his decision to run for Congress.Speaking of videos,&nbsp;when Chad attended his first class at Wizard Academy in 2004, he was randomly chosen to make a few comments about his experience in another video you may not have seen. I met Chad just 2 days before he appeared in&nbsp;<a...

James Lipton asked Barbra Streisand the secret of her success.&nbsp;She responded by saying,&nbsp;“At the moment of commitment, the Universe conspires to assist you.”&nbsp;– September 8, 2003, while recording an episode of&nbsp;Inside the Actor’s Studio&nbsp;that would air on March 21, 2004Streisand&nbsp;was&nbsp;summarizing a quote usually attributed to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe&nbsp;(1749-1832,)&nbsp;the Shakespeare of Germany:“Until one is committed, there is hesitancy, the chance to draw back. Concerning all acts of initiative and creation, there is one elementary truth, the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans: that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then Providence moves too. All sorts of things occur to help one that would never otherwise have occurred. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one’s favor all manner of unforeseen incidents and meetings and material assistance, which no man could have dreamed would have come his way. Whatever you can do, or dream you can do, begin it. Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it. Begin it now.”Goethe never said it,*&nbsp;but it’s true nonetheless.The medical term&nbsp;for this most American characteristic is hypomania. In a nutshell, hypomania is “the good kind of crazy,” an irrational optimism that never abandons its hold on the truth. (Mania is bad. Hypermania would be “beyond mania,” extremely bad, but Hypomania is an optimism that remains “below mania.”) Hence, the good kind of crazy;&nbsp;“There’s got to be a pony in here somewhere!”&nbsp;(Google that punchline if you don’t know the story. Or ask a few of your friends. One of them will know.)Hypomania is&nbsp;(1.) an inherited bipolar disorder, (2.) the definitive characteristic of the American people and (3.) extremely common in successful entrepreneurs. Hypomania is considered to be the most common&nbsp;undiagnosed&nbsp;condition in our nation. Think about it. No one ever goes to a counselor, psychologist or psychiatrist to say,&nbsp;“I’m feeling GREAT, Doc! What’s wrong with me?”Read the biography&nbsp;of any man or woman who left their fingerprints on the world and you’ll likely read the tale of a hypomaniac, someone who said,&nbsp;“I must attempt the ridiculous if I am to accomplish the impossible.”&nbsp;Ray Kroc, Mother Teresa, Teddy Roosevelt, Barbra Streisand, Steve Jobs, Florence Nightingale,&nbsp;Tom McDowall, Jane Pauley, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Ronald Reagan…)Yes, it’s inherited.&nbsp;A few generations ago, tens of thousands of men and women boarded ships that would take them to America. These men and women had minimal skills, no money, no jobs, no relatives or friends waiting for their arrival. Yet somehow these people believed,&nbsp;“This is going to be AWESOME! We’ve got it made.”The average American&nbsp;is a descendant of self-selected hypomaniacs. Consider the impact of a few generations of interbreeding and it’s no wonder that hypomania is the principal trait the world loves&nbsp;and hates&nbsp;about Americans. Make no mistake. Hypomania can easily cross the line into arrogance and self-delusion; Charlie Sheen, Ernest Hemingway and Robert Downey, Jr. were each fomally diagnosed with it.Hypomania is a medical disorder,&nbsp;but one with an upside: It helps us&nbsp;“to dream the impossible dream, to fight the unbeatable foe, to bear with unbearable sorrow, to run where the brave dare not go…”You can learn magical things from crazy people&nbsp;if they are “the good kind” of crazy.&nbsp;How to Make Awesome Sauce&nbsp;is a gathering of highly-accomplished entrepreneurs who have proven...

I love Garrison Keillor’s&nbsp;Lake Wobegon&nbsp;for the same reason I love Norman Rockwell. The people in those worlds are quirky but loveable, flawed but happy, sincere but imaginary. When you think about it,&nbsp;Lake Wobegon&nbsp;is a lot like Andy Griffith’s&nbsp;Mayberry,&nbsp;where the children are mischievous but good-hearted, racial tension is nonexistent and all the women are homespun and pure. Just like they were in Michael Landon’s&nbsp;Little House on the Prairie.&nbsp;Michael grew up as Little Joe Cartwright on the Ponderosa before he became Melissa Gilbert’s “Pa” in an even better idyllic environment.You do realize&nbsp;Lake Wobegon&nbsp;and&nbsp;Mayberry&nbsp;and&nbsp;Little House&nbsp;aren’t real places, right?I’ve always loved Norman Rockwell&nbsp;but let’s not pretend he told us the truth. Rockwell painted a nation that never was, an idealized America, the nation of Paul Revere and Valley Forge and the key on Benjamin Franklin’s kite string as that adorable old man stood alone under a lightning-filled sky.America’s love of country music&nbsp;is an escape to that world of Bo and Luke and Daisy Duke and their bright orange General Lee, the original NASCAR driven by the original good old boys:Tommy Lee Jones&nbsp;is a Man’s Man.&nbsp;He don’t take no shit from nobody. Damn. If he was president, he’d sure whip that Middle East into shape, wouldn’t he? And then he’d use common sense to lower taxes, save Social Security, create jobs and sell us gas for a dollar a gallon.Hero worship&nbsp;breeds&nbsp;naiveté. It causes otherwise intelligent people to make idiotic “Tommy Lee Jones” statements and then vigorously defend those statements with extrapolations and fabricated facts.&nbsp;I am a professional romanticizer.&nbsp;My job is to write ads that make certain products and people larger than life. I am, frankly, very good at it.The American worship&nbsp;of “The Founding Fathers” is wearisome to me. I hear people speak of them as though they were emissaries of God’s Perfect Will rather than the debt-laden, combative, self-interested businessmen they really were.Am I speaking heresy?&nbsp;If so, you believe America to be a religion that needs to be protected and enforced. My crime is that I see America as a people.“Well,&nbsp;things sure were simpler and better back then.”No they weren’t.&nbsp;Things were exactly like they are now but without modern medicine and electricity and cell phones and cars and central heat and air conditioning.Make no mistake; heroes do have value.Bigger than life,&nbsp;highly exaggerated and always positioned in the most favorable light, a hero is a beautiful lie. We have historic heroes, folk heroes and comic book heroes. We have heroes in books and songs and movies and sport. We have heroes of morality, leadership, kindness and excellence. And nothing is so devastating to our sense of wellbeing as a badly fallen hero. Yes, heroes are dangerous to have.The only thing&nbsp;more dangerous is not to have them.Heroes raise the bar we jump&nbsp;and hold high the standards we live by.&nbsp;They are tattoos on our psyche, the embodiment of all we’re striving to be.We create our heroes from our hopes and dreams.And then they create us in their own image.–&nbsp;from&nbsp;The Monday Morning Memo of the Wizard of Ads,&nbsp;Feb. 17, 2003&nbsp;I am a true believer&nbsp;in the power and beauty of heroes. I do not wish to live in a world without them.&nbsp;But please hear this:&nbsp;a hero is that by which we should measure ourselves, as individuals. If you measure others by your heroes, you will quickly descend into a dark and frantic judgmentalism, crying, “All...

“Two heads are better than one,”&nbsp;is often quoted but horribly wrong.&nbsp;&nbsp;Trust me, I know.Anything with two heads is a monster.“Nothing was ever created by two men.&nbsp;There are no good collaborations, whether in music, in art, in poetry, in mathematics, in philosophy. Once the miracle of creation has taken place, the group can build and extend it, but the group never invents anything. The preciousness lies in the lonely mind of a man.”– John Steinbeck,&nbsp;East of Eden,&nbsp;Chap. 13, 1952This is the point in the discussion&nbsp;where one could easily say, “Well, that’s your opinion and Steinbeck’s. But I happen to know that brainstorming as a team leads to better idea generation.”But do you know that, really?&nbsp;Or is brainstorming just another sacred cultural myth?Jonah Lehrer&nbsp;published a research article this week that eliminates the need for speculation and debate.Alex Faikney Osborn was the “O”&nbsp;in the famous advertising agency B.B.D.O.&nbsp;&nbsp;Alex was full of ideas.&nbsp;His first book,&nbsp;How to “Think Up”, was published in 1942, followed by&nbsp;Your Creative Power&nbsp;in 1948,&nbsp;Wake Up Your Mind&nbsp;in 1952, and then in 1953,&nbsp;Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving.In the opening paragraphs&nbsp;of&nbsp;Jonah Lehrer’s marvelous research&nbsp;into “Groupthink,” he writes,“Osborn’s most celebrated idea&nbsp;was the one discussed in Chapter 33, ‘How to Organize a Squad to Create Ideas.’ When a group works together, he wrote, the members should engage in a ‘brainstorm.’ The book outlined the essential rules of a successful brainstorming session. The single most important of these, Osborn said, was the absence of criticism and negative feedback. Brainstorming was an immediate hit and Osborn became a popular business guru. The underlying assumption of brainstorming is that if people are scared of saying the wrong thing, they’ll end up saying nothing at all. Typically, participants leave a brainstorming session proud of their contribution. The whiteboard has been filled with free associations. At such moments, brainstorming can seem like an ideal mental technique, a feel-good way to boost productivity. But there is one overwhelming problem with brainstorming. It doesn’t work. The first empirical test of Osborn’s brainstorming technique was performed at Yale University, in 1958. The results were a sobering refutation of Osborn. Although the findings did nothing to dent brainstorming’s popularity, numerous follow-up studies have come to the same conclusion.”Interesting, isn’t it?&nbsp;Sixty years of scientifically controlled experiments, studies and tests have proven brainstorming to be significantly less effective than individual effort but the brainstorming myth just won’t go away.Here’s the real kicker:&nbsp;discussion and debate –&nbsp;the very two things prohibited in a&nbsp;‘brainstorming’ session –&nbsp;have been repeatedly proven to bring out the best in us.And now I must pause to do my Happy Dance.Okay, I’m back now.I’m happy because&nbsp;Jonah Lehrer describes, in the second half of his research article, what has been proven time and again to be the ultimate environment for true creative breakthrough,&nbsp;“a space with an almost uncanny ability to extract the best from people… a magical incubator.”&nbsp;He then gives us a clear description of the kitchen and courtyard of&nbsp;Engelbrecht House, the student mansion on the campus of Wizard Academy.Many of you&nbsp;reading this Monday Morning Memo will recall my greeting during the opening session on your...

A brief summary of this episode

Media Buying Lesson Number OneI’ve never seen&nbsp;a business fail because they were reaching the wrong customer. But I’ve seen hundreds fail because they were saying the wrong things.&nbsp;Most ads&nbsp;answer questions no one was asking.How did we Americans&nbsp;become so fixated on “targeting the right customer” in our advertising?That question has two answers.&nbsp;The first is, “because it’s completely logical” and our natural inclination is to follow the footsteps of lovely Logic, even when she leads us to erroneous conclusions.&nbsp;&nbsp;The second reason&nbsp;we’re fixated on targeting the right customer is, in two words, “advertising salespeople.”If you were selling a commodity&nbsp;that was only mildly different than the same commodity sold by your competitors, you’d focus your sales presentation on those mild differences, right? Because if you didn’t, price would be the only remaining factor for your customer to consider.I’m not accusing&nbsp;the ad-selling community of deception. I know these people and I like them. A lot. Many have been good friends for years. But like all sellers of products, they cannot be successful unless they convince themselves that buying advertising from anyone else would be a tragic mistake. And they care too much about you to let you make that mistake.Advertising salespeople rarely succeed unless they(1.) sincerely care about their clients and(2.) believe they are telling their clients the truth.But mass media –&nbsp;in all its forms – is a commodity. We call it “mass media” because it reaches the male and female, young and old, rich and poor, white-collar and blue-collar masses.“Who&nbsp;is your primary target?”“Females&nbsp;25 to 34 years old.”“Excellent!&nbsp;Barbie 98 is the Number One radio station for females 25 to 34! That’s exactly who we reach! If you don’t buy our station, you’re going to be missing the Barbies. We fit your needs like a hand in glove.”“The Wizard of Ads&nbsp;told me to buy Wacko 103.”“Well, I like&nbsp;the Wizard of Ads and I read all his books, but this time he’s wrong. Wacko 103 ranks number 7 with females 25-34 and they cost 20 percent more per ad than Barbie! That just doesn’t make any sense at all. Oh my god! Look at this data. Just 7 percent of Wacko’s audience are 25 to 34 year-old females while 17 percent of Barbie’s audience is exactly your target. Wacko 103 is just a tragically, horribly inefficient buy for you. The Wizard really missed it this time.”Before we look deeper&nbsp;into this Barbie/Wacko fiasco, let me ask you a different question:&nbsp;Do the people outside your target have value? Is there anyone whose opinion you DON’T care about? Is there anyone you would rather NOT recommend you to their friends?Decisions are rarely made in a vacuum.&nbsp;Each of us is guided by co-workers and family members, neighbors and friends.If you are normal and healthy,&nbsp;you maintain about 250 people in your “realm of association.” Some of these are permanent members of that realm while others will pass through your life and be replaced. But the number hovers at about 250. And guess what? Beyond their connection to you, these 250 people have little, if anything, in common. They are your personal world: the male and female, young and old, rich and poor, white-collar and blue-collar “masses” that give your life purpose and meaning.You are someone’s target customer.&nbsp;If I fail to reach you with my ads but my company is beloved by half the people in your realm of association, what’s the likelihood that you’ll hear about me?Google and Facebook,&nbsp;radio and television, magazines and mailers, billboards and flyers are called mass media...

People today&nbsp;are different, less naïve, less gullible, less open to suggestion than in the past. Christopher Isherwood describes this difference perfectly:&nbsp;“To live sanely&nbsp;in Los Angeles or, I suppose, in any other large American city, you have to cultivate the art of staying awake. You must learn to resist the unceasing hypnotic suggestions of the radio, the billboards, the movies and the newspapers; those demon voices which are forever whispering in your ear what you should desire, what you should fear, what you should wear and eat and drink and enjoy, what you should think and do and be. They have planned a life for you from the cradle to the grave and beyond which it would be easy, fatally easy, to accept. The least wandering of the attention, the least relaxation of your awareness, and already the eyelids begin to droop, the eyes grow vacant, the body starts to move in obedience to the hypnotist’s command. Wake up, wake up… you’ve got to think, to discriminate, to exercise your own free will and judgment.”&nbsp;Yes, people today are definitely&nbsp;more skeptical than they used to be.&nbsp;Have you noticed how few people&nbsp;these days spout the old “positive thinking” platitudes that were so popular during the revved-up years of Reagan, George Sr., and Bill Clinton? Quiet determination and clenched-teeth endurance are the virtues we admire today. A person spewing happy platitudes and cliché’s is likely to be told, “Talk is cheap. Shut up and do something. Don’t&nbsp;tell&nbsp;us what you believe.&nbsp;Show&nbsp;us.”&nbsp;Conversations among friends&nbsp;are less likely to be shallow and superficial than in the past. Concerns run deeper, fears lie closer to the surface and frustration often simmers deep inside. Even the happiest people are a little bit angry.&nbsp;The public&nbsp;is no longer looking for a perfect icon to worship. Most of them are looking for&nbsp;an equally-flawed friend&nbsp;with whom they can connect.&nbsp;The online world&nbsp;gives us instant access to information. This has sensitized the public to&nbsp;the absence of facts&nbsp;in most selling messages. Unsubstantiated claims in advertising are likely to fall on deaf ears.&nbsp;Much has been written&nbsp;about the importance of transparency as though transparency were still a choice. But it isn’t. You are transparent whether you choose to be or not. Search engines have removed any veil you might have hidden behind.&nbsp;I hear a voice whispering in the night:“Relevance and credibility, ad writer, are the words you must engrave on your heart if you will write ads that move the needle.&nbsp;The customer is asking, ‘Does this matter to me?’&nbsp;They are looking for relevance.&nbsp;And their second question is, ‘Do I believe what they’re telling me?’&nbsp;They are looking for credibility.”&nbsp;Today’s customers&nbsp;have been lied to by the best. All but the stupidest of them can spot a half-truth a mile away.&nbsp;Make no mistake;&nbsp;there are still plenty of stupid people left in America. Fools must outnumber con men or the con men could not find enough to live upon. My seat-of-the-pants estimate is that roughly 15 percent of Americans are gullible fools whose prejudices outweigh their intellect. I’m not trying to be vicious. I just don’t want you to cling to those obvious exceptions that would appear to disprove the larger truth.&nbsp;Fifteen percent of the population&nbsp;is still a pile of people and frankly, you can make a lot of money by yanking their chain with hyperbole, misdirection, overstatement and lies. But to me, writing ads that target stupid people is like beating up little children. I can do it. I just don’t...

1845:&nbsp;This is the year Johnny “Appleseed” Chapman will plant his final apple tree. Mark Twain is 10 years old, living the boyhood that will bring us Tom Sawyer. Florida will be added to the U.S. this year, raising the total number of states to 27. We think of life as being simpler, more idyllic back then, don’t we?The American Revolution&nbsp;was more recent to them than World War II is to us today. Memories of colonial times were only just beginning to fade. But Thoreau felt compelled to take a sabbatical in the woods near Concord, Massachusetts, saying, “The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation.”Stéphane Mallarmé was 3 years old&nbsp;and living in Paris in 1845, much too young and too far away to extend a hand to Thoreau. But in just a few more years&nbsp;he’ll bring a generation of world-changers together&nbsp;on Tuesday nights at 89 Rue de Rome.Gertrude Stein never met&nbsp;Mallarmé though their houses were only 3 miles apart. Stein arrived in Paris in 1903, 5 years after&nbsp;Mallarmé&nbsp;died. Stein’s living room is where Pablo Picasso, Ernest Hemingway, Henri Matisse, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Salvador Dali and Man Ray banged ideas together while Josephine Baker danced to the music of Cole Porter who played the piano and sang. None of them was yet famous.Prior to 1953,&nbsp;America was too uptight to embrace outside-the-box thinkers so Paris was the haven for renegades. The living rooms of Mallarmé and Stein were like cabins in the woods.&nbsp;But when several Henry Davids arrive at a cabin simultaneously,&nbsp;the dust in the air begins to sparkle as the place becomes an island of pirates. Tinker Bell can be seen if you look quickly enough. Peter Pan is learning to fly.The salons&nbsp;of Stein and Mallarmé brought together the great minds of their day and tumbled them like clothes in a dryer, influencing, stimulating, inspiring one another to new heights above the accepted norm.Stein and Mallarmé were unimportant writers&nbsp;who surrounded themselves with the shapers of fashion, the inventors of tomorrow, the makers of the future.I strongly identify with&nbsp;Stein and Mallarmé.Funny, isn’t it?&nbsp;No one wants to be average, but everyone wants to be normal.How about you?&nbsp;Will your need to be “normal” condemn you to a life of screaming mediocrity? You’re familiar with the phrase,&nbsp;“The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation…”&nbsp;but the truly frightening part is the thought that follows,&nbsp;“and go to their graves with their songs still in them.”Thoreau&nbsp;went to Walden Pond because Wizard Academy was not yet built.This bizarre little business school&nbsp;in Austin, Texas, is barely a dozen years old but its alumni and friends include an astounding array of scientists and musicians, journalists and authors, businesspeople and government officials. Tony Hsieh of Zappos recently sent us his endorsement of&nbsp;Pendulum,&nbsp;the book we’ll release this spring. Two of our alumni will be elected to congress in November.Don’t&nbsp;go to your grave&nbsp;with your song still in you. Come and tumble topsy-turvy with people who will make you sparkle and shine. It’s time you learned to fly.The day-to-day can wait.&nbsp;Don’t allow the merely urgent to displace the truly important.Let 2012 be your year.Roy H. Williams

America contained&nbsp;about two and a half million people when we declared our independence in 1776. Today’s Portland, Oregon is bigger than that.The Constitution (1787)&nbsp;empowered every citizen who was white, male and a landowner. Minorities, women and poor people? Not so much.America was unlike Europe&nbsp;in that we didn’t divide our population into nobles and peasants. We divided our people into landowners and land workers. This was different from Europe where the nobles owned the land and the peasants worked on it. You see the difference, don’t you?Three years later (1790,)&nbsp;our first census reported that America had mushroomed to 3,929,000 people; roughly the population of Seattle. But Seattle did not yet exist. It would be another 13 years before Thomas Jefferson would buy the Louisiana Territory and send Lewis and Clark to the other side of the continent to search for Starbucks. They didn’t find it, but they did find enough land to ensure that everyone who wanted to be a landowner could easily become one.“Land? I can own land?”&nbsp;Here came the people.Study America’s history&nbsp;and you’ll find that most of us are the children of castoffs, rejects and refugees. Some of us were even brought here against our will. But that was also true of the original settlers of Australia, wasn’t it? Australia, wow. What a gorgeous place to start a penal colony! If you’re going to banish me, England, please send me there.My own belief&nbsp;is that modern America – America 2.0 – began in 1883 when a 34 year-old writer born in New York City penned a poem to be auctioned in a fundraiser to help erect a 305-foot statue of a woman lifting a torch to the sky; “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…” Emma Lazarus died just 4 years after she wrote that phrase, never suspecting her words would help shape the personality of America for a century. The rest of the money needed to erect the statue was raised by another Jew, a young refugee who had started a little newspaper in New York. His name was Joseph Pulitzer.Jews understand the importance of tolerance.The Dutch understand inclusion.&nbsp;Throughout history the Dutch have been quick to shelter the outcast and embrace the oppressed, so you shouldn’t be surprised to learn that a fifth-generation Dutch New Yorker was President of the United States at the zenith of the “Me” in 1903* when the statue was finally finished and those now-famous words of Emma Lazarus were officially placed on the pedestal beneath it. This visionary Dutchman shut down the power of big corporations to oppress the poor and put an end to child labor. But before he did any of this, his first official act as President of the United States was to invite an African-American, Booker T. Washington, to the White House.Tolerance and inclusion.&nbsp;“I accept that you are different and I want you to be in our group anyway.”&nbsp;&nbsp;This is America.Humility and courage.&nbsp;“I cannot do it alone, but working together, I believe we can.”&nbsp;This is America.Audacity and a sense of humor.&nbsp;As Babe Ruth reportedly introduced himself when he met the Queen of England, “Hey Queen, pull my finger.”&nbsp;This is most definitely America.Emma Lazarus, Joseph Pulitzer and Teddy Roosevelt&nbsp;believed in the beauty, the power and the wisdom of the little guy. They believed in you.Wizard Academy does, too.The US census&nbsp;tells us there are 5.91 million businesses in America with fewer than 100 employees. Wizard Academy is a business school created expressly for them. This is where we teach big things quickly, the kinds of things that often mean the difference between failure and success.The...

A Barely Explicable Collection of MomentsEvery person&nbsp;is a collector, I think.Businesspeople&nbsp;collect money.Travelers&nbsp;collect places.Competitors&nbsp;collect shining moments.Insecure people&nbsp;collect conquests, panties hanging from the bedpost.My own collection&nbsp;consists of curiosities, tokens of moments nearly forgotten; captured glimpses of interesting lives. I’m not certain what this says about me but I like to think it says I’m a writer.&nbsp;Marcel Proust&nbsp;lectured, “The duty and the task of a writer are those of an interpreter.” So I try to interpret what I find.Arthur Schopenhauer&nbsp;added,&nbsp;“The business of the novelist is not to relate great events, but to make small ones interesting.” So I do my best to make each small item in the collection interesting.Mignon Eberhart&nbsp;echoed my soul when he confessed, “I seat myself at the typewriter and hope, and lurk.”My collection of curiosities&nbsp;is a rock that skips across 500 years of cultural icons. The worldwide ocean of art is impossibly deep and wide and my rock touches only a few superficial places.But the ripples are amazing:A 500 year-old&nbsp;Spanish ship’s bell dragged up from the ocean floor in the Philippines, very possibly from one of the two ships Ferdinand Magellan lost there in 1521 during his historic circling of the earth.A pencil sketch of Napoleon&nbsp;drawn by his little brother, 24 year-old Lucien Bonaparte, shortly after the pair of them captured the throne of France in 1799.Don Kehan, Marshall of Manchon,&nbsp;the original manuscript of an unpublished book about Don Quixote written by John Steinbeck.The world’s only copy&nbsp;of a 1936 photo of Jacqueline Bouvier at a horse show when she was just 6 years old,&nbsp;but already unmistakably “Jackie O.”The Wise Men&nbsp;who sat on the piano of Liberace each Christmas, complete with Joseph and Mary and an angel with just one wing. A one-of-a-kind, handmade set dressed in velvet. (Liberace was a flamboyant piano player known for his over-the-top costumes, the original Elton John.)&nbsp;A cultural icon&nbsp;is never about the thing itself, but the&nbsp;idea&nbsp;it represents.Magellan = ExplorationNapoleon = StrategyQuixote = Commitment to a DreamJackie O. = EleganceLiberace = ShowmanshipYou’ll find these&nbsp;and other curiosities touching Teddy Roosevelt, Pablo Picasso, the Wright Brothers, Oceanic Flight 815 and dozens of other ripples on the water of time as you tour the campus at Wizard Academy.You’re coming, aren’t you?&nbsp;Roy H. Williams

I’m a Merry Christmas person.&nbsp;Does that make me bad? “Happy Holidays” doesn’t carry quite the same exuberance for me as “Merry Christmas.” And I must shamefully confess that deep in my heart I still think of Navajos, Cherokees and Apaches as Indians. My publisher tells me there is no such place as the Orient anymore! So are the boundaries of Asia the same as they were back when I was in school? In those days Asia was everything east of Constantinople. I’m sorry. My bad. Istanbul.&nbsp;Russian Cossacks&nbsp;with their knee-high boots and furry hats, Arab Sheiks with their flowing robes and elegant turbans, and those squinty, inscrutable men wearing silk gowns with big sleeves are no longer to be differentiated from one another. They’re all just “Asians” now.&nbsp;Evidently, the goal is worldwide homogenization.&nbsp;We’ve already achieved it architecturally so now we’re spreading that colorless twilight over every other expression of individuality. Welcome to Zoloft Grey where the mood is forever funereal. Cultural Splendor lies quietly in the coffin there but please don’t look at it, admire it, comment upon it or celebrate it.&nbsp;If you do, you’re obviously a racist.&nbsp;If you fail to ignore cultural differences&nbsp;you are a very bad person indeed. Indians? The Orient? Shame on you! What were you thinking? I just finished Agatha Christie’s mystery novel,&nbsp;Murder on the Asian Express.&nbsp;John Wayne starred in a lot of cowboy and Native American movies. I’m sorry. My bad. Cowperson&nbsp;and Native American.&nbsp;The best Indian food I ever had –&nbsp;(I can still say “Indian” if they’re from India, right?) – was in 1986 at the Bombay Palace restaurant in Washington, DC. I’m sorry.&nbsp;Mumbai&nbsp;Palace. I don’t want to be insensitive.&nbsp;What the…?&nbsp;I just Googled Bombay Palace in Washington DC and they’re closed! I wonder if it was because they failed to change their name to Mumbai Palace in 1995?&nbsp;Does the word holiday come from holy day?&nbsp;&nbsp;I should check into that. I don’t want to be insensitive to people who prefer to live deity-free. I’ll let you know what I find out.&nbsp;In the meantime, from me and mine to you and yours:&nbsp;Merry…&nbsp;Happy…&nbsp;Have a good day.&nbsp;Roy H. Williams

Do Creative People Have to be Self-Destructive?&nbsp;New York Times&nbsp;writer&nbsp;Samuel G. Freedman asks,“Can the forces that make you creative also kill you?”“Can you live with control and yet create free of restraint?”“Can you live enough of the dark side to tell the tale without becoming a casualty?”Freedman’s curiosity&nbsp;is well founded. History is littered with the corpses of creative geniuses who were self-destructive.&nbsp;Vincent Van Gogh cut off his own ear&nbsp;and mailed it to his girlfriend. Jackson Pollock and Mark Rothko would likely have made out the mailing label and taped up the box. Rothko is the lightweight of this trio. His most valuable painting is worth only about 80 million dollars, while Van Gogh and Pollock have paintings worth 150 million each.&nbsp;Nobel laureates Hemingway and Faulkner&nbsp;are the opening names on a&nbsp;Who’s Who&nbsp;list of alcoholic authors. James Joyce, Dorothy Parker, Jack Kerouac, Truman Capote, Hunter S. Thompson and dozens of others trot faithfully behind.&nbsp;Hendrix, Joplin, Cobain and Winehouse&nbsp;are the high-stepping drum majors in a holiday parade of musicians who flirted with death until it finally seduced them.&nbsp;Each of these artists&nbsp;deserved better than what they gave themselves.&nbsp;In her&nbsp;research paper,&nbsp;Creativity, the Arts, and Madness,&nbsp;Dr. Maureen Neihart says,&nbsp;“The belief that madness is&nbsp;linked with creative thinking has been held since ancient times. It is a widely popular notion.”&nbsp;In his book,&nbsp;Creativity and Madness: New Findings and Old Stereotypes,&nbsp;Dr. Albert Rothenberg says, “Deviant behavior, whether in the form of eccentricity or worse, is not only associated with persons of genius or high-level creativity, but it is frequently expected of them.”&nbsp;But we still haven’t answered&nbsp;Freedman’s questions. Let me do that for you now:&nbsp;Q:&nbsp;“Can the forces that make you creative also kill you?”A:&nbsp;There are no “forces that make you creative.” Practice and determination are what make a person good at basketball, ice skating or cliff diving. The same is true of creativity.&nbsp;Q:&nbsp;“Can you live with control and yet create free of restraint?”A:&nbsp;Yes.&nbsp;Q:&nbsp;“Can you live enough of the dark side to tell the tale without becoming a casualty?”A:&nbsp;Can a man fight in a horrible war and return home safely to the people he loves?&nbsp;Examine the life&nbsp;of a creative genius who got lost in the dark and you’ll find that he or she had no partner watching out for them. When Pennie says, “Honey, help me carry the trash to the curb,” it’s not because she needs help with the trash. I’m always annoyed that she broke my concentration in the same way a pot smoker is annoyed when you harsh their mellow. But I help her carry the trash to the curb.&nbsp;As we fall ever deeper into creative thought,&nbsp;we float weightlessly in a silent world underwater where time stands still and everything is beautiful. But it is dangerous to go swimming alone. Be sure someone who loves you ties a rope to your leg so they can haul you up when you’ve been under too long.&nbsp;Self-talk is the other key to keeping your balance.&nbsp;Do you want to drown in the darkness alone?&nbsp;All you have to do is say to yourself, “No one understands me… I’ll never be appreciated… Some people have all the luck but nothing ever works out for me… It just wasn’t meant to be.”&nbsp;Each of us believes what we hear ourselves say.&nbsp;The maternal side of my...

“Added value”&nbsp;is the popular name for what’s included at no extra charge.&nbsp;But we are entering a time when it will no longer be sufficient to tell the world what you include and what you stand for. To hold the attention of the public in 2012 and beyond, you must identify what you leave out and what you stand against.Organic fruit&nbsp;and vegetable growers leave out the fertilizer and pesticides.&nbsp;Netflix leaves out the trip to the video store.&nbsp;Southwest Airlines leaves out meals and assigned seating. Digital cameras leave out the film. The Full Plate Diet leaves out fiberless foods.&nbsp;What does your company leave out?&nbsp;My friend W. Reed Foster&nbsp;and his partner Joel Peterson were men ahead of their time. They employed this technique more than a decade ago to distinguish their brand in what is perhaps the most overcrowded retail category on earth:&nbsp;wine.&nbsp;If they had described their wine as “intense and full-bodied, with hints of…” they would have sounded exactly like 1,000 other wineries. But the slogan “No Wimpy Wines” made&nbsp;Ravenswood an important, worldwide brand. (Their wine also had to be good, of course, but that’s the easy part. Lots of vineyards produce good wine.)You can’t have&nbsp;insiders unless you have outsiders.&nbsp;I demonstrated&nbsp;this technique in last week’s Monday Morning Memo. I’ll wager you remember it: “Wizard Academy is not a school for whiners, posers, devil’s advocates, nitpickers, hand-wringers, crybabies, complainers, chicken-hearts or fools. But it is definitely the school for you.”I’ve written before&nbsp;about “leaving things out” and it’s becoming more important than ever. But&nbsp;definition though exclusion&nbsp;is about to be taken too far.&nbsp;John Steinbeck spoke of a similar time when he wrote, “a teetotaler is not content not to drink—he must stop all the drinking in the world; a vegetarian among us would outlaw the eating of meat.”&nbsp;I’m not saying&nbsp;that’s how it ought to be. I’m saying that’s how it’s going to be.&nbsp;And I have 3,000 years of history to back me up.We’re about to enter&nbsp;the final 10 years in the upswing of a “We” cycle, an event that happens only once every 80 years. It is a time of high polarization, Us versus Them.&nbsp;“Working together for the common good” produces, over time, a gang mentality.&nbsp;The Salem witch trials, Robespierre’s reign of terror in France, the American Civil War and the rise of Adolph Hitler are just a few of the angry, Us versus Them events that have occurred within 10 years of the zenith of a “We.”&nbsp;Just three weeks ago,&nbsp;Joan Smith, a reporter in Britain for&nbsp;The Independent&nbsp;wrote,&nbsp;“The red poppy has been a symbol of remembrance&nbsp;since shortly after the First World War… a means of honoring the fallen and raising money for veterans and their families… This year, the pressure to wear one has been greater than ever… This year, coercion of reluctant red-poppy wearers has been joined by an outbreak of sheer nastiness towards the few who wear white ones.”&nbsp;Stand-up comedian Chris Rock&nbsp;makes this point more sharply&nbsp;in the rabbit hole.&nbsp;I know&nbsp;today’s memo makes me sound like a raving loon, but I trust that our new book,&nbsp;Pendulum,&nbsp;will change your mind when it’s released in April.David Farland warns us,&nbsp;I believe, very presciently, “Men who believe themselves to be good, who do not search their own souls,

Man of La Mancha&nbsp;rocked Broadway in 1965 with its thundering theme song,&nbsp;The Impossible Dream.&nbsp;You remember&nbsp;that song, don’t you? It opens in soft reflection, “To dream the impossible dream… To fight the unbeatable foe…” but then it defies mortal gravity to rise heavenward on a column of fury like an old Apollo rocket from Cape Canaveral:This is my Quest: to follow that star!No matter how hopeless, no matter how far!To fight for the rightWithout question or pause,To be willing to march into hellFor a heavenly cause!And I know, if I’ll only be trueTo this glorious Quest,That my heart will lie peaceful and calmWhen I’m laid to my rest…Wise Men&nbsp;follow a star when they believe the destination will be worth the journey.Time and money:&nbsp;you can always save one by spending more of the other.&nbsp;But money can be replaced and time cannot.&nbsp;We spend the hours of our lives like a pocketful of pennies, one by one until they are gone. What are you buying with yours?Can you name your current journey?&nbsp;You can call it your 5-year plan, your business plan, your goal, your mission. You can dress it up with numerals and call it a pro forma or wrap it in legalese and call it a prospectus. All that really matters is that you understand your time, your energy,&nbsp;indeed the hours of your life&nbsp;are being spent in the pursuit of something.“And I know,&nbsp;if I’ll only be true to this glorious Quest, that my heart will lie peaceful and calm when I’m laid to my rest…”Wait a minute…&nbsp;are we talking about business goals, life goals, the Christmas story of Matthew chapter two or the Broadway musical of 1965?Yes, yes, yes and yes;&nbsp;we are talking about those. That’s the thing about an archetypal story. Its message will echo through different actors dressed in different costumes but the play never changes: Each of us follows a star. How clearly can you see yours?Wizard Academy is a 501c3&nbsp;nonprofit educational organization committed to helping individuals achieve the things they have committed to do. You choose the star. We don’t care. Our only job is to get you there.A solid limestone plateau&nbsp;rises 900 feet above downtown Austin, overlooking that city from 20 miles away. We cut perfectly northward into that limestone with heavy diesel equipment for 4 months, then planted a vertical sword in the wall of the Stardeck that sits like a crown on the million-dollar tower we built at the end of it.Walk to the center&nbsp;of that deeply cut limestone&nbsp;becauseway&nbsp;and stand on the Laughlin stone on any clear night. The point of light just above the hilt of the sword is Polaris, the North Star that rises above the axis of the earth. The whole world revolves around it. Polaris has served as a navigational tool for millennia because unlike other stars, its position never changes.Can you name the star that beckons you?We cut&nbsp;a 300-foot furrow 14 feet deep in solid rock on top a 900-foot plateau and then built&nbsp;a landmark tower with a sword in its crown&nbsp;purely as a symbol to help us make a point: that’s how serious were are about the importance of picking a destination and launching your life’s journey.Wizard Academy&nbsp;is not a school for whiners, posers, devil’s advocates, nitpickers, hand-wringers, crybabies, complainers, chicken-hearts or fools.But it is definitely the school for you.Come.&nbsp;The next chapter of your adventure is about to begin.Roy H. Williams

Most people&nbsp;see life as a linear progression, a canoe ride on the river of time. The scenery passes. The sun rises and sets. Occasionally there is a storm.It’s a tempting metaphor&nbsp;because we often think of time flowing like a river and to see ourselves as passengers on that river is a natural extension. But my life hasn’t been like that and I’ll bet yours hasn’t either.I see us as boulders&nbsp;tumbling down a mountainside, our rough edges smoothed by all the hard places we encounter that make us older and wiser.&nbsp;We’re not often sure&nbsp;which way is up.Time is the gravity we cannot resist,&nbsp;the energy behind this avalanche called life. Before a thing is dealt with another is upon us and as we turn to it we’re bumped from behind because we don’t have time for this while the telephone rings and someone is at the door and then we go over a cliff.I didn’t&nbsp;see that coming. Did you?It’s hard to tell a person who you are&nbsp;because you are so many things.Quantum Theory was born&nbsp;when Werner Heisenberg published his Uncertainty Principle in 1927. He wrote, “It is impossible to determine accurately both the position and the direction and speed of a particle at the same instant.”&nbsp;His Uncertainty Principle opened the door to Chaos Theory and Fractal Geometry, the mapping of chaotic systems.Like you and me,&nbsp;Heisenberg lived the avalanche.&nbsp;I HAD ALREADY WRITTEN EVERYTHING ABOVE THIS LINEand was staring at the computer screen unsure of what to write next when “ding,” a&nbsp;little pop-up alerted me that one of my business partners, Manley Miller, had just sent me an email:Have you ever heard of&nbsp;the Droste effect?Apparently it’s Fractals + Portals.&nbsp;I clicked the hyperlink&nbsp;in Manley’s email and was greeted by a video that illustrated&nbsp;precisely&nbsp;what I was trying to describe.&nbsp;Manley’s boulder was evidently tumbling next to mine.&nbsp;I spent some time reading about the Droste Effect and said, “Wow. What I’m feeling is so common that it even has a name.”&nbsp;Here’s the weird part:&nbsp;No one on earth could have known what I was thinking and feeling in that moment. I had just received some unexpected news that caused me to lean against the wall, unable to focus my eyes. Stumbling to the computer I pecked out the words, “Life in the Clothes Dryer” and wrote the nine paragraphs at the top of this page. I didn’t plan to send them to you but then Manley’s email arrived.The Droste Effect is a powerful tool&nbsp;that combines the visual suction of a spiral with the infinity of a picture-within-a-picture-within-a-picture. The result is that the viewer is pulled into the alternate reality of a fractal image, the map of a highly specific infinity, one of the “many worlds” predicted by Quantum Theory.Variations&nbsp;of this visual technique will likely prove to be highly effective in online marketing. Do you want someone to click a button? Sprinkle a little Droste into the mix and watch what happens.Manley&nbsp;recognized the Droste Effect as a simple combination of fractals and portals because he remembered studying each of these in Wizard Academy’s&nbsp;Magical Worlds Communications Workshop&nbsp;and the even-more-advanced sequel to that class,&nbsp;Advanced Thought Particles&nbsp;(including Portals and the 12 Languages of the Mind.)These classes are taught back-to-back just once every other year.February 20-24, 2012.&nbsp;&nbsp;I can hardly

Our system of education is built on the belief&nbsp;that learning is best achieved&nbsp;by bringing the best of the past forward through expert advice and clear example. Consequently, educators rise through the ranks like officers in the military:&nbsp;through compliance and conformity to the norm.&nbsp;But in this era of quantum change, are we really best served by imitating the past?&nbsp;Let’s look at two characteristics&nbsp;the innovative leaders of today all seem to have in common:&nbsp;&nbsp;1. They tend to be college dropouts.&nbsp;Steve Jobs of Apple, Bill Gates and Paul Allen of Microsoft, Jack Dorsey, Evan Williams and Biz Stone of Twitter, Mark Zuckerberg, Dustin Moskovitz and Sean Parker of Facebook. Dropouts, all. The list goes on and on.&nbsp;2. They have no fear of failure.&nbsp;Innovative leaders experiment constantly because they see failure as an unavoidable step toward success. These leaders know the truth about failure;&nbsp;it’s an extremely temporary condition, a fleeting moment, nothing to be feared. Failure is motion and motion is life.Educators hesitate to experiment&nbsp;because they fear failure and reprimand. Consequently, the average teacher with 20 years’ experience&nbsp;really&nbsp;has just 1 year’s experience 20 times.In the October 22 issue of the&nbsp;New York Times,&nbsp;researcher Michael Ellsberg wrote,“Entrepreneurs must embrace failure.&nbsp;I spent the last two years interviewing college dropouts who went on to become millionaires and billionaires. All spoke passionately about the importance of their business failures in leading them to success. Our education system encourages students to play it safe and retreat at the first sign of failure… Certainly, if you want to become a doctor, lawyer or engineer, then you must go to college. But, beyond regulated fields like these, the focus on higher education… is profoundly misguided.”&nbsp;Pennie had a fantastic idea&nbsp;while we were taking our morning walk. As she explained it to me, I realized her plan would make solid education more widely available, more relevant to the student and save a great deal of money as well.“Princess,” I said, “if someone&nbsp;isn’t already doing this, they will be soon. This is the right idea at the right time so it’s highly likely that lots of people are having this same idea&nbsp;right now.”I was right. Salman Kahn&nbsp;(pictured above,) already has the project well underway. Pennie’s idea – and Kahn’s – is to harness Youtube to deliver 10-to-12-minute tutorials in an effort to fill the painful gaps in public education.Stanford University professor&nbsp;Philip Zimbardo recently said,“There is a disaster recipe&nbsp;developing among boys in America dropping out of high school and college. And it’s not simply poor performance. One of the problems is, a recent study shows, that by the time a boy is 21, he has spent at least 10,000 hours playing video games by himself, alone… They live in a world they create. They’re playing Warcraft and these other games which are exciting…&nbsp;Their brains are being digitally rewired, which means they will never fit in a traditional classroom, which is analog. Somebody talks at you without even nice pictures. Meaning it’s boring. You control nothing. You sit there passively.&nbsp;Disaster.&nbsp;&nbsp;These kids will never fit into that. They have to be in a situation where they are controlling something. And school is set up where you control nothing.”&nbsp;Video allows the world’s best teachers to be everywhere&nbsp;simultaneously. And if you eliminate the time spent for roll call, bad behavior, discipline, silent reading and working on exercises, there’s rarely more than 10 minutes of real teaching delivered during the average...

Storytelling is gaining momentum.&nbsp;&nbsp;Open-mic nights are the hot ticket in Los Angeles, Chicago, Detroit and New York with people lining up two hours before show time to hear storytellers tell stories.Let’s look at the reasons why:“Storytelling is human connection&nbsp;at its most primal form,”&nbsp;says Catherine Burns, artistic director for the storytelling broadcast,&nbsp;The Moth,&nbsp;winner of the 2010 Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.&nbsp;“In the midst of this technological revolution, it’s not surprising to me that people are looking to return to their roots. We want more than a status update about a breakfast cereal or someone’s child’s potty-training escapades. We crave more than a ‘like’ on Facebook or a retweeted Tweet. Storytelling is to entertainment as the slow food movement is to dining – it’s fresh and it’s local.”Researchers at Princeton University&nbsp;in 2010 discovered that storytellers cause the brains of their listeners to operate in synch with their own. Greg J. Stephens, Lauren J. Silbert and Uri Hasson used functional magnetic resonance imaging to reveal how the same brain areas in the storyteller and the listener were stimulated at precisely the same points in the story.The biological mechanism that enables&nbsp;vicarious experience was only recently discovered. Groups of specialized neurons called “mirror neurons” exist opposite each other in the left and right hemispheres of the brain, allowing us to vicariously participate in what someone else is experiencing.These neurons enable human empathy,&nbsp;allowing us to tune in to each others’ feelings. In effect, mirror neurons allow you to live inside the minds of others. This is why hearing stories of adventure is almost as exciting as having the adventure yourself.You don’t take&nbsp;books and movies with you; they take you with them.When you’re watching sports,&nbsp;a piece of you is in that game.&nbsp;&nbsp;Salespeople, evangelists and speechwriters&nbsp;have long known that a good story can cause the listener to see and feel what the storyteller is seeing and feeling,&nbsp;thereby empowering the storyteller to transfer ideas and emotions intact.&nbsp;Every good story&nbsp;provides a point of entry – a portal – that allows the listener to join in the adventure.&nbsp;Secrets to Storytelling in Advertising&nbsp;will be the topic of&nbsp;our monthly webinar&nbsp;next Monday, November 14, and a special Storytelling Workshop will soon be announced at Wizard Academy.&nbsp;Questions? Jackie is your girl.&nbsp;You can phone her during business hours (Central Time) at 512-295-5700 or email her at [email protected]&nbsp;Adventure. Storytelling. Advertising.Taking your business to the next level.Find your adventure. Tell your story.It works every time.Roy H. Williams

Pearl was a bit of a whore.We never kept her in a fenceSo she had puppies at least once a year.She was a good mother.Abandoned in the country, starving,We found her when I was in third grade.She knew she was my dog immediately.God help you if you got mad at me.A blur of fur and teeth and little-dog roaringAwaited you halfway to me. No one ever calledPearl’s bluff because they knew she wasn’t bluffing.I think I learned loyalty from Pearl.Her oversized sense of protectivenessExtended to the house a little, too.But not much.We lived on a small riseAt the end of a long driveway.We would see her asleep on the porch in the sunshineBut when the crunch of tires on gravel reached her earsShe would leap like Wonder Woman off the porchAnd race to the far end of the yard,Barking the whole while,Careful never to look our way.She’d bark at the unseen burglarThen cut and run a different way toStop and bark at other phantoms.The shutting of a car doorMade her look our way, startled,As if to say, “Oh, you’re back already?When did you arrive?”And then she would trot with great pride,Paws lifted a little too highHer head swinging back and forthAs if to say, “Aren’t I wonderful?”“Pearl, you’re wonderful,” I would sayBecause she knew her job and I knew mine.In later years I stepped from the kitchenInto the garage to see her curledWith a small cat under her foreleg,It’s head snuggled beneath her chin, friendsLaid down for a nap.The screen door springs closed with a clapAnd Pearl lifts her bleary eyes, “What was that?”She looks up to see me,With a cat in her bed.Standing slowly to her feetPearl gives a soft “woof,”As if to whisper,“The boss is here.”The cat, knowing&nbsp;her&nbsp;job, too,Stands,Looks at me,Looks at Pearl,Then trots out the garageAnd around the corner.Pearl gives me one more lookThen chases the catTo do her duty.Later, I walk outsideAnd see Pearl beside the houseIn the soft sunshineLaid down for a napWith her friend.Forty years laterI walk aroundanother house500 miles away,And secretly hope toSee Pearl and the catOne last time.– Roy H. Williams

Anxious anticipation,&nbsp;nervous trepidation, heart palpitation and a tingling sensation are the smells and bells of adventure.&nbsp;Paul Tournier was a 3 year-old orphan&nbsp;in Switzerland when Teddy Roosevelt became President of the United States.&nbsp;&nbsp;Paul grew up to become a doctor.&nbsp;He did a lot of thinking&nbsp;and he wrote a few books.&nbsp;Paul Tournier was nearly 70&nbsp;when he wrote&nbsp;The Adventure of Living:&nbsp;“Our actual lives&nbsp;rarely suffice to assuage our thirst for adventure. Fortunately we can all supply the want by using our imaginations. The dullest and most humdrum life can be enlivened by imagined pleasures… Those who are lacking in imagination of their own can always use that of other people. There is no shortage of novels to read… The same mechanism of identification makes it possible in the cinema, through the radio or television, or at a circus to procure cheaply the feeling of taking part in an adventure. This is the case, too, with ‘sportsmen’ who come back from a football match proudly proclaiming ‘We won!’ although they personally have done nothing but applaud the winners… That the need for adventure lies behind the passion for gambling hardly needs mention. A habit that is quite as difficult to cure as gambling is that of drug-taking, in all its various forms. This too can be regarded as an expression of the instinct for adventure… Looked at in its best light, adultery may be seen to be for many men the only means of satisfying their craving for adventure.”&nbsp;Tournier believed&nbsp;every human life is a never-ending search for adventure.&nbsp;“A most important observation&nbsp;must, however, be made at this point, and that is that a distinction is to be made between&nbsp;quality adventure&nbsp;and&nbsp;quantity adventure.&nbsp;In capitalist countries financial success is still, if not a truly satisfying adventure, at least a symbol of adventure. There are of course other&nbsp;quantity adventures&nbsp;aside from those of money, gambling or dope. There is, for example, that of frenzied activity. It is obvious that for many people these days the whirl of activities with which they fill their lives is a compensation for a profound dissatisfaction in regard to the quality of life they are living.”&nbsp;Video games, movies, reality TV shows,&nbsp;online flirtations, romance novels, sporting events and conspiracy theories are just different manifestations of our common need for adventure. I learned all this in the first 17 pages of Tournier’s 250-page book. I’m glad my friend Ron told me about it.&nbsp;Purchases&nbsp;are often an adventure. Much of what we buy is bought to remind ourselves – and tell the world around us – who we are. The politically correct term for this, I believe, is self-expression. Kurt Vonnegut may have been pondering self-expression when he said, “We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful what we pretend to be.”I pretend to be a writer&nbsp;and an advertising consultant and a connoisseur of fine art. (I say “pretend” because I’m not actually qualified to be any of these things. It’s really quite an adventure.)&nbsp;What is your current adventure?&nbsp;Are the stakes high enough to make it truly riveting?&nbsp;Page 21&nbsp;of Tournier’s&nbsp;The Adventure of Living&nbsp;helped me to understand why people often do stupid things: “Many people are never able to come to terms with the death to which every adventure is inevitably subject…&nbsp;The Law of Adventure is that it dies as it achieves its object.” And then we must find a new adventure.&nbsp;Desperate for adventure,&nbsp;some people feel compelled to outsmart society. Vandalism and shoplifting are two of the standby adventures of youth. Road rage and embezzlement are just around the corner....

Style Guides and Audio Signatures: Part ThreeWords shine like a movie projector&nbsp;on the screen of imagination, creating lifelike images in the mind.1: Which actors will you place on the screen?&nbsp;Will your voice be first person “I,” second person “you,” or third person “they?”2. What will be your time perspective?Will your verbs be past tense “was,” present tense “am,” or future tense “will be?”These two,&nbsp;simple choices yield nine different voices:“I was…”I was walking down 5th street, my dog with me, when…“I am…”&nbsp;I am walking down 5th street, my dog with me, when…“I will be…”I will be walking down 5th street, my dog with me, when…“You were…”You were walking down 5th street, your dog with you, when…“You are…”&nbsp;&nbsp;You are walking down 5th street, your dog with you, when…“You will be…”&nbsp;&nbsp;You will be walking down 5th street, your dog with you, when…“They were…”Sally was walking down 5th street, her dog with her, when…“They are…”Sally is walking down 5th street, her dog with her, when…“They will be…”Sally will be walking down 5th street, her dog with her, when…3. How will you structure your sentences?At one end of the spectrum&nbsp;are long, rambling sentences that bridge from one thought to another in a conversational stream-of-consciousness reminiscent of how William Faulkner and Jack Kerouac would fill page after page with colorful images without ever feeling the need to take a breath or insert a period&nbsp;that might allow the listener to think a thought or see an image other than the ones they so carefully projected onto the screen of imagination.At the other end:&nbsp;Hemingway.&nbsp;Declarative. Short and tight.&nbsp;Calling upon the imagination to supply what the writer leaves out. Action happening between the lines. “For sale:&nbsp;baby shoes, never worn.”&nbsp;Faulkner and Hemingway&nbsp;wrote in opposite styles but each of them won the Nobel Prize in Literature. (Faulkner in ’49, Hemingway in ’54.) Faulkner said of Hemingway, “He has never been known to use a word that might send a reader to the dictionary.” To which Hemingway replied, “Poor Faulkner. Does he really think big emotions come from big words?”Somewhere between&nbsp;loquacious Faulkner and Spartan Hemingway is the meter, the cadence, the rhythm of syllables that will become a distinctive identifier of your brand, an important part of your audio signature.We’re very anxious to hear it.Roy H. Williams

The boys were born on the same day&nbsp;in the same year: February 12, 1809. Both were intensely private. Each boy lost his mother in early childhood. Neither was close to his father.The two never met&nbsp;but together they tipped the world on its axis and made it wobble for 100 years.You know the story&nbsp;of the first one; born in a log cabin, taught himself to read by the light of the fireplace, wrote with charcoal on the back of a shovel because there was no paper in the house, became a lawyer, had a big heart, kept the Union together.&nbsp;He accomplished his axis tilting because he believed the soaring words Thomas Jefferson had written 87 years earlier. He even made reference to those majestic ideals in the opening line of his most famous speech:“Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”The other man&nbsp;believed precisely the opposite.&nbsp;He held a different set of truths to be self-evident. I find it strange that so many people consider him to be the greater hero.&nbsp;Robert was raised with privilege,&nbsp;servants, independently wealthy.&nbsp;&nbsp;He toyed with the idea of becoming a doctor, then flirted with becoming a minister. His father said, “You care for nothing but shooting, dogs, and rat catching, and you will be a disgrace to yourself and all your family.”&nbsp;At the age of 22,&nbsp;Robbie convinced the captain of a ship that he could provide intelligent conversation at the dinner table and was thus allowed to tag along on an adventure that would free a different kind of slave.&nbsp;Five years later,&nbsp;a much-changed Robert returned to the shores of England where he began to edit the journal of his journey. After two decades of agonizing refinement, the story of his voyage was published:&nbsp;On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.&nbsp;This book&nbsp;that elevated Charles Robert Darwin to god-like status was built upon his observation of “the survival of the fittest.” Lincoln held to the belief that all men are created equal, but Darwin insisted that some are a little more equal than others.&nbsp;His theory of natural selection tilted the earth again on its axis.&nbsp;&nbsp;When humans use&nbsp;“survival of the fittest” as a model for making decisions, we lower ourselves to the level of animals. These conversations usually conclude with an agreement that “the end justifies the means” because of something we call “the greater good.”&nbsp;Natural selection&nbsp;would justify every pogrom and ethnic cleansing in our history.&nbsp;But the real earth-wobbling&nbsp;of Charles Robert Darwin was that he gave us a belief system that empowered us to triumphantly dismiss God from our thoughts. We say, “If God does not exist, then we are no longer subject to him.” This shedding of our need for a deity is generally regarded as “the next important step” in human evolution.&nbsp;Most of us,&nbsp;I believe, are captives of bad theology. We often escape one slavery only to be captured by another master even more demanding than the first. And each of us believes his or her own theology, or anti-theology, to provide the truest and best answers. Personally, I consider modern Darwinism to be a religion, or more accurately an anti-theology, a belief system that argues against a creator.&nbsp;&nbsp;I believe in science&nbsp;and am devoted to its principles. I depend upon the reliability of physics. I acknowledge that evolution can and does happen. But I also believe that God spoke a universe into existence as is written in the book of Genesis and I believe “the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us,” as is proclaimed in the Gospel of John. I

But Not Their Own Facts&nbsp;“If you’ve read about social media&nbsp;or been to any marketing conferences, you’ve probably heard tons of advice like love your customers, engage in the conversation, be yourself, and make friends. I call this unicorns-and-rainbows advice. Take a couple of time-honored adages, add in the unquestioning awe of an unaware audience, and pretty soon you’ve got an entire industry based on easy-to-agree-with but unsubstantiated ideas. But there’s a problem. Myths aren’t real and superstitions often do more harm than good.”-Dan Zarrella,&nbsp;Zarrella’s Hierarchy of ContagiousnessI agree with Dan Zarrella.Have you ever met a person&nbsp;who was absolutely certain that a flu vaccination gave them the flu? “I got a flu shot and immediately got the flu and I know lots of other people who have had the same experience.”“Post hoc, ergo propter hoc”&nbsp;is the Latin name for this highly seductive, misbegotten logic and it’s difficult to resist;&nbsp;“The second thing followed the first thing, therefore the first thing caused the second thing.”&nbsp;But it’s almost never true.It is impossible&nbsp;for a flu vaccine to cause the flu.&nbsp;Flu vaccines contain a killed virus, not a weakened one. The flu germs you receive are&nbsp;dead, dead, dead&nbsp;and cannot come back to life.I sense&nbsp;the narrowing of eyes, the clenching of jaws and the tightening of fists as thousands of readers hunker down to defend a deeply held personal belief: “I got the flu from a flu vaccine no matter what you say. You cannot debate my experience.”It takes a couple of weeks&nbsp;for a flu vaccine to develop sufficient antibodies to protect you from the flu. If you are exposed to the flu within those 2 weeks,&nbsp;bingo: you get the flu. And guess what?&nbsp;They give flu vaccines during flu season.&nbsp;That’s why it’s common for people to get the flu after receiving a flu shot. Those people were going to get the flu anyway, but they don’t know that. All they know is, “I got a flu shot and then I got the flu. The End.”Superstitions about advertising and social media&nbsp;are far more pervasive than misundertandings about flu vaccines. Honestly, I’d rather&nbsp;have&nbsp;the flu than argue with someone whose only “facts” are to say, “Well,&nbsp;I’ve&nbsp;always believed…” and “Me and all&nbsp;my&nbsp;friends…”And then there’s the BIG one: “Studies have shown…”I always want to throw my head back and scream to the sky,&nbsp;“Name the study! Who did the study? Where is the study? Show me the study!” but I usually don’t. I just smile and nod like a bobblehead doll and try to think of a way to escape the conversation.There’s no way&nbsp;to convince a person who makes up their own facts.In my 30 years as an ad writer,&nbsp;I’ve come to the conclusion that most people believe that everyone else thinks like&nbsp;they&nbsp;do. This has led to more disasters in advertising than you can possibly imagine.Think about your business,&nbsp;the thing you do for a living.Here is my promise:&nbsp;you can be certain that people outside your business DON’T think about it like you do.Consequently, you are uniquely&nbsp;unqualified to write ads for your business. You know too much about it. More importantly, you care too much about it. This causes you to assume that everyone else cares, or should care as much as you do.But they don’t.&nbsp;So do the right thing; hire an experienced professional to craft your ads for you.And go get a flu shot.Roy H. Williams

Eleven million copies of&nbsp;Tuesdays with Morrie&nbsp;have been sold.&nbsp;But one hundred years&nbsp;before Mitch Albom began spending the-day-after-Monday with Morrie, a previous Tuesday gathering had already left its mark upon the earth and walked triumphantly into the pages of history.&nbsp;You are&nbsp;cordially invited to the home ofStéphane Mallarmé89 Rue de Rome, ParisTuesdays, 9PM until Midnight&nbsp;Stéphane Mallarmé&nbsp;was an English teacher who wrote a little poetry on the side.&nbsp;Marcel Proust,&nbsp;the writer Grahame Greene would call “the greatest novelist of the 20th century,” was fond of Mallarmé but did not care for his poetry, saying, “How unfortunate that so gifted a man should become insane every time he takes up the pen.”&nbsp;Ouch.&nbsp;Other writers&nbsp;who spent Tuesdays with Stéphane were André Gide, Paul Valéry, Oscar Wilde, Paul Verlaine, Rainer Maria Rilke, and W.B. Yeats. Of these, only Verlaine was impressed with the poems of Stéphane Mallarmé.&nbsp;Of greater&nbsp;consequence, perhaps, than the writers who gathered on Tuesdays were the artists who came and filled Stéphane’s house with their drawings and paintings of him. These “Tuesday” works of art are now worth tens of millions of dollars though very few people realize Stéphane Mallarmé is the man portrayed. These works of art sell for millions because they were created by Manet, Degas, Gaugin, Whistler, Renoir and Munch.&nbsp;Auguste Rodin&nbsp;would pop in from time to time even though he was busy sculpting&nbsp;The Thinker. Claude Monet said very good things about the snacks. Yes, these were the days when legends walked the earth&nbsp;but they did not yet realize they were legends.&nbsp;In Paris they were known only as Les Mardistes, derived from the French word for Tuesday; “The Tuesday people of Stéphane Mallarmé.”&nbsp;Mallarmé believed&nbsp;poetry should evoke thoughts through suggestion rather than description and that it should approach the abstraction of music.&nbsp;Music!&nbsp;Claude Debussy, speaking of his masterpiece&nbsp;The Afternoon of a Faun, said “The music of this prelude is a very free illustration of Mallarmé’s beautiful poem… a succession of scenes through which pass the desires and dreams of the faun in the heat of the afternoon. Then, tired of pursuing the timorous flight of nymphs and naiads, he succumbs to intoxicating sleep…”&nbsp;Likewise,&nbsp;Ravel wrote&nbsp;Trois poèmes de Stéphane Mallarmé&nbsp;shortly after Mallarmé died, fantastic music dedicated to his memory.&nbsp;It’s easy&nbsp;to understand why musicians and impressionist painters liked Mallarmé. He said, “I am creating a language which must necessarily spring from a quite new conception of poetry, and I define it in these words: To paint, not the thing, but the effect which it produces.”&nbsp;Mallarmé liked&nbsp;images of snow, ice, swans, gems, mirrors, cold stars, and women’s fans. He saw the poet’s function as being, above all, “to give a purer meaning to the words of the tribe.”&nbsp;The music&nbsp;of Debussy and Ravel.The sculpture&nbsp;of Rodin.The words&nbsp;of Proust, Wilde and Yeats.The paintings&nbsp;of Monet, Degas, Gaugin and Renoir.&nbsp;The world&nbsp;may have forgotten Stéphane Mallarmé but we will never forget his tribe.&nbsp;Les Mardistes.&nbsp;It is enough.&nbsp;Roy H. Williams

Style Guides and Audio Signatures: Part Two&nbsp;THE OUTER YOU:&nbsp;The best ad campaigns have a style guide. Implicit or explicit, the style guide is always there.A visual style guide&nbsp;determines the look and feel of visual ads, signage and décor. Audio Signatures (distinctive enunciations, sound effects, special effects, unusual voices, rhythms, delivery styles, etc.) are the primary elements in a style guide for electronic media.If a campaign lacks a style guide,&nbsp;it’s a group of disconnected ads. The tighter your style guide, the tighter the connection between your ads and the more memorable your ad campaign.THE INNER YOU:&nbsp;A Character Bible is the style guide that determines the personality of each actor on the stage, telling the playwright how each character thinks, acts and sees the world. The Character Bible is what makes character arcs believable in works of fiction. (A character arc is the emotional transformation of a fictional character as he or she reacts to events in the story, thereby becoming a different person than the one he or she was when the story began.)Keep&nbsp;that thought in mind:&nbsp;The personality of a fictional entity is created through a style guide.INSIDE YOUR BRAND:&nbsp;Every brand is a fictional entity. The strongest brands are those with the most attractive personalities.What is the personality&nbsp;of your brand? What does it look like? What does it sound like? How does your brand think, act, and see the world? (If you’ve spent any time with David Freeman at Wizard Academy, you know exactly what I’m talking about.)INSIDE YOUR COMPANY:&nbsp;A company is another type of fictional entity.The personality of your company&nbsp;is spread across its employees, representatives who are supposed to think, act, and see the world according to the principles your company was built upon. Your employees are your actors and they hunger for a style guide.Your Mission Statement is not your style guide.&nbsp;Mission Statements are amorphous dollops of wishful thinking, high hopes committed to paper. Forgive me, but the average Mission Statement is packed with more clichés than the greeting card aisle in a drugstore. Every time I read one I’m reminded of those young women in beauty pageants who look to the judges with big Bambi eyes and say, “My dream is for world peace.”It takes more than a Mission Statement&nbsp;to bring about world peace and it will take more than a Mission Statement to unify your employees.HOW TO USE THIS INFORMATION:1. Identify&nbsp;the Unifying Principles of your company.2. Write&nbsp;them down.3. Make them real&nbsp;through your words and actions.Unifying Principles become the Character Bible for real-world employees.Unifying Principles are not core values. They provide more guidance than core values.Unifying Principles are not rules. They provide more freedom than rules.Unifying Principles are specific statements that reflect a belief system.Unifying Principles bring people into unity and form the basis for coordinated action.When Jesus was challenged&nbsp;to name “the highest” of the 10 Commandments,&nbsp;he did not answer with a commandment&nbsp;but with two Unifying Principles: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest [Unifying Principle.] And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two [Unifying Principles.]”Honesty is a core value.“Do not steal” is a rule.“Love your neighbor as yourself” is a Unifying...

Ad Campaign:&nbsp;a series of ads bound together by a set of distinctive identifiers.Can you name&nbsp;the identifiers that mark your campaign?Okay,&nbsp;there’s the font you use for your company name and the color scheme you use on your business cards, letterhead and signage.&nbsp;But the world overflows with fonts and colors.&nbsp;What other distinctive identifiers cause your readers, listeners and viewers to immediately recognize your ads as&nbsp;yours?Think of an ad campaign&nbsp;other than your own that you admire. What are its distinctive identifiers?Every successful campaign&nbsp;has a&nbsp;style guide&nbsp;that gives its ads their “connectedness.” The longer you use a memorable style guide, the more recognizable your brand becomes.Customers prefer&nbsp;the known to the unknown, the familiar to the unfamiliar.&nbsp;&nbsp;The Morton Salt girl&nbsp;has changed dramatically over the years, but always within a clearly defined style guide that makes her seem forever the same;&nbsp;right foot forward, left foot back, umbrella cradled in the crook of the right elbow, salt pouring behind her as she carries it in the crook of her left elbow, and the rain falling at an angle, right to left, as though pushing the girl forward rather than opposing her. And the color scheme is strictly dichromatic: yellow and navy blue.Salty Sally&nbsp;has had six different faces and has changed her clothes and shoes and hairstyle in virtually every incarnation&nbsp;but she remains one of the most recognized brand icons in the world&nbsp;due to Morton’s commitment to work within the boundaries of a highly specific style guide.A good style guide&nbsp;is built upon the words “always” and “never.” What is&nbsp;always&nbsp;in your ads? What is&nbsp;never&nbsp;in them? What are the boundaries of your style guide?A distinct brand personality&nbsp;is the result of a memorable style guide.&nbsp;A tight style guide makes your company feel reliable in the mind of your customer.It’s easy&nbsp;to be creative when you’re free to do anything you want. The test of real creative genius is whether you can be unpredictable and consistent simultaneously. Can you create something new, surprising and different within a recognizable framework carved in stone?If you do&nbsp;what people expect you to do, you bore them. If you say what they expect you to say, they turn their attention elsewhere.Predictability&nbsp;is death in advertising. But consistency is the lifeblood of brand building.Predictability&nbsp;is the result of bad writing.Consistency&nbsp;is the result of a style guide.Good writing&nbsp;within a memorable style guide is the mark of a master.In works of fiction,&nbsp;the style guide is known as the Character Bible. It defines how each character thinks, acts, and sees the world. If a fictional character says or does something that doesn’t ring true, it’s because the writer stepped beyond the boundaries of the Character Bible.Bill Watterson&nbsp;created the comic strip&nbsp;Calvin and Hobbes&nbsp;within a devilishly narrow style guide and an unbelievably tight Character Bible. Hobbes is a lanky tiger with a dry wit when only Calvin is in the frame of the cartoon with him but when anyone else is present, Hobbes is a small, stuffed tiger with button eyes. Watterson steadfastly refuses to license&nbsp;Calvin and Hobbes&nbsp;television shows, plush toys, action figures or other products. This unforgettable pair will forever be limited to the printed page.Watterson is giving up&nbsp;tens...

You’re reading this&nbsp;and I’m honored, because you delete far more emails than you open.Which others do you open?I know, of course,&nbsp;that you read emails from your closest friends and family. But are there any newsletters, blog posts or subscriptions that you open more often than not? Can you pick a single favorite you’d be willing to share?I was crafting an altogether different&nbsp;Monday Morning Memo when&nbsp;“ding”&nbsp;my computer let me know an email had arrived. I glanced at the time and said, “That will be Exley.”And it was.I’ve known&nbsp;Richard Exley for 30 years. We met when he was a struggling preacher holding church in a school gymnasium and I was a bright-eyed advertising salesman trying to make a living on straight commission. I never attended his church but we often had lunch together.&nbsp;&nbsp;Although Richard and I have spoken only about 5 times in the past 25 years, we continue to be important to one another. You have friends like that, don’t you?Take comfort.&nbsp;Frequency of communication does not equal depth of relationship.Richard began sending out&nbsp;a daily&nbsp;One-Minute Devotional&nbsp;about a year ago.&nbsp;&nbsp;Like any good writer, Richard nudges my mind into green fields where it might not otherwise have wandered.“I don’t like to think of myself&nbsp;as a materialistic person but driving away from the Highway 12 East storage complex I could hardly come to any other conclusion. For nine years I paid almost $40 a month to store things I haven’t used in nearly a decade. Add it up – nine years at $444 a year comes to $3,996.”Richard’s thoughts interest me&nbsp;because he notices all kinds of things that most people don’t. This was his greeting last Christmas:A“There is not a shred of evidence&nbsp;to indicate that the shepherds were in any way special; nothing to suggest that there was anything in their spirit, or nature, or lifestyle that predisposed them to receive the angelic announcement of the savior’s birth. Which means that God doesn’t just come to religious people in church but to undeserving people the world over, be it lepers or lunatics, shepherds or Samaritans, or even women taken in adultery.”Sometimes Richard offers grandfatherly advice.“If you have the courage&nbsp;to follow your heart’s desire you will usually gravitate to your area of giftedness. You may not end up in the most prestigious position, or land the best-paying job, but you will have a more fulfilling life.”I give&nbsp;Richard Exley 60 seconds each day and I consider it a good investment.“Don’t mistake&nbsp;recklessness for boldness. Boldness is a calculated risk based on the best possible information.”“Forgiving&nbsp;those who have wronged us is often a process rather than a single event.”I asked&nbsp;my friend Richard to record these quotes in his own voice because I wanted to ask your opinion:&nbsp;Is it just me, or does he sound a little bit like Sean Connery?&nbsp;Every time I hear Richard I expect him to say, “Bond. James Bond.”&nbsp;Now it’s your turn.&nbsp;I want you to tell the rest of us about a daily or weekly email you always open.&nbsp;But just one.&nbsp;Give us a link to it. Tell us what you get from it that causes you to always open it. I’ve told Indiana Beagle to post all submissions in next week’s&nbsp;rabbit hole.&nbsp;But this is the rule: you must select just ONE subscription to share with us. If you send...

What Do You See In Your Mind?The goal of the batter&nbsp;is to hit the baseball. This is why every kid who holds a bat is told, “Don’t take your eye off the ball.”Later,&nbsp;when endurance is needed, we say, “Keep your eye on the prize.”Can you name&nbsp;the ball you’re trying to hit? Can you name the prize?As&nbsp;a consultant to business owners for more than 30 years, I can tell you without equivocation the question that is the hardest for the average businessperson to answer. This is the question:&nbsp;Drum roll, please.&nbsp;(rumble-rumble-rumble-rumble) “What are you trying to make happen?”With death hanging in the balance,&nbsp;mountain climbers turn my question into the imperative command: “Don’t Look Where You Don’t Want to Go.”The first step in any journey is to see your destination.Your mind is an amazing thing,&nbsp;crammed with invisible and unknown mechanisms* that move you unconsciously toward whatever future you believe to be real.What future do you believe to be real?&nbsp;Do you have the audacity to believe in a happy ending? Do you have the courage to move toward that ending with every action you take? Persons who are frightened, angry or bitter will see this and call you “naïve.”Sadly, this will be most people.Your choices and your actions&nbsp;are merely reflections of what you see in your mind. What do you see?The first step&nbsp;toward accomplishing a thing is to project it onto the visuospatial sketchpad of working memory. This is the scientific phrase for “see it in your mind’s eye.” You can do only what you have first imagined.What do you imagine?Boredom is a kind of death.&nbsp;Human beings need strong emotion. This is why we would rather be angry than bored.&nbsp;Anger is a type of excitement.Fear&nbsp;is another type of excitement. The success of horror movies is proof of this.&nbsp;Our thoughts are informed&nbsp;and our moods are altered by the voices we let into our minds. What voices do you invite in?&nbsp;In the dark, oppressive days&nbsp;of colonial America Thomas Jefferson wrote sparkling words about the bright future he saw in his mind, “We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men are created equal…” I believe Jefferson’s ability to see this bright future was rooted in something else he wrote, “I do not take a single newspaper, nor read one a month, and I feel myself infinitely the happier for it.”My greatest luxury in life&nbsp;is that I have a terrifically strong wife. Pennie pays attention to all that’s happening in the world and shares with me only those things she believes I’d like to know. The Princess of my world is one of those rare people who feels no fear and is slow to anger.&nbsp;For these and other reasons, Pennie can gather news about current events and not be affected by it. I do not have her gift. Most people, I believe, do not. Had&nbsp;the Princess and I&nbsp;not been married these 35 years, I’d have had to choose between being woefully uninformed or being made miserable by the demons who smile from behind teleprompters and microphones.Call me childish and broken if you want,&nbsp;but I avoid woeful country music for the same reason I avoid self-important newscasters:&nbsp;my world overflows with possibilities that seem not to exist in theirs.&nbsp;Sad country singers and somber newscasters try to drag me into their world but I hang tightly to the one I prefer.In my world, each of us&nbsp;is swimming in opportunity and everything is possible. I see opportunity all around you. You can see it too, can’t you?My highest wish&nbsp;is that you should have a crystal clear vision of what you are trying to make happen.1. See it clearly&nbsp;in your mind. This is...

This will be&nbsp;the smartest thing I’ve done in years or it will be the stupidest. And I’m going to do it openly so the whole world can watch to see what happens as these next few months unfold.The promotion&nbsp;of Wizard Academy is about to be turned over to someone else.Mark Fox&nbsp;said, “Roy,&nbsp;instead of hiring someone to do what you do badly, why not hire someone to do what you do best?”“Huh?”&nbsp;Mark is on the board of directors of Wizard Academy so I had to keep listening.“You say the Academy needs&nbsp;a vice-chancellor to stay connected with the students because you do such a bad job of that. But the truth is that the faculty and staff are making sure that everyone’s needs are met. What we need is a marketing apprentice, someone who can spend all day, every day, doing the ten thousand things that need to be done to promote the academy and its classes.”Suddenly I remembered why Mark is on the board.&nbsp;I am on the inside, looking out, and had been seeing the problem backwards. Mark is on the outside, looking in, and saw the problem clearly.&nbsp;Have You Chosen&nbsp;advertising, marketing and public relations to be your life’s work? Are you overflowing with ideas, energy and time? Are you teachable? Are you willing to relocate to Austin, Texas? Can you live on less than $50,000 a year? The marketing apprentice at Wizard Academy will attend classes for free and be advised by some of the greatest media minds in America: Mark Huffman of Procter and Gamble, Dean Rotbart of&nbsp;Wall Street Journal&nbsp;fame, Greg Farrell of&nbsp;Bloomberg News&nbsp;and David McInnis, the revolutionary founder of PR Web. And these are just 4 of several hundred giants who will be happy to take your phone call.The online marketing books of Bryan and Jeffrey Eisenberg&nbsp;have ridden the bestseller lists of&nbsp;The New York Times, BusinessWeek, USA Today&nbsp;and&nbsp;The Wall Street Journal.&nbsp;Bryan and Jeffrey will help you in any way they can. The scope of Wizard Academy’s relational resources is so vast that you’ll need to lie down and put a cold rag on your head when the full impact of it lands on your mind.Your office&nbsp;will be in the tower at Wizard Academy, overlooking Austin from a 900-foot plateau at the edge of town. You’ll be horribly overworked and underpaid, but you’ll have a fabulous office and lots of friends.This job does have a downside:&nbsp;The chancellor of Wizard Academy will be your boss and the current chancellor is overcommitted, reclusive, moody and impatient. He will expect you to use short sentences and make your points very quickly. He will not help you process your thoughts. You’ll have to use other staff members for that. And you WILL have to live in Austin so that you can meet and interact with your principal resource: the alumni and friends of Wizard Academy. Telecommuting is not an option.Are you up for it?&nbsp;If so, email us 2 pages. Tell us about yourself on the first page. We want to know who, what, where and why. The second page will be a 1-sheet marketing plan detailing&nbsp;exactly&nbsp;what you would do to promote Wizard Academy if your only tools were a computer with online access, a recording studio, a television studio, access to hundreds of profoundly important people and the names and email addresses of a few thousand Wizard Academy alumni. If you have an idea that requires anyone’s energy but your own, that idea is immediately disqualified. And one last thing: you have no marketing budget whatsoever. Are you still up for it? Email your 2 pages to&nbsp;[email protected] Luck,Roy H. Williams

These are the 5 questions&nbsp;you must answer before you can know how soon your ads will start working:Q. 1:&nbsp;What percentage of the noise&nbsp;made in your category – in all the different media combined – is being made by you? This is your&nbsp;Share of Voice.Q. 2:&nbsp;What percentage of the population&nbsp;will&nbsp;actively&nbsp;be in the market for your product or service&nbsp;this week? This is your&nbsp;Product Purchase Cycle.Food has a very short Product Purchase Cycle.&nbsp;The shorter the Product Purchase Cycle, the quicker your ad campaign will reach maximum ROI.Cars have a medium-length Product Purchase Cycle.&nbsp;The average American trades cars every 180 weeks (42 months.) Consequently, 0.55 percent of us will buy or lease a car this week. (Does this mean that anyone who advertises cars is wasting 99.45 percent of his investment?)That’s right; 180 weeks&nbsp;(42 months) is a&nbsp;medium-length&nbsp;product purchase cycle. What do you suppose is the Product Purchase Cycle for HVAC system replacement? Engagement rings? Furniture? Products with longer purchase cycles require more time for their ad campaigns to ramp up to their full potential.&nbsp;&nbsp;These campaigns usually show poor results during the first 90 to 150 days then begin to deliver increasingly good results until the growth curve begins to flatten out about halfway through the Purchase Cycle. If the purchase cycle is 10 years, the campaign will start slow, then generate increasingly good results until it levels off in about 5 years. You will then have to continue advertising just to maintain the market share you’ve achieved. If relevant new information is not injected into the campaign at this time, the advertiser will become frustrated and disgruntled and begin to say things like, “Our ads aren’t as good as they used to be,” or “I don’t think we’re reaching the right people.”Q. 3:&nbsp;How many people&nbsp;will&nbsp;ever&nbsp;be in the market for this product or service?&nbsp;&nbsp;What percentage of the public will&nbsp;ever&nbsp;consider this product to be&nbsp;relevant?&nbsp;A high percentage of the public will someday need a refrigerator, furniture, HVAC system replacement and an engagement ring. The best strategy for advertisers such as these is for them to use&nbsp;relevance and repetition&nbsp;to become the provider the customer thinks of first&nbsp;and feels the best about.But what about fine formal china,&nbsp;such as Royal Doulton at $100 per place setting and the solid silver tableware that accompanies it? What percentage of today’s public will&nbsp;ever&nbsp;be in the market for these?Q. 4:&nbsp;&nbsp;What degree of credible urgency&nbsp;does your ad contain? Is there any reason for the customer to take action&nbsp;now?&nbsp;You can shorten a Product Purchase Cycle by making a strong offer that is time-limited or quantity-limited. If you create a once-in-a-lifetime offer for a product with a long purchase cycle, you’ll likely move a number of people into the market who would otherwise have purchased at a later date. If your offer is powerful and credible, you’ll see great success. But don’t take a good thing too far; the more often you do this, the less well it will work. Sadly, the success of this “urgency” technique makes it highly addictive. Almost without exception, the advertiser who makes a once-in-a-lifetime offer will choose to make a similar, once-in-a-lifetime offer within a year. Soon his “sale” ads lose all credibility and his customers will begin to ask, “When does this go on sale?”&nbsp;God help us. We pushed a good thing too far and we’ve trained the customer NOT to buy unless we’re promoting a massive...

If History, Indeed, Repeats Itself&nbsp;“There is a holy mistaken zeal in politics as well as in religion.”–&nbsp;The Letters of Junius,&nbsp;1769 – 1771“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to bed in the streets, and to steal bread.”– Anatole France, 1844 – 1924&nbsp;“Men who believe themselves to be good, who do not search their own souls, often commit the worst atrocities. A man who sees himself as evil will restrain himself. It is only when we do evil in the belief that we do good that we pursue it wholeheartedly.”– David Farland, 2001We are in danger of becoming&nbsp;self-righteous, sanctimonious and insufferably judgmental. You don’t want to see this happen. Neither do I.My hope&nbsp;is that you and I – with open eyes and soft words – might be able to mitigate this coming trend.&nbsp;I recently completed&nbsp;a study of societal trends that have repeated themselves for the past 3,000 years.&nbsp;Pendulum,&nbsp;the book that resulted from this study, will be released on September 4, 2012.Let me start at the beginning:We see the world&nbsp;through the lens of an entirely different set of values every 40 years. We become a different people.We are pulled&nbsp;20 years up from the tipping point to the zenith of a “We” (1923 to 1943.)We swing&nbsp;20 years down to the next tipping point (1963.) Tipping points are interesting times.We are pulled&nbsp;20 years up to the zenith of a “Me” (1963 to 1983.)We swing&nbsp;20 years down to the next tipping point (2003.)Eighty years&nbsp;is a complete cycle but there are only 40 years between the extremes. (The 1943 zenith of “We” to 1983 zenith of “Me.”)We’re nearly&nbsp;halfway up to the next zenith of “We” (2023.) 2011 is 1931 all over again. But instead of being gaga over a thing called “radio” we’re gaga over this thing called “online.”A new set of values every 40 years…On one side are the values of “We,”&nbsp;the team, the tribe, the group working together, staying connected.On the other side are the values of “Me,”&nbsp;the individual, unique and special and possessing unlimited potential.“Me”1. …demands&nbsp;freedom of expression.&nbsp;2. …applauds&nbsp;personal liberty.3. …believes&nbsp;one man is wiser than a million men, “A camel is a racehorse designed&nbsp;by a committee.”4. …wants&nbsp;to achieve a better life.5. …is about&nbsp;big dreams.6. …desires&nbsp;to be Number One. “I came, I saw, I conquered.”7. …admires&nbsp;individual confidence and is attracted to decisive persons.8. …leadership is,&nbsp;“Look at me. Admire me. Emulate me if you can.”9. …strengthens&nbsp;a society’s sense of identity as it elevates attractive heroes.&nbsp;“We”1. …demands&nbsp;conformity for the common good.2. …applauds&nbsp;personal responsibility.3. …believes&nbsp;a million men are wiser than one man, “Two heads are better than one.”4. …wants&nbsp;to create a better world.5. …is about&nbsp;small actions.6. …desires&nbsp;to be a productive member of the team. “I came, I saw, I concurred.”7. …admires&nbsp;individual humility and is attracted to thoughtful persons.8. …leadership is,&nbsp;“This is the problem as I see it. Please consider the things I...

Relevance&nbsp;has always been an important part of effective communication but never so much as today.&nbsp;The appalling&nbsp;dropout rate in High Schools and the sharp decline in church attendance are just two of the indicators of an accelerated demand by people for&nbsp;relevance.&nbsp;“Why should I?&nbsp;Will it make me happier? Is it really going to make a difference or is it just a waste of my time?” These are the unspoken questions asked all day, every day, by every customer. I believe these fierce, unspoken questions are society’s response to the jet-engine whine of information overload.&nbsp;Are you answering&nbsp;these unspoken questions in your ads, or are you just adding to the overload?&nbsp;“I am the customer.&nbsp;How will you change my condition? Convince me that interacting with you would be worth my time.”&nbsp;Keep in mind,&nbsp;advertiser, that your ad will be just one of 5,000 sneaky little messages that will try to break into the customer’s consciousness today. Most of these 5,000 messages will be evaluated and dismissed&nbsp;in a fraction of a second. Will yours be one of these? Look around. The air is thick with messages. They bark like little dogs and wave at us like shadows from the corners of our eyes.Let’s talk for a moment about the two basic styles of selling:A dynamic&nbsp;“Me” personality believes in “overcoming objections.” Selling is combat.&nbsp;Push.A responsive&nbsp;“We” personality believes in “positive attraction.” Selling is seduction.&nbsp;Pull.Most people talk about Push and Pull&nbsp;as different forms of media. “The Internet,” they say, “is a Pull media. Everything else is Push.”But don’t you believe that for a second.&nbsp;“Push” and “Pull” don’t describe the media;&nbsp;they describe the relationship between advertiser and customer.&nbsp;Internet advertisers who use a&nbsp;Push&nbsp;message strategy quickly conclude they’re somehow “reaching the wrong people” and then go off to find a qualified opt-in list because, “By golly, if I can just reach the right people I know I can make me some money!”&nbsp;It’s hard to convince an overbearing&nbsp;Push&nbsp;jackass that he needs to change his approach.Let me say this plainly:&nbsp;Marshall McLuhan was wrong. The media is NOT the message.&nbsp;The message is the message.What, I ask you,&nbsp;will be your message? The media is just the messenger who will deliver it. Do you actually believe it is&nbsp;the messenger&nbsp;who determines the customer’s response to your message?Push or Pull&nbsp;can be used online.Push or Pull&nbsp;can be used in traditional media.Advertisers using a&nbsp;Pull&nbsp;strategy&nbsp;in traditional media are seeing this new style of advertising work extremely well.Pull&nbsp;is built on relevance,&nbsp;positive attraction, connection, relationship and credibility. But you can’t create an ad that&nbsp;relates&nbsp;to your customer and seems credible to them until you first understand the wants, needs, hungers, fears and anxieties of your customer.It’s not about you. It’s about them.&nbsp;How will your product or service change their condition? Tell them.If I could teach you in 6 minutes&nbsp;how to create a&nbsp;Pull&nbsp;message, I’d happily do that for you in next week’s Monday Morning Memo. But I can’t teach it in 6 minutes.I can, and I will, teach it in 2 long days.Are you coming?&nbsp;If so, be sure to bring lots of examples of the recent ads you’ve been using.&nbsp;<a href="https://wizardacademy.org/scripts/prodList.asp?idCategory=386" rel="noopener...

A 20 year-old kid&nbsp;walks the streets in Oklahoma.&nbsp;Married. No money. Works construction by day, changes tapes in an automated radio station from 1AM to 11AM each Saturday morning for $3.35 an hour. No microphone. No one will know if he’s doing a good job because station management is at home fast asleep.Frankly, the kid is a goober.The broken-down little radio station&nbsp;is ranked dead last in a city of 23 stations. Just one radio listener in 200 will ever tune in to listen to the radio preachers this station airs. The ratings book says that only 18,000 people will spend 5 minutes or more listening to his station each week and there will rarely be more than 500 people listening at any given moment. The city is home to nearly a million people.But 500 people&nbsp;sounds like a lot to the goober and it occurs to him that 18,000 would fill Skelly Stadium at the University of Tulsa. “If a person could reach all 18,000 listeners that would be huge and even 500 people can make a difference to a small business.”&nbsp;One Saturday morning&nbsp;the station manager calls to ask if Goober can cover the next shift. Goob happily agrees to work the rest of that day, then asks, “Why are there never any ads scheduled on our station?”&nbsp;The manager explains&nbsp;that the station makes its money by selling 14-minute and 28-minute blocks of time to radio preachers. Then on impulse he asks, “Would you be willing to sell some ads for us?”&nbsp;“You bet!” says Goob. “How much do I charge?”&nbsp;“Whatever you can get,” the manager replies.&nbsp;This is when our 20 year-old Goober&nbsp;made a decision that would change his life forever. Like most of life’s pivotal forks-in-the-road, the decision didn’t seem important at the time but in later years he would look back and remember this day as the beginning of his career.&nbsp;A Mom’n’Pop retailer&nbsp;had a small showroom filled with carpet samples at the bottom of the hill near the radio station. With a yellow legal tablet in his left hand and holding the tip of an ink pen to it with his right, he said, “I’m Roy Williams and I’m studying advertising and I’d consider it a huge favor if you could answer a couple of tiny questions for me; have you ever done any advertising that you felt was worth the money you spent?” Staring at the business owner like an eager young reporter, our 20 year-old goober wrote down exactly what the carpet store owner told him.&nbsp;“One last question.&nbsp;Have you ever done any advertising that you felt was really going to make a difference, but it wound up doing no good at all?” The carpet storeowner started laughing. Looking down and writing furiously on his yellow legal tablet, the goober said, “Tell me about it.”&nbsp;And then the goober did something very different.&nbsp;He said, “Thank you. You’ve been very helpful,” and left.&nbsp;He did not ask the man&nbsp;if he wanted to buy some advertising.&nbsp;A few weeks later,&nbsp;after the goober had spoken to hundreds more business owners, he walked in to that little carpet store and said, “Remember me?” When the carpet storeowner nodded yes, Goob said, “Another business owner told me something the other day that I thought might be helpful to you…” And then he relayed a very relevant story of a successful innovation that had been pioneered by a business owner in a different category on the other side of town. Goober then said, “I really appreciate the time you spent with me the other day. Hopefully, you’ll get some benefit out of some of the things I learn from other people.”&nbsp;And then he left again&nbsp;without asking the man if he wanted to buy some advertising.&nbsp;By the time our goober...

Once a year&nbsp;I allow myself to ramble a bit in the insane delusion that someone out there might actually want to know what’s happening in my life.Deep in my heart&nbsp;I know the only people who really care about my private trivia are my wife and my mom. My wife, of course, lives with me so I’ll address the rest of today’s Memo to my mom.You can eavesdrop if you like.Dear Mom,The tower is finally finished.&nbsp;Everyone who has seen it so far has been big-eyed and breathless. Classes are 10 times as much fun there as when they were in Tuscan Hall.The only things&nbsp;left to be completed on the campus are the Chris and Dave Windmill Theater, Bilbo Baggins’ home in the hillside and some landscaping. We should have all this done in less than a year and then I’ll be stepping down as Chancellor to let someone with better organizational skills take the Academy to the next level.Can you believe&nbsp;I’ve got to raise $40,000 to pay for&nbsp;another big bronze statue?&nbsp;It’s the final piece in the master design of the interlinked symbols on the campus. The Academy is, of course, completely without funds but that’s what always happens in the summer. I try not to worry.Due to&nbsp;the Academy’s predictable lack of summertime revenue, Pennie and I have moved the construction crew to our private property next door to the campus to build a spectacular new Welcome Center right at the property line where our property borders the Academy’s property. Pennie has been saving up the money to do this so the Academy will be able to catch its breath financially for the next few months.The location&nbsp;of the Welcome Center lets my staff greet the Academy’s visitors to the campus since the Academy doesn’t yet have the money to hire its own full-time people. When the Academy completes the final few construction projects I mentioned earlier, it should easily be able to afford to hire its own people. Till then, my staff will continue to work for the Academy for free as necessary.Sean Taylor has decided&nbsp;that I should teach a 1-hour class each month by streaming video. People will send in their questions and I’ll answer the best questions for everyone present in the electronic classroom and maybe throw in a few valuable tips along the way. We’ve done this for a number of companies in recent months and it’s been hugely successful, so Sean wants to start a class for anyone who is willing to pay the tuition. The whole world is invited to&nbsp;sit in on the first class for free next Monday, July 18,&nbsp;to see if they want to enroll.I’m sending the manuscript of&nbsp;Pendulum&nbsp;to the publisher this week. Like the tower, it turned out profoundly better than I had imagined.&nbsp;Here’s what the reader will find on the front page of the book when it hits the bookstores next spring:&nbsp;&nbsp;“If you will see into the heart of a people, look closely at&nbsp;what they create. Examine the inventions to which they&nbsp;pay attention. Read their bestselling books.Listen to their popular music.This is how you will know them.”&nbsp;&nbsp;– Roy H. Williams&nbsp;Having made my 90-minute presentation on&nbsp;Society’s 40-Year Pendulum&nbsp;to 241 auditoriums full of people in the past 8 years, I began this book by trying to disprove my own 40-year hypothesis.My friend Dr. Kary Mullis, winner of the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, said,“Roy, there are few, true scientists left in the world. Too often, a...

Chronic problems in business&nbsp;are usually the result of binary thinking. “It’s either this way or that way. It can’t be both.”Strangely,&nbsp;the answer is almost always “both.”“Should I try to attract&nbsp;the price-driven (transactional) customer, or should I go for the (relational) customer who cares about something other than price?”Both.&nbsp;&nbsp;Create and schedule ads that speak convincingly to the question of price. Create and schedule other ads that speak of important matters beyond price. Just don’t try to do both in the same ad.“Should I manage with&nbsp;strict policies, procedures, methods and systems, or should I empower my employees to make decisions on their own?”Both.&nbsp;Systematize the 90 percent of your company’s activities that are recurrent so that your employees have the freedom to&nbsp;humanize and customize&nbsp;the 10 percent of your activities that are ever-changing and unusual. A company without freedoms is a sweatshop. A company without policies, procedures, methods and systems is a country club for unproductive employees.“Should I promote&nbsp;an exclusive brand and risk the manufacturer betraying me by allowing my competitor to sell that brand for which I’ve created all the demand, or should I create my own in-house brand so that I can remain in control of it?”Both.&nbsp;You need the credibility of established brands to lend strength to the new brand you will introduce. Advertise both, but never in the same ad.“Won’t this make me seem unfocused?”No.&nbsp;You must get on board with proven procedures. You must also do your own thing and go your own direction. It’s not only possible that you do both, it is essential.Mechanics across Europe&nbsp;began building cars in 1886 and each time they built a car it was different. More than 2,000 different garages built and sold cars one-at-a-time before Henry Ford’s 1913 introduction of the first moving assembly line employing conveyor belts. Henry popularized the concept of interchangeable parts. It was efficient. It also made him the richest man in the world. By 1923 Henry Ford was personally earning $264,000 a day. He was declared a billionaire by the Associated Press.More than 17,000,000&nbsp;Model T’s rolled off Henry’s assembly line and you could have any color you wanted as long as it was black. The inefficiency of building cars one-at-a-time forced the other 2,000 garages to sell their cars at about $2,500 apiece while the price of a reliable, new Model T was only $849.Soon the other&nbsp;carmakers got on board and America became an automotive Wonderland.But we always take a good thing too far.&nbsp;Fifty years later, General Motors decided to take this idea to the next level. “Instead of designing 5 different brands each year and retooling our machinery to build Chevrolets, Pontiacs, Oldsmobiles, Buicks and Cadillacs, why not just put a different interior package and grille and taillights in the same, basic car and sell that car under 5 different names?”A Chevy Cavalier&nbsp;is a Pontiac Sunbird is an Oldsmobile Firenza is a Buick Skyhawk is a Cadillac Cimarron.A Chevy Nova&nbsp;is a Pontiac Ventura is an Oldsmobile Omega is a Buick Apollo is a Cadillac Seville.A Chevy Caprice&nbsp;is a Pontiac Catalina is an Olds 98 is a Buick Electra is a Cadillac DeVille.On the surface,&nbsp;this looks like exactly the same idea that made Henry Ford rich. The problem with the “platform engineering” introduced by GM in the late 1970s is that it eroded the distinctiveness of their brands. Two decades later GM was forced to close Oldsmobile and a few years after that, Pontiac fell as well. Analysts speculate whether Buick or Cadillac will be...

PROVED: Technique Beats Inspiration&nbsp;Wizard Academy completed an experiment&nbsp;last Thursday and we’re prepared to share the results of it.Amateur musicians were gathered&nbsp;from across North America. We refused to allow them to create music in the manner they preferred. Instead, we showed them video clips of Bob Dylan, Elton John, Richard Carpenter and other musicians explaining the tricks they used to create the greatest hits the world has ever known. Our musicians were required to do as they had been instructed.The objective of this experiment&nbsp;was to determine if success in the arts might be less dependent on talent, sincerity and inspiration than we have previously assumed. This is not to say the amateur musicians who volunteered to be the objects of our experiment were untalented, insincere or lacked inspiration. They simply weren’t allowed to access these traits and characteristics.Instead, they were given&nbsp;specific&nbsp;techniques, narrow guidelines, insufficient instruments and not nearly enough time.&nbsp;&nbsp;The 17&nbsp;spent the morning of the first day in training and instruction. Four of the 17 were writers. At lunchtime, the musicians were sent to the banquet hall while Trisha Sylvestre, Ashley Leroux, Mark Forrester and Scott Broderick were asked to randomly choose 4 strong emotions apiece and write a dozen short lines about each emotion. They were given a total of 28 minutes to do all of this. Their 7-minute writings were later distributed randomly to the musicians who were told these “song lyrics” could not be altered in any way.&nbsp;&nbsp;Each musician’s assignment&nbsp;was to write music that expressed whatever emotion was precisely opposite the lyrics they had been given. They were then told to sing those lyrics to the music they had written. Words of rage were sung joyfully. Words of hatred were sung lovingly. Words of happiness were sung sadly. Words of anxiety were sung calmly. Deep thoughts were sung as shallow little ditties.&nbsp;This first exercise taught the musicians the techniques of random entry and contradiction.The songs they created were shockingly interesting.On Day Two&nbsp;the writers presented the musicians with a second set of lyrics that employed additional techniques they had learned. And instead of 7 minutes, the writers were allowed a luxurious 20 minutes per song.Did I mention&nbsp;the only instruments the musicians were allowed to use were conga drums, a violin, a flute, a bass clarinet, a harmonica, an acoustic guitar, a melodeon, an electric keyboard and an electric bass? In other words they were given instruments that could not possibly be combined to create what had been demanded of them.And yet they did it anyway.On Day Three&nbsp;all the songs were recorded live. No corrections or alterations were made in post-production. And just to keep things fair, the writers were each told they had to write and deliver a spoken word performance.Want to hear the results?Wizard Academy&nbsp;is a business school where big things are taught quickly.&nbsp;Come. You belong here.We think you might be&nbsp;our brand of crazy.Roy H. Williams&nbsp;

How to Become Self-Selected, Part TwoMonday Morning, One Week Ago&nbsp;–&nbsp;“Honey, I liked this week’s memo but you never really told us how to become self-selected. You just gave us examples of other people who have done it.”I took another look&nbsp;at that memo and said, “You’re right, Princess. I intended the reader to read the line that says, ‘The self-selected are those who take action, the ones who participate, the ones who don’t go away,’&nbsp;and understand that you select yourself for leadership when you take action, participate, and don’t go away.&nbsp;But now that I look at it again, I can see that I didn’t connect those attributes to the reader nearly so clearly as I thought.”Self-selection&nbsp;is an important life skill, so I’ve decided to make another run at explaining it:Leaders&nbsp;aren’t appointed or selected so much as they’re simply acknowledged.Let’s look&nbsp;at the example of Peter, James and John. People assume Jesus chose these three above the other nine. But I’m convinced Jesus was merely reacting to the fact that&nbsp;they chose him&nbsp;more strongly than the other nine. Anytime Jesus stood up, they stood up. When he walked to a different spot, they followed him to that spot, even if it meant getting out of the boat. They were the ones who were always with him.&nbsp;&nbsp;Every time Jesus looked up from what he was doing, Peter, James and John were there. This is what it means to be self-selected.To be self-selected&nbsp;is to volunteer. No, that’s not it. To volunteer is to say that you’d be willing to take action if it were asked of you. But self-selection doesn’t wait to be asked.&nbsp;E.W. Howe (1853-1937) understood self-selection perfectly, I think. “When a friend is in trouble, don’t annoy him by asking if there is anything you can do. Think up something appropriate and do it.”The world is full of educated people&nbsp;waiting for an opportunity to demonstrate their competence. Most of these people will go to their graves having never gotten “their big break.”Education is one thing. Recognition is another.&nbsp;Education is what you receive when you choose to become informed. Recognition is what you receive when other people see the value of your expertise. Education without recognition has very little value in the marketplace.Wizard Academy&nbsp;is a business school. Is this beginning to make sense to you?Do you want to be a published author?&nbsp;Take the advice of Mark Twain, “Write without pay until someone offers to pay.” Write intelligent, clearly worded letters to the editor. Submit feature stories and op-ed pieces to magazines and websites. Write a blog on whatever subject you’d like to become known as an expert. If you have something to say worth hearing, people will tell other people and soon your readership will begin to grow. It may take a few years but if you self-select and don’t go away, you’ll someday have a book in print.Wizard Academy&nbsp;is a business school. Is this beginning to make sense to you?Do you want to be a public speaker?&nbsp;Talk constantly about your subject. Talk to the crowd that gathers at the water cooler. Talk to Ms. Johnson’s seventh&nbsp;grade class on career day. Talk to a breakfast club. Talk to the Rotary Club. Find 100 different opportunities to talk about your subject for free, no matter how small and insignificant your audience. Prepare for each of these audiences as if you were being highly paid. You’ll be a highly paid public speaker before you reach&nbsp;venue 150.&nbsp;The myth of a “big break”&nbsp;is what keeps the average person from becoming successful. They keep&nbsp;waiting on&nbsp;someone else&nbsp;to do something instead of simply&nbsp;selecting themselves&nbsp;and taking action.&nbsp;The self-selected person&nbsp;is not the average...