Sign in

Business
Dr. Greg Story
Leading in Japan is distinct and different from other countries. The language, culture and size of the economy make sure of that. We can learn by trial and error or we can draw on real world practical experience and save ourselves a lot of friction, wear and tear. This podcasts offers hundreds of episodes packed with value, insights and perspectives on leading here. The only other podcast on Japan which can match the depth and breadth of this Leadership Japan Series podcast is the Japan's Top Business interviews podcast.
Total 595 episodes
12
...
1011
12
Go to
45: Focus Mapping

45: Focus Mapping

11:2905/06/2014
44: Bad Presentation Skills Break Your Brand

44: Bad Presentation Skills Break Your Brand

12:5029/05/2014
43: Women Get No Respect

43: Women Get No Respect

11:4022/05/2014
42: Engaged, Energised, Motivated Employees!

42: Engaged, Energised, Motivated Employees!

08:4715/05/2014
41: The Vision Thing

41: The Vision Thing

07:5608/05/2014
40: Attitude Determines Altitude

40: Attitude Determines Altitude

09:5601/05/2014
39: Building Japan's Next Generation Of Leaders

39: Building Japan's Next Generation Of Leaders

11:3624/04/2014
38: You Can't Cold Call In Japan. Really

38: You Can't Cold Call In Japan. Really

10:0517/04/2014
37: Stressed Out Japan

37: Stressed Out Japan

09:5810/04/2014
36: Stop Whining And Start Coaching

36: Stop Whining And Start Coaching

13:0803/04/2014
35: How To Get That Business Boost

35: How To Get That Business Boost

08:5027/03/2014
34: What Leaders Should Be Doing Everyday

34: What Leaders Should Be Doing Everyday

10:1720/03/2014
33: Comfort Zone Hell

33: Comfort Zone Hell

10:1113/03/2014
32: Slapping No Sense Into Them

32: Slapping No Sense Into Them

09:3606/03/2014
31: The 11 Rs Of Handling Mistakes

31: The 11 Rs Of Handling Mistakes

12:0927/02/2014
30: OJT Is Dead!

30: OJT Is Dead!

09:3120/02/2014
29: You Gotta Have Personality

29: You Gotta Have Personality

11:5813/02/2014
28: Training Is A Waste Of Money

28: Training Is A Waste Of Money

10:1606/02/2014
27: How To Hold More Effective Sales Meetings

27: How To Hold More Effective Sales Meetings

11:4230/01/2014
26: How To Motivate Your Team

26: How To Motivate Your Team

17:5923/01/2014
25: What Is Smart

25: What Is Smart

09:2416/01/2014
24: Speak Without Fear!

24: Speak Without Fear!

06:1909/01/2014
23: Selling Services In Japan

23: Selling Services In Japan

08:1202/01/2014
22: The 12 Igniters For Sales Leadership

22: The 12 Igniters For Sales Leadership

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/
57:2726/12/2013
21: How To Build Trust, Credibility And Respect

21: How To Build Trust, Credibility And Respect

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/ According to recent research by Dale Carnegie Training Japan, there are three critical drivers for engagement, namely, your relationship with your immediate supervisor, your belief in senior management’s direction for the organisation and your sense of pride in working there. An emotional trigger also creates engagement—the feeling of trust. What is meant by trust? It can be defined as confidence in the fact that you can rely on a certain person or thing. The presence of too little trust or too much trust can be dangerous, however. A healthy level of trust comes from making good decisions and exercising good judgment, using a balance of head and heart, facts and instinct. Working in a healthy trust environment versus one full of distrust brings many benefits: greater job satisfaction, employees who are more engaged, improved productivity, reduced stress, more innovation, better customer interaction, and high staff retention rates. Trust, respect and credibility are tightly interconnected. If you don’t TRUST me, you will not view me as credible, nor will you respect me. If you don’t RESPECT me, you will not view me as credible or trustworthy. If you don’t find me CREDIBLE, you will not trust or respect me. What are the usual signs of distrust? Here are six warning beacons: Low morale and lack of motivation or initiative High absenteeism, tardiness and staff turnover Guarded communication or an active gossip/rumour mill spreading often false information An undercurrent of fear and worry among staff Cynical or suspicious behaviour Defensive or aggressive behaviour and communication It can be tricky discerning levels of distrust in Japan. As a boss, you will certainly be the last to know if there is a sense of distrust in the office. It pays to have informal talks outside business hours with various staff, so they can tell you what is really happening. The boozy bar-side chat is standard operating procedure among older generation Japanese, so they can tell the boss he is an idiot and later save everyone’s face by blaming the demon drink. If trust is lost, how can it be restored? First of all, you must be aware of an important cycle related to the deterioration and rebuilding of trust. First, an event or events trigger a breakdown in trust between people. Second, feelings of disappointment, anger, resentment and fear come to the surface. In response, we feel the need to emotionally disengage from the issue, to pull back, take a "time out" to reflect on the situation. We then discuss and communicate our thoughts and feelings about the situation with the other person. This part is tricky in Japan, because people don’t easily tell you what is wrong. remember once spending a full hour of total, unbroken silence with a company employee, waiting for the answer to my question asking about her concern. After what felt like an eternity, the woman finally spoke up, only to say, "I can’t tell you!" After discussing your thoughts, be generous in spirit and give the person in whom trust has been lost a second chance. It is to be hoped this will lead to a positive outcome, and that the person will redeem themself. Finally, with time and more positive interactions, trust can be re-established. Once trust has been compromised, it is not all a lost cause. We can be proactive and take five steps to boost and restore trust. Put your ego aside and allow yourself to be seen as vulnerable. Reveal yourself as a human being, not just an authority figure. Honestly review your perceptions and take full responsibility for your part in breaking the trust. Examine your assumptions and be honest with yourself. Reflect on what role you had in the situation. Meet privately with the person and disclose your perceptions and concerns. Ask for their perspective, keep an open mind, truly listen and put yourself in their shoes. Shut up and let them do most of the talking. Find out what the offended person needs from you to repair the broken trust, and share what you need from them. Listen and check for understanding. Meet on a regular basis to assess progress. Be vigilant about upholding your end of the deal. Actions will speak volumes. The way in which we communicate can either reinforce our positive efforts or derail them. In ascending order of importance, consider the following factors as ones that influence communication. Appearance Facial expressions can be misinterpreted. Never forget, employees are expert "boss watchers", always scanning leaders’ faces for their moods. Japanese bosses have a genetic disadvantage here, because their serious, concentrating faces and their angry faces can look the same in many cases! Make sure you are aware of your own facial expressions. Behaviour A person’s demeanour, attitude and character all communicate positive or negative feelings. Constantly check what your attitude is conveying. Maybe your body language is screaming at someone, even though you haven’t said a word. What you say The words we choose, the facts we give, the stories we tell, the knowledge we access—they all play a big role in engaging a person. How you say it Most importantly, a speaker’s tone, pitch, speed, strength and tempo when talking all send messages to listeners. We need to carefully align these aspects with our intended message. In addition to this advice, I recommend Dale Carnegie’s book, How To Win Friends and Influence People. It is a timeless classic on how to improve your daily interactions. Read it for the first time or, if it has been a while, read it again. It could change your life. It certainly changed mine! Related article by Dr. Greg Story:"How To Build Trust, Credibilty And Respect"
09:0919/12/2013
20: How To Work On Your Business Not Just In Your Business

20: How To Work On Your Business Not Just In Your Business

08:3012/12/2013
19: Motivational Leadership

19: Motivational Leadership

18:1405/12/2013
18: Why Choose Dale Carnegie Training

18: Why Choose Dale Carnegie Training

25:3028/11/2013
17: Why We Are So Passionate About Dale Carnegie Training

17: Why We Are So Passionate About Dale Carnegie Training

06:3921/11/2013
16: Talking About Dale Carnegie Training

16: Talking About Dale Carnegie Training

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/
13:2314/11/2013
15: Employee Engagement

15: Employee Engagement

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/
01:06:0407/11/2013
14: How To Become People Smart

14: How To Become People Smart

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/
09:0031/10/2013
13: Delegate Or Die

13: Delegate Or Die

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/
07:2324/10/2013
 12: Employee Engagement Matters

12: Employee Engagement Matters

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/ 
08:2317/10/2013
11: Killing The Ums and Ahs

11: Killing The Ums and Ahs

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/ TOKYO — My former colleague was a notorious “ummer” and “ahher”. “Um, I, um, would, um, like to um, say um, thank you, um, for um, this um, opportunity”. Listening to him was seriously painful. Time seemed to freeze, as it took forever for him to get to the point, which was mostly lost due to dreadful syntax. The ability to stand before others and express oneself clearly is a basic skill that is sadly still lacking in many people. Rambling, mumbling, zero focus on the audience, no power of persuasion, and “I Am the Brand” suicide continue to stunt careers. Sprinkle in some ums and ahs for good measure and we have a recipe for disaster. I will now share with you a guaranteed formula to end this reign of terror you potentially have been inflicting on audiences your entire life. Experience tells us that off-the-cuff remarks are more likely to produce hesitancy in speech than a prepared presentation. For those hard-core ummers, however, it seems to make little difference. Reading a prepared speech is another form of torture for an audience that should be avoided at all cost if possible. However, following this advice forces speakers to think on their feet, which triggers the dreaded filler words. No wonder people rate public speaking higher than death in surveys about their worst fears. These filler words give us time to think, but why do we need them? If we know what we want to say, we should just be able to get right into it. The PowerPoint trap Usually, preparing for a presentation means working on PowerPoint for 99.9% of us. Herein lies the first mistake. Slaves to PowerPoint will never become effective communicators, because the focus is on the data rather than the message. We know that how we say something is more important than what we say. Please read that sentence again, as I am sure for many people that sounds outrageous. You may think, “Surely content is king and people will pay more attention to the message than smoke and mirrors used for presentation”. But this is not the case. When a presentation’s content and delivery are incongruent, only 7% of the message is heard and 93% is lost due to distraction caused by how we look and sound. No wonder presenters who devote 99.9% of their time to PowerPoint content at the expense of rehearsing their delivery are dull. If listeners are only getting 7% of what we are saying, that does not constitute very effective communication. PowerPoint is not a substitute for good communication — it is merely an aid. The president of a firm who immediately launches into a corporate video joins the ranks of “presentation scoundrels”. This happens more often than it should. Videos should never take the place of strong communication for key messages. Like PowerPoint, they are just for support, so use them sparingly and make your face the key communication tool, followed by your voice, gestures, pauses and posture. Using notes, either on paper or through the order of slides, is perfectly acceptable. Reading those notes is not. Recently, I attended a presentation where the speaker was well dressed, well groomed, the whole package — until she proceeded to read entirely from her notes. You could hear the air of her credibility being sucked out of the room the moment she started reading. Don’t be relegated to the dustbin of totally forgettable speakers like her. We should allow our notes to spark the messages we wish to convey. Prior to delivery, practise, practise, practise! No one expects perfection, so incorrect pronunciation or pauses to consider subsequent remarks are natural. The use of filler words is permissible a few times in a presentation, but the higher the frequency, the tighter the hangman’s noose is tied around the speaker’s own reputation and personal brand. Here is the Dr Story rule on avoiding filler words: Decide the first word of each sentence and hit that word hard. Allow no other noise to escape your mouth before continuing with the sentence. Once you get to the end of that sentence, SHUT UP! Then it is very, very important to purse you lips together so no sound can escape. Keep repeating this process and there is no possibility of filler words ever being uttered. I guarantee you this works. I wasn’t quite in the league of the colleague I referred to above, but I did give him a run for his money occasionally. Like me, everyone I have taught this method to has eliminated filler words almost entirely. They followed this simple technique until it became habit — a positive habit. Good luck! Related article by Dr. Greg Story:"Killing the ums and ahs"
07:5310/10/2013
10: The Nine Step Innovation Process

10: The Nine Step Innovation Process

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/ Idea generation needs to be done quickly and well. In our busy lives, time out to think has become a scarce resource. “The leader knows everything, just follow orders” is a construct for failure. Organisations need to draw on the full brainpower and experience of the whole team, and the leader’s job is to tap into that rich vein. We all probably assume that technology firms have such innovation processes in place, but this is not the case. You would be surprised to know that many innovators seem to have the individual R&D components set up, but no overall guiding process. Below is a nine-step process that is fast, comprehensive and simple to execute.Step 1. VisualisationThis requires some hard and clear thinking around the “should be”, the ideal future we want to achieve. It sounds simple, but there are many interacting parts in the corporate machine, and we need to visualise how we can get them all working together to achieve the ideal outcome.Time, cost and quality aspirations are in constant tension. We must be careful what we wish for, because if we choose the wrong target, we will hit it!Step 2. Fact findingWe determine the “as is” situation, namely our current state, and gather data to establish a starting point. This is a critical step to enable measurement, but also to promote the brainstorming process.It is very difficult to go from a vision to a quality idea in one bound. We need to gather information and use this as our base to launch forward into idea generation.Step 3. Problem or opportunity findingWe now know where we are and where we want to be, so why aren’t we there already? What is holding us back? This step requires identifying and then prioritising the problems or opportunities facing us. A great leading question is “In what way can we…”This prioritisation step is critical in busy people’s lives. You can’t do everything, but you can do the most important thing. You just need to be clear about what that thing is.Step 4. Idea findingThe aim, the reasons holding us back, and key information about the critical aspects of our business should serve as a foundation for brainstorming the creative ideas we need.However, there is a caveat we need to apply at this point; we must use Green Light Thinking. This means we are aiming for volume of ideas and not judging the quality of those ideas at this point.We want a big basket of ideas from which to harvest the best. Even if someone in the group comes up with the most ridiculous, idiotic contribution you have had to suffer, which is an affront to your intelligence, just SHUT UP!That crazy idea might provoke a truly creative and usable idea from someone else, so don’t kill off suggestions at this stage. Encourage people to write down their ideas before sharing with the group and use a good facilitator to make sure all of those ideas are drawn out.Step 5. Solution findingNow we use Red Light Thinking. We become judicial, we make decisions about which among competing ideas is best and we now focus on the quality of each idea.There are many ways to arrive at this process, be it consensus, voting, criteria method (absolutes versus desirables) or directing. The method chosen will vary from issue to issue, and company culture will play a role.Step 6. Acceptance findingIdeas are free, but their execution is usually attached to a cost, and this is when we need to get the decision makers involved. An idea may require a pilot programme or simply jumping in with both feet. Regardless, don’t bother doing any more work unless senior management is with you on this.Step 7. ImplementationNow we put the ideas into action as the execution stage to get from “as is” to “should be”. This requires a planning process. It doesn’t have to be complicated, but it needs to be written down, have names attached to tasks and have very firm timelines.Step 8. Follow upMonitoring that people are doing what they say they are doing is always insightful. Good intentions don’t cut it. People must be held accountable for their role or the project begins to drift. Set up follow-up meetings at 30-, 60- and 90-day intervals.Step 9. EvaluationIf we had a precise starting point and a clear goal, and we have executed the project well, then we are in a good position to make judgements about identifying and assessing the end results.It sounds simplistic when we read this but sometimes the fuzziness and lack of clarity at the start comes back to haunt us at the end. Constantly ask: Do we continue as is or do we need to modify for further success?These nine steps provide a complete framework for innovation and will tap the full power of the team, leaving your competitors wondering what happened. Good luck besting the competition through your power of innovation! Related article by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan:"The Nine-Step Innovation Process" Related video Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: THE Leadership Japan Series #10 - The 9 Step Innovation Process
08:1203/10/2013
9: The Self-Disciplined Leader

9: The Self-Disciplined Leader

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/ Leadership is about creating environments that influence others to achieve group goals. This works because people support a world they help create.There are five success areas for leaders to focus on that make all the difference. Rate your performance by giving yourself a mark on a scale of 1 (low) to 10 (high) for each area.Self-directionThis is a must for leaders. If you can’t organise yourself, your ability to have others follow you is doubtful.Effective self-directed leaders have a personal vision which they review each day to remind themselves that the compass is more critical than the clock. They write down this vision and they write down their goals. They do this because they know there is magic in committing generalities to specifics in written form.They have a broad range of goals around their main roles in life, so that the balance between business and non-business is never compromised.They have clearly defined values that guide their behaviour. This makes them predictable, congruent, consistent and reliable for those dealing with them.They understand the importance of self-direction and they are evangelistic about converting those they are responsible for into similar individuals.People skillsMainly because they lack self-awareness, are under-informed or uneducated, many people find these skills one of the most difficult areas to master.Leaders know that failure to form effective teams and partnerships at all levels, inside and outside the organisation, will have a critical negative impact on their personal influence capacity.Organisations that wish to prosper need their people to grow, and that requires a safe, open environment that encourages individual development.Effective leaders understand what turns people off and stop doing these things. In the same way, they study what works best and strive to interact with others accordingly.Many successful leaders have read Dale Carnegie’s classic text on developing an aptitude for human relations, and make it their bible for people skills. The primary reason leaders should develop people skills is to ensure they can build trust and respect between themselves and their subordinates.Process skillsSuch skills challenge a leader to ensure the system is not subjecting great people to poor systems and processes, ensuring that they will fail.We cannot see a process, but we can observe people using that process. It is, therefore, easier to blame the poor performer than the process, and leaders must be attuned to the difference.Leaders demonstrate the ability to plan, innovate, define clear performance objectives, delegate, utilise time effectively, analyse problems and make good decisions.As noted above, leaders know that people support a world they help create, so they enlist their people for reviewing and improving processes. Effective people skills ensure processes work optimally through users.Communication skillsThese make or break leaders. By demonstrating effective questioning and listening skills, leaders learn the most.They understand that, even during their first day on the job, associates can offer valuable insights and ideas for innovations. This is counterintuitive because leaders often fall into the habit of telling everyone what they need to do and how they need to do it.Leaders are usually the most experienced, smart, capable individuals in a group, and are willing to share their knowledge and insights.Learning how to ask questions instead of giving orders is an essential discipline for leaders. They also investigate the communication systems in the organisation to ensure they are right, and examine their processes to verify communication flows effectively throughout the organisation.Checking for understanding and being clear, transparent and concise are great strategies for leadership.Mass motivational speeches have been replaced in business by quality one-on-one questioning. Such questioning sessions spur the self-discovery process, and provide the best coaching opportunities.AccountabilityThis success area is disseminated throughout the organisation by leaders who hold themselves and their team accountable. Leaders quickly and emphatically admit their own mistakes and lead by example.Following Mr. or Ms. Perfect is difficult. Leaders have the self-confidence to show their humanity, including their weaknesses, and have the communication skills to enlist their teams’ support.Leaders coach, guide, support, and train others to achieve mutually agreed goals and objectives, as well as provide direction and manage change.Leaders also create and monitor systems and processes of control and accountability within their organisation, so that people have the freedom to achieve results.And your mark is . . .?What mark did you give yourself out of 50?We all know we can do better on the basics. Take a moment out from your busy leadership role to gauge your performance in these five areas, then redirect yourself and move forward. Watch the clock but seize the compass! Related article by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan:"The self-disciplined leader" Related video by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: THE Leadership Japan Series #9 - The Self-Disciplined Leader
07:5226/09/2013
8: Handling Nasty Questions From Nasty People

8: Handling Nasty Questions From Nasty People

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/ We have probably all been on the receiving end of it or have been a witness to it. The presentation is completed, after which come the questions; some are fact finding, some seek clarification, while some are just plain nasty.Perhaps the questioner is not trying to be mean, but the result is the same. All eyes in the room burn a hole into you as everyone waits to see how you are going to handle this little Scud missile that is thinly disguised as a question.Some presenters splutter, nervousness sapping intellectual and verbal powers, while some give such a pathetic response we can see their credibility sail out the window as they speak. Some get angry, assuring everyone there that they are not fit for higher responsibilities because they can’t control their emotions.Do these questions come up? Yes, so there is no point imagining that we won’t have to face the meeting room moment of truth.Do we usually prepare beforehand, in the event that someone might decide to go after us? In 99% of cases the answer is “no”. The Scud catches us off guard and we simply flounder.This is a challenge that easily can be fixed. Below are a few steps that will trounce your rivals, diminish your adversaries, and show everyone what a true professional you are.Most preparation prior to any presentation generally focuses on the content and not the delivery. Taking questions, by the way, is part of the delivery and not something tacked on to the main proceedings. When preparing a speech or presentation, we are in control of the direction. However, once the questions start raining down, sadly, we are no longer in command of the situation.The first step before the meeting is to imagine what trouble may lie ahead. Who will be in the room? Who has a vested interest in seeing you go down in flames? Who are the potential troublemakers and their acolytes, possibly beavering away at creating problems for you? What have been some of the historical issues between your section and other parts of the organisation? Will there be someone in the room still smarting over you getting his or her money for last year’s project? What are some of the current burning issues that have a lot of money or prestige attached to them that would invite someone to slice you up in front of the assembled masses?Having identified the issues that are likely to become “hot” during the questioning period, let’s design some positive messages.Henry Kissinger, former US secretary of state, gave a great piece of advice once when announcing at a press conference, “Who has questions for the answers I have ready for you?” It is an amusing question, but also very smart.Rather than moving straight into damage control, which can often appear weak, squeamish, shifty and dishonest, go on to the front foot and put forward a strong positive message about the benefits of what you are proposing. Have at least two or three of these ready for each issue that you have designated as potential trouble.As a side note, be aware of your body language when doing this. Albert Mehrabian’s book, Silent Messages, has become well known for noting the disconnection between what we say and how we say it. If the two don’t match up, your message (your actual words) get lost, while 93% of everyone’s attention is focused on how you look and the style of your voice.Thus, a positive message needs positive body language, facial expression, tone of voice, and strength to back it up—preferably with a steely eye that glints with confidence. Even if you don’t possess one of those, try to fake it until you make it.Focus on four response options that will help to provide a strategy when questions come assailing you.• Immediately deny what others say when it is factually incorrect, misinformation, rumour, hearsay, or when you have been misinterpreted. Be strong, brief and have clear evidence to support your denial.• Admit you are wrong when there has been a misunderstanding or mistake. This is disarming and leaves the questioner with nowhere to go. The wind has been drained from their sails; you look honest and reliable.• Reverse negative perceptions by turning them into positives. For example, when dealing with competing priorities within the organisation, you might say: “I understand that going through this reorganisation is costing us a lot of time right now. The fact that we are dedicating this time now to the issue should save us all time later by having a more efficient structure”.• Explain in more detail by providing further background and facts. The reason behind a decision or position is often news to the other party who may not have the same grasp of the details as you.The distance between our ear and our mouth is way too short! We blurt out the first thing that comes into our mind when we encounter trouble. We need a verbal cushion to slow down the response process. Our first response is rarely our best one, so delay it slightly.We can do this by paraphrasing, into neutral terms, what someone else has just said. This has a double benefit because you are now in control of the language of the question and you have given yourself some thinking time.The question might be: “Is it true that the company is going to start firing people next month?” Your paraphrase might be: “The question was about future staffing”.Other cushions might include phrases such as: “Many people we have talked to have expressed similar concerns”; “That is an important issue, let’s talk about that for a moment”, and “Thank you for bringing that up so we can address it”.Our brains work very fast, so we only need three or four seconds to get to a second response option, which will always outshine the first bluster that comes out of our mouths.Calm, considered responses, cushioned for effect, and delivering positive messages in a positive way will disarm any nasty boardroom pirates who are trying to scuttle you.Good luck! Related article by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan:"Handling nasty questions from nasty people" Related video by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: THE Leadership Japan Series #8 - Handling Nasty Questions From Nasty People
08:4519/09/2013
7: Managers Are An Unaffordable Luxury

7: Managers Are An Unaffordable Luxury

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/ Doing more, and doing it better, faster and with less is driving global business. A cadre of professional managers running organisations is going the same way as the typing pool.Organisations can no longer afford managers who only manage; instead, they also need them to be leaders. This begs the question: what is the difference between a manager and a leader?Simply put, leaders build people and manage processes, while managers just manage processes.The organisation has various processes that must be completed entirely, efficiently and reliably—the classic belief of “getting the paperwork sorted”. Attention to detail is paramount. Multi-tasking, time management, and personal effectiveness all contribute to process success.The manager must ensure these activities are being carried out correctly and so the supervision of staff is key. If the operation is not coordinated, then there is potential for chaos. However, it is more likely we are dealing with inefficiencies and costly delays.The manager has to monitor worker’s activities to ensure priorities are dealt with properly, the urgent is done first, the details are correct, the sequence is in proper play and employees are working correctly. The “mice” on the treadmill need to be present and correct.All this activity has to add up to planned outcomes, such as numbers around revenue, production volumes, quality milestones, speed of delivery, and consistency. The manager has to tally the score against the score sheet, note discrepancies and get them attended to promptly.Whether the organisation is new or mature, the goal is to reach an equilibrium between competing demands so that the organisation moves forward in a planned and expected manner.The goal is the maintenance of systems and the manager is the maintainer.All of this sounds wonderful. Yes, we want our brand to be safeguarded, by ensuring everything is working properly, and our salaries to be paid on time, thank you very much. The question is whether this is enough?We need our managers to be able to do all of this and more. The ability to handle people, as well as getting everyone doing what they should be doing, when they should be doing it, and how is a critical skill.The managerial role may seem mechanical, but those pesky people who resist mechanisation keep popping up in the system. They have personalities, ambitions, biases, demands, failings and strengths. This big confusing mess of humanity under the manager’s control needs to be led as well as managed. They are not a process!Supervision is one level of interaction, but it is inherently backward looking and historical in nature. Leaders, on the other hand, are thinking about motivating people, looking forward and trying to understand what makes each team member tick.They are striving to align the goals of the organisation with the inherent motivations of the individuals in their team, rather than trying the approach of injecting the “motivation syringe” into their heads. Leaders need to have a reservoir of trust and good human relations skills to make this work.Leaders are pointing people towards the future, not just reviewing the past. They are working with the team to create a vision. This may be a sub-vision of how to execute the organisation’s broader vision, itself perhaps designed on high during a boozy directors’ offsite gathering. The section leader can’t change this lofty vision but they can lead the team to conjure how to make it come to life.Even with the vision a given, there is still an opportunity to have the team design a mini vision for their section or department under the umbrella of the big picture.The point is to lead people—using an innovation methodology—to an outcome where there is shared ownership of what was created. Leaders always keep in mind that people “own the world they create”, so getting the team involved is a critical skill.Leaders are not able to function in stasis. They know the competition never sleeps and understand this is one marketplace and its name is “global”.The leader knows that incremental improvements may not be enough and, instead, breakthroughs are needed and these come from the people who work for us.Does anyone remember a great thing called i-mode? Gone! Steve Jobs leading the Apple team killed it off with an innovation. Breakthroughs count and innovation is how to produce them.Richard Branson, founder and chairman of the Virgin Group, announced as a hoax on 1 April, 1986, that his firm had created a supercomputer called Music Box, which would let anyone, anywhere download any music they wanted.Steve Jobs later told him that the idea inspired him, and Apple ultimately created iTunes, which would put a big hole in music stores’ business and directly impact Branson’s own Virgin Megastores.Virgin store managers who were “managing” a better process were not much help when leaders somewhere in California put Virgin’s music business to the sword. Innovation counts and this requires the leader to tap into the team’s full power.Change in organisations doesn’t happen by itself. The leaders must get busy coaching their employees and ensure their skills are constantly evolving.Challenging them to go faster, further and higher is not simply managing a process. Instead, it is igniting workplace enthusiasm to ensure the team themselves want to be better.The typists have all departed the typing pool and moved on. Managers who can only manage processes are going the same way.The modern business requirement is to be able to manage processes and build your people. Businesses that are slow to recognise this will be eating their competitors’ dust and wondering what happened. Related article by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: "Managers Are An Unaffordable Luxury" Related video by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: THE Leadership Japan Series #7 - Managers Are An Unaffordable Luxury
07:4912/09/2013
6: Networking That Works

6: Networking That Works

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/ How big is your database of contacts? How many business cards have you collected and filed? How many people do you know? Turns out these are all rather pointless questions!The best questions are: how many people know you and how many care?Networking throws up images of attending events, exchanging contact details and handing over meishi.This is basically a push model, where you push your details out to others in the hope that it will lead to business. But what is missing?The care factor. Yes, they have your beautifully designed and carefully crafted message-laden card, but do they care?What happened during your initial interaction that would create or increase the care factor?I go to the occasional event here in Tokyo and, like many others, belong to chambers of commerce and study groups. Sometimes I look at my diary and wonder whether I should remove the word “president” from my business card and replace it with “professional event attendee”.I am always fascinated by watching the way people interact—or don’t—at these events. If I am correct in my presumption that people are attending the events in the hope of learning something valuable from the proceedings, meeting someone who can add value to their business, or both, then the methodologies being applied are in need of some work.Incredibly, there are numerous unfriendly, brusque, unresponsive people attending these events who are just killing their brands—their personal brand and that of their organisation. Some radiate “I don’t like people” like a bad case of sunburn.I wonder why their firms allow them to wander around alone, given what a force of negativity they represent. They are there for the content of the proceedings, and meeting others is a byproduct of the process that they clearly detest. It simply never occurs to them that they are the brand!We are social beings, however, and today we are interconnected to a greater extent than in all human history. The six degrees of separation theory is already well proved.The saying, “No man is an island” wasn’t created yesterday; the idea has been around for a very long time. Yet some of the people representing their firms don’t want to connect.Dismal interactions are doing damage to the brand. We come away thinking poorly of the person and the organisation’s culture.We are not going to think how we can help them, nor will we bring solutions to their problems. We will never dream of connecting them to others in our trusted network, nor ever give them any business.Others are more open to the possibility of expanding business through expanding their circle of friends. I use the word “friends” on purpose, since we all prefer to do business with people we like.We will do business with people we don’t like, but only if there isn’t a choice. Fine. Question: what makes you likeable?There are two networking aspects to this: the sheer number of people we can meet and influence, who will like us; and the quality of that influence.You might be thinking, “well, I am not trying to influence people”. Oh, but you are! It is a truism that we are all in sales, whether we realise it or not.At the minimum, we are selling an image of ourselves—trustworthy, professional, competent, reliable, friendly, intelligent, experienced, and creative. Being likeable is an advantage in business that we neglect at our peril.Drawing business to our firms and ourselves requires that we influence others in a positive manner.“You don’t know which one is the beautiful princess, so you need to kiss a lot of frogs”, is an old sales idea that is still relevant. By having a bigger circle of influence we can generate more opportunities, so frog-kissing volume helps.However, what puzzles me considerably is when, on meeting people who are sitting at my table at an event, I discover that they work together. They are usually in pairs but, shock horror, I recently met five! I was really floored when I realised one of the five was their section boss!I would normally think that the firm’s management team definitely needs some of our training, but I happened to recall their president telling me a few months earlier what a sterling global internal training programme they already had in place. Just to really top it off, they were all recruiters!Leaders, please take note: it may never occur to you that you would have to coach your people on something as basic as never sitting together at events. Why not generate the greatest possible influence and build new friends for both you and your brand?Here is a zero cost solution for you—tell the team to divide up the room between them and get cracking on being likeable!How about the quality part of the networking interaction that I referred to?Here the fundamentals of communication and people skills come into play. My observation is that there is also a lot of work to be done in these areas.The questions, What do you do? and How long have you been here? seem to be about as good as it gets. There is nothing wrong with either of these, but we can go deeper.Letting the other person talk is one of the key precepts taught by Dale Carnegie. It sounds too simple, but there is a lot of influence and power in using questions and following Principle Number Four: “Become genuinely interested in other people”.Reflecting on the word “genuinely”, should make instantly apparent the reason this idea is so powerful.Another good one is Number Eight: “Be a good listener. Encourage others to talk about themselves”.We could try some additional interesting questions: What do you like most about Japan? Where is the best local holiday spot you have found? Which is your favourite restaurant here?These questions will tell us a lot about each other—what we think and what we like—and are always useful in finding points of common interest, the building blocks of being likeable.I also recommend seeking advice from others. While we rarely ever take our own brilliant advice, we are usually geniuses at handing it out, and we enjoy doing it.Ask people you meet what they believe their firm does particularly well. Ask how they build a strong internal culture in their team, especially if there are cross-cultural challenges. Ask about their view on the state of play in their industry. Do they believe the current Nikkei Abenomics-led surge is a dead cat bounce? I think you get the idea.Engaging people in a likeable manner builds brands, businesses and a powerful network of people who both know you and care. Try it! Related article by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: "Networking That Works" Related video by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: THE Leadership Japan Series # 6 - Networking That Works
08:5405/09/2013
5: Essentials For Motivating Salespeople

5: Essentials For Motivating Salespeople

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/ “Hey, it’s a jungle out there”. A brilliant meeting followed by a woeful meeting; the emotional roller-coaster world of sales.You’re up and down within minutes, depending on the client’s interest and reaction. You’re always too early or too late for the business chance.The client is never on your timetable, especially your schedule around meeting the month’s quota. So how do we keep salespeople motivated to push through and produce the needed results?Managing salespeople requires time-usage perspective. Break the team composition down to some key segments; the star, the non-performer, the new or developing, and the plateaued employee.Our natural instinct is to spend a disproportionate amount of our time on “fixing” non-performers. Stop doing this!Instead, spend only 10% of your time on it and give them clear guidelines, firm activity targets, lots of encouragement and sell them hope.Tell them they can do it but let them do it—don’t do it for them. Send them to training to get the required skills.The plateaued employee should get slightly more attention—around 15% of your valuable time. This group needs you to model the sales process, to go together on joint calls and to receive your coaching.Set realistic activity levels, monitor achievement and let them know that your time becomes more available to them the more they achieve results.The new and developing deserve 25% of your attention. Their attitude and skills are good, but they lack experience. Extra coaching, your modelling of the sales technique, and priming the pump with some new leads all set them on a course for becoming high-level performers.In fact, they are keen and want to succeed, to challenge the more established performers for the top sales spot.The star performer is often neglected because we see them as capable, skilful, competent, already producing—we think we just need to get out of their way and let them get on with it, and use our time to do other things.Big mistake! They need 50% of our time.Their capacity for even bigger deals, bigger clients and more strategic solutions is the greatest you have available to you.Don’t waste this succulent opportunity by spending your time with low-level performers who, even if they doubled their production, would not make a great deal of difference to the overall monthly quota achievement.Get the star performers dealing exclusively with higher-level strategic accounts. With your seniority and contacts you often will have better initial access, and so can clear their path forward.Don’t use your prime client opportunities as a training exercise for less capable salespeople!Keep thinking of new ways to challenge the stars. They have the capacity to do more complex deals so keep pointing them in this direction.At the same time, clear obstacles, find them needed resources, and don’t forget to praise and appreciate them.Often these employees are highly driven, so we think they are totally self-contained and don’t need our recognition. Not true! They may not need it but they still want to hear it from you.Formal, informal and daily recognition tools are some of the basics in the sales manager’s toolbox. Examples of formal recognition are awards, reward trips, plaques and pins, while informal acknowledgment is a spontaneous recognition of milestones achieved.Examples include an individual or team lunch, tickets to a film or sporting event, a holiday or food. Daily appreciation might include a simple “thank you”, a congratulatory handwritten note, or recognition in front of the group.Be careful with this last point in Japan. Being singled out for praise in front of one’s peers can be uncomfortable in a group-oriented culture like Japan, where fitting in is more valued than standing out.Murahachibu (banishment from village collective celebrations and joint activities) was a traditional exclusion technique used to punish those who didn’t fit in. Japanese know that in many cases if you stand out in Japan, the knives will come out!So, very often to give praise in private is a safer bet.However, when you do give praise—whether in private or in public—be specific. Tell employees what you admire, the reason (with actual evidence), and then ask them a question so you can shut up and they can do the talking.By the way, “good job” is the most pathetic form of praise as it is so meaningless. Many bosses use it; don’t be one of them. Rather, be clear and precise about exactly what workers did well.Top salespeople are competitive but money isn’t the only recognition tool available to you. Find out what else each of your sales team members want and tailor rewards to them.Knowing what your individual team members want should be a big part of your psychoanalyst role as sales manager. There are many studies done on engagement, motivation and what employees want from their organisation. Read these for reference but, better still, just ask!Spend time uncovering the desires and aspirations of your people. By the way, these change over time, so keep checking what tangibles and intangibles they are seeking.To motivate your team, try this: praise early, praise often, praise with detail, and reward with what they want—not what you think they want. Related article by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: "Essentials for motivating salespeople" Related video by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: THE Leadership Japan Series #5 - Essentials For Motivating Salespeople
08:4129/08/2013
4: Are You People Smart Enough

4: Are You People Smart Enough

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/ Success is usually thought to be built on a combination of personal attributes such as intelligence, technical knowledge, street smarts, hard won experience (built on failures from pushing too hard), guts and tenacity.  Our varsity halls offer a vast array of academic knowledge, information, insights, concepts, theories, tomes, technology and debate.  Company education is usually focused on producing detailed product knowledge and navigation clarity around the organizational labyrinth. Tick the boxes on all of these and you are off to the races for career progression.  Trouble usually starts though when they recognize you and start to expect leverage from your personal abilities.  Leverage means not just what you can individually contribute, but your capacity to get contribution from others they have placed in your charge.  As the old saw goes "all of our troubles in life walk on two legs and talk back".  Welcome to management! Even if you are a powerhouse, a total workaholic,  pounding out 100 hours every week, your 5 staff working 40 hours  a week are doing twice as much as you are.  By the way, if you are putting in 100 hours a week, we need to talk! The tricky part though is you got recognized for your personal qualities, which quite frankly, you are depressed to discover are not universal within your team.  You might even become a Theory X manager, who sees the glass as very much half full.  You have become a legend at finding faults and shortcomings in your team.  You perceive them as useless. They can’t be trusted, they are lazy, they make mistakes all the time, they don't take responsibility, they don’t have the required commitment, etc .  Theory Y managers, on the other hand, see the glass as half full.  They see their people as decent, capable, honest, doing their best, wanting to succeed, etc.  McGregor, who termed Theory X and Y, concluded that how you see them is what you will create for yourself. Uh oh! This means we really have to be careful about our own attitude, more than worried about our staff’s attitude.  We have to be walking around looking for the ten things people are doing well rather than the one thing they are not doing well.  Leveraging strengths is more effective than trying to minimise weaknesses. "Gotcha" however is a popular pursuit for bosses. They really enjoy finding fault and spend their time whining into their beers about what a pitiful deck they have been dealt back at the office.  Could they themselves be part of the problem?  Impossible they believe, why they are in this position of leadership, accountability and responsibility because they are superior!  If this is you, by the way, get ready for 200 hour work weeks.   You will have no leverage and will have to do all the work.  "Delegation" will be but a distant dream. Here is a simple hint for looking for the good:  when wandering around, tell your team what they are doing now that is "good" in your opinion and then ask them what they think they could do "better".  Here is another idea: "make the other person happy about doing the thing you suggest".  Sounds simple, but how does that actually work?  Normally everyone thinks they are busy enough already thank you very much or they are deep in their comfort zone around the way things are done around here.  Usually the boss’s suggestion represents more work or doing things differently – neither considered particularly attractive prospects.  So how do we get people to engage?  Instead of giving orders we could ask questions.  This "self discovery" process leads to greater ownership and commitment to the execution of the task.  We could break the task down to smaller pieces ("eat an elephant one bite at a time") and "praise the slightest improvement and praise very improvement".  It is too late to wait until task completion to tell people they did a good job.  We need to be intervening part the way through to recognize and appreciate their efforts. We could follow Theory Y and "give the other person a fine reputation to live up to".  That means we assume they are good, serious, capable and treat them and communicate with them in that way.  They feel it and won’t let our expectations down. We could also "talk about our own mistakes before criticizing the other person".  If we reflect that we are asking people to step out of their comfort zone, to do new things or things in a new way, how smart is it to whack them whenever they make a mistake?  There is always going to be differences in performance between doing something well practiced and something new – that is the messy innovation process.  We are all the embodiment of all of our own mistakes.  We gained experience by being able to discern what works and what doesn’t, mainly by finding out the hard way.  We have to appreciate that our own team can’t be expected to be perfect at the beginning.  Shock, horror - they will be just like we were at their level or stage!  So we should share the mistakes we made to show it is part of the learning process.  We then plumb the depths of what was good and explore what we need to do better. Being smart is not enough.  We have to be "people smart" and that is a learned skill available to all, regardless of rank or stage.  Congratulations on becoming smarter! Related article by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: "Are You People Smart Enough?" Related video by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: THE Leadership Japan Series #4 - Are You People Smart Enough
07:3422/08/2013
3: You Don't Learn Do You

3: You Don't Learn Do You

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/ Corporate learning isn’t working. Heroically, time and treasure are being spent by company leaders to improve staff performance. Inherent in that goal is that we as recipients learn something new or re-learn what we supposedly should know already. Talking to companies interested in increasing people performance, we have noted some common barriers to making learning work.Business conditions, markets, the competition are all in a state of flux and change is now "constant". Companies attempt to respond. The clarion call goes out to the troops to rally behind the latest change. New policies, slogans, work methods, and systems "cascade" and are met with disinterest or just tacit compliance.The changes usually require everyone to "learn" to do things in a new or different way. The desired order is usually (1) learn, (2) change, (3) improve results. The breakdown point in this continuum is the one in the middle – change. The organisation may want improved performance, but is met with the mindset of "I" agree in principle, but no thank you - "I" don’t want to make any changes to what "I" do now. Insanity is defined as doing the same thing every time and expecting a different outcome. This "no thank you" attitude drives leaders nuts.So why don’t we want to change? Actually we are changing all the time, and with the influx of powerful hand held technology, which we lug around 24 hours a day, we are the leading generation of change adoption. Having some cool new piece of technology is fine, as far as change goes, but getting on board with the latest corporate direction is not as appealing. The bosses return from the executive off-site brimming with exuberance and high hopes, to find the troops don’t really buy into the change proposal."Seen it all before" cynicism runs wild, and top down direction is resisted. By the way, "we own the world we create". So when there is no creation or ownership, leaders, at best, get passive compliance from subordinates.In the adoption of the new, change necessitates exposure to RISK. We are generally risk averse, that is why we are all firmly entrenched in our Comfort Zones. We have all learnt to reduce risk, so that is why we take the same route to work every day, eat the same range of cuisines, listen to the same range of music, have the basic same circle of friends, and have the same group of close colleagues at work. Hey, it’s comfortable and we will have boiled down a lot of complex choices to settle on these few safer alternatives. So don’t ask me to go through the whole process again and make changes, thank you very much!Break out of our Comfort Zone? Successful companies work on this to successfully drive the culture change required to meet the organisation’s goals. The barrier is the learning process inside most companies. There is no content component to expand their people’s Comfort Zones. "Learning" is often just data download, purely technical or simply product knowledge driven. Now is a good time to take a measured look at your current learning content. Where is the bit to build the confidence to take risks, to really expand those Comfort Zones, to actively adopt change, to learn, to improve performance?Will we ever learn? Related article by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: "Will We Ever Learn?" Related video by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: THE Leadership Japan Series #3 - You Don't Learn Do You
05:0515/08/2013
2: Management Smoke And Mirrors In Japan

2: Management Smoke And Mirrors In Japan

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/    "I don’t understand!". Well in Nippon, particularly, what a pandora’s box or treasure trove that statement is, depending on your point of view. Employees who respond in this way may have a number of subterranean issues bubbling away. As managers, our ability to plumb the depths of what they are saying is integral for success. Here are 5 hidden meanings behind that "I don’t understand" response. Gauging which one applies is the combined IQ and EQ test for managers. Here are few hints on passing the test and getting your just reward – keeping your job! 1 – They don’t know what to do They may genuinely not understand the task content or have enough experience to execute what you require of them. They may not want to "fess up" to their lack of ability, because they fear the consequences. 2 – They don’t know how to do it Funnily enough common sense is not so common it would appear. What is obvious to a seasoned, experienced manager may be "Swahili" to their staff. Logic works in mysterious ways, especially here in Japan, so the way forward can be unclear. 3 – Not believing they can do it This is closely linked to the "Big Black Book of Failure". This infamous tome is usually squirrelled away in the bowels of the HR Department and it carefully captures and records everyone’s errors, mistakes, crimes and disasters. Therefore, a certain inspired logic informs it is better to do nothing, than to make a mistake. Fear of falling short of expectations or performance minimums is re-branded as "I don’t understand". 4 – Not knowing why they should do it This has two variants. One is why should "I" be doing this? In other words, in my highly refined and defined world view, my guidebook of Big Black Book of Failure avoidance says only do precisely what is in my job description and avoid straying into exotic areas of interest to my manager. The second variant is more bold. It is the actual idea that this task or project has dubious, shallow or irrelevant value, so why do it at all. 5 – Not wanting to do it Ah, we have arrived at last. They know what happens to "nails that stick out" and they know that challenging your whacky ideas is a path to pain. There is "no way" I am going to do this, but I will snow you and just say "I don’t understand". So facing that sea of inscrutable staff faces, all certified masters of silence and obfuscation, how do we work out what is the problem. Some gentle probing will ascertain whether they don’t know what to do. For example, "Have you ever done this task before?" will establish whether you are facing blank, terrified total ignorance or not. This usually covers off Hidden Responses 1 & 2. If the answer is "No", the boss penchant for muscling up to the bar and displaying vast knowledge, capability, and experience should be avoided, unless you want to be doing their job as well as your own, with no reduction in headcount and no increase in your own remuneration. If the answer is "Yes", we move on to see if Number 3 - self doubt - is the issue. "Is there anything about this task this time which you think is going be difficult (code word for "impossible" when rendered back into Japanese as "muzukashii"). If the answer comes back as a "No" or lists concerns that don’t seem insurmountable, then we need to see if Number 4 - the "why" - is the issue. Here some background on why you chose them for this task could be helpful. "I chose you for this task because I know I can rely on you, even though you are so busy with other work. The reason why this project is important to me is ….’ A "trial close" at this point is useful. "Are you happy to do this task?". If they say "Yes", we are off to the races, if it is a "No" then we are getting down to it at last. Their answer about why they are not happy will tell you all you need to know about why your idea won’t work in Japan. Always useful to get that type of feedback - just do your best to not nuke your staff member at this point. A studied pause, then "Oh, good point. Let’s get a few of the team together and see if it is possible to work our way through these barriers" works well. Good luck! Dale Carnegie Training has been helping companies manage "I don’t understand" for the last 100 years.   Related article by Dr. Greg Story: “Understanding 'I don’t understand'” Related video by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: THE Leadership Japan Series #2 - Management Smoke and Mirrors In Japan  
06:4508/08/2013
1: Flexible Japan - Stop Dreaming

1: Flexible Japan - Stop Dreaming

Dale Carnegie Training Japan: http://japan.dalecarnegie.com/ Often, the issue is the structure of the service model. Employ the cheapest hourly labour, provide the barest minimums of training, have non-professional management and count the money. In the case of Japan, they can also exploit high levels of basic politeness.Hot milk is a by-product of coffee shops, but try getting a glass of hot milk if it isn’t on the menu.When my wife was pregnant with our son, she avoided coffee and tea, but wanted something warm to drink. She became pregnant while we were based in Sydney, Australia (during a temporary posting) and there was no hot milk on the menu, but flexible Aussies and so “no worries”.The same coffee shop would charge her a slightly different amount each time, depending on the serving staff on that shift. They would just decide what they thought it should cost, as it wasn’t already specified.Back in Japan, there was a sea of hot milk everywhere in coffee shop land, but staff always gave a firm “no”. And that was that. It wasn’t in the manual.Order or request something outside the “manual”—beyond the narrow range of orthodox procedure—and the easiest answer is “no”. The politeness of the Japanese language masks a lot of service sins. The act of having to “think” often seems “outside the manual”.“Beyond my pay grade” is an expression I absolutely loath as it exemplifies a total lack of interest in being accountable for the success of the business, or for taking any responsibility for the sanctity of the brand.I have never heard the equivalent expression in Japanese, if such an expression even exists, but the mentality can sometimes be familiar.In the case of foreign retail businesses, there are not so many here in Japan. For those that are here, I am sure a lot of effort goes into not just ensuring the quality of the goods or service, the delivery logistics, and the brand integrity, but also getting the team to be flexible around “not in the manual” situations. If not, give me call!Call centres are usually great for examples of inflexibility, as the low wages, high turnover, short hold time imperatives, and poor management cocktail really packs a nasty punch.My credit card was receiving a lot of work and was wearing out. To receive a new plastic card with the same number, I had to lose access to my card for two weeks (I would send the old one back in order for them to send me a new one). After severe hand-to-hand combat over this, a solution was found (they sent me a new card and I sent the old card back).At the end of this struggle session on the phone, I wondered, Why was that so difficult? I was reminded of John Cleese’s line in the Monty Python’s “dead parrot” sketch: “If you want anything done in this country you have to argue until you are blue in the mouth”.Why couldn’t that simple solution have been offered at the start? I cannot be the first customer in the firm’s long retail history here who wanted a new piece of plastic with the same number. Why did I have to dynamite an acceptable outcome out of them?I recall recently being advised to “go to a competitor” by the person taking my call, because of her total inflexibility to resolve my issue.I won’t labour the point, but it was a simple issue around a preferred starting time. Her fateful words got my attention though. I thought, this person is killing the brand and losing the business money. Why is that necessary? Well actually it isn’t. However, it is often easier to be inflexible than flexible in Japan, so that is why we often get such service.My experience has been that there is also the inability to articulate sufficiently well the “why” it can’t be done. In fact, there is usually no articulation, just a polite but firm refusal.This seems more like a training, rather than a cultural, issue to me. Reality check: are your team members successfully articulating the “why” when it can’t be done?The more difficult to perceive service sins are in the corporate B2B areas. These are not low paid hourly workers, but are the relatively well-paid, lifetime employment, almost impossible to fire, types. They sometimes lack accountability for the business, and brand integrity is a concept totally outside their mental frame.Mistakes usually make themselves apparent at some point, but this inflexibility that is killing the business and the brand is much harder to ferret out.You, as the boss, probably won’t ever be told about it. It is almost invisible and like a “brand cancer”—ignore it at your peril. So how do we build that “go the extra mile” flexible mentality in our team members?Leadership and management are key factors in setting the tone of service delivery. Ask yourself, “when was the last time I made any mention about the need to be more flexible in our thinking about solving customer’s issues?”Or ask, “when was the last time anyone who works for me, in a leadership or management position, said anything to the team about winning more share of the pie by being more flexible than our competitors?” If the answer is “never”, or close to it, then perhaps it is time to raise the issue and explain why this is important to the brand.Another tool often overlooked is “values”. Whenever you ask Japanese teams to compile a list of their personal values, a lot of wonderful words come up—all the usual suspects (integrity, trust, honesty, respect)—but rarely do you come across flexibility.I do this a lot with client’s teams and have never seen it. What this says is that we need to consciously add this as a value. Articulate why it is important and provide stories and examples to “prime the pump”. It needs to be constantly referred to as a differentiator of the brand—“a powerful means of delighting customers”.Get the team focused on this and pray your competitors embrace inflexibility well into the future. Make a plan to go after their clients in the meantime!To finish on a positive note, I was recently pleasantly surprised by the flexible attitude of a Japanese staff member of a mid-sized Japanese hotel.Due to a sudden heavy snowfall in Tokyo, drivers couldn’t negotiate the hill near my home. I was one of these drivers, and had to leave my car overnight in the car park of this particular hotel, located at the bottom of that very snowy hill.Picking up the car and bill the next day, the car park vending machine had never seen such a spine-chilling sum and couldn’t deal with it, thus help was needed.After explaining why the car was there, the male staff member in his mid-twenties said something very significant: “Thank you for not obstructing the road outside our hotel during the snow storm. I will take responsibility and waive the parking cost”.Wow! I wasn’t dreaming after all! Related article by Dr. Greg Story, President of Dale Carnegie Training Japan: "Flexible Japan - Stop Dreaming!" Related video by Dr. Greg Story, Presidet of Dale Carnegie Training Japan:  THE Leadership Japan Series # 1 - Flexible Japan - Stop Dreaming
09:0701/08/2013