It’s that time of year (again!)- when medical students- both US and International- are preparing their residency applications. This year, we have been focusing on the special challenges International Medical Graduates face when applying to US surgical residency positions. In our previous episode, we discussed how residents can make their applications stand out to program directors. Today, we will explore the unique challenges, experiences, and the future of IMGs with special guest Dr. Hasan Alam.  Guests: Hasan Alam, MD- Chair of the Department of Surgery and Professor of Surgery (Trauma and Critical Care) and Cell and Developmental Biology- Northwestern University  Previous DOMINATE the Match Episodes:  Episode 2- “Choose Me” (Personal Statements and Letters of Recommendations) https://behindtheknife.org/podcast/dominate-the-match-episode-2-choose-me/ Episode 3- “The Interview” https://behindtheknife.org/podcast/dominate-the-match-episode-3-the-interview/ Episode 4- “Rank and Match” https://behindtheknife.org/podcast/dominate-the-match-episode-4-rank-and-match/ Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.  If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

It’s that time of year (again!)- when medical students- both US and International- are preparing their residency applications. In this episode, we will focus on the special challenges International Medical Graduates face when applying to US surgical residency positions and discuss tips and tricks for making IMG residency applicants standout to program directors in the US.  Guests: David Hughes, MD- Clinical Associate Professor of Endocrine Surgery and General Surgery Residency Program Director- University of Michigan Krishnan Raghavendran, MBBS- Professor of Acute Care Surgery and Critical Care- University of Michigan Link to video:  You can watch Dr. Hughes’s full presentation here: https://youtu.be/iQ0CzH7xHwE Previous DOMINATE the Match Episodes:  Episode 2- “Choose Me” (Personal Statements and Letters of Recommendations) https://behindtheknife.org/podcast/dominate-the-match-episode-2-choose-me/ Episode 3- “The Interview” https://behindtheknife.org/podcast/dominate-the-match-episode-3-the-interview/ Episode 4- “Rank and Match” https://behindtheknife.org/podcast/dominate-the-match-episode-4-rank-and-match/ Residency Program Lists:  - FREIDA Residency and Fellowship Database: https://freida.ama-assn.org/ - Doximity: https://www.doximity.com/residency/?utm_campaign=marketing_resnav_competitor_broad_20210520&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&gclid=CjwKCAjwt52mBhB5EiwA05YKo1J47BLAtTPtsJBmVvXGP2pDXLLqgDIwM0pgkSYjoBhFUOO1ktXDYRoC2bkQAvD_BwE Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced approximately 30 years ago and quickly became the gold standard due to multiple benefits over open cholecystectomy. It ushered in the laparoscopic revolution but also increased the number of bile duct injuries. Through the dedicated efforts of many the rate of bile duct injury has been reduced, now mirroring open cholecystectomy. The robotic surgery revolution is well underway and unsurprisingly this technology has been applied to cholecystectomy. Given the devastating nature of bile duct injury and the history of increased injury with the last major shift in operative approach, we examine the current literature on the comparative safety of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 1.     Andrew Wright, UW Medical Center – Montlake and Northwest, @andrewswright  2.     Nick Cetrulo, UW Medical Center - Northwest, @Trules25  3.     Nicole White, UW Medical Center - Northwest  4.     Paul Herman, UW General Surgery Resident PGY-3, @paul_herm  5.     Ben Vierra, UW General Surgery Resident PGY-2 @benvierra95  Learning objectives:   1.     Examine the history of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy and review the efforts to reduce bile duct injury (SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Task Force and Multi-Society Practice Guideline)  2.     Review literature on causes and prevention of bile duct injury  3.     Review a recent article on robotic cholecystectomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes  4.     Describe precautions that might mitigate expected increase in bile duct injury as a new approach is applied  References  1.     https://www.sages.org/publications/guidelines/safe-cholecystectomy-multi-society-practice-guideline/ 2.     https://www.sages.org/safe-cholecystectomy-program/  3.     MacFadyen BV Jr, Vecchio R, Ricardo AE, Mathis CR. Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The United States experience. Surg Endosc. 1998 Apr;12(4):315-21. doi: 10.1007/s004649900661. PMID: 9543520. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9543520/ 4.     Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD006231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006231. PMID: 17054285. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17054285/ 5.     Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, Liu K, Lee CM, Whang K, Hunter JG. Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg. 2003 Apr;237(4):460-9. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000060680.92690.E9. PMID: 12677139; PMCID: PMC1514483. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12677139/ 6.     Kalata S, Thumma JR, Norton EC, Dimick JB, Sheetz KH. Comparative Safety of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. JAMA Surg. 2023;158(12):1303–1310. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4389 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37728932/  Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Join for the forth episode in the Association of Out Surgeons & Allies (AOSA) series for a discussion on gender affirming care and gender affirming surgery. Host: Dan Scheese, MD Andrew Schlussel, DO, Colorectal and General Surgeon, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center Guests: 1. Dr. Megan Lane (She/her) [email protected] Dr. Lane is a Plastic Surgery resident at the University of Michigan who is planning on going into Gender Affirming Surgery and general reconstruction, she completed a research fellowship in the National Clinician Scholars Program and focused primarily on patient-reported outcomes in gender affirming surgery.  2. Dr. Scott Chaiet (he/him/his/himself) [email protected] Dr. Chaiet is double board certified by the American Board of Otolaryngology and the American Board of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and is currently at the University of Wisconsin. His areas of expertise include rhinoplasty and facial gender surgery. He also practices reconstructive surgery including facial paralysis reanimation. His gender affirming practice includes all areas of the face and Adam’s apple except for hair. 3. Dr. Amy Suwanabol  [email protected] Amy Suwanabol is a colorectal surgeon at the University of Michigan and the Ann Arbor VA. She assists the gender affirming surgeons at the University of Michigan in performing robotic assisted vaginoplasty. Her research focuses on optimizing quality of life among surgical patients and their families, surgeon well being, and cancer survivorship.   4. Dr. Monica Llado-Farrulla [email protected] Dr. Llado-Farulla was born and raised in Puerto Rico, completed a residency in general surgery and then plastic surgery at Tulane and Penn, respectively. She pursued a year of training in advanced gender surgery and is now currently at OHSU, her practice largely focuses on facial feminization, chest affirming surgeries, phalloplasty, autologous breast reconstruction, and limb salvage.  5. Dr. Michele “Mike” Fascelli (he/him/his) [email protected] Dr. Fascelli is a practicing reconstructive urologist at Cleveland Clinic.  He comppleted his urology training at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio and then fellowship in urogenital gender affirming surgery with the urology team at OHSU with Dr. Llado-Farulla. He is now the Director of Urogenital Reconstruction and Co-Director of the Gender Affirming Surgery Program at Cleveland Clinic.  He is very committed to LGBTQIA+ urologic access and actively works to protect and expand care to the rainbow community, and to our trans and gender diverse patients.  His practice is currently focused on queer urologic health concerns and genital gender surgery (i.e. vaginoplasty, metoidioplasty and phalloplasty).     Learn more and get involved with AOSA: https://www.outsurgeons.org Twitter/X: @OutSurgeons   Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Interested in cardiac surgery? The training paradigm for cardiac surgery has changed significantly over the past decade and we know may students often struggle when deciding what pathway is best for them. For this episode, we assembled a robust team of attendings, fellows, and residents to discuss their journey as well as some of the research that has been conducted about these different pathways to help guide students navigating this decision.  Hosts:  - Jessica Millar, MD- PGY-5 General Surgery Resident, University of Michigan, @Jess_Millar15 Guests:  - Nick Teman, MD- Assistant Professor of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, @nickteman - Jolian Dahl, MD, MSc- Integrated Thoracic Surgery Resident (PGY-6), University of Virginia, @JolianDahl - Lyndsey Wessels, MD- Traditional Thoracic Surgery Resident (CT-1), University of Virginia, @LyndseyWessels  Articles Referenced:  - Pathways to Certification: https://www.abts.org/ABTS/CertificationWebPages/Pathways%20to%20Certification.aspx - Narahari AK, Patel PD, Chandrabhatla AS, Wolverton J, Lantieri MA, Sarkar A, Mehaffey JH, Wagner CM, Ailawadi G, Pagani FD, Likosky DS. A Nationwide Evaluation of Cardiothoracic Resident Research Productivity. Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Feb;117(2):449-455. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.08.011. Epub 2023 Aug 26. PMID: 37640148; PMCID: PMC10842395 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37640148/ - Bougioukas L, Heiser A, Berg A, Polomsky M, Rokkas C, Hirashima F. Integrated cardiothoracic surgery match: Trends among applicants compared with other surgical subspecialties. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Sep;166(3):904-914. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.11.112. Epub 2022 Mar 22. PMID: 35461707. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35461707/ For episode ideas/suggestions/feedback feel free to email Jessica Millar at: [email protected] Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Bariatric surgery is an evolving field with new procedures, or variations of old ones, being developed to meet the needs of patients with obesity. The single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass (SADI) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are two such procedures which have recently entered the mainstream conversation. In this episode we will give a brief overview of the SADI and OAGB, go over some short and long term studies evaluating safety and efficacy, and discuss current sentiments about these options and how they may fit into bariatric practice.  Show Hosts: Matthew Martin, MD Adrian Dan, MD Crystal Johnson-Mann, MD Paul Wisniowski, MD Article #1: Chao 2024 - Outcomes of SADI and OAGB Compared to RYGB from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Quality Improvement Program: The North American Experience Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and duodenal switch are well described procedure for weight loss; however, associated postoperative complications have led to the development of simpler techniques Single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass (SADI) - modification of the duodenal switch where by a loop of ileum of the bilopancreatic limb approximately 200-300cm from the ileal cecal valve is anastomosed to the distal duodenal cuff of a tubularized stomach One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) – modification of the RYGB where a loop of jejunum of the bilopancreatic limb approximately 150-200cm from the ligament of treitz is anastomosed to the distal end of a gastric pouch. There is increasing interest in these procedures given the perceived reduced risk reduction associated with one fewer anastomosis Currently, there is insufficient data on the safety of these procedures compared to the established RYGB.  The article utilizes the MBSAQIP database to evaluate each procedure against the RYGB  Matched groups: SADI vs RYGB and OAGB vs RYGB  Matched against age, sex, BMI, operative time, and ASA classification 30-day outcomes included complications and health care utilization Results were analyzed with univariate comparative analysis, and significant outcomes were examined with logistic regression SADI vs RYGB: SADI independently associated INCREASED odds with staple line leak, sepsis, organ space infection, and pneumonia.  OAGB vs RYGB: OAGB independently associated with REDUCED odds of SSI, transfusion requirement/GI bleed, ICU admission, bowel obstruction, and healthcare utilization (reoperation, readmissions, and reinterventions) No significant differences in mortality Limitation: Article generally reviews technical complications of procedures. Unable to address significant bariatric outcomes such as weight loss and metabolic profile, as well as long term outcomes.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38170422/ Article #2: Maud 2019 - Efficacy and safety of OAGB vs RYGB for obesity (YOMEGA trial): A multicentre, randomized, open label, non-inferiority trial Limited long-term evidence on OAGB Mostly arising from retrospective analyses and one meta-analysis Two randomized clinical trials but with poor power and questionable methodology.  This is a randomized non-inferiority trial of in patients undergoing bariatric surgery   Randomized into 2 groups: OAGB vs RYGB with 117 patients per group Patients were followed for 2 years with a loss to follow up of 21% in OAGB and 24% in RYGB cohorts The primary outcome was weight loss with a noninferiority threshold of 7% assuming 60% weight loss at 2 years. Secondary outcomes included complications and metabolic outcomes Groups were compared with Student’s T and Wilcoxon tests for quantitative data, and chi-squared and Fischer’s exact for qualitative endpoints.  Cohorts were analyzed with the intention to treat, and missing data on the primary endpoint was imputed with prediction-based modeling.  Highlighted Outcomes Mean percent excess BMI loss of 87.9% in OAGB group compared to 85.8% in RYGB group demonstrating non-inferiority in terms of weight loss Increased number of serious adverse events (SAE) in the OAGB group, but no difference in the proportion of patients with at least 1 SAE OAGB demonstrated 70% complete or partial remission of diabetes compared to 44% in RYGB but underpowered to demonstrate significant difference.  Equal rates of gastritis and esophagitis based on endoscopic biopsy results at 2 years. There were increased nutritional complications in the OAGB groups with 21% vs 0% in RYGB and high rates of diarrhea/anal fissures 14% vs 0%, respectively. This suggests a greater malabsorptive effect of OAGB.  There was equal satisfaction in quality of life between RYGB and OAGB on two validated surveys with >80% satisfaction rates. Limitations Data was imputed for the primary end point High rates of loss to follow up in both cohorts Use of “severe adverse events” instead of Clavien-Dindo classification Comparison of specific institutional/surgeon technique of OAGB vs RYGB https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30851879/ Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Join Drs. Jason Bingham (@BinghamMd) and Patrick Georgoff (@georgoff) for a thought-provoking discussion with titans of hernia surgery Drs. Todd Heniford (@THeniford) and Michael Rosen (@MikeRosenMD).  You don't want to miss this one!  This episode goes deep, touching on some of the most vexing questions in the world of abdominal wall reconstruction.   Highlights:  Hernia is chronic disease process.  Surgeons should act like it and patients need to understand this.   Follow-up data is hard to come by and therefore limited.  Studies must be interpreted with this in mind. Hernia surgery is sexy, which is both exciting and concerning. "Technology is not useful until it is boring."  New techniques and devices can hurt patients.   Complicated hernias should be sent to hernia centers.  Otherwise, general surgeons are more than capable of doing the repair. Link to paper: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2816986 Link to ACHQC: https://achqc.org/ Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Join the Behind the Knife Surgical Oncology Team as we discuss the presentation, work-up, and management of gastric cancer. Hosts: - Timothy Vreeland, MD, FACS (@vreelant) is an Assistant Professor of Surgery at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Surgical Oncologist at Brooke Army Medical Center - Connor Chick, MD (@connor_chick) is a Surgical Oncology fellow at Ohio State University. - Lexy (Alexandra) Adams, MD, MPH (@lexyadams16) is a PGY-6 General Surgery resident at Brooke Army Medical Center - Beth (Elizabeth) Carpenter, MD (@elizcarpenter16) is a PGY-5 General Surgery resident at Brooke Army Medical Center Learning Objectives: In this episode, we review the basics of gastric cancer, including presentation, work-up, staging, and treatment modalities as well as high yield topics including the Siewert classification system. We also briefly discuss trials establishing peri-operative chemotherapy regimens for gastric cancer and the controversy of D1 vs. D2 lymphadenectomy. Links to Papers Referenced in this Episode Perioperative Chemotherapy versus Surgery Alone for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer. NEJM 2006 Jul;355(1):11-20. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa055531 Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesphageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomized, phase2/3 trial Lancet 2019 May;393(10184):1948-1957. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30982686/ Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Join Drs. Peter Marcello, Jonathan Abelson, Tess Aulet and special guest Dr. Philip Fleshner as they discuss the management of small bowel strictures in Crohn’s disease.  Learning Objectives 1.    Discuss the role for J-pouch in a patient with inflammatory bowel disease 2.    Identify the key steps in creation of the J-pouch and technical considerations. 3.    Describe post operative complications and management in patients with a J-pouch Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PMFaQHah5A Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

How is each release of the TAR contributing to the final tension on the anterior and posterior fascia? Join Drs. Michael Rosen, Benjamin T. Miller, Sara Maskal, and Ryan C. Ellis as they discuss their group’s recent cohort study of tensiometry in 100 TARs.  Hosts:  - Michael Rosen, Cleveland Clinic - Benjamin T. Miller, Cleveland Clinic - Sara Maskal, Cleveland Clinic - Ryan C. Ellis, Cleveland Clinic, @ryanellismd Learning objectives:  - Review the steps of a TAR - Understand the changes in tension on the anterior and posterior fascia with each step of the TAR - Think about the application this data has to similar operations References:  Miller BT, Ellis RC, Petro CC, Krpata DM, Prabhu AS, Beffa LRA, Huang LC, Tu C, Rosen MJ. Quantitative Tension on the Abdominal Wall in Posterior Components Separation With Transversus Abdominis Release. JAMA Surg. 2023 Dec 1;158(12):1321-1326. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4847. PMID: 37792324; PMCID: PMC10551814. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37792324/ Miller BT, Ellis RC, Walsh RM, Joyce D, Simon R, Almassi N, Lee B, DeBernardo R, Steele S, Haywood S, Beffa L, Tu C, Rosen MJ. Physiologic tension of the abdominal wall. Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9347-9350. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10346-w. Epub 2023 Aug 28. PMID: 37640951. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37640951/ Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. "Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990 Sep;86(3):519-26. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199009000-00023. PMID: 2143588. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2143588/ Hope WW, Williams ZF, Rawles JW 3rd, Hooks WB 3rd, Clancy TV, Eckhauser FE. Rationale and Technique for Measuring Abdominal Wall Tension in Hernia Repair. Am Surg. 2018 Sep 1;84(9):1446-1449. PMID: 30268173. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30268173/ Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Welcome to Humanism in Surgery, a new series where we take a deep dive into the extremes of humanity within the field of surgery. As surgeons, there are times when we feel deeply human and times when we feel we have lost our humanity. These experiences impact us immensely and shape our careers in important ways. It's time these stories are told! For those of you who are fans of NPR, think of this as Story Core for surgery.  Today, Dr. Patrick Georgoff is joined by Dr. Tamara Fitzgerald, Associate Professor of Pediatric Surgery at Duke University, and Dr. Ted Pappas, Professor of Surgery and Master Surgeon at Duke University.  Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

A patient with a large TBSA burn injury presents to a local emergency department and you are the only surgeon on duty that evening. With snow covered roads and poor visibility, the patient requires initial stabilization prior to transfer to the regional burn center. You are faced with some difficult clinical decisions as you begin their resuscitation. Join Drs. Tam Pham, Rob Cartotto, Julie Rizzo, Alex Morzycki and Jamie Oh as they discuss the clinical challenges in initiating burn resuscitation, pitfalls in long-distance transport, and more.  Hosts: ·       Dr. Tam Pham: UW Medicine Regional Burn Center ·       Dr. Robert Cartotto: University of Toronto, Ross Tilley Burn Centre  ·       Dr. Julie Rizzo: Brooke Army Medical Center  ·       Dr. Alex Morzycki: UW Medicine Regional Burn Center ·       Dr. Jamie Oh: UW Medicine Regional Burn Center Learning Objectives: ·       Describe initial fluid strategies, including the recommendations of the Advanced Burn Life Support (ABLS) course, traditional resuscitation formulas, and the Rule of 10.   ·       Describe logistical and medical challenges of long-distance transport to a regional burn center. ·       Understand recent advances learned from recent conflicts in military burn casualty care.  ·       List options for intravenous access.  ·       Understand endpoints of resuscitation, including adjuncts which may help guide fluid titration.  1.     Cartotto R, Johnson LS, Savetamal A, et al. American Burn Association Clinical Practice Guidelines on Burn Shock Resuscitation. J Burn Care Res 2023 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38051821/ 2.     Renz EM, Cancio LC, Barillo DJ, et al. Long-Range Transport of War-Related Burn Casualties. J Trauma 2008 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18376156/ 3.     Adibfar A, Camacho F, Rogers AD, Cartotto R. The Use of Vasopressors During Acute Burn Resuscitation. Burns 2021 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33293152/ 4.     Chung KK, Wolf SE, Cancio LC, et al. Resuscitaiton of Severely Burned Military Casualties: Fluid Begets More Fluid. J Trauma 2009 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19667873/ 5.     Chung KK, Salinas J, Renz EM, et al. Simple Derivation of the Initial Fluid Rate for the Resuscitation of Severely Burned Adult Combat Casualties: in Silico Validation of the Rule of 10, J Trauma 2009 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20622619/ Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG)-Burn Care, updated 2022 Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Your patient was in a terrible car crash and is currently intubated with multiple traumatic injuries that will need surgery. Family has just arrived and all they’ve heard is that he has a broken leg. How do you share this serious news with family? What do you do when they become angry, cry or bombard you with questions that you don’t have answers to? Join the surgical palliative care team from the University of Washington as we role play a difficult conversation with a standardized patient. We will identify common challenges that arise and discuss key skills to navigate these situations. Hosts:  Dr. Katie O’Connell (@katmo15) is an assistant professor of surgery at the University of Washington. She is a trauma surgeon, palliative care physician, director of surgical palliative care, and founder of the Advance Care Planning for Surgery clinic at Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA. Dr. Ali Haruta is a PGY7 current palliative care fellow at the University of Washington, formerly a UW general surgery resident and Parkland trauma/critical care fellow.  Dr. Lindsay Dickerson (@lindsdickerson1) is a PGY5 general surgery resident and current surgical oncology research fellow at the University of Washington. Dr. Virginia Wang is a PGY2 general surgery resident at the University of Washington. Learning Objectives: ·      Identify common pitfalls encountered during difficult conversations ·      Learn how to synthesize complex medical information and construct a succinct headline statement to deliver a digestible take-home message ·      Develop skills to respond to emotional cues using empathetic statements References: ·      “Responding to Emotion.” Vitaltalk. Accessed March 4, 2024. https://www.vitaltalk.org/guides/responding-to-emotion-respecting/ ·      “Serious News.” Vitaltalk. Accessed March 4, 2024. https://www.vitaltalk.org/guides/serious-news/ Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Circulating tumor DNA, more commonly referred to as ctDNA, has emerged as an attractive and potentially highly sensitive biomarker for patients with colorectal cancer. But what exactly is ctDNA, does it have any prognostic value for patients with colorectal liver metastasis, and how can it be incorporated into the management of said patients? In this episode from the HPB team at Behind the Knife, listen in on the discussion about ctDNA and its role in the perioperative management of colorectal liver metastasis.   Hosts Anish J. Jain MD (@anishjayjain) is a T32 Research Fellow at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center within the Department of Surgical Oncology. Timothy E. Newhook MD, FACS (@timnewhook19) is an Assistant Professor within the Department of Surgical Oncology. He is also the associate program director of the HPB fellowship at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.  Jean-Nicolas Vauthey MD, FACS (@VautheyMD) is Professor of Surgery and Chief of the HPB Section, as well as the Dallas/Fort Worth Living Legend Chair of Cancer Research in the Department of Surgical Oncology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Learning Objectives: -Develop an understanding of what circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is.  -Develop an understanding of what makes ctDNA unique from other “tumor markers” like CEA. -Develop an understanding of the prognostic value of ctDNA for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).  -Develop an understanding of the current role of ctDNA in the perioperative treatment of patients with CRLM. -Develop an understanding of how ctDNA can be incorporated into future treatment algorithms for patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM. Papers Referenced (in the order they were mentioned in the episode): 1)    Newhook TE, Overman MJ, Chun YS, et al. Prospective Study of Perioperative Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamics in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg. 2023;277(5):813-820. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35797554/ 2)    Nishioka Y, Chun YS, Overman MJ, et al. Effect of Co-mutation of RAS and TP53 on Postoperative ctDNA Detection and Early Recurrence after Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Am Coll Surg. 2022;234(4):474-483. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35290266/ Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Taking a lactating patient the OR? Prescribing antibiotics? What about a CT scan with IV contrast? Pump and dump, right? WRONG. It's time to get educated! Today, we review the finer points of caring for our lactating patients.  In this episode Dr. Patrick Georgoff is joined by Dr. Austin Eckhoff, general surgery resident at Duke University, Dr. Annie Dotson, family medicine and breastfeeding medicine physician at Duke University, and Dr. Katrina Mitchell, breast surgeon at Ridley Tree Cancer Center in Santa Barbara, CA.  Resources:  https://www.bfmed.org/ https://www.e-lactancia.org/ https://physicianguidetobreastfeeding.org/ - -  TRASH THE PUMP & DUMP: https://physicianguidetobreastfeeding.org/trash-the-pump-and-dump/trash-pump-dump/ Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination will officially be switching from reporting percentile scores by year level to percent of questions correct. What does this change mean for residents? Podcast hosts Dr. Ananya Anand, Dr. Joe L’Huillier, and Dr. Rebecca Moreci are joined by three fellow CoSEF members for this discussion: Dr. Gus Godley, Dr. Colleen McDermott, and Dr. Josh Roshal.  Hosts: –Dr. Ananya Anand, Stanford University, @AnanyaAnandMD, [email protected] –Dr. Joseph L’Huillier, University at Buffalo, @JoeLHuillier101, [email protected] –Dr. Rebecca Moreci, Louisiana State University, @md_moreci, [email protected] –COSEF: @surgedfellows Special guests:  -Dr. Gus Godley, University of Chicago, [email protected], @GusGodley -Dr. Colleen McDermott, University of Utah, [email protected] -Dr. Josh Roshal, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, [email protected], @Joshua_Roshal Learning Objectives:  Listeners will:  – Understand the changes to the ABSITE score reporting by the American Board of Surgery  – Describe both positive impacts and limitations of this change from the resident perspective – List possible ideas for further refinements to standardized exams in medicine   References:  -Yeo HL, Dolan PT, Mao J, Sosa JA. Association of Demographic and Program Factors With American Board of Surgery Qualifying and Certifying Examinations Pass Rates. JAMA Surg. Jan 1 2020;155(1):22-30. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4081 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31617872/ -Sathe TS, Wang JJ, Yap A, Zhao NW, O’Sullivan P, Alseidi A. Proposed Reforms to the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE). https://www.ideasurg.pub/proposed-absite-reforms/ -Miller AT, Swain GW, Midmar M, Divino CM. How Important Are American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Scores When Applying for Fellowships? J Surg Educ. 2010;67(3):149-151. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.02.007  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20630424/ -Savoie KB, Kulaylat AN, Huntington JT, Kelley-Quon L, Gonzalez DO, Richards H, Besner G, Nwomeh BC, Fisher JG. The pediatric surgery match by the numbers: Defining the successful application. J Pediatr Surg. 2020;55(6):1053-1057. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.02.052 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32197826/ -Alnahhal KI, Lyden SP, Caputo FJ, Sorour AA, Rowe VL, Colglazier JJ, Smith BK, Shames ML, Kirksey L. The USMLE® STEP 1 Pass or Fail Era of the Vascular Surgery Residency Application Process: Implications for Structural Bias and Recommendations. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2023;94:195-204. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2023.04.018  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37120072/ -Williams M, Kim EJ, Pappas K, Uwemedimo O, Marrast L, Pekmezaris R, Martinez J. The impact of United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) step 1 cutoff scores on recruitment of underrepresented minorities in medicine: A retrospective cross‐sectional study. Health Sci Rep. 2020;3(2):e2161. doi:10.1002/hsr2.161 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32318628/ -Lucey CR, Saguil A. The Consequences of Structural Racism on MCAT Scores and Medical School Admissions: The Past Is Prologue. Academic Medicine. 2020;95(3):351. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002939 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31425184/ -Natanson H, Svrluga S. The SAT is coming back at some colleges. It’s stressing everyone out. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2024/03/18/sat-test-policies-confuse-students/. Published March 19, 2024. Accessed April 5, 2024. -de Virgilio C, Yaghoubian A, Kaji A, Collins JC, Deveney K, Dolich M, Easter D, Hines OJ, Katz S, Liu T, Mahmoud A, Melcher ML, Parks S, Reeves M, Salim A, Scherer L, Takanishi D, Waxman K.. Predicting Performance on the American Board of Surgery Qualifying and Certifying Examinations: A Multi-institutional Study. Archives of Surgery. 2010;145(9):852-856. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.177 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20855755/ -Weighted test content from the ABS:  https://www.absurgery.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/GS-ITE.pdf -USMLE program announces upcoming policy changes | USMLE. Accessed April 9, 2024. https://www.usmle.org/usmle-program-announces-upcoming-policy-changes   Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

The ABSITE score report is changing… what does it mean? CEO of the American Board of Surgery Dr. Jo Buyske discusses ABSITE and MUCH more.   Hosts: Dr. Scott Steele, Dr. Nina Clark, Dr. Jessica Millar Guest: Dr. Jo Buyske, President/CEO of the American Board of Surgery Resources:  Announcement - ABSITE Percentiles:  https://www.absurgery.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ABSITE-Percentiles.pdf  ABSITE Data Tools: https://sandbox.absurgery.org/default.jsp?publicdata   Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

In this episode our team dives into the diagnosis, workup and management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Listen as we debate the pros and cons of surgical management of this disease with extrapleural pneumonectomy versus pleural decortication and discuss the nuances of choosing the right approach for the right patient. Learning Objectives - Describe the workup and staging of a patient with malignant pleural mesothelioma - List the subtypes of malignant pleural mesothelioma, characteristics of resectable disease, and patient factors which impact surgical candidacy  - Describe the approach to an extrapleural pneumonectomy and pleural decortication - Analyze which surgical approach is best for various subsets of patients - Describe the adjuvant treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma Hosts Kelly Daus MD, Adam Bograd MD, Peter White MD, Brian Louie MD Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.  If you liked this episode, check out more recent episodes: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Can appendicitis wait until the morning? Join Drs. Ashlie Nadler, Jordan Nantais, Graham Skelhorne-Gross, and Marika Sevigny from our Emergency General Surgery Team as they discuss the role of deferring appendectomies from overnight to the next morning. Paper 1: Patel SV, Zhang L, Mir ZM, Lemke M, Leeper WR, Allen LJ, Walser E, Vogt K. Delayed Versus Early Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Adult Patients With Acute Appendicitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2024 Jan 1;279(1):88-93. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37436871/ -Non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing delayed appendectomy group with surgery taking place after 0600 the morning following a decision to operate versus the immediate appendectomy group with surgery taking place between 8pm and 4am and within 6 hours of a decision to operate -A priori non-inferiority margin of 15% for 30-day complications -Intention-to-treat analysis with risk difference -12% in favor of the delayed group (p < 0.001) -Superiority as on per protocol analysis -Underpowered at 91% due to early closure of study due to loss of reliable day time emergency triage operating time Paper 2: Jalava K, Sallinen V, Lampela H, Malmi H, Steinholt I, Augestad KM, Leppäniemi A, Mentula P. Role of preoperative in-hospital delay on appendiceal perforation while awaiting appendicectomy (PERFECT): a Nordic, pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2023 Oct 28;402(10412):1552-1561. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37717589/ -Non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing appendectomy within 8 hours versus 24 hours -No difference in rate of perforation on intention-to-treat or per protocol analyses Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.  If you liked this episode, check out more recent episodes: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Before 1952, open heart surgery was considered science fiction. The heart was off limits to surgeons despite more than half a million Americans dying annually from heart disease. Doing nothing was the strategy. However, the status quo would soon change thanks to a few brave and imaginative surgeons who dared to break the most rigid of medical taboos: Do not touch the human heart. We sat down with Dr. Gerald Imber, author of the new book “Cardiac Cowboys: The Heroic Invention of Heart Surgery” to discuss how five men raced to invent an entirely new field of surgery.  Guests: Jessica Millar, MD- General Surgery Resident- University of Michigan; Education Fellow- Behind the Knife Nick Teman, MD- Associate Professor of Cardiac Surgery and Critical Care- University of Virginia  Gerald Imber- Assistant Clinical Professor of Plastic surgery at the Weill-Cornell Medical Center, Attending Surgeon at New York-Presbyterian Hospital, and Director of a private clinic in New York City, NY; Author of “Wendell Black, MD”, “Genius on the Edge: The Bizarre Double Life of Dr. William Stewart Halsted”, and “Cardiac Cowboys: The Heroic Invention of Heart Surgery”.  Want to hear more from Dr. Imber- be sure to check out his podcast series, Cardiac Cowboys, based on Dr. Imber’s book. You can listen to an introduction of the Cardiac Cowboys series here: https://shorturl.at/rKLM8 Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out more recent episodes: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Join Drs. Galandiuk, Bolshinsky, Kavalukas, and Simon as they discuss Management of Advanced and Malignant Polyps.  Come with us as we navigate through sessile serrated lesions, pathology reports, and rectal polyp nuances.  Hosts:  - Susan Galandiuk, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, @DCREdInChief - Vladimir Bolshinsky, Peninsula Health, Victoria, Australia, @bolshinskyv - Sandy Kavalukas, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, @sandykava - Hillary Simon, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, @HillaryLSimon Producer:  - Manasa Sunkara MS3, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, @manasasunkara12 Learning objectives:  - Review colorectal cancer screening for the average risk patient. - Understand what a malignant polyp is defined as and management strategies.  - Discuss the pathology review and re-review processes.  References:  - Church J, et al. Keeping the Cecum Clean: A Randomized, Prospective, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Loperamide as Part of Preparation for Colonoscopy. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 56(1):p 120-125, January 2013. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23222289/ - Fan C, et al. Management of Serrated Polyps of the Colon. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 16(1):182-202, March 2018. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29445907/ - Gupta S, et al. Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 115(3): 415-434, March 2020. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32039982/ - Hyman N, Waye JD. Endoscopic four quadrant tattoo for the identification of colonic lesions at surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 37:56–58, 1991. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1706283/ - Kaltenbach T, et al. Endoscopic Removal of Colorectal Lesions—Recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 91(3): 486-519, March 2020. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32067745/ - Keswani R, et al. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Strategies to Improve Quality of Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: Expert Review. Gastroenterology, 161(2): 701 – 711, Aug 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34334168/ - Shaukat A, et al. Endoscopic Recognition and Management Strategies for Malignant Colorectal Polyps: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology, 159(5): 1916 - 1934.e2, Nov 2020. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33159840/ Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent epispdes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Join for the third episodes in the Association of Out Surgeons & Allies (AOSA) series for a discussion on LGBTQIA+ healthcare providers and their patients.   Host:  Nina Clark, MD  Guests:  - Andrew Schlussel, DO, Colorectal and General Surgeon, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center - Dr. James Taylor, Assistant Professor of Colorectal Surgery at Montefiore Medical Center - Dr. Alex Bonte, General Surgery PGY4 at Hackensack University Medical Center in Hackensack NJ.  - Dr. Paige Tannhauser, General Surgery PGY3 (completed) at Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh PA, and currently finishing up a post-doctoral research fellowship at the University of Virginia. Learn more and get involved with AOSA: https://www.outsurgeons.org Twitter/X: @OutSurgeons Resources Mentioned This Episode:  "Gender Unicorn" schema for terminology: https://transstudent.org/gender/ LGBTQ Healthcare Directory: https://lgbtqhealthcaredirectory.org/ CDC Recommendations in LGBTQ Health: https://www.cdc.gov/lgbthealth/index.htm WPATH Resources: https://www.wpath.org/  Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.  If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://behindtheknife.org/listen/

Listen to another episode by the Hernia Team from Carolinas Medical Center as they discuss their approach to open preperitoneal ventral hernia repair. Although uncommonly performed, a preperitoneal approach offers several advantages including the ability to achieve large mesh overlap without the need for myofascial release. The team discusses their tips and tricks for utilizing the preperitoneal space in even the most challenging hernia cases.  Hosts: - Dr. Sullivan “Sully” Ayuso, Chief Resident, Carolinas Medical Center, @SAyusoMD (Twitter) - Dr. Todd Heniford, Chief of GI & MIS, Carolinas Medical Center, @THeniford (Twitter) - Dr. Vedra Augenstein, Professor of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, @VedraAugenstein (Twitter) - Dr. Monica Polcz, Attending Surgeon, Baptist Health (Miami, FL)  Learning Objectives: - Review standard methods of herniorraphy in open abdominal wall reconstruction - Introduce the concept of open preperitoneal ventral hernia repair - Discuss the advantages as well as the standard tips and tricks for performing an open preperitoneal repair - Review outcomes for preperitoneal hernia repair over time Podcast Video Clip:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pMvB0rnokQ References: - Novitsky et al, Open Preperitoneal Retrofascial Mesh Repair for Multiply Recurrent Ventral Incisional Hernias, JACS, 2006 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36280505/  - Heniford et al, Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair: A Decade Long Prospective Observational Study with Analysis of 1023 Patient Outcomes, Annals of Surgery, 2020 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30080725/  - Katzen et al, Open Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair: Prospective Observational Outcomes of Quality Improvement Outcomes Over 18 Years and 1,842 Patients, Surgery, 2023  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36280505/ Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out other recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Eat when you can, sleep when you can, and don’t F with the pancreas!  What happens when that third rule goes wrong, and why do people say pancreas injuries are like eating crawfish?  Whether you love the pancreas or just the mention of the P-word strikes fear in your heart, or if you just want the answer to the aforementioned questions, join Drs. Cobler-Lichter, Kwon, and Meizoso, as they guide you through all this and more!  Hosts: - Michael Cobler-Lichter, MD, PGY3, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital/Ryder Trauma Center, @mdcobler (twitter) - Eugenia Kwon, MD, Trauma/Surgical Critical Care Fellow, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital/Ryder Trauma Center -Jonathan Meizoso, MD, MSPH Assistant Professor of Surgery, 4 years in practice, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital/Ryder Trauma Center, @jpmeizoso (twitter) Learning Objectives: - Describe the AAST grading system for pancreatic injuries - Come up with a treatment plan for each grade of pancreatic injury - Identify commonly associated injuries with pancreatic trauma -  List potential complications of pancreatic trauma and/or surgery Quick Hits: 1. Pancreas injuries do not all require a trip to the operating room. Low grade injuries should be managed with a trial of nonoperative management if there are no other operative indications 2. CT is the best initial imaging modality, although it has low sensitivity. If there is high concern for a pancreas injury based on mechanism or associated injuries, further investigation is required. 3. Pancreas injuries are like crawfish: suck the head and eat the tail. 4. Injuries to the left of the SMV can generally be treated with distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy, whereas injuries to the right of the SMV are usually drained. 5. Its important to identify and address any concomitant injuries, with duodenal injuries being the most common in higher grade injuries. 6. In the case of the dreaded grade 5 injury, the safe answer is to come back and do your reconstruction at a later time. References 1.     https://www.westerntrauma.org/western-trauma-association-algorithms/management-of-pancreatic-injuries/ 2.     Bassi, Claudio et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery, Volume 161, Issue 3, 584 – 591 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28040257/ Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Join us for another episode of our Global Surgery series, where we have a special focus on trauma care in resource-limited settings.  Traumatic injury remains one of the largest burdens of disease and causes of mortality internationally. The WHO estimates that 4.4 million lives are lost to traumatic injuries per year, accounting for approximately 8% of all deaths. Notably, traumatic injuries are the top killer of children, adolescents, and young adults, compounding the patient-years lost. Trauma is ubiquitous–accidents and injuries happen all over the globe, and thus differences in trauma incidence and mortality is often a function of health systems and infrastructure.  Jon Williams is joined by Dr. Anthony Charles. Dr. Charles is a trauma surgeon at University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Additionally, he holds professorships in the medical school and school of public health at UNC, as well as serving as the director of the adult ECMO program and the director of global surgery at the UNC Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases. He leads the Malawian Surgical Initiative, designed to train and support local surgeons in the country of Malawi where he has established a longstanding partnership with UNC. Having been raised in Nigeria, Dr. Charles completed medical school at the University of Lagos, and subsequently underwent  general surgery residency training in London at North Middlesex University Hospital and subsequently at Charles Drew University in Los Angeles. Upon completion of trauma and critical care fellowship at University of Michigan, he took a faculty position at UNC where he has remained since and grown the global surgery presence to what it is today. Key Points: Often, the pivotal first step in developing global surgery trauma initiatives is increasing trained personnel, and so training initiatives are very meaningful and provide sustainability to the effort.  Growing a health system’s ability to provide trauma care helps develop improved care for all aspects of disease. The resources, training, and infrastructure required benefits healthcare at large.  Improvement of trauma care extends well beyond in-hospital care–injury prevention and pre-hospital care/triage/transport are even more impactful. It takes more than surgeons to improve trauma care globally. Thus, clinician and non-clinician training and oversight is critical, and foundational concepts of care of the trauma patient must be familiar to all.  Local governing bodies need to understand the importance of trauma care to invest in it. Traumatic injuries and mortality are a health burden, but even more so an economic burden to a country. This is what is compelling to investment in trauma care. We now have over 725 episodes!  The easiest way to find specific topics or episodes is on our website https://app.behindtheknife.org/home or on our new Apple/Android app.  You can search or browse by topic, podcast series, etc., making it much easier to navigate than podcast players. iOS: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/behind-the-knife/id1672420049 Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.btk.app PREMIUM BUNDLE: https://app.behindtheknife.org/bundle/95 Please email [email protected] to learn more about our premium bundle and institutional discounts. Premium Bundle Includes: General Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Trauma Surgery Video Atlas Colorectal Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Surgical Oncology Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Vascular Surgery Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Surgery Oral Board Audio Review

Join us for a new edition of our global surgery series! On this episode, Dr. Jon Williams is joined by Dr. Sudha Jayaraman and Dr. Justina Seyi-Olajide to discuss how we define global surgery today and how health infrastructure interacts with global surgical care.  Dr. Jayaraman is a trauma and acute care surgeon at University of Utah, and the director of the Center for Global Surgery. After attending UC Davis for medical school, Dr. Jayaraman completed general surgery residency at UCSF, during which time she obtained a masters in public health in developing countries from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. During this time, her efforts were dedicated to researching and implementing trauma systems development in Uganda. After residency she then completed a trauma and critical care fellowship at Brigham and Women’s, during which she received the Harvard Medical School Health Disparities Fellowship to continue her trauma systems work in Rwanda. Her ongoing work investigating injury burden and trauma systems in low and middle income countries has been well funded by the NIH, DOD, and others and published in numerous forums, as she is a well-renowned expert in this field.  Dr. Justina Seyi-Olajide is a pediatric surgeon at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital in Lagos, Nigeria. She completed her medical school training at the Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, Nigeria and subsequently her general surgical and pediatric surgical training at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, earning the Fellowship of West African College of Surgeons in Pediatric Surgery and the Alinta Nwako prize for best graduating pediatric surgical trainee. Dr. Seyi-Olajide’s vision is to provide equitable pediatric surgical care in resource-limited settings, and has been highly influential for developing initiatives such as the National Surgical, Obstetric, Anesthesia and Nursing Plan for Nigeria. Additionally, she is a member of the Global Initiative for Children’s Surgery and is well published for her original research on topics regarding access to pediatric surgical care in low and middle income countries.  Have any feedback for the global surgery content, or have any suggestions for future episodes? Please feel free to reach out to us at [email protected]. We now have over 725 episodes!  The easiest way to find specific topics or episodes is on our website https://app.behindtheknife.org/home or on our new Apple/Android app.  You can search or browse by topic, podcast series, etc., making it much easier to navigate than podcast players.  iOS: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/behind-the-knife/id1672420049 Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.btk.app PREMIUM BUNDLE: https://app.behindtheknife.org/bundle/95 Please email [email protected] to learn more about our premium bundle and institutional discounts. Premium Bundle Includes: General Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Trauma Surgery Video Atlas Colorectal Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Surgical Oncology Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Vascular Surgery Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Surgery Oral Board Audio Review

With the increasing popularity of artificial intelligence, its uses are quickly becoming not only a part of everyday life, but also training in surgery. Those of us without much understanding of the technology might be intimidated by this nebulous topic, or worry that we won’t be able to comprehend the advancements to come to the field. Luckily, we’re joined by a leading expert in the use of AI in surgery, Dr. Dan Hashimoto. He breaks down some examples of how AI is being used in surgical education, the role surgeons should play in these advancements, and some tips for how we can critically appraise work in the field of AI if we don’t understand the technology ourselves. Join hosts Nicole Brooks, MD, Judith French, PhD and Jeremy Lipman, MD, MHPE for this exciting conversation.  Learning Objectives 1.     Listeners will describe how AI is being applied to surgical education. 2.     Listeners will identify the roles surgeons without training in AI can play in developing the use of AI in surgery.  3.     Listeners will explain the regulatory and ethical considerations that must be addressed with the implementation of AI in surgical education.  4.     Listeners will consider principles for critically evaluating research or technology in AI for application or use in their own educational or surgical practice. References Laplante S, Namazi B, Kiani P, Hashimoto DA, Alseidi A, Pasten M, Brunt LM, Gill S, Davis B, Bloom M, Pernar L, Okrainec A, Madani A. Validation of an artificial intelligence platform for the guidance of safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2260-2268. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09439-9. Epub 2022 Aug 2. PMID: 35918549. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35918549/ Hashimoto DA, Varas J, Schwartz TA. Practical Guide to Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Education Research. JAMA Surg. 2024 Jan 3. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6687. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38170510. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38170510/ We now have over 725 episodes!  The easiest way to find specific topics or episodes is on our website https://app.behindtheknife.org/home or on our new Apple/Android app.  You can search or browse by topic, podcast series, etc., making it much easier to navigate than podcast players.  iOS: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/behind-the-knife/id1672420049 Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.btk.app PREMIUM BUNDLE: https://app.behindtheknife.org/bundle/95 Please email [email protected] to learn more about our premium bundle and institutional discounts. Premium Bundle Includes: General Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Trauma Surgery Video Atlas Colorectal Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Surgical Oncology Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Vascular Surgery Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Surgery Oral Board Audio Review

The Fellowship of the Snow kept it interesting this year…both on and off the slopes!  On this episode, Patrick Georgoff discusses the Western Trauma Association’s updated resuscitative thoracotomy algorithm with Ron Tesoriero, the results of a WTA multicenter trial exploring chest tube irrigation for the prevention of retained hemothorax with Thomas Carver, and prehospital blood administration with Juan Duchesne.   ** Algorithms and papers are pending final review and are therefore not available to link to this episode.   Ron Tesoriero, MD: Associate Professor of Surgery, Director of the Acute Care Surgery Fellowship, and Co-Director of the SICU at UCSF. Thomas Carver, MD: Associate Professor of Surgery, Director of the Acute Care Surgery Fellowship, and Senior Medical Director of Critical Care Services at the Medical College of Wisconsin.   Juan Duchesne, MD: Professor of Surgery and Chief of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery at Tulane university.    Resuscitative Thoracotomy: The Who (Episode 475): https://app.behindtheknife.org/podcast/big-t-trauma-series-ep-14-ed-thoracotomy-the-who  Resuscitative Thoracotomy: The How (Episode 476): https://app.behindtheknife.org/podcast/big-t-trauma-series-ep-15-ed-thoracotomy-the-how Innovation Lifeflow (Episode 642): https://app.behindtheknife.org/podcast/innovations-in-surgery-lifeflow We now have over 725 episodes!  The easiest way to find specific topics or episodes is on our website https://app.behindtheknife.org/home or on our new Apple/Android app.  You can search or browse by topic, podcast series, etc., making it much easier to navigate than podcast players.   iOS: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/behind-the-knife/id1672420049 Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.btk.app PREMIUM BUNDLE: https://app.behindtheknife.org/bundle/95 Please email [email protected] to learn more about our premium bundle and institutional discounts.  Premium Bundle Includes: General Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Trauma Surgery Video Atlas Colorectal Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Surgical Oncology Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Vascular Surgery Surgery Oral Board Audio Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Surgery Oral Board Audio Review

In this episode of Behind the Knife the vascular surgery subspecialty team discusses a few case scenarios of patients with dialysis associated hand ischemia (or steal syndrome). Although a rare, steal syndrome can be detrimental to patients with end stage renal disease and result in not only risk of losing dialysis access but even their limb.  What options do you have to fix this problem? In this episode, we will cover the who is at risk of this, and what options you have to fix it. Hosts:  Dr. Bobby Beaulieu is an Assistant Professor of Vascular Surgery at the University of Michigan and the Program Director of the Integrated Vascular Surgery Residency Program as well as the Vascular Surgery Fellowship Program at the University of Michigan. Dr. David Schectman is a Vascular Surgery Fellow at the University of Michigan Dr. Drew Braet is a PGY-4 Integrated Vascular Surgery Resident at the University of Michigan Learning Objectives - Review high-yield topics regarding hemodialysis access - Understand the incidence of and the relevant risk factors for dialysis associated steal syndrome - Review the spectrum of presenting symptoms and relevant workup for dialysis associated steal syndrome - Understand surgical treatment options for dialysis associated steal syndrome References Please review the journal article below for helpful pictures and depictions of the operations we describe in this episode. - Al Shakarchi J, et al. Surgical techniques for haemodialysis access-induced distal ischaemia. J Vasc Access. 2016 Jan-Feb;17(1):40-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26349875/ Other helpful references - Kordzadeh A, Parsa AD. A Systematic review of distal revascularization and interval ligation for the treatment of vascular access-induced ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2019; 70:1364. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31153703/ - Huber TS, Larive B, Imprey PB, et al. Access-related hand ischemia and the Hemodialysis Fistula Maturation Study. J Vasc Surg 2016;64:1050. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27478007/ - Sidawy An, Spergel LM, Besarab A, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery: clinical practice guidelines for the surgical placement and maintenance of arteriovenous hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48:2S. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19000589/ ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Join BTK eduction fellows, Drs. Nina Clark and Jon Williams along with guests Drs. Sharmila Dissanaike and Paula Ferrada for a discussion on whether it’s time for a paradigm shift toward a circulation-first approach to trauma resuscitation. Hosts: Nina Clark, MD and Jon Williams, MD Guests: Sharmila Dissanaike, MD - Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX Paula Ferrada, MD - Inova, Fairfax, VA References: Ferrada P, Dissanaike S. Circulation First for the Rapidly Bleeding Trauma Patient-It Is Time to Reconsider the ABCs ofTrauma Care. JAMA Surg. 2023 Aug 1;158(8):884-885. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.8436. PMID: 37195675. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37195675/ Ferrada P, Ferrada R, Jacobs L, Duchesne J, Ghio M, Joseph B, Taghavi S, Qasim ZA, Zakrison T, Brenner M,Dissanaike S, Feliciano D. Prioritizing Circulation to Improve Outcomes for Patients with Exsanguinating Injury: ALiterature Review and Techniques to Help Clinicians Achieve Bleeding Control. J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Jan 1;238(1):129-136. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000889. Epub 2023 Nov 28. PMID: 38014850; PMCID: PMC10718219. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38014850/ ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Please visit https://app.behindtheknife.org/home to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more. If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Join the Behind the Knife Surgical Oncology Team as we discuss “One versus Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Randomized Trial,” the randomized trial guiding duration of imatinib treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Hosts: - Timothy Vreeland, MD, FACS (@vreelant) is an Assistant Professor of Surgery at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Surgical Oncologist at Brooke Army Medical Center. - Daniel Nelson, DO, FACS (@usarmydoc24) is Surgical Oncologist and current HPB fellow at MD Anderson. - Connor Chick, MD (@connor_chick) is a Surgical Oncology fellow at Ohio State University. - Lexy (Alexandra) Adams, MD, MPH (@lexyadams16) is a PGY-6 General Surgery resident at Brooke Army Medical Center. - Beth (Elizabeth) Carpenter, MD (@elizcarpenter16) is a PGY-5 General Surgery resident at Brooke Army Medical Center. Learning Objectives: In this episode, we discuss the article “One versus Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Randomized Trial” published in JAMA in 2012. This study demonstrated that 3 years of imatinib led to improved recurrence-free and overall survival compared to 1 year.   Links to Paper Referenced in this Episode https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1105116  ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Please visit https://app.behindtheknife.org/home to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more. If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Though relatively rare, lateral abdominal wall hernias present a unique challenge to surgeons. Join Drs. Ajita Prabhu, Lucas Beffa, Sara Maskal and Ryan Ellis as they talk through their approach to these difficult cases.   Hosts:   · Ajita Prabhu, MD, Cleveland Clinic, @aprabhumd1  · Lucas Beffa, MD, Cleveland Clinic, @BeffaLukeMD  · Ryan Ellis, MD, Cleveland Clinic, @EllisMD2020  · Sara Maskal, MD, Cleveland Clinic  Learning Objectives:   · Review anatomy of lateral abdominal wall hernias  · Review pitfalls of operating in the retroperitoneum  · Review surgical approaches to repair defects based on algorithmic assessment   References:  · Montelione KC, Petro CC, Krpata DM, Lau B, Shukla P, Olson MA, Tamer R, Rosenblatt S, Rosen MJ, Prabhu AS. Open Retromuscular Lateral Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair: Algorithmic Approach and Long-Term Outcomes at a Single Center. J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Jan 1;236(1):220-234. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000419. Epub 2022 Dec 15. PMID: 36106747.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36106747/ · Beffa LR, Margiotta AL, Carbonell AM. Flank and Lumbar Hernia Repair. Surg Clin North Am. 2018 Jun;98(3):593-605. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Mar 12. PMID: 29754624.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29754624/ ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Please visit https://app.behindtheknife.org/home to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more. If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Do the words “Is there a doctor on board” fill you with anxiety? For Dr. Thomas Doyle, responding to in flight medical events is just another day at the office. As the medical director for STAT-MD, him and his team provide on the ground consultation for passengers experiencing medical events at 35,000 feet. In this episode we talk about what events are most common, what equipment is on board, what are the rules/regulations around providing medical assistance, and what ground consultation services like STAT-MD can help offer to you so you’re never alone if you hear that phrase “Is there a doctor on board?” Guests: Thomas J. Doyle, MD, MPH- Clinical Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Medical Director, STAT-MD Jessica Millar, MD- General Surgery Resident- University of Michigan; Education Fellow- Behind the Knife Major John McClellan, MD- Acute Care and Trauma Surgeon- University of North Carolina Chapel Hill  Want to learn more from Dr. Doyle about in-flight medical events- you can check out one of his previous lectures here: https://www.upmcphysicianresources.com/cme-courses/emergencies-at-35000-feet-is-there-a-medical-provider-on-board **Introducing Behind the Knife's Trauma Surgery Video Atlas - https://app.behindtheknife.org/premium/trauma-surgery-video-atlas/show-content The Trauma Surgery Video Atlas contains 24 scenarios that include never-before-seen high-definition operative footage, rich, original illustrations, and practical, easy-to-read pearls that will help you dominate the most difficult trauma scenarios. ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.  If you liked this episode, check out more recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

You have a patient referred to you for a history of anal dysplasia and found to have an anal lesion on colonoscopy. How do you evaluate this? What are the risk factors? How will you perform surveillance afterwards? Does everyone need HRA? Tune in to find out! Join Drs. Peter Marcello, Jonathan Abelson, Tess Aulet and special guest Dr. Lisa Breen as they discuss high yield papers discussing Anal Dysplasia.  Learning Objectives 1. Describe the different types of anal dysplasia and pathologic categorization 2. Describe high risk populations for development of anal squamous cell cancer 3. Discuss the different options and recommendations for surveillance and treatment of anal dysplasia Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdOjV1Gcqvk **Introducing Behind the Knife's Trauma Surgery Video Atlas - https://app.behindtheknife.org/premium/trauma-surgery-video-atlas/show-content The Trauma Surgery Video Atlas contains 24 scenarios that include never-before-seen high-definition operative footage, rich, original illustrations, and practical, easy-to-read pearls that will help you dominate the most difficult trauma scenarios. ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.  If you liked this episode, check out more recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

You get called to see a consult in the middle of the night. It is a middle-aged woman with a bariatric history, and she says her stomach is smaller but doesn’t know the name of the operation. She developed worsening abdominal pain after dinner and it’s been getting worse. She’s not peritonitic, but she’s clearly in discomfort. Is it cholecystitis, diverticulitis, pancreatitis, marginal ulcer, or an internal hernia? What do you do? Join Drs. Matthew Martin, Adrian Dan, and Paul Wisniowski on a discussion about initial evaluation and management of bariatric patients with internal hernias.  Show Hosts: Matthew Martin Adrian Dan Paul Wisniowski Video companion: https://app.behindtheknife.org/video/clinical-challenges-in-bariatric-surgery-internal-hernia Show Notes 1.     Initial Evaluation a.     Focused history and physical, labs, and imaging                                       i.     Presenting symptoms may vary and include: nausea, emesis, and abdominal pain ranging from vague to severe.                                        ii.     A basic lab panel can aid in developing the diagnosis and guide resuscitation.                                     iii.     CT of the abdomen and pelvis with IV and oral contrast can assist in identifying intra-abdominal pathology                                     iv.     Reviewing the previous operative report is beneficial to have a framework of the anatomy, i.e. type of bariatric surgery, and configuration of small bowel limbs (ante- vs retro-gastric and ante- vs retro-colic). 1.     According to a 2019 study, 40-60% of closed defects had reopened at time of re-exploration                                       v.     If the patient is peritonitic with abdominal pain, they should be treated similarly to any patient with an acute abdomen with emergent exploration. b.     CT Imaging                                        i.     A mesenteric swirl sign with twisting of the soft tissue and mesenteric vessels with surrounding fat attenuation has been shown to have a sensitivity of 78-100% and specificity of 80-90%. Other findings include: a Bird’s beak, dilation of roux or biliopancreatic limbs, SMV narrowing, and displacement of JJ limb to the RUQ and can be used to support the diagnosis of internal hernia                                      ii.     An experienced radiologist familiar with bariatric anatomy has been shown to have a positive predictive value to 81% and negative predictive value to 96% at radiologically diagnosing internal hernia.                                      iii.     A CT scan can provide insight for a suspected diagnosis but it cannot rule out internal hernia c.      Nasogastric/Esophageal Tube                                       i.     Use judiciously based on patient’s presenting symptoms                                      ii.     Placement should be done by the surgical team                                      iii.     This may mitigate the risk of aspiration during intubation. 2.     Operative Management a.     Entry should be dependent on the comfort of the operating surgeon.                                        i.     Veress entry into the abdomen with dilated bowels may lead to increased injuries.                                       ii.     Optiview allows for direct visualization of each layer of the abdominal wall. Focusing on twisting the trochar and limiting perpendicular pressure.                                      iii.     Hasson entry also allows for direct visualization but may be limiting in bariatric patients with thick abdominal walls b.     Exploration – a systematic approach                                       i.     Start with evaluation of the gastric pouch and run the roux limb to the jejunojejunostomy, and examine Petersen’s and mesojejunal defects.                                       ii.     Follow the biliopancreatic limb to the ligament of Treitz                                     iii.     Lastly, identify the terminal ileum at the sail of Treves and run backwards to the jejunojejunostomy                                     iv.     This will allow for examination of all possible defect and possible intussusception at the jejunostomy c.      Defect Management                                       i.     All defects should be closed, with studies demonstrating reduced rates of internal hernia when defects are closed with a running suture. There is no strong evidence to support the use of a specific suture material. 1.     The use of suture is superior to other methods of closure such as metallic clips, fibrin glue, mesh, or abrasive pads. 2.     A barbed suture can be considered. d.     In a patient with unfavorable anatomy or those unable to tolerate pneumoperitoneum surgeons should consider early conversion to open exploration  3.     Postoperative Care a.     Patients are started on ERAS protocol with limited narcotic use, same day mobilization, early oral nutrition with advancement, and no nasogastric tubes or foley catheters b.     Patients with bowel resection and those with suspected postoperative ileus may benefit from judicious advancement of diet. 4.     Pregnancy a.     Pregnant patients with history of anastomotic bariatric surgery are at increased risk of internal hernia especially in 3rd trimester due to loss of intra-abdominal space b.     Evaluation of a pregnant patient should include abdominal imaging.                                        i.     In a non-acute setting, an MRI abd/pelvis can be considered.                                       ii.     Patients with abdominal pain presenting to the Emergency Department should undergo CT imaging.                                     iii.     The risk of radiation to a fetus, especially beyond the 1st trimester, is limited. Based on the CDC guidelines, a human embryo and fetus are sensitive to ionizing radiation at doses greater than 0.1Gray. The amount of radiation from a typical CT range from 0.015 to 0.034Gray depending if it is multiphasic or not; well below the guideline level. c.      It is important to discuss with women of child bearing age the risk of internal hernia during pregnancy with anastomotic bariatric surgery 5.     Outpatient Presentation a.     Half of patients with internal hernia will present in outpatient setting often >6 months after initial operation with complaints of intermittent nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain b.     Workup includes: CT abd/pelvis with IV and oral contrast, Upper GI series, EGD, and a RUQ ultrasound based on their symptoms c.      If diagnostic testing is equivocal, proceed with diagnostic laparoscopy to mitigate the risk of internal hernia with bowel ischemia. **Introducing Behind the Knife's Trauma Surgery Video Atlas - https://app.behindtheknife.org/premium/trauma-surgery-video-atlas/show-content The Trauma Surgery Video Atlas contains 24 scenarios that include never-before-seen high-definition operative footage, rich, original illustrations, and practical, easy-to-read pearls that will help you dominate the most difficult trauma scenarios. ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out more recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

We know cardiac surgery can seem a bit daunting on the surface. However, most surgeons will come across cardiac surgery patients at some point whether in the OR, ICU, ED, etc. As the FIRST cardiac surgery specialty team for Behind the Knife, we are excited to bring you episodes focused on high-yield topics to help you navigate common cardiac surgery challenges, discuss relevant literature to help you in practice, and help our listeners feel more comfortable around cardiac surgery patients.  In this episode we’ll discuss mitral valve disease. We’ll review important physiologic differences in patients with mitral valve disease, the most common surgical approaches to address mitral valve disease, and how to work up and address acute mitral regurgitation due to acute papillary muscle rupture.  Hosts:  - Jessica Millar, MD- PGY-5 General Surgery Resident, University of Michigan, @Jess_Millar15 - Aaron William, MD- Cardiothoracic Surgery Fellow, Duke University, @AMWilliamsMD - Nick Teman, MD- Assistant Professor of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, @nickteman Learning objectives: - Understand the physiologic differences that occur with mitral valve stenosis and regurgitation.  - Understand the basic principles of mitral valve repair and replacement strategies.  - Understand the presentation, work-up, and acute management of acute mitral valve regurgitations due to acute papillary muscle rupture/MI.   For episode ideas/suggestions/feedback feel free to email Jessica Millar at: [email protected] **Introducing Behind the Knife's Trauma Surgery Video Atlas - https://app.behindtheknife.org/premium/trauma-surgery-video-atlas/show-content The Trauma Surgery Video Atlas contains 24 scenarios that include never-before-seen high-definition operative footage, rich, original illustrations, and practical, easy-to-read pearls that will help you dominate the most difficult trauma scenarios.

Our Cardiothoracic Oral Board Audio Review includes 43 high-yield scenarios designed for Cardiothoracic Surgeons by Cardiothoracic Surgeons. Scenarios are 5 to 7 minutes long and include a variety of tactics and styles. If you are able to achieve this level of performance in your preparation you are sure to pass the oral exam with flying colors. The second part introduces high-yield commentary to each scenario. This commentary includes tips and tricks to help you dominate the most challenging scenarios in addition to practical, easy-to-understand teaching that covers the most confusing topics we face as cardiothoracic surgeons. We are confident you will find this unique, dual format approach a highly effective way to prepare for the test. Learn more about the course and see all the episode topics here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/premium/cardiothoracic-surgery-oral-board-audio-review Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.  

Our Cardiothoracic Oral Board Audio Review includes 43 high-yield scenarios designed for Cardiothoracic Surgeons by Cardiothoracic Surgeons. Scenarios are 5 to 7 minutes long and include a variety of tactics and styles. If you are able to achieve this level of performance in your preparation you are sure to pass the oral exam with flying colors. The second part introduces high-yield commentary to each scenario. This commentary includes tips and tricks to help you dominate the most challenging scenarios in addition to practical, easy-to-understand teaching that covers the most confusing topics we face as cardiothoracic surgeons. We are confident you will find this unique, dual format approach a highly effective way to prepare for the test. Learn more about the course and see all the episode topics here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/premium/cardiothoracic-surgery-oral-board-audio-review Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.  

REBOA is one spicy meatball!   On this episode, Drs. Nina Clark and Patrick Georgoff discuss the landmark UK-REBOA trial with Dr. Karim Brohi.  This is the first randomized controlled trial studying REBOA and provides invaluable information about its potential indications.    Dr. Karim Brohi is a trauma and vascular surgeon at the Royal London Major Trauma Centre and director of the London Major Trauma System, which is the largest integrated urban trauma system in the world and manages over 33,000 injuries a year.  He studied at University College of London where he obtained degrees in both computer science and medicine.  Dr. Brohi went on to train in general surgery, vascular surgery, and anesthesia/critical care in the UK and trauma surgery in Cape Town and San Francisco.  He is a prolific researcher and has led multiple large clinical trials.  Link to UK-REBOA paper: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2810757 BIG T Trauma episode 290 covers potential indications, placement, and complications of REBOA: https://behindtheknife.org/podcast/big-t-trauma-series-ep-2-reboa/ ***TRAUMA SURGERY VIDEO ATLAS: https://app.behindtheknife.org/premium/trauma-surgery-video-atlas ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Surgical resection of bilateral colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) can pose a significant challenge to even the most experienced HPB surgeon. Is surgical resection justified, if so, in which patients? What’s the best surgical approach for curative intent resection of all lesions, and does ablation play a role? In this episode from the HPB team at Behind the Knife, listen in on the discussion about the surgical management of patients with bilateral colorectal liver metastasis. Hosts Anish J. Jain MD (@anishjayjain) is a T32 Research Fellow at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center within the Department of Surgical Oncology. Timothy E. Newhook MD, FACS (@timnewhook19) is an Assistant Professor within the Department of Surgical Oncology. He is also the associate program director of the HPB fellowship at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.  Jean-Nicolas Vauthey MD, FACS (@VautheyMD) is Professor of Surgery and Chief of the HPB Section, as well as the Dallas/Fort Worth Living Legend Chair of Cancer Research in the Department of Surgical Oncology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Learning Objectives: ·      Develop an understanding of patient selection for surgical resection of bilateral colorectal liver metastasis (CLM). ·      Develop an understanding of the use of Two Stage Hepatectomy (TSH) versus Parenchymal Sparing Hepatectomy (PSH) in the treatment of bilateral CLM. ·      Develop an understanding of if and when to use ablative procedures for resection of bilateral CLM. ·      Develop an understanding of selection and management of patients who suffer recurrence after resection of bilateral CLM. Suggested Readings ·      Omichi K, Shindoh J, Cloyd JM, Mizuno T, Chun YS, Conrad C, Aloia TA, Tzeng CD, Vauthey JN. Liver resection is justified for patients with bilateral multiple colorectal liver metastases: A propensity-score-matched analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan;44(1):122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 24. PMID: 29208318; PMCID: PMC5742306. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29208318/ ·      Kawaguchi Y, Kopetz S, Tran Cao HS, Panettieri E, De Bellis M, Nishioka Y, Hwang H, Wang X, Tzeng CD, Chun YS, Aloia TA, Hasegawa K, Guglielmi A, Giuliante F, Vauthey JN. Contour prognostic model for predicting survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases: development and multicentre validation study using largest diameter and number of metastases with RAS mutation status. Br J Surg. 2021 Aug 19;108(8):968-975. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab086. PMID: 33829254; PMCID: PMC8378514. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33829254/ ·      Nishioka Y, Paez-Arango N, Boettcher FO, Kawaguchi Y, Newhook TE, Chun YS, Tzeng CD, Tran Cao HS, Lee JE, Vreeland TJ, Vauthey JN. Neither Surgical Margin Status nor Somatic Mutation Predicts Local Recurrence After R0-intent Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Apr;26(4):791-801. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05173-0. Epub 2021 Nov 1. PMID: 34725784. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34725784/ ·      Passot G, Chun YS, Kopetz SE, Zorzi D, Brudvik KW, Kim BJ, Conrad C, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN. Predictors of Safety and Efficacy of 2-Stage Hepatectomy for Bilateral Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jul;223(1):99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.057. Epub 2016 Jan 18. PMID: 26968325; PMCID: PMC4925205. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26968325/ ·      Donadon M, Cescon M, Cucchetti A, Cimino M, Costa G, Pesi B, Ercolani G, Pinna AD, Torzilli G. Parenchymal-Sparing Surgery for the Surgical Treatment of Multiple Colorectal Liver Metastases Is a Safer Approach than Major Hepatectomy Not Impairing Patients' Prognosis: A Bi-Institutional Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Dig Surg. 2018;35(4):342-349. doi: 10.1159/000479336. Epub 2017 Oct 14. PMID: 29032372. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29032372/ ·      Lillemoe HA, Kawaguchi Y, Passot G, Karagkounis G, Simoneau E, You YN, Mehran RJ, Chun YS, Tzeng CD, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN. Surgical Resection for Recurrence After Two-Stage Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases Is Feasible, Is Safe, and Improves Survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jan;23(1):84-92. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3890-y. Epub 2018 Aug 6. PMID: 30084064; PMCID: PMC6329635. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30084064/ ·      Panettieri E, Kim BJ, Kawaguchi Y, Ardito F, Mele C, De Rose AM, Vellone M, Chun YS, Tzeng CD, Aloia TA, Giuliante F, Vauthey JN. Survival by Number and Sites of Resections of Recurrence after First Curative Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Dec;26(12):2503-2511. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05456-0. Epub 2022 Sep 20. PMID: 36127553. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36127553/ ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent Hepatobiliary Surgery episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/podcast-category/hepatobiliary

2023 was an exciting year for Surgical Palliative Care research! Join Drs. Katie O’Connell, Ali Haruta, Lindsay Dickerson, and Virginia Wang from the University of Washington to discuss two seminal randomized controlled trials in the Surgical Palliative Care space. Hosts: ·    Dr. Katie O’Connell (@katmo15) is an Assistant Professor of Surgery at the University of Washington. She is a trauma surgeon, palliative care physician, Director of Surgical Palliative Care, and founder of the Advance Care Planning for Surgery clinic at Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA. ·    Dr. Ali Haruta is a PGY7 Hospice & Palliative Care fellow at the University of Washington, formerly a UW General Surgery resident and Parkland Trauma/Critical Care fellow.  ·    Dr. Lindsay Dickerson (@lindsdickerson1) is a PGY5 General Surgery resident and current Surgical Oncology fellow at the University of Washington. ·    Dr. Virginia Wang is a PGY2 General Surgery resident at the University of Washington. Learning Objectives: ·    Discuss the current state of the RCT literature in Palliative Care & Surgical Palliative Care ·    Understand the primary outcomes of the Shinall and Aslakson trials as related to perioperative specialty palliative care intervention ·    Identify limitations in existing surgical palliative care RCTs & further opportunities for study ·    Identify underlying differences between medical oncology and surgical oncology patient populations References: 1.  Shinall MC, Martin SF, Karlekar M, et al. Effects of Specialist Palliative Care for Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery for Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2023;158(7):747–755. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1396 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37163249/ 2.  Aslakson RA, Rickerson E, Fahy B, et al. Effect of Perioperative Palliative Care on Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(5):e2314660. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14660 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37256623/ 3.  Ingersoll LT, Alexander SC, Priest J, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in prognosis communication during initial inpatient palliative care consultations among people with advanced cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(6):1098-1103. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2019.01.002 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30642715/ 4.  Bakitas M, Lyons KD, Hegel MT, et al. Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: the Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;302(7):741-749. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1198 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19690306/ 5.  Corn BW, Feldman DB, Hull JG, O'Rourke MA, Bakitas MA. Dispositional hope as a potential outcome parameter among patients with advanced malignancy: An analysis of the ENABLE database. Cancer. 2022;128(2):401-409. doi:10.1002/cncr.33907 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34613617/ 6.  El-Jawahri A, LeBlanc TW, Kavanaugh A, et al. Effectiveness of Integrated Palliative and Oncology Care for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(2):238-245. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6343 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33331857/ 7.  More about the metrics from both the Shinall and Aslakson studies: a.     FACT-G – https://www.facit.org/measures/fact-g b.     FACIT-Pal – https://www.facit.org/measures/facit-pal c.     PROMIS-29 – https://heartbeat-med.com/resources/promis-29/ d.     PROPr (PROMIS-Preference) score – https://www.proprscore.com/ ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out other surgical palliative care episodes here: https://app.behindtheknife.org/podcast-category/palliative-care

Join Professor Michael Solomon, Dr Kilian Brown and Dr Jacob Waller from Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Sydney, Australia, for this special four part series on pelvic exenteration surgery for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. Learn about these ultra-radical procedures which go beyond the traditional TME planes that we learn during surgical training, and into all compartments of the pelvis. Episode 4 outlines the complex perineal and soft tissue, urological, bone and vascular reconstructions that may be required as part of these multi-visceral resections, as well as how to approach challenging postoperative complications. Each episode in this series features a different international guest surgeon. In episode 4, the RPA team are joined by A/Prof Gabrielle van Ramshorst from the Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. Technical descriptions: Ho K, Warrier S, Solomon MJ, Lee K. A prepelvic tunnel for the rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in perineal reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(12):1415-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.01.050. Epub 2006 Jun 22. PMID: 17113532. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17113532/ Jacombs AS, Rome P, Harrison JD, Solomon MJ. Assessment of the selection process for myocutaneous flap repair and surgical complications in pelvic exenteration surgery. Br J Surg. 2013 Mar;100(4):561-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9002. Epub 2012 Nov 27. PMID: 23188415. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23188415/ References: Witte DYS, van Ramshorst GH, Lapid O, Bouman MB, Tuynman JB. Flap Reconstruction of Perineal Defects after Pelvic Exenteration: A Systematic Description of Four Choices of Surgical Reconstruction Methods. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 1;147(6):1420-1435. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007976. PMID: 33973948. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33973948/ van Ramshorst GH, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Complications and Impact on Quality of Life of Vertical Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flaps for Reconstruction in Pelvic Exenteration Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Sep;63(9):1225-1233. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001632. PMID: 33216493. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33216493/ Sutton PA, Brown KGM, Ebrahimi N, Solomon MJ, Austin KKS, Lee PJ. Long-term surgical complications following pelvic exenteration: Operative management of the empty pelvis syndrome. Colorectal Dis. 2022 Dec;24(12):1491-1497. doi: 10.1111/codi.16238. Epub 2022 Jul 19. PMID: 35766998. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35766998/ Johnson YL, West MA, Gould LE, Drami I, Behrenbruch C, Burns EM, Mirnezami AH, Jenkins JT. Empty pelvis syndrome: a systematic review of reconstruction techniques and their associated complications. Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jan;24(1):16-26. doi: 10.1111/codi.15956. Epub 2021 Oct 25. PMID: 34653292. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34653292/ Persson P, Chong P, Steele CW, Quinn M. Prevention and management of complications in pelvic exenteration. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov;48(11):2277-2283. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.470. Epub 2022 Jan 1. PMID: 35101315. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35101315/ Lee P, Tan WJ, Brown KGM, Solomon MJ. Addressing the empty pelvic syndrome following total pelvic exenteration: does mesh reconstruction help? Colorectal Dis. 2019 Mar;21(3):365-369. doi: 10.1111/codi.14523. Epub 2019 Jan 16. PMID: 30548166. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30548166/ Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBC-ZD0B7UM  ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Please visit https://app.behindtheknife.org/home to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.  If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Join Professor Michael Solomon, Dr Kilian Brown and Dr Jacob Waller from Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Sydney, Australia, for this special four part series on pelvic exenteration surgery for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. Learn about these ultra-radical procedures which go beyond the traditional TME planes that we learn during surgical training, and into all compartments of the pelvis. Episode 3 outlines the radical technical approaches to posterior and laterally invasive tumours, including en bloc iliac vascular resection and reconstruction, as well as radical sacrectomy techniques. Each episode in this series features a different international guest surgeon. In episode 3, the RPA team are joined by Dr Oliver Peacock from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, USA. Episode Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y25IYUiARgQ Technical descriptions and videos: Shaikh I, Holloway I, Aston W, Littler S, Burling D, Antoniou A, Jenkins JT; Complex Cancer Clinic St Mark's Hospital London. High subcortical sacrectomy: a novel approach to facilitate complete resection of locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer with high (S1-S2) sacral extension. Colorectal Dis. 2016 Apr;18(4):386-92. doi: 10.1111/codi.13226. PMID: 26638828. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26638828/ Brown KGM, Solomon MJ, Austin KKS, Lee PJ, Stalley P. Posterior high sacral segmental disconnection prior to anterior en bloc exenteration for recurrent rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Jun;20(6):401-404. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1456-0. Epub 2016 Mar 21. PMID: 27000857. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27000857/ Sutton PA, Solomon M, Sasidharan P, Lee P, Austin K. Abdominolithotomy sacrectomy for the management of locally recurrent rectal cancer: video vignette. Br J Surg. 2021 Aug 19;108(8):e257. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab105. PMID: 34089593. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34089593/ Drami I, Fletcher JA, Corr A, West MA, Aston W, Hellawell G, Burns EM, Jenkins JT. Total pelvic exenteration with 'high and wide' sacrectomy for recurrent rectal cancer: A video vignette. Colorectal Dis. 2022 Dec;24(12):1625-1626. doi: 10.1111/codi.16230. Epub 2022 Jul 18. PMID: 35730692. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35730692/ References: Rajendran S, Brown KGM, Solomon MJ. Oncovascular surgery for advanced pelvic malignancy. Br J Surg. 2023 Jan 10;110(2):144-149. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac414. PMID: 36427187. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36427187/ Austin KK, Solomon MJ. Pelvic exenteration with en bloc iliac vessel resection for lateral pelvic wall involvement. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jul;52(7):1223-33. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a73f48. PMID: 19571697. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19571697/ Rogers AC, Jenkins JT, Rasheed S, Malietzis G, Burns EM, Kontovounisios C, Tekkis PP. Towards Standardisation of Technique for En Bloc Sacrectomy for Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 25;10(21):4921. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214921. PMID: 34768442; PMCID: PMC8584798. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34768442/ van Kessel CS, Waller J, Steffens D, Lee PJ, Austin KKS, Stalley PD, Solomon MJ. Improving Surgical Outcomes in Pelvic Exenteration Surgery: Comparison of Prone Sacrectomy with Anterior Cortical Sacrectomy Techniques. Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 24. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006040. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37485983. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37485983/  ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Please visit https://app.behindtheknife.org/home to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.  If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Behind the Knife ABSITE 2024 – Brand new, up-to-date, high yield learning to help you DOMINATE the exam. ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Don’t forget to check out our NEW ABSITE Podcast Companion Book available on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Behind-Knife-ABSITE-Podcast-Companion/dp/B0CLDQWZG3/ref=monarch_sidesheet Behind the Knife would like to sincerely thank Medtronic for sponsoring the entire 2024 ABSITE podcast series.  Medtronic has a rich history of supporting surgical education, and we couldn’t be happier that they chose to partner with Behind the Knife.  Learn more at https://www.medtronic.com/ Download our iOS and Android apps from your App Store.  You can easily search through our library of content, bookmark episodes for later and enjoy our premium content.  You can also take notes, pin chapters and download for off-line listening.     If you like the work that Behind the Knife is doing, please leave us a review wherever you listen to podcasts.   Visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.  

Behind the Knife ABSITE 2024 – Brand new, up-to-date, high yield learning to help you DOMINATE the exam. ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Don’t forget to check out our NEW ABSITE Podcast Companion Book available on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Behind-Knife-ABSITE-Podcast-Companion/dp/B0CLDQWZG3/ref=monarch_sidesheet Behind the Knife would like to sincerely thank Medtronic for sponsoring the entire 2024 ABSITE podcast series.  Medtronic has a rich history of supporting surgical education, and we couldn’t be happier that they chose to partner with Behind the Knife.  Learn more at https://www.medtronic.com/ Download our iOS and Android apps from your App Store.  You can easily search through our library of content, bookmark episodes for later and enjoy our premium content.  You can also take notes, pin chapters and download for off-line listening.     If you like the work that Behind the Knife is doing, please leave us a review wherever you listen to podcasts.   Visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.  

Behind the Knife ABSITE 2024 – Brand new, up-to-date, high yield learning to help you DOMINATE the exam. ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Don’t forget to check out our NEW ABSITE Podcast Companion Book available on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Behind-Knife-ABSITE-Podcast-Companion/dp/B0CLDQWZG3/ref=monarch_sidesheet Behind the Knife would like to sincerely thank Medtronic for sponsoring the entire 2024 ABSITE podcast series.  Medtronic has a rich history of supporting surgical education, and we couldn’t be happier that they chose to partner with Behind the Knife.  Learn more at https://www.medtronic.com/ Download our iOS and Android apps from your App Store.  You can easily search through our library of content, bookmark episodes for later and enjoy our premium content.  You can also take notes, pin chapters and download for off-line listening.     If you like the work that Behind the Knife is doing, please leave us a review wherever you listen to podcasts.   Visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.  

As the cost of living continues to rise, the salary and housing stipends of resident physicians are not keeping pace. Dr. Melissa Drezdzon and Dr. Jed Calata from the Medical College of Wisconsin have explored these issues in depth and share their insights. Join hosts Dr. Ananya Anand, Dr. Joe L’Huillier, and Dr. Rebecca Moreci and their special guests as they discuss the salary of resident physicians.  Hosts: –Dr. Ananya Anand, Stanford University, @AnanyaAnandMD, [email protected] –Dr. Joseph L’Huillier, University at Buffalo, @JoeLHuillier101, [email protected] –Dr. Rebecca Moreci, Louisiana State University, @md_moreci, [email protected] –COSEF: @surgedfellows Special guests:  -Dr. Melissa Drezdzon, Medical College of Wisconsin, @mdrezdzonmd, [email protected] -Dr. Jed Calata, Medical College of Wisconsin, [email protected] Learning Objectives:  Listeners will:  – Appreciate the discrepancy between cost of living increases and stagnant resident salaries – Describe how residency salaries are funded – Recall the regional variation in resident stipends and access to affordable housing across the united states  – List possible solutions for addressing this issue  References:  Drezdzon MK, Cowley NJ, Sweeney DP, Peterson CY, Ridolfi TJ, Ludwig KA, Evans DB, Calata JF. Going for Broke: The Impact of Cost of Living on Surgery Resident Stipend Value. Ann Surg. 2023 Dec 1;278(6):1053-1059. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005923. Epub 2023 May 25. PMID: 37226808. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37226808/ Drezdzon, M.K., Cowley, N.J., Sweeney, D.P., Peterson CY, Ridolfi TJ, Ludwig KA, Calata JF. A costly threat to GME: the housing crisis and residency training. Global Surg Educ 2, 85 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-023-00157-x ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DYJIxCrsDE Please visit https://app.behindtheknife.org/home to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our recent episodes here https://app.behindtheknife.org/listen

Behind the Knife ABSITE 2024 – Brand new, up-to-date, high yield learning to help you DOMINATE the exam. ***Fellowship Application - https://forms.gle/5fbYJ1JXv3ijpgCq9*** Don’t forget to check out our NEW ABSITE Podcast Companion Book available on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Behind-Knife-ABSITE-Podcast-Companion/dp/B0CLDQWZG3/ref=monarch_sidesheet Behind the Knife would like to sincerely thank Medtronic for sponsoring the entire 2024 ABSITE podcast series.  Medtronic has a rich history of supporting surgical education, and we couldn’t be happier that they chose to partner with Behind the Knife.  Learn more at https://www.medtronic.com/ Download our iOS and Android apps from your App Store.  You can easily search through our library of content, bookmark episodes for later and enjoy our premium content.  You can also take notes, pin chapters and download for off-line listening.     If you like the work that Behind the Knife is doing, please leave us a review wherever you listen to podcasts.   Visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.