All right, all right, welcome back to another edition of Beyond the Told, Destroying the Narrative.I'm your host, Dr. David Roberts, and thank you so much for being a part of the program.
This episode comes at a request, or a suggestion, I should say.This is from a video that was put onto Rumble and YouTube, and really hasn't gotten a lot of play, probably because of the title.
But this has a lot to do with geoengineering, chemtrails, whatever you want to call them.And it's called Clearing the Air. And the whole point was to kind of sift through, I guess, I don't know, the conspiracy, the truth, the science.
There's a lot of confusion on the topic, alarmingly, and it always confuses me.
It confuses me because of how much information there is out there on the topic, but when you think about epistemic rigidity, it's really easy to find yourself in the wrong rabbit holes and either completely dismiss the reality or to overinflate it.
So I made this video in an attempt to I don't know, kind of level it out.And I don't know.Interestingly enough, again, one of those things where probably because of the title, it just didn't get a lot of play.
But it was suggested that I put that audio into this new format.So that's what we're going to do.So here is that video or that audio.And I hope you guys enjoy it. Welcome to Beyond the Told, the sanctuary of the unspoken and the home of the unseen.
In today's episode, we're peering through another keyhole to unveil another hidden truth.
A reader brought to my attention a recent article from the Washington Post by Shannon Osaka, titled, Why Tennessee Lawmakers Are Pushing a Bill to Keep Government from Spraying the Sky.
I was asked to provide some insights into this article and share what I knew about such activities.I'm happy to do so.For clarity, Osaka's piece dives into a Tennessee bill that's sparking debate.The bill takes aim at geoengineering.
Of course, Osaka casts this practice as something out of a sci-fi novel, unproven, controversial, and, quote, a practice not yet in use.However, it seems that, perhaps, there is some confusion on this matter.
This moment perfectly illustrates the critical need for fact-checking.
Osaka's portrayal of geoengineering and the legislative efforts to regulate it in Tennessee oversimplifies and, perhaps inadvertently, dismisses the nuanced realities and conversations happening around this topic.
For starters, geoengineering isn't just some baseless theory tangled up with chemtrail conspiracy tales.It's a reality ripe with ethical debates, scientific research, and discussions on governance.
To paint it as merely experimental is to overlook the reality entirely.Furthermore, to chalk up public skepticism to misinformation alone?
That is simply irresponsible, and it misses the broader spectrum of valid concerns and questions about the impact and oversight of geoengineering initiatives.
I want you to remember that confirmation bias opens the door to inaccuracy, and such reporting results in false perceptions.
Contrary to Osaka's portrayal, there's actually considerable engagement in the United States within the realms of cloud seeding, geoengineering, and weather modification by numerous companies, academic institutions, and governmental bodies.
This collective endeavor is propelled by the varied and promising applications of weather modification techniques. ranging from enhancing water resources and agricultural yields to exploring avenues for climate change mitigation.
Let's begin this journey by examining private industry.In truth, several companies in the US specialize in weather modification, particularly cloud seeding.
These firms offer services ranging from operational cloud seeding projects aiming to enhance precipitation for water resources and agriculture to research and development in advanced weather modification technologies.
The industry includes a mix of established companies with a long history in weather modification operations and newer startups focusing on innovative approaches to geoengineering and climate intervention.For example, Weather Modification Inc.
is one of the better known companies specializing in cloud seeding and weather modification services. They offer a range of services including precipitation enhancement, hail suppression, and fog dispersion.
North American Weather Consultants is another one, claiming to be the oldest weather modification company in continuous operation in the Western Hemisphere.
They provide cloud seeding services for water resource management and environmental improvement projects.
SOAR, which stands for Seeding Operations and Atmospheric Research, this company focuses on cloud seeding for precipitation enhancement and hail damage mitigation.They conduct operations primarily in the western United States.
There is even a season for such activities in some states. Let's take Texas, for example.The Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation states that numerous organizations are involved in such activities.
In fact, and just for example, they stated that in 2012, the cloud seeding season lasted 209 days, beginning on March 19th and continuing through October 13th.Most, 88%, of the total of 162 missions occurred from May through September.
In all, a total of 353 individual thunderstorms were treated.Of course, numerous universities are involved in the effort as well.For example, Harvard's Solar Geoengineering Research Program is one of the leading efforts in geoengineering research.
The program focuses on understanding the science, ethics, and governance of solar geoengineering. The University of California, Irvine, is another one.
UC Irvine has researchers actively engaged in studies related to geoengineering, including the potential impacts of solar radiation management on climate systems.Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT, is another one.
MIT researchers are involved in various studies related to climate science, including geoengineering.
In fact, they boast the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, which is an interdisciplinary center where much of this research converges.And yes, the government is involved as well.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, is a great example.
While not a commercial company or university, the NOAA is a key governmental body that conducts and supports research in atmospheric sciences, including aspects relevant to weather modification and geoengineering.
Of course, these examples represent a mere fraction of the entities involved in these fields.
Participation in weather modification and geoengineering is global, with many other companies, universities, and research institutions worldwide contributing to these areas of study.
Frankly, I don't understand why or how any of this can be misconstrued as conspiracy at this point.It's been around for a long time. Weather modification, particularly cloud seeding, has a scientific basis that dates back to the mid-20th century.
The first successful experiments in cloud seeding were conducted by Vincent Schaefer and Irving Langmuir in 1946.
Since then, numerous studies and operational projects have demonstrated the potential to influence precipitation patterns through cloud seeding with substances like silver iodide or liquid propane.
Many weather modification operations, especially those related to cloud seeding for precipitation enhancement, are conducted openly by both governmental and private entities.
In fact, these operations often require permits and are subject to environmental impact assessments contradicting the notion of secretive manipulation of the weather.Furthermore, such activities are easily found in public records.
Expanding the scope, the World Meteorological Organization, a United Nations agency, provides guidelines and standards for practices in weather modification.
The existence of such guidelines and the ongoing international research into these technologies underscore their legitimacy and the interest in understanding and potentially leveraging them for beneficial purposes.
Geoengineering, particularly proposals for solar radiation management or carbon dioxide removal, is a field of research that has gained attention as a potential, albeit controversial, means to mitigate climate change impacts.
While it's crucial to differentiate between research and implementation, dismissing the entire field as a conspiracy overlooks the scientific discussions and ethical debates occurring in academic and policymaking circles.
It also dismisses efforts, such as those seen in Tennessee, to ensure that such activities are carried out ethically and responsibly.
Now, while some might like to argue that such activities solely involve smaller aircraft, the truth is much more nuanced.Indeed, smaller planes are commonly used for cloud seeding operations due to their maneuverability and cost-effectiveness.
However, larger aircraft can also be employed, especially for larger operational areas or when the deployment of significant quantities of seeding material is required.
Such operations aim to enhance precipitation, mitigate hail damage, or disperse fog at airports, supporting water resources management and agricultural productivity.In fact, large aircraft are instrumental in atmospheric research.
equipped with sophisticated instruments to collect data on weather patterns, atmospheric composition, and climate change.
These flights contribute valuable insights into the dynamics of the Earth's atmosphere, informing both short-term weather forecasting and long-term climate models. And now for the big question.
Are governments and corporations intentionally dispersing toxic chemicals into the atmosphere?Well, as previously mentioned, these processes do typically involve dropping chemicals, such as silver iodide.
Now, some argue that silver iodide has been found to have minimal environmental impact at the concentrations used for weather modification. That might be true, however, minimal still implies that some impact occurs.
The bigger question we should be asking is, are these chemicals really toxic? We should be aware that silver iodide is known for its use as a fungicide, herbicide, and microbicide, and it does have some concerning toxicological properties.
So, while it is often used in cloud seeding to support plant growth, it ironically poses risks to vegetation due to its inherent herbicidal properties or toxicity. Moreover, documented by sources like the U.S.
National Library of Medicine, silver iodide's dangers to humans arise from exposure through inhalation, ingestion, and skin contact, highlighting the complex balance required in its environmental application and the importance of regulatory oversight.
Either way, while the concern might be overinflated in most cases, I would argue that the concern is still legitimate.
This is especially true when you consider bioaccumulation, not to mention the wide variety of materials and chemicals being used or explored.
As for the supposed conspiracy theory, I think it's important to understand the term chemtrail is simply a layman's term for things like stratospheric aerosol injection, cloud seeding, weather modification, solar radiation management, and geoengineering.
After all, if you're spraying chemicals from a plane, and it leaves a trail, which it does, then that would be a fairly accurate description of the activity.
Regardless, just know that the activities go by a variety of names, but at the end of the day, the activities are very similar.The point is that regardless of what you choose to label it, it is a real thing.
It seems to me that only the motives are in question. Of course, that seems to be debatable and likely varies depending on the entities involved.Either way, I encourage an exploration and critical examination of the sources of information available.
Numerous credible scientific studies, governmental reports, and articles from reputable news outlets and academic institutions can provide plenty of evidence-based insights into the reality of these technologies and their applications.
At the same time, it's crucial to recognize the limitations and uncertainties associated with weather modification in geoengineering.Some of the concerns are entirely legitimate.
And finally, it's important to keep in mind that while these practices exist, it's a far more complex reality than simplistic conspiracy theories or uninformed reporters might suggest.Make sure to hit the like button and subscribe to the channel.
That's it for this one.And remember, the truth is often just beyond what's told.Until next time, stay skeptical and question everything.
Sign in
