Hey, Tim Pool here.My new show, The Culture War, dives deep into the most controversial issues of our time.
No topic is off limits, and I bring on guests with unique perspectives to explore the cultural landscape in today's politically charged climate.If you're looking for real conversations and bold insights, this is the show for you.
Tune into The Culture War on Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your shows, and get ready for the tough discussions. Joe Rogan has revealed further details about the Kamala Harris potential interview that never happened.
And as it turns out, she didn't just refuse his terms.Joe Rogan rolled out the red carpet for Kamala Harris, and she said no. What are we seeing?
Well, many corporate news outlets are saying that Joe Rogan snubbed Kamala Harris, that he refused to do an interview with her.OK, so the story the other day was Joe Rogan says she didn't decline the interview.And this is following Donald Trump.
She didn't decline the interview.She just said, why don't you come here and we'll do one hour.Joe's response was, I think the show is better served in its natural format.
But the bigger picture here, I think, is Joe is trying to be polite, still trying to make the interview happen, but Kamala Harris is refusing.First, let's just say this.
If you offer a show, come out here to Austin, sit down, we'll talk for three hours, and they go, nah, you come here, we'll talk for an hour, that is declining your invitation.
Just because she offered up something else doesn't mean that Joe Rogan's the one who snubbed her, but it gets crazier. Rogan said he told her team anytime, anywhere in Austin.That is, when she's here in Austin, she can show up.
I will come down to the studio at midnight, 2 a.m., 9 p.m., 9 a.m., whatever you want to do, come to the studio when you are here.And guess what?Kamala Harris was there. She was there, she was doing a rally, and she did not go on this show.
Now let's talk about that.I'm more interested in the current state of the polls, but vibe check where we're currently at.
And I'm going to show you a series of podcasts that Kamala Harris was willing to travel to, not Joe Rogan, the viewership and why this is significant, and of course the polling data.
When you look at the shows that she did go on, she traveled to Breakfast Club, she traveled for Shannon Sharp, she traveled for Call Her Daddy.None of those shows are particularly big relative to Joe Rogan.
I mean, don't get me wrong, like these are prominent shows.I'm just saying the shows she did, not very big at all.I think she's hitting about half a million views.
And currently the Donald Trump, Joe Rogan interview has 41 million views and Kamala has refused an open invite anytime. to go on Rogan.I wonder what that says.
But let's take a look at the story first, and then we'll go over the market and the polling data.We got big updates as it pertains to what is going to happen on Tuesday.Oh boy.Oh boy.Daily Wire reports, quote, I gave them an open invitation.
Rogan opens up more about potential Kamala interviews.She had an opportunity to come here when she was in Texas. on Wednesday.
During the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, the host said that it was Harris's team who first reached out to him about appearing on his show after her campaign learned that Trump was coming in for an interview.
She had an opportunity to come here when she was in Texas, and I literally gave them an open invitation. Rogan explained on his show, hitting back at claims he was somehow being a diva about her interview.
Harris held a rally in Texas last Friday with both Willie Nelson and Beyonce making appearances.I said, any time.If she's done at 10 o'clock, we'll come back here at 10 o'clock.I'll do it at 9 in the morning.I'll do it at 10 p.m.
I'll do it at midnight.If she shows up, she wants to drink a Red Bull effing party on. So their camp reached out to me, so I said, great, I would love to talk to her, Rogan continued.But it was very difficult to tie down.They wanted to travel.
And see, the thing is, if I go somewhere, then there's going to be other people in the room, and they want to control a lot of things.I'm sure, according to the Brett Baier interview on Fox, that's a distraction.
You see, on top of it all, Joe knew that if he traveled somewhere, they would control what the interview was going to be.That's the game.So let me break it down for you.These are Joe's words.Joe's being polite.I think it's fair.I think it's fair.
Joe's being polite.Kamala's team did not want to do this in his territory where he can ask whatever he wants.Hey, Jamie, pull that up. So what do they say?Make him come to us, we'll be in the room and we can shut it down if we want.
That is wild, because you guys remember, on the Brett Baier interview, there was this big story where Brett Baier says, they're waving at me, hard stop, hard stop, we've gotta go.
And that wasn't just Kamala's team in my opinion, it was probably Fox News.Brett was saying she showed up late, didn't get as much time as they wanted, and they were fanning him, it's gotta stop.
Now people on the right were saying, this is Kamala's team shutting down the interview because she couldn't handle it.I'm saying,
They were short for time, Fox was trying to get the interview up, quick turnaround, like 20 minute turnaround, not so easy to do.And that's probably what makes more sense.
But when you take a look at what Joe Rogan is saying, it sounds like that actually may have been the case.Kamala's team wants to control elements of the interview that Joe would not be able to have control himself.
So when they do things like pull that up and they show clips and proof that would be taken away from Joe now. This is one of the reasons why we do our show in real life with people sitting here.
We tell all our guests, bring your laptop, we got internet, you can look up whatever you want, and we will pull up anything.There will never be an instance where on TimCast IRL you say, I've got a source, pull it up, and I go, no.Never happens.
In fact, I'd say DM it to me on Twitter, I'll pull it right up, and I'll show it to everybody. If Joe travels for Kamala, they're going to cut the interview short and she's going to say some nonsense and Joe will not be able to fact check.
How about them apples?Take a look at this. It's not just that Kamala says, oh, Trump should travel to me.All these leftists are saying Joe should go to her.She's so busy.Here's Kamala having traveled to the Call Her Daddy podcast.
750,000 views on YouTube.To be fair, it is just a small clip.Ain't nobody wanted to watch it.Vibe check.What's the vibe check here?How about the Breakfast Club?5.65 million subscribers on YouTube.
565,000 views, and this is the full sit-down hour-long interview with Kamala Harris.Vibe check, my friends.What do people think?Joe Rogan experienced 41,000,000.5 views since October 25th.
It has been just shy of a week, and the Rogan-Trump show, 41,000,000 views.Take a look at this one. Kamala Harris on Club Shea Shea with Shannon Sharpe.1.3 million views.Hey, not bad.Not bad.Not bad indeed.Now, Rogan is going to have J.D.Vance on.
This you probably heard.J.D.Vance is apparently going to be in studio.I think it's today, actually.I'm really excited for this show.I don't think it'll do nearly as well as the Trump interview, of course.But I think it'll probably get 10 million.
That's my bet.My bet is 10 million. I ask you this, liberals.Honestly, I ask you this.Kamala Harris can travel for Shannon Sharp, Breakfast Club, Call Her Daddy.Those ain't the only ones.
But while she was in Texas, literally there, she could not go on Joe Rogan's show.Okay.So what do I mean by vibe check?You get it.How are people feeling?What do we think is going to happen?And I got to tell you,
It's looking like Donald Trump is going to win across the board.Now, Ryan Long, famed comedian and man of great emotional intelligence, asked me the other day, how do you explain it if Kamala wins this time?I'm like, oh man, you don't.Look.
In 2020, all these Trump supporters were like, the enthusiasm for Trump is through the roof and Biden has none.Nobody wants to vote for Biden.And I kept pointing this out.Yes, but look at the polling for enthusiasm against Trump.It was higher.
It was like 96 percent in aggregate.And enthusiasm for Trump was 92.And I said, hey, man. So Democrats end up ballot harvesting, and it's funny because the mainstream media is trying to act like saying they ballot harvested is cheating.
I'm not saying they cheated, I'm saying they had much, much better ground game.
They went out there, they rallied the votes, they sent the activists out there, they have certain advantages in blue areas collecting ballots, and it worked really well for them in cities.I think that was the main play.
I think there was lax signature verification, but is that cheating? Now, you can argue there are procedural challenges based on legislatures having the constitutional right to determine elections and judges and governors changing the rules.
That's got to be adjudicated.That wasn't.And so I think we've got lingering questions that are going to cause a lot of problems. But cheating?No, I'm just saying that they had better ground game.People did not like Trump.Gallup actually predicted it.
The number one issue for people was COVID, and they thought Democrats were going to do a better job.No matter what happened in the first three years of Trump, no matter how good the economy may have been, the best numbers of our lives, CNBC.
doesn't matter because that last year is what matters most and that's when people want to see the change.Right now, things ain't so good for people, okay?They're not feeling well.28% according to CNN believe the country's on the wrong track.
There has never been, according to CNN, an election where this many people said the country's on the wrong track and the incumbent party won.Never happened. So let's see.I don't know for sure.
But if someone if Kamala Harris were to win with all of these factors, vibe check, I'm saying it again.Forty one point five million views for Trump, half a million to a million for Kamala.I mean, the sentiment is just not there.It's just not.
I got no explanation.I got none.I mean, I can argue that Democrats are better at mail-in voting, but Republicans have picked that up.Now Republicans are winning in early voting, and in some areas they've made tremendous gains in mail-in voting.
So it's not looking very good for Democrats.If Connell is still managed to win at this point, I have no explanations. I'll say it again, you go back to 2020, and I'm like, it's plausible.
Joe Biden won, because I was telling people, look, I know the skateboarders, okay?Skateboarders are dumb as a box of rocks.Sorry, skaters, it's true.Most of you are dumb as a box of rocks, and they'd probably agree.
And I'm watching this dude film himself with his phone carrying a mail-in ballot to a mailbox, and I'm like, this dude doesn't know left from right.He couldn't tell you what Supreme Court justice meant, and he voted. That is massive.That is massive.
People had nothing better to do.This was the world they lived in.Everyone was locked down and it worked.I don't know that this will play out so well this time around.
I think you look at, we'll talk about this in a minute, Anna Kasparian defending Donald Trump.She's not saying she supports him.She's just like, stop these lies about him.
I know people who are leftist liberal, like I mentioned, dropping these mail-in votes for Biden.Today, they say they're moderates. No joke.
I know a couple people that were very lefty, very, you know, putting the pride stickers and the flags, but they weren't super in tune with the politics.They just followed along.Default liberal, we call it.
Today, they're like, oh, no, no, no, I'm not into that stuff.And I swear, I think it's the cultural issues.The gender ideology stuff has freaked a lot of these people out.But let's take a look at the polls, right?
Let's take a look what we got going on Polly Market. Hey, Tim Pool here.My new show, The Culture War, dives deep into the most controversial issues of our time.
No topic is off limits, and I bring on guests with unique perspectives to explore the cultural landscape in today's politically charged climate.If you're looking for real conversations and bold insights, this is the show for you.
Tune into The Culture War on Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your shows, and get ready for the tough discussions.
Hey, Eric Bolling here inviting you to check out my new podcast, Bolling, where we deliver a daily dose of uncensored, unfiltered truth.My new show is based on the bedrock of democracy.Free speech every day.
I promise to expose those who misinform, edit, and push outright lies for their own agenda.On Bolling, the truth is always our top priority.So don't wait.Listen and subscribe to Bolling right now wherever you get your favorite podcasts.
Presidential election winner Trump is currently at 65.3% with a billion dollars wagered on Donald Trump.That is absolutely insane.Yo.Yeah, you're not going to make that much money if you made a bet now.You know, one to two, I guess.
Let's jump over here.Polly market popular vote winner.In fact, 62% of people think Kamala Harris is going to win the popular vote.This is where it gets interesting.
If you look at the which party wins the presidency and the popular vote, Republicans at 38% have the plurality.Only $10 million wagered on the Republicans.A large percentage say Republican presidency, depopular vote.
2%, and still $9 million wagered, a Democrat presidency with a Republican popular vote.That seems patently absurd, my friends, patently absurd. Right now, here's your updates.
The top battlegrounds from the Real Clear Politics average, Donald Trump is up by one, but hold your horses.With the latest aggregate polling coming in, Kamala Harris has Wisconsin and Michigan, and that matters.That's pretty dang big.
She's got two states.Still, without Pennsylvania, she ain't winning nothing.Now, if you look over at the national, this one's crazy, let's see if we have any updates so far.No, Trump is winning nationally
Point four, indicating if there is a margin of error, this is going to be a Trump victory.I'm not going to call it a landslide, but a Trump victory.I'm going to pull up these two polls, and I'll tell you why it matters.
This is the Michigan aggregate polling.Right now, the average has Harris with 0.5% lead in Michigan, and in Wisconsin, 0.2.
So what I'm gonna do here is I'm gonna pull up this here tweet from Tom Bevin of RealClearPolitics, and he says, for posterity, CNN was one of the best pollsters in 2022, but was among the worst in 2020.All right, let's do this.
So, Rich Barris, the People's Pundit,
says well that's about to go up because nobody believes harris is going to win either of those states by those margins if she does it all they're taking turns inflating her support in your statewide averages while hedging how she still loses it's very very obvious interesting he says uh...
Tom Bevin said, over the 14-22 cycle, CNN was a middle of the pack with a 4.6 point average error, favoring Democrats 73% of the time.Rich Berra says that's going to go up.No one believes she's going to win in these multiple states.So let's do this.
Here's RealClearPolitics pollster's scorecard. I don't care about 2014 and 2022, okay?I don't.That's too wide a margin.There's only two factors I think we want to look at.2020, a presidential election, and 2022, the most up-to-date midterm.
So let's take a look at this.I'm gonna jump over to Michigan and we have the Washington Post as the latest poll giving Harris one point.The Washington Post, let's see if the Washington Post is, do we have their bias listed here?
It doesn't look like, we do.ABC News, the Washington Post had a 100% bias with an average, 100% Democrat bias, 5.4 favoring Democrats in the multiple state pollster scorecard.And that's ABC News, Washington Post.
okay well once again we jump back to uh... michigan and the washington post saying harris plus one Yeah, okay, not looking good for Harris.Let's try this, Wisconsin.CNN, look at this, CNN gave Harris six points in Wisconsin.Are you nuts?
Six points, okay.Well, let's look at the 2020 multi-state scorecard.CNN had a 100% Democrat bias that's favoring Democrats 100% of the time, 7.3 points, meaning if you were to apply that bias to today, Trump is winning. Okay.
I think the reason why we want to use 2020 for the bias check is because that was a presidential election featuring Donald Trump.We don't know how people, but hold on.We don't know how people are going to favor the president versus the midterms.
It's different.So we want to, we want to hold them separately and we don't know how polls have changed.So this is what I say.I'm going to compare 2024 to 2020, but I also think it's fair to compare 2022.Now it is different.
2022 is different because Trump wasn't on the ballot.And so a lot of people probably said, don't know, don't care.But let's look at it anyway.The average error for the midterms, CNN actually was fairly balanced.
50-50 between the error-favoring Republicans and Democrats with an average error of 1.2.So it could go either way.In which case, seriously, CNN?They got an asterisk next to their name.What is, I don't even know, what is that supposed to mean?
It doesn't say.Six points for Kamala Harris?Okay, fine.Let's give it to him.Let's do the RealClearPolitics electoral college map.We're going to pull this bad boy up right now, and we're going to take a look at the Create Your Own Map.
With no toss-ups, as of right now, Trump wins 287 to Kamala Harris' 251.Well, shucks. That's based on their current polling in the battlegrounds.That's right.Wisconsin and Michigan go to Harris.PA goes to Donald Trump.
If Donald Trump loses PA in this metric, it's bad news.Kamala Harris wins.270 to Trump, 268.It's over.But let's say, that's why they call it the Keystone.Trump wins PA, but he loses North Carolina.Don't matter.Still Trump, 271.So this is fascinating.
Jumping over to the forecast models, which I'm not entirely sure matter, but you know, we'll read them anyway.Nate Silver says, last update from Wednesday, this is yesterday, another high volume polling day.So we've got a second update for you.
Kamala Harris got some good results in Michigan and Wisconsin from CNN and Fox, but both firms showed a tied race in Pennsylvania.We also have a new model talk out for you about whether you should trust early voting, blah, blah, blah.
Okay, so right now, take a look at this. Who's ahead in the polls?Nate Silver uses a specialized edition or model of pollsters.Real clear politics polls in everybody.
Nate Silver goes, I don't trust these, that, or otherwise, so they don't get included.This gives Harris 48.6 nationally to Trump's 47.5. Interesting.We scroll down and we can see the forecast model that he's given.Trump has a 53.8% chance to win.
Harris is 45.8.That means, based on this forecast model, you're losing money if you bet on Polly Market. because the edge is not there.But I'm just going to say this, as I've said it many, many times.It's meaningless.Forecast models mean nothing.
Sorry, Nate, but take a look at this.You had Trump at 61.3 to win in September.What does that number matter at all?These numbers mean literally nothing. Polls show us like a week to a week and a half lagged sentiment.
Prediction markets shows what people think is going to happen.And you got to put them all together and try and figure it out for yourself.We don't know.
If the pollsters updated their models as of 2022, where you can see there was a lot of Republican favored polling, which is really fascinating.Trump could be in trouble.This is why I'm saying we don't know.
So I tell all of you right now, you got to go vote. It is here.We don't know what no one knows.Nobody does.Avi Amendi came on the show and he said, no, I'm calling it for Trump.No idea, man.
The 2022 pollsters, according to RCP, had a higher average favorability for Republican.That's where the bias was.Rasmussen had a 100% Republican bias, weighted 5.1%.That's kind of crazy.Only two states polled.Fine.
Between 2014 and 2022, you can see a very heavy Democrat bias, CNN 4.6, 73% of the time.But I don't know that it means anything.That's several midterms, a couple presidential elections, what does that ultimately mean?
We look at 2020, the presidential polls are heavily favoring Democrats. Do we have 2018?It was mixed.So I'll tell you what I think.
If you go back to the midterm 2018 and you can see that some of the Republicans were favored and some Democrats were favored, it seems like the midterm polls tend to do a good job.
But when you look at, let me see if we can pull up, do we, we don't have 2016 in here. When you take a look at 2020, it's all Democrat favored.2022 more resembles the 2018 midterms, slightly more favoring Republicans.
I'm going to go ahead and say, I think the weight right now is favoring Democrats.The bias is for Democrats.It's good news for Trump, but it don't matter. You need to go out and vote.
What we're seeing in PA, people are losing their Republican suit in one because they're saying early voting locations are being shut down.And there's a video where a cop literally says there's too many and it's a long, grueling process.
So no one's allowed to vote anymore.No joke.And there are there are Democrats apparently wearing badges.It's a voter protection going around and telling people to leave.Absolutely insane stuff that we're seeing. I'll tell you this, my friends.
None of the data matters.The only thing that matters is that you go out and vote.But I'll tell you this.There will be no free and fair election no matter what happens.No one will believe it.
Already these videos are coming out and already doubt is being cast.You've got reports of Lancaster County potentially fraudulent mail-in vote registrations coming in at the last minute.Trump calls it out.The media loses their minds.
It's going to get absolutely insane.I'm going to wrap it up there.Smash the like button, share the show with everyone, you know.Follow me on Instagram and Timcast and Twitter at Timcast.And my friends, we had a new song coming out.
It's called Hunger Inside.Go to hungerinside.com if you want to check it out.It's coming out tonight at midnight. It is a Halloween-themed song with zombies, and there's chickens, and the chicken fights the zombies, and it's the greatest music video.
Look at that angry chicken.Here you go, he's gonna, she's gonna, look how strong that chicken is.Check it out, hungerinside.com.Thanks for hanging out, and we will see you all in the next segment at 1 p.m.
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, it was likely censorship.Joe Rogan says YouTube tried to suppress Trump.No way.It was a mistake.For those of you that don't know, you all do.But sure.Joe Rogan interviewed Donald Trump on his show about a week ago.
It was amazing.It was a really, really great show.We were all looking forward to this interview finally happening.And of course, as soon as it came out, You couldn't find it.
Now, of course, initially it was unlisted, and a lot of people thought this was censorship.No, Joe Rogan did that on purpose because they were trying to synchronize the uploads with Spotify, but there was an upload error with Spotify.
That's no big deal.However, following the relisting by Joe, you still could not find the show.If you searched for it, it didn't come up.
A lot of people were saying, how is it possible that one of the most consequential, if not the most consequential podcast ever cannot be searched for on YouTube?It doesn't quite make sense.
It wasn't just that you couldn't search for it, it didn't even trend.Well, they try to give explanations and they say, I believe one explanation that's been circulating is that, well, a bunch of people must have flagged this as a spam.
and then YouTube automatically put it through their spam filter and now we ain't buying it.Joe Rogan and Donald Trump were doing the sit-down and everyone in the world knew it in advance.
There's no way YouTube did not have this something ready to go. Now, perhaps it was one rogue engineer who suppressed the video.That may be.They'll never admit it.But this did happen before Elon bought X, when it was still Twitter.
A rogue employee deleted Donald Trump's account because these people are fervent.And so I tell you right now, man, we're less than a week away from this election.And I'm going to tell you right now.
I am very concerned about what rogue actors will do.I am not super concerned about conspiracies.You know, a lot of people say, deep state this, conspiracy that.I mean, maybe.You know, maybe.
What I am concerned about is all of the lone actors who we have already seen.You've got the story of the guy on the bike torching.A guy had a sign in his yard.Some random guy on a bike came and lit it on fire twice.Got arrested for it.
You have the woman who runs up onto someone's lawn and starts punching their Trump sign.Insane.Numerous videos of people ripping down Trump signs.
Because these individuals, they don't need to be told to take action to cause harm to Trump or his campaign.They just do it.
So one rogue actor at YouTube nukes the Joe Rogan, Donald Trump interview, but not shutting it down, just making it harder to find.And I think this probably did have a big impact on the total viewership.
When this video went live and people couldn't find it, other people started posting it on other platforms, rebroadcasting it or whatever. ripping Joe's show, re-hosting it.This, of course, negatively impacted the viewership.
So we see right now 41.5 million, perhaps it would have been 50.I'm not kidding.Other people were uploading it in full to Rumble, to X, and to other channels on YouTube.Because they were saying, you need to see it, they're suppressing it.
I think some of them may have been a bit more nefarious, like, ooh, I'll get a lot of views if I take Joe's show, sure. But I think this did negatively impact the interview with Donald Trump.
Newsweek reports, podcaster Joe Rogan has addressed the controversy over his interview with Trump being too difficult to find on YouTube, alleging that the issues were not a mistake.
Trump's appearance in the Joe Rogan experience drew millions of views, but users reported issues.Quote, if you Googled Rogan Trump, you could only get clips.You couldn't watch the whole episode.You couldn't find it.
And so we reached out to them a couple of times and they fixed it to their credit.So now you can find it.There is no way it was a mistake.That's too convenient, Rogan said, adding that it could have been a rogue engineer.
Although he initially said he was sure it was a mistake, he later clarified that he was being sarcastic.You can't suppress ish.It doesn't work. This is the internet.This is 2024.
People are going to realize what you're doing if you try to make it so that something can't come up in search engine because it's too popular.
Rogan questioned why the interview had not been featured on YouTube's trending page despite it generating 26 million views in 24 hours.He said that if that's not trending, he doesn't know what is.I'm telling you.I don't know.
Maybe Joe's watching my show because I said that too. One of the big issues around the censorship was, how did it not hit trending?And I know a lot of people, look, look, look.I got a song coming out tonight.
I'm not doing this because I want to promo the song.I do want to promo the song, but I want to stress this.I make these videos.Yesterday, two days ago, I made a video, and let me see the numbers right now. 656,000 views from my show on the 29th.
Fascinating within I believe an hour it had 200,000 views and maybe that's not that big I don't know, but I can tell you this When we started a new channel to release music, this is like two years ago We put out a song called only ever wanted the channel had very few subscribers Brand-new channel we launched the song and share it it generates a couple hundred thousand views over I think like eight hours it had like 400,000 and it was trending in on YouTube.
It was trending Because YouTube has, and the number appeared next to it, we were like, whoa.I was like, I had never had a trending video like this before.I had a featured video back in the day 10 years ago, and they used to do front page features.
But I had never had so many views in so short a time that I got this trend.And I said, well, hold on.I've had a lot of videos.YouTube.com slash Timcast, where I got 500,000 views in like three hours.And it was never trending. It's obvious, isn't it?
YouTube, they likely blacklist, or I guess you call it redlisting, whatever it is.Blacklisting is more like you're banned, you're shadowbanned, it's hard to find.They have put my channels, I can only assume, on lists saying, do not trend.
That's right.I believe this is the tiny room shadow ban, and the purpose is make it difficult for new audience members to find this channel.Hence, we were never trending.But a new channel we launched was.
I believe they're doing the same thing to Joe Rogan.There's no way you can have 26 million, hit 10 million overnight and trended nothing.
I bet if you go to YouTube trending right now, you're going to find videos that only have a couple hundred thousand views.How is that possible?Except they've done it intentionally.Now, Joe may say rogue engineer removed him from search.Sure.
But not trending?That's not a rogue engineer.That's structural.That's someone removing the trend or blocking it from happening.I suppose maybe he's a rogue engineer too.Nah, I don't buy it. I don't buy it.I believe that's institutional right there.
Maybe the search removal.Sure.But not on trending?This was the most trending podcast in the world!And YouTube did not list it.
They're going to say that YouTube previously addressed the issue in a statement to Variety on Monday, stating, for some searches on Monday, the original three-hour interview didn't appear prominently.
Short excerpts uploaded by Joe Rogan Channel appeared, but we know it's frustrating for users looking to find the full video.We worked hard to resolve the issue, blah blah blah.
When the interview first aired, viewers questioned why the video was unlisted, but Rogan clarified this, we know.
In the latest podcast episode, Rogan praised Elon Musk, the owner of Vaxx, a staunch Trump supporter, for intervening and uploading the full video to his platform.
Elon was furious, so Elon contacted Daniel Elkett Spotify, and they put it on X as well.So now it's on X, the full.So it has way more views than ever.
In that episode, which featured comedians Francis Foster and Konstantin Kaysen as guests, Rogan spoke about how he believed large media companies control and suppress information.And, dear friends, Joe Rogan is correct. The trending thing matters.
It really does.Trending is how people get an understanding of what is currently popular among the general population, what's happening right now.That's why we have trending.
We released our first two songs, and on a new channel, they were trending with comparable views.Never again.We released a song called Together Again.It was a spoof cover of a Daily Wire song that Jeremy Boring and Michael Knowles had written.
It's our biggest release ever.It's got millions of views.We sold tens of thousands of singles.Not only were we told it couldn't chart on Billboard, but it did not trend on YouTube. Now, how can that be?
Unless they've decided you are no longer eligible to appear on Trending.Interesting, is it not?I suppose there'll be some argument from someone saying, you just don't understand the algorithm.You know, Rogan's got too many subscribers.
Now, fair point. The weight of the trending may be, relative to your subscribers, how many views did you get?Now that can't be the end-all be-all, because that would mean that a channel with no subs getting 10,000 views would appear on trending.
That doesn't make sense.There's got to be a bottom line.For a new channel like Timcast Music, when we launched with no subscribers, hmm, didn't make sense that we would appear on trending.
Now, they may argue, look, Joe's got 18 million subs, and so if he launches a video that gets a ton of views, it's not trending just because Joe Rogan's big.I would actually argue that's exactly what it means to be trending.
Just because Joe Rogan is famous does not mean his content is not trending.If he has 18 million subs and 5 million watch the episode in 10 hours, that's trending.That is culturally prominent.
Perhaps the argument from YouTube is gonna be, well, who needs to be notified of this if they're all watching it anyway? Five million ain't the world.Twenty million ain't the world.It doesn't matter who you think needs to be notified or otherwise.
Is it trending, yes or no?And in this regard, it was and they did not list it.I think it's on purpose.I think it's on purpose.Kamala Harris won't do the interview.And so surprise, surprise, YouTube is pushing back on Joe Rogan. It's not just Joe.
We go back to 2018, there was a smear campaign where they falsely claimed that prominent YouTubers were secretly working with racists or something like this.The Alternative Influencer Network, they called it.
Each and every one of us that had been maligned had seen, instantly after that report, YouTube recommendations drop off like crazy.You could actually track when the report came out, and they were lies.It was all fake news.
They had claimed that a video game comedian, Chris Ragon, had directly coordinated with Richard Spencer. Chris Reagan's like, I don't even know who that is, I never met the guy.What?They claimed that I had done collaborations with Stefan Molyneux.
And I'm like, I've never met the guy.I know who he is, I never met him.It was fake news.This is what the corporate press does.
Now we're hearing Tucker Carlson, we've heard Ben Shapiro say that the New York Times is working on a big smear piece laundering media matters for the efforts of suppressing channels that are counter to the machine narrative.Podcasts, prominent ones.
You know, I've been asked about it several times because I also did receive a similar message.This is funny.It was like, can you comment?We're writing a story about this.And they gave me nothing to comment on.
It was like, we've identified several people and using research for media matters, misinformation.And then it just mentioned some things like with no questions.And it was like, care to comment?And I'm like, comment on what?
Like you didn't ask me a question or you didn't say anything. It was like the weirdest thing ever.I was like, I don't know why you're messaging me this.Maybe the guy's just trying to get attention or something.Seemingly nonsensical.
But I wouldn't be surprised if the corporate press is continuing their downward spiral and trying to manipulate the machines to benefit themselves.
That being said, you may have noticed that in the past couple of weeks, Timcast IRL and this show have been appearing on the front page of YouTube default.That is, for new users, when you go to youtube.com, guess what you see?
Big podcasts, left and right.Well, the CEO passed, rest in peace, I mean no disrespect, and I think a new CEO must have come in and said, we're making changes here.We want to maximize revenue, but also take a look at this.
with Jeff Bezos and others, stepping up and saying outright, we will not endorse.I have to wonder if what's actually happening is that they can see the writing on the wall.Bezos runs this op-ed saying, we don't want to appear biased.
Yeah, okay, dude.Some people have pointed out that USA Today, LA Times, and Washington Post not endorsing is because the wealthy owners don't want Kamala Harris.She's in favor of a wealth tax.And they're like, nah, we don't want that.Not one bit.
I actually think it's because they're scared of what happens when Donald Trump comes into office.That's what they expect.The polls are leaning Trump's direction.The metrics, the betting markets, everything is coming up Donald Trump.
Public sentiment, direction of the country, the Gallup poll predictions are all indicating a Donald Trump win in five days.So imagine you're a billionaire.You're running Google.You're Mark Zuckerberg.You're running Facebook.
You're probably going, ah, crap.Elon Musk saw it. Elon Musk, I think, saw it legitimately, though.He buys X. He says, this is wrong.They're banning Babylon B. We can't allow this.So what do you get?He buys X and he says, I'm not for these things.
Trump is better.Mark Zuckerberg comes on, goes, oh, geez.Oh, oh, man.Oh, wow.I'm I'm a libertarian now.I'm not Democrat. Remember that video where Mark Zuckerberg had Sweet Baby Rays just on a shelf in his living room?
You know, I don't know what that was all about.It's kind of weird, but he probably just bought it from the store and put it on a shelf and forgot about it or something, whatever.That was kind of weird.
But anyway, I think Mark is concerned about what happens when a Trump administration comes in, cleans up shop, and then starts bringing in some antitrust accountability across the board.
And so these billionaires, they're sitting there being like, we are in trouble. Oh, y'all played dirty games in 2020 suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story.
Oh, man, how about when the Ukraine scandal hit and we learned about the man who blew the whistle? It was all completely orchestrated and fake.
And let me tell you this, I still, the name has been spoken, but I will not speak it, because I still don't know what they're going to do.
But there was a name that was banned from all social media, and it was one of the weirdest things I've ever experienced.This is when I think you could see the deep state falling apart in sheer panic.Yeah, no joke.
What we ended up seeing was following the impeachment investigation, there was this whistleblower that Donald Trump was engaging in a quid pro quo with Ukraine.Quid pro quo.
The guy who blew the whistle worked for the CIA and real clear investigations discovered his name. And what happened?If you typed his name in on Facebook, it would disappear instantly.Now that's weird.
So I actually made a post seeing all of this happening.No rules were broken.No strikes were given.I said, so-and-so is a 54-year-old dentist from Dubuque with three kids.That was it.Clearly not a reference to any CIA agents.They deleted the post.
I said, that's really weird.This is just a regular name. Just someone's name, but they filtered it out.On YouTube, this was the craziest thing.I had made a video saying, real clear investigations exposes this individual, and I got no notifications.
Someone messaged me and said, hey Tim, why did you delete your video?And I said, what?No, your video from this morning is gone.
So I went in, looked at the video, and when I tried to mouse over the video, it didn't, you know when you put your mouse over a link, it turns to the pointing finger? When I did that, can we do that?There you go, like there.
So see right there on Newsweek, it turns into a finger to point.It didn't.I couldn't click on anything.And I was like, this is really weird.So for me, it looked like it was still there.But when I hovered my mouse over it, nothing happened.
That was when Donald Trump was president the first time.Do you think he has amnesia?I certainly do not.
So for all of these people that have been running this machine against Donald Trump, now seeing that the machine has failed, Donald Trump is approaching victory.He may win.I don't know.Y'all better go vote.
Oh, man, I bet they are shaking in their boots. So the people at YouTube, the people at Twitter, now X, the people at Facebook, the people at the Washington Post, the LA Times, USA Today, well, they know it's coming.And they're concerned about it.
That's why I think these changes may start to roll out.The front page of YouTube is now being very nice to my show.Very nice.Wow, I've seen it appear on the front page quite a bit.
Not all the time, but what's fascinating is Timcast IRL typically ranks around the top five live streams in the world.It's kind of crazy to say.We're not the biggest show, okay?We do around 20 million views per month.It's not a whole lot.
The show itself gets between 300 to 500 on YouTube, some a little bit more, and the audio podcast gets about 100,000. Strangely, the live audience is one of the largest in the world.That's interesting.
I think we can do a lot to improve reach and be better than we are, but again, I'll stress, we're not the biggest show.In fact, I mentioned this and some people got mad about it, but my morning show is actually bigger than TimCast IRL.
Gets substantially more views.Like I was mentioning just a couple of days ago, 700,000 views.One of my videos from yesterday, 400,000 views.
There is much, much more attention on my individual news segments, this this channel right here, then Timcast IRL gets.But now we're starting to see the censorship get lifted.
And I wonder if that is because we gained hundreds of thousands of subscribers over the past month.This channel as well.
I wonder if they're starting to realize, oopsie daisies, Trump is going to win and this is going to reshape the censorship and the media industrial complex.The Democrat media industrial complex is in for a boy.
Trump was speaking about the CBS interview with Kamala Harris, 60 Minutes.They edited her answers to make her look better.They changed what she said.Trump said that should be illegal.They should lose their license for this.What did the media report?
Trump says that interviewing Kamala should have been illegal and they should lose their license.They lied because they're desperate. Well, some of these people still got fightin' him.
They're still, I mean, you still got New York Times and other outlets endorsing Kamala Harris.
Some have endorsed Donald Trump, but I think when Trump gets in, he's gonna bring in, I don't know, FEC, FCC, DOJ, and it is going to be very interesting what ends up happening.Now, look, my friends, I don't know if Trump's gonna win.
Certainly, there's some writing on the wall suggesting he will.These billionaires are rather terrified.It's going to be up to you.Did you go vote?I did.I went and voted yesterday.It took about 15 minutes.No big deal.And it was easy for me.
I'm in West Virginia.I was like, they give me a pencil and they said, use the eraser and you just tap the things you want. And I did.Double checked everything to make sure I was good.And I said, all right, let's roll.
And they gave me a little sticker.I'm in West Virginia.They call this mega country.They say, ain't no way West Virginia is going blue.But you know what matters?The popular vote.That's why I've been saying it nonstop every day.
This is the most important week of our lives.There's five days left.You need to go vote.I don't care what state you're in.If you're in a swing state, of course you need to go vote. If you're in California, Washington, or Oregon, you need to go vote.
Trump must win the national popular vote.Now, I'm seeing these rumors out of California that you have the screen where it's got all the list of candidates.You have to actually scroll down.It doesn't show Trump. It's not going to be easy.
They're going to put every hurdle in your way, but send that message.Let the far left crackpots know we will not tolerate the censorship, the manipulation, the lies, the spending of our tax dollars on foreign conflicts.We reject that.
We want border security.We want security for American workers.And no more wars. So you need to go out.If you're in deep red and you think Trump's gonna win anyway, doesn't matter.Trump needs the popular vote.
If you're in deep blue and Trump's gonna lose anyway, doesn't matter.Trump needs the popular vote.And if you're in Pennsylvania, you better bring everybody you know to go vote.Tell everybody, come on everybody, we're going to vote.And you go vote.
Because this is the most important week.I can't imagine what this country's gonna look like if Kamala Harris wins.Not that Donald Trump's gonna be a perfect leader or anything like that, but Lord help us, I do not know what to,
I don't know that anyone will accept the results anyway.But we'll see, my friends.I'll leave it there.Next segment's coming up at 4 p.m.on this channel.Thanks for hanging out, and I'll see you all then.
Yes, Jimmy Kimmel, the arbiter of truth, as it were. He'll come out and say he's a late-night comedian, nothing he says is ever true, and that's the game they play.
Masquerading as comedians, they often present information that is expected to be a grain of truth, but it's all just jokes.Then when they're called out for lying, they say, oh, oh, oh, you know, no, hey, we were just kidding.
Jimmy Kimmel spreads election disinformation by joking Trump supporters should vote late.Biden-Harris admin prosecuted Douglas Mackey for less.It's actually an interesting story.
I have the clip for you that I will play, and you can hear the words straight from Jimmy Kimmel's mouth.
Give him a call.Wrestle that mop bucket out of his hands.I don't know if you guys know about this, but we have an election coming up on.I feel pretty relaxed about it.I've really been enjoying the week.
In times like these, it's important to remember that cannabis is legal in our state.You can vote early, vote early.If you can't vote early, vote on time.If you want to vote for Trump, vote late, vote very late.
Do your voting on Thursday or maybe Friday.This will be my third time voting against Donald Trump.Fifth, if you count the two times he was nominated for an Emmy for a reality show host.
And did you catch that? Jimmy Kimmel said if you want to vote for Trump, vote late, vote Thursday or Friday.Let me play that for you again.
You can vote early, vote early.If you can't vote early, vote on time.If you want to vote for Trump, vote late, vote very late.Do your voting on Thursday or maybe Friday.This will be my third time voting against Donald.
It doesn't matter if it's a joke or not. Douglas Mackey was criminally charged.And what's the story with Douglas Mackey?Well, I believe they may have the image in the post-millennial story.
This guy, going by the name Ricky Vaughn on X, posted an image that said, avoid the line vote from home, text Hillary to 59925, vote for Hillary and be a part of history.
At the bottom it says, must be 18 or older to vote, one vote per person, must be a legal citizen of the United States, voting by text not available in Guam, Puerto Rico, Alaska, or Hawaii.Now hold on there a minute.
You actually can vote by text on, I don't know, American Idol, a bunch of other shows.This was a joke that was sent to Douglas Mackey.He did not make.He then posted it because he thought it was funny.He was sentenced to seven months in prison.
Now, I think this is very important.What if I said right now that I was having a cookie contest, seriously, because people do this, And I said, hey, we have Kamala Harris cookies and Trump cookies.And then I said, vote from home.
Don't wait in line at my cookie shop.Text Kamala or Trump to this number in order to vote.Or if you want to support Kamala.You see, the point is, this doesn't say vote in the general election for this person.The point is, it doesn't matter.
The federal government said this was illegal. Jimmy Kimmel just went on TV and said, vote late, vote very late.Vote Thursday or Friday.Thursday or Friday aren't late voting.That's after the election.
If he wants to make the argument, I was just joking, well, hold on there, so was Ricky Vaughn. But you know what?We all know nothing will happen to Jimmy Kimmel.
Maybe if Donald Trump wins, though, he might say, Ricky Vaughn was sentenced to seven months in prison for this joke.Jimmy Kimmel will be charged for his joke.The reality is, I think that we shouldn't charge either of them for their jokes.
But what if this clip is seen by a run-of-the-mill, somebody who watches Jimmy Kimmel, but small percentage that lean Trump, and he jokes and says, vote late, vote very late.Vote Thursday or Friday.
What if someone doesn't understand that that literally means, after the election, that's the joke?Not everybody understands all of these jokes, right?That's the argument they made about putting Ricky Vaughn in jail.
So somebody watching this says, ah, well, you know, I wasn't gonna vote early anyway, so what's the big deal if I'm a little late? Because late might mean what?The end of the day on election day?
If you do not know that you cannot vote on Friday, and you're thinking, well, they counted ballots last time around, several days after the election, right up to the weekend.
Someone who doesn't know might be thinking, oh, I can vote Thursday or Friday?Because of what Jimmy Kimmel said.So, double standard much?Post Millennial says, Kimmel said he voted against Trump when he was nominated for Emmy Awards.Okay.
According to a new poll from CNN, only 30% of Americans, American voters think if he loses, Trump will concede.What would give them that idea?Of course Trump won't concede if he loses his election.
He still hasn't conceded the last election and he's already claiming Pennsylvania is cheating.This is the crazy thing about what Jimmy Kimmel does.Let me pull this up.Lancaster PA fraud.This is not something Trump just made up. Uh, here we go.
Look at this.I mean, it's absolutely nuts.These people are evil.This is from Lancaster Online.Lancaster County D.A.says probe into hundreds of problem voter registration forms continues.And I believe it wasn't even just hundreds.Twenty-five hundred!
Lancaster County detectives have so far identified hundreds of fraudulent voter registration applications among a batch of 2,500 dropped at the county elections office on or near the deadline, D.A.Heather Adams said in a statement Wednesday.
So what we had heard when Trump tweeted this could potentially be fraud, that's all we heard.These ballots came in, they may be fraudulent.It is now confirmed as of this morning from Lancaster Online that hundreds so far reviewed are fraudulent.
Yo, that's crazy.And Jimmy Kimmel is attacking Donald Trump and telling his voters to vote on Thursday or Friday.
And if these people are not smart, don't understand or they're just ignorant of the of the rules, they might actually think the joke isn't that you're voting after the deadline.It's that he's telling you to get there as late as possible.
Imagine I said the joke, if you're going to vote for Trump, vote early, vote now, or get there on time if you have to.But if you want to vote for Kamala, show up at 7 p.m.Well, a lot of polling locations are open at 7 p.m.
Polls don't close, I think, on the East Coast until around 8 or so.But what if I were to make a joke like that?The average person would be like, haha, I get it, you're saying if I get there late, I might not make it in time.
Some people may interpret what Jimmy Kimmel is saying in that way. So I say we uphold a single standard.If that's the game you want to play, Jimmy boy.I wonder if Jimmy ever actually commented on Douglas Mackey.
Christina Wong also posted a joke in the lead up to the 2016 election, telling Trump supporters to skip the polls and text their vote.Wong was not prosecuted by the DOJ.Well, the argument was she did not include a number.
I don't, I don't know that that matters.Not a single person actually tried to vote for Hillary through text.And I will stress the simple argument.What if I said, vote for Ian or Alex Sine's coffee?
Text 12345 and Ian to vote for Ian and skip the lines.Does that, it doesn't mean anything?Well, Ian's not running for office.My point here is, you could be voting for Hillary for who knows what.It does not say in this meme for the president.
Doesn't matter.They went after him anyway.The Intercept pointed this out in April.A MAGA troll's memes were blatant disinformation, but were they a crime?
A federal appeals court will decide whether Douglas Mackey should go to prison for his posts about Hillary Clinton and the 2016 election.But what about anybody else? There is no vote-by-text mechanism, it goes on to say.
Last year, after what the Department of Justice called a groundbreaking prosecution, for which another notorious MAGA troll was a key government witness, Mackey was convicted of violating a broad Reconstruction-era federal statute and sentenced to seven months in prison.
Mackey's case sharply divided legal experts, including First Amendment and election law scholars.As another presidential election looms, the case highlights the inherent challenges of criminalizing and prosecuting disinformation.
I'm not saying it's an easy case. Uh, said Sean Morales-Doyle, director of the Brennan Center for Justice Voting Rights Program.
All that said, in the context of voting in elections, there's something very heavy weighing on the other side of the scale.The constitutional right to vote.Yeah, blah blah blah blah, they go on to say a lot about this stuff, I'm sure.
But you know what, my friends?There's not going to be a single standard.But this proves it, doesn't it? We already knew this.The left doesn't care about this at all.Jimmy Kimmel just told Trump voters to basically not vote.He's tricking them.
It was a joke, right?I don't know, but Douglas Mackey was a joke.If the standard we're going by is that any joke that is misinformation is misinformation, then Jimmy Kimmel committed a crime.And what if this has a real impact on the election?
This one's going to be hot, my friends.I can't predict what's going to happen.So the only thing I can tell you is y'all need to go vote.That's it.That's all that matters is that you guys go vote.
You vote, you bring your friends, you bring your family, you go vote.Because in five days, we will find out, will we have any kind of restoration of this system? Now, it is likely, in my opinion, that even if Trump wins, we don't get one.
I do not believe that people like Jimmy Kimmel will accept a Trump victory because they didn't accept a 2016 victory.They tried challenging the election on January 6th.
They tried challenging every Republican that's won, going back to forever, basically, calling each and every one of them Hitler, and unfortunately for this country,
Many Republicans, people on the right, people who are not Democrats, tolerated the Democrats' absurdity, but it's reached an apex.If this persists, this country gets ripped apart.I don't see a reasonable conclusion at all.I hope there is.I do.
I genuinely hope there will be a reasonable conclusion. But I'm not convinced that either side will accept the results of the election.
And with things like this, the double standards, the lies, the manipulations, I hate to say it, but it looks like the overt likelihood is going to be abject chaos.
Forgive me, my friends, for being, I don't know, I don't want to call it pessimistic, and I don't think it's unfair to criticize realism.
I think we have a very serious challenge ahead of us, but there is a potential outcome, as I've stressed in every video thus far.It's the most important week.If Trump wins the national popular vote, then none of this stuff matters.
They can say whatever they want, but they will not have a popular mandate.They will say, oh, it's not fair.It's not fair.But if Trump wins the popular vote, we'll just say you guys are the minority.You're the screaming squeaky wheel.
You didn't win this one. I hope.Forecasters think Kamala Harris is going to win the popular vote and Trump will win the electoral college.
And that it's better than Kamala winning, but it's still a recipe for disaster because Democrats will claim popular mandate and that the archaic electoral college system must be overturned and it will be bedlam.So, my friends, go vote.
Next segment's coming up at 6 p.m.on this channel.Thanks for hanging out.We'll see you all then. There are many things that I would never have predicted.One of them would be Anna Kasparian defending Donald Trump. Yeah, never saw this one coming.
I mean, I guess until recently.For those that don't know, Anna Kasparian is the co-host of The Young Turks, their progressive network.And as of recent, she has been more accepting of, I guess we'll call it the truth.
The truth is the left has been pushing lies.Now, even Anna herself is calling out some of these lies, notably that Donald Trump was a fascist.He's certainly not.And this hyperbole is actually damaging to any real Democrat arguments.
The story from The Daily Wire. Progressive commentator throws water on Democrat attempt to brand Trump a fascist.Kasparian recently revealed that she abandoned the Democratic Party after she was sexually assaulted by a homeless man.
Kasparian, co-host of The Young Turks, responded to recent attacks by the left on Trump by noting that they are not helpful because they are not true.She says, okay, fine, I'll bite.
Fascism requires a militarized citizenry, conquest and imperialism, the elimination of our governing bodies like Congress, and the notion that anyone who isn't part of a master race should be massacred.
She noted that was a weird thing to label a guy who brags about not starting any new wars. He also passed criminal justice reform and personally pardoned black inmates who were serving life sentences for drug crimes who Obama was unwilling to pardon.
But I'm the effing stupid one, okay?Oh boy. When she was attacked by leftists for her statement, she responded, how do you explain more minorities supporting him now more than ever?Are they fascist too?
She added that while she does not support Trump, she does not think it's helpful to call him fascist or a Nazi.Those words actually mean something beyond not liking a candidate.
I also don't think listening to or reading the perspectives of conservative voters is a flaw or something I should feel ashamed of.What a remarkable turn of events, as the story goes.For those that aren't familiar,
Anna Kasparian was very progressive, very unmoved by reality, and I'm not trying to be a dick, I like Anna, she's very nice, she's come around, she's seen the truth, but you see, and she pointed this out, she wrote this long piece where she said that she had been unwilling to read what the right had been suggesting, and when she was assaulted by a homeless man, came up behind her, grabbed her, and let's just say violated her,
The first thing that happens is she said, hey, this just happened to me.They called her racist.And she was like, but I never said the race of the homeless guy.Right.It was a weird thing for him to say.
They then said that she was stigmatizing and demonizing a marginalized group, so she should keep it to herself.But she was like, but I was assaulted.She then said later on, stop calling me a birthing person.I'm a woman.And they said, no, you're not.
You're a birthing person.And then she kind of had it. She goes on to mention that following this, she noticed a bunch of leftist channels started making up fake stories about her.
They were exaggerating what she was saying, they were lying about what she actually said, and they were doing it for clout and clicks.And she said, hold on a minute.Now it's fascinating.
When you experience that happening to yourself, you start to go, are they lying about everything?Imagine you're one of these lefties.You get all your news from all these lefties and you believe it. until you become the subject of the story.
We call this, my friends, well, it's akin to the Gell-Man amnesia effect for which Anna is not a victim.For those that aren't familiar, Gell-Man amnesia is a fake name made it by this dude who was like, I got an idea.I'm gonna make it sound official.
Gell-Man amnesia, not sound scientific and academic, right? The reality was, it was just some dude, and he was like, you know what I noticed?
If, let's say you're a guitar player, and you're reading the newspaper, and you come across a story about guitaring, and you are reading it, and it says, you know, John Doe, one of the greatest guitar players recognized in the Hall of Fame, was seen doing an arpeggio at his latest rock concert, and it's a picture of him, and you're like, hold on.
That's called an arpeggio, not an arpeggio.What?That's fake.They're wrong.How could they have run something that's wrong?See, you as the expert who plays guitar knows they made something up that's fake.Then you go, how silly.
You turn the page and you read a story about Syria and you go, wow, I didn't know that was true.As though you had just forgotten the story in which you are an expert was fake. And that's why it's called Gelman Amnesia.We forget.
When we're the expert, we don't believe it.When we're not the expert, we believe it.For Anna, she actually got to experience how they lie about all of us.But here's my favorite part. Anna's lied about me.I don't know, it's just kind of funny, huh?
Yeah, weird how that works.
So I don't know that I completely trust the Young Turks, but at any rate, when they started attacking Anna, she was saying, okay, this is wrong, but I'll tell you what I really think, and then we'll read more about what she's saying.
I think Anna and Cenk just realized they're on the losing side of things.I think you take a look at the sentiment of the American people, the working class, as it pertains to war and illegal immigration, and y'all are on the wrong side of history.
I think they figured it out.They're going to try and maintain that they're still progressive, but now they're going to do the left has gone crazy route.Trump is still bad, but I'm not now more reasonable.
Jake, especially, and I actually believe a little bit more because she actually got assaulted by this guy.So it's messed up. So if she says this, I'll bite, she gets a response from this year Fowler Darrell Owens, who says, you're stupid as hell.
I'm sorry leftists and Bushwick made fun of you for getting mugged by a homeless man.
But excusing Trump's drone war, killing the Iranian nuclear deal, deregulation of civilian rules of engagement, and total disdain for the lives of minorities is pathetic.
She responds, how do you explain more minorities supporting him now more than ever before?Are they fascist too?And then someone said, Stephen goes, Anna, more minorities supporting fascism for cheaper eggs is not really a great argument.
You see, these people don't actually have good arguments.Here's a funny point brought up by Nuance Bro.It says one in five black voters and one in five 18 to 29 year olds think Hitler had some good ideas.
there is a among all uh... voters was it's uh... eleven percent that's actually got a crazy twenty one percent of a of gen z think hitler had some good ideas thirty four sixty percent sixty percent of thirty to forty nine seven percent of fifty sixty four
Here's a point.I don't know what they mean by that, and I think it's important to break it down.Let's talk about minorities supporting Donald Trump.Maybe it's because he's talking about things they care about.Notably, securing the border.
Right now in Chicago, famously, black Chicagoans are saying we are being replaced. So that's not really a racial thing.
I don't think the black people are claiming there's a great black replacement happening where the Democrats are trying to replace black people with Latinos.
They're saying Americans of any and all backgrounds are being displaced and replaced by a different workforce.But let's talk about this idea.
Stig Sexton and I made a really great point when I was at a, we were at a speaking event in, I think it was New York. Someone in the audience asked a question, and it was pertaining to a known white supremacist.
And people started trying to answer the question, and I said, well, hold on.I was like, I'm pretty sure you're referencing like a known white nationalist guy.
And Sticks, Hex, and Emory immediately said, just because someone has overwhelmingly bad ideas doesn't mean you throw out any idea they may have that may be good.Hitler liked dogs.That's the nuance.
And I think Ricky Gervais had a joke about this, too. So looking at a poll like this, I'll tell you what concerns me.The increasing number in Gen Z that think Hitler had good ideas is kind of weird.You know why?Well, I'll tell you.
It's the right and the left.You've got pro-Nazi young people, and then you've got anti-Semitic young people as a big portion. Among black people, it's 21%.Among 18 to 29, it's also 21%.
But I think if you're, so I'm prepping this because I don't think the reason they feel that way has anything to do with the nuance of understanding that just because someone is like really evil doesn't mean every idea they have is bad, right?
So I can call some of these Democrat politicians, here you go.Nancy Pelosi, I think she's evil.She enriches herself off the back of Americans, but she also has a refrigerator full of that, what is it, Jenny's ice cream? That's good.
She went out and bought ice cream.I think ice cream is good.You know what I mean?I like ice cream, too.We understand this.Seeing young people overwhelmingly support it, that's getting kind of worrisome if you ask me.
But ultimately, I don't think minorities are supporting Donald Trump because he makes eggs cheaper.That's stupid.It's because he's not a fascist and he makes eggs cheaper. So we have this, this is where I think the whole thing starts.
Gabe Gutierrez says, President Biden tonight.Donald Trump has no character.He doesn't give a damn about the Latino community.Just the other day, a speaker at his rally called Puerto Rico a floating island of garbage.
The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters.Interesting.Kasperian says, so the president calling tens of millions of Americans garbage is supposed to demonstrate character? She's criticizing Joe Biden.
He's on camera saying it, but political reporters said something different, not a good look.Chris Bartman says, Anna, it's time.And it's a picture of her wearing a MAGA hat.
Well, shout out to Anna Kasparian for being on the right side of history, as the left likes to say it.I don't know how much I believe any of it's genuine.I think for the longest time I've said this, Cenk Uygur,
I think has realized the the audience of unhinged lying leftists is diminishing.More and more people are finding themselves in a moderate position and they're sick of the lies that come from so many of these left liberal pundits.
Their viewership is in decline. And I think they're realizing if we're going to maintain a business and survive, we have to be on the right side of history.
The reason why the left loves that line, where they chant, you're on the wrong side of history, is because they want you to be scared that you will be shunned, ostracized, and excised from society.But you know what?
The disagreeable nature of Americans is that we don't care.We stand up for what we believe in.And in the words of the great Captain America, It is your job to plant yourself like a tree.And when everyone around you says move, you say no.You move.
That is the American spirit.So I'm going to sit here and tell you what I think, what I think we need, what I feel, what I know.And there's not a lot that I do know.I get a lot wrong.True knowledge is knowing that you know nothing.How about that?
We look at sources, we trust them, and we try to make our best conclusions.But recognizing those faults allows us to evolve and improve.
Famously, Jordan Peterson was doing an interview with a comedian who he was asked, do you think that a business should be able to deny someone on the basis of their identity?And he's like, yeah, sure, why not?And he says, what about if they're black?
And he goes, yeah, OK, maybe I was wrong about that one.Simple enough for Dr. Jordan Peterson.He's not so attached to ego.He can easily say, oh, yeah, good point.I hadn't considered that. This is something we don't see among the left.
But a lot of people now are starting to realize their greatest fears.
When these leftists went out screaming you're on the wrong side of history, now that Bud Light has fallen, oh yeah, Disney lost a billion dollars, and people are fed up with woke garbage, and it's looking like Trump might win the popular vote, they're starting to hedge their bets.
They're starting to prepare themselves to say, hey, oh, whoa, look at me, I came to the right side, I'm on the right side of history now.Where was yours a couple years ago? But you know what?Said it before, I'll say it again.
If people come around and bend the knee, I will let them kiss the pinky ring.Now, a little later to get to say, but what I mean is, if these people want to come around and back off their psychosis, I say okay.Welcome aboard.Don't act up.
How about that?We got another segment coming up in a few minutes.Stick around.Smash that like button.Share the show with everyone you know.Follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast.And we'll see you all then.
Massively famous YouTuber Jake Paul has formally endorsed Donald Trump.Now, there have been mutterings in the past about how he was likely backing Donald Trump.
He's a Trump fan, but he put out this very long video, 18 minutes breaking down exactly why he thinks y'all should vote for Donald Trump.He believes that America will fall apart if Trump is not reelected.
He goes into great detail, and it's a really amazing video.I want to give my respect to Jake Paul, and I'll tell you guys all this.I don't care all that much for celebrity endorsements, for the most part.
But there's something here that's more than just a celebrity endorsement.When you back Kamala Harris, you face no repercussions.That's just it.Trump supporters might be like, yeah, yeah, yeah, here we go.But you know what?
All these women who support Trump still listen to Taylor Swift. They don't care that she had the cookies for Biden-Harris.They don't care that she said she's a cat lady and she's going to be for Kamala Harris.They don't care.
Now, if you're a conservative and you come out in favor of Trump and you work in Hollywood, you're done.Zachary Levi may not have a career after his recent endorsement of Donald Trump. And it's not so much Trump.
Zachary said that it's it's it's RFK Jr.It's Tulsi Gabbard.It's Vivek Ramaswamy.It's it's it's J.D.Vance.It's Elon Musk and Trump.But he thought RFK Jr.was better.But this is the path forward.
And I want to say I am so bummed that Zachary Levi endorsed Donald Trump. Because now we may not get Shazam 3.Haha, I'm kidding.I think it's tremendous that he made that endorsement, but at great personal risk.
Celebrity endorsements, I largely say, OK, sure, fine, whatever.But you've got to understand the imbalance.Like I said, all of these people on the left can make the endorsements.Beyonce comes out, ain't no problem.
People on the right just will keep on keeping on.But for Jake Paul to come out and say Donald Trump needs to win, this could be bad for him. But I'm gonna tell you this.I don't think it will be.Because it has all changed.Everything's changed.
And now, uh... He may actually see improvement.I believe that this is the right side of history.I don't care what everyone else thinks is the right side of history.I don't care what is the moral majority.I care about what is moral, true, and correct.
Now this article, Jake Paul believes America will fall apart if Trump not elected, is actually from a couple weeks ago.Why?When you go to the news and take a look at the headlines, the scumbags at all of these news outlets Here's one, Daily Mail.
Jake Paul endorses presidential candidate in 18-minute video, but reveals he cannot vote himself.Who is he voting for? They don't put it in the headline.TMZ, Jake Paul rips Tony Hinchcliffe's Puerto Rico joke in passionate pro-Trump speech.
Doesn't mention that it was an endorsement for him as president.The Mirror, Jake Paul makes pick for US president, but there's a problem.Once again, not in the headline.
The Independent, Jake Paul admits he's nervous as he reveals presidential endorsement in new video.They do not say in any of these headlines who he's supporting.Now, why is that?Two reasons.Clickbait.
Now, I hear people say, you know, Tim, you make clickbait.No, no, no, no, no, no, no.When I title a video exactly what the subject matter is, you can choose to click it or not.If I'm giving my opinion, that's not clickbait.
Clickbait is when you say, Jake Paul admits he's nervous as he reveals endorsement in new video.That's clickbait because you have to click it to actually figure out what the news actually is.It has been around for some time, this technique.
click baiting.It went away for a little while, but here you go.Now, if you go back to July 18th, what do we have?Influencers with millions of followers are backing Trump, but few are vocally supporting Joe Biden.
So we knew for some time that Jake Paul was backing Donald Trump.It's not the biggest revelation.However, it is substantial, especially with his video.I want to play a little bit of his video so you can hear it from himself.
I'm not going to play the full 18 minute thing, but let's take a listen.
Nervous, scared. to make this video because of what it means in terms of my career, my life, people coming after me, more accusations, more turmoil, more division potentially.
However, I just want to provide information to the potentially undecided voter, the things that I have seen over the past couple of years that have led me in a certain direction as to who I
supporting in this presidential election and most of all encouraging y'all to actually vote encouraging y'all to actually do your own research and to base that research in the truth not just reckless propaganda or your favorite pop star telling you to vote a certain way and you believing them because you love their song
And with that said, after watching this video, you shouldn't necessarily just listen to me either.Do your own research before you go and vote.But I highly, highly, highly encourage you to exercise your right to vote.
Because I moved to Puerto Rico in pursuit of becoming a world champion in my boxing career, I have rescinded my right to vote.But that doesn't mean I can't present my 80 million large audience with proper facts, numbers, and data.
to encourage them to vote in the proper direction to quite literally save America.And I'll start off with something that bothered me recently was Tony Hinchcliffe, a comedian who made a bad joke.
Obviously he's doing his job.Residents of Puerto Rico can't vote for president.
I'm trying to be funny, but him talking smack about Puerto Rico was not funny.And I want to shine a light on the fact that these aren't Donald Trump's views.It was a comedian who made a bad joke.
I have no idea who he is, never saw him, never heard of him, and don't want to hear of him.
They're really coming after Tony, aren't they?
All right, we get it.Let's jump ahead. ...in the office and hasn't done anything while she's in office.
PAUSE!Uh, let me, let me play, I'll give him another second.
Basically no accomplishments.
WRONG, Jake Paul!WRONG! Wrong, wrong, wrong.Kamala Harris has accomplished much, if not everything, she set out to accomplish.She has cast the tie-breaking vote in the Senate in support of the Democratic Party 33 times.
That is to say, if you're looking around and wondering why things are bad, that is what she has accomplished.So all these conservatives keep coming on saying, what's Kamala's greatest accomplishment?I got a response for you.
Dare you ask me her greatest accomplishment?Well, as a series, she is the tiebreaking vote as the president of the Senate.This means that the Democrat agenda, as they've been pushing forward, is being led by her.
If the Democrats introduce a bill in the House or the Senate, It ain't going anywhere without Kamala's approval because the Senate is 50-50.I don't know if it's 50-50 right now, but it was, largely.So, 33 tie-breaking votes.
She is responsible for all of it.And you know what?I think that's a really bad thing.I think this country ain't doing too well, but maybe you're a Democrat and you're gonna be like, I like what she did.Sure.
I hope you claim that you like the current state of things.Let's see how voters feel about that.
Let's start with the chart of inflation during the Biden-Harris term.Their overall inflation is 20.2% compared to the Trump-Pence administration, with an overall inflation of 6.7%.Statistically, 14% better while Trump was running the economy.
As you can see in every category, energy, gasoline, rent, and food, the numbers are exponentially lower. and the lowest of the past 30 years of presidents.Again, regardless of your emotion, I'm just presenting you with facts.
Do I think Donald Trump is a perfect human being?No, I don't think anybody on this planet is a perfect human being, myself included.Don't judge people off of a character that the media has portrayed them to be.
Because Democrats control 90% of the U.S.media, so they will paint a picture to y'all, and that picture is what they want you to see. and a can compete against her in sports.It's bullshit.That is taking away a woman's rights.
And I don't hate trans people.It's not an attack against them.I believe adults should dress and act however they want.But you shouldn't encroach your rights into other areas of delusion and infringe on other humans' basic rights.
I don't think he articulated that point very well, but the idea is, hey look man, you do you, but don't take away other people's spaces, and don't take away from other people to gain.That's not what we're supposed to be doing.
So I'll jump to the end, because I don't, I'm not going to play the full thing.He goes on to mention, I believe he mentions like the Service Act and things like that.
Donald Trump, quote, if we allow border czar Harris to win this election, this great country is going to hell.The untold millions of people.
That's the the border patrol.That's the border patrol right there.Let's jump to the end.
I love you, even if you are lost.Genuinely, from the bottom of my heart, I have love for all of the people of America.And with all this said, I have friends that are Democrats and Republicans, and we all go about our lives in one harmony.
That is what I really wish.
encourage for this world remember it's the United States of America and if you are a Democrat watching this maybe there's something you can learn from this maybe there's something that I can learn from you I don't know everything but these are my opinions and the way we move forward is by communicating and having a positive discourse versus attacking each other on X all the time yeah please go
For the love of God, go exercise your right to vote on my behalf and vote for Donald Trump.
Let me tell you about influence.Does Beyonce have influence?Of course she does, but is it direct influence?She can write a song, the record labels, the industries can promote that song, but does Jake Paul have direct influence 100%?
Let me tell you guys about how this business works.So we get people reaching out saying, we would like you to do an ad read for us.We tend not to do them, though we probably have to pick up some because
You know, I'm resistant, and I always have been, to accepting sponsorships, but you know, you gotta do it, right?Well, here's what our buyers always say, our sponsors.Hey, for some reason we sell way more with you for the same price as other people.
That's right.When you run ads on the robotic networks where you upload the ad and press play, and then the machine runs it for you, You don't sell that much.
But when you get a personality who directly communicates with an audience to do so, massive impact.Because people are listening.Jake Paul is a vlogger.That means he's directly speaking to his audience every day.This is big.
We've known that he's been a Trump guy, but this is big.I don't weigh it the same way as we do other celebrity endorsements. And I do think it's fair to say, yeah, yeah, we get it, we get it.
But here's a guy sticking out his neck, knowing there will be social consequences.That matters.I'm gonna leave it there.We got, I believe, one more segment coming up.Stick around, smash the like button, share the show with everyone you know.
Follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast.And we'll see you all soon. And as we have long awaited, the New York Times has released its report, which many are saying was a direct attempt to get YouTube to censor prominent voices.
It's not news, it's fake news.Utilizing conspiracy crackpots over at Media Matters, the New York Times ran what is a fake news story to try and get me as well as many others censored on YouTube.
As you can see, there are many prominent figures here listed in their beautiful little animated gif at the top of the New York Times page.
Well, recently, we saw a post from Ben Shapiro where he said he'd been reached out to by the New York Times, asking him about a series of things that had been stated.
Tucker Carl said something similar, and I had posted, I too had received word from an individual.However, for me, all I can really say is he didn't ask for anything.He asked me to comment, but there was nothing to comment on.
Then he puts in this story that I refused to comment.My guy. What am I supposed to comment on?I love this.
The story basically says that while Media Matters is partisan, they did their fact-checking and all of us are posting misinformation, to which YouTube responded, none of this breaks the rules and you're allowed to debate these things politically.
What I love most about this is that nowhere in the story does it say I ever did anything wrong.Hence, what am I supposed to comment on? Such a very, very weird circumstance to find ourselves in.
Ben Shapiro, Tucker Carlson, Michael Knowles, Rudy Giuliani, whatever, they're allowed to have opinions in news and politics.And we are all following YouTube's rules.We at TimCastIROL follow them quite to the T, dotting our I's as well.
So it's not going to work.I was asked several times about this, and I told everybody, guys, these stories pop up all the time.By all means, we can call it out, but I don't think it is meaningful in any real way.Here's what they wrote.
Election falsehoods take off on YouTube as it looks the other way.Nico Grant says,
In June of 2023, YouTube decided to stop fighting the most persistent strain of election misinformation in the U.S., the falsehood that President Biden stole the 2020 election from Donald J. Trump.
Within months, the largest video platform became a home for election conspiracy theories, half-truths, and lies.They, in turn, became a source of revenue for YouTube, which announced growing quarterly ad sales on Tuesday.
During four tumultuous months of this year's presidential campaign, researchers from Media Matters for America, which is a left-partisan smear organization, they don't do legitimate research, they're conspiracy theorists, a group that monitors information from conservative sources examine the consequences of YouTube's about-face.
While Media Matters is a partisan organization that regularly criticizes conservatives, reporters and academics frequently cite it as a source on YouTube misinformation because it devotes a significant resources to tracking the vast problem.
The New York Times independently verified the research, examining all of the videos identified by Media Matters and determining whether YouTube placed ads or fact-check labels on them.
From May through August, researchers at Media Matters tracked 30 of the most popular YouTube channels they identified as persistently spreading election misinformation to analyze the narratives they share in the run-up to the election.
The 30 conservative channels posted 286 videos containing election misinformation.So that's, what is that, about nine videos per channel Oi, I post probably 20 videos per day, my dude.
If of all these channels, you couldn't find nothing on me, forgive me for making errors when they arise.We often correct here at TimCast, and we actually have correction submissions.But you know what they do?
There's this thing where, I'll give you one example, Fox once ran a story claiming that there was some evidence about the Seth Rich conspiracy theory.And then I said, wow, look at this story from Fox Business.Then it was later retracted.
And they said, aha, you have fake news.And I'm like, my guy, I am citing Fox News.Forgive me, what am I supposed to do?If the news is retracted later, what am I supposed to do about that?Obviously, we correct.And then we put up a new story.
That's the misinformation they do.So 30 conservative channels, they don't actually break down, what did I say?I'd like to know.They say, because we post, what do we do?I think we do 10 to 15 videos per day, about.
So what, you're saying in four months, with 10 to 15 videos per day, on average, you found nine that you believe contained election misinformation.Here's the other thing, none of them did. None of them did.
Because we use the New York Times and Fox News and ABC News.We use corporate press sources to determine the news.
They go to mention that YouTube generated revenue for more than a third of those videos by placing ads before or during them, research has found.
Some commentators also made money from those videos and other monetized features available to the members of the YouTube Partner Program.Commentators included Rudolf Giuliani, who disputed the results of the 2020 race.
Tucker Carlson said the last election was stolen.Ben Shapiro said Democrats rigged voting rules in 2020.Anything from me?Didn't think so. Mr. Giuliani, the former New York mayor, posted more false electoral claims.Don't care.
Mr. Carlson and Mr. Shapiro did not directly respond to a series of questions but attacked the reporting.Don't care.Because what are you saying that was wrong?An opinion?Define the word rigged.An opinion?
YouTube, which is owned by Google, has prided itself on authoritative news, blah blah blah.The commentators used false narratives about 2020 as a foundation for elaborate claims the 2024 contest was also rigged.
All while YouTube made money from them.Kayla Gagardia, research director at Media Matters, who led the analysis, said that YouTube is allowing these right-wing accounts and channels to undermine the 2024 results.
A YouTube spokesman said none of the 286 videos violated its community guidelines.Huh. The ability to openly debate political ideas, even those that are controversial, is an important value, especially in the midst of election season.
It would be quite hilarious, indeed, if YouTube were to take down some of the most prominent Trump-supporting channels a few days out from an election.That would be substantially worse for business, would result in a congressional investigation.
That's why I think this story is nonsense, but hey, the story's been bubbling up and many people wanted to hear about it, so let's break it down.
Most of the 30 Trek channels are ineligible for advertising, and some had previously violated the company's content policies, the spokesman added.This report demonstrates our consistent approach to enforcing our policies.
YouTube said it removes videos that mislead voters on how to vote, encourage election interference, or make violent threats.Mary Ellen Koh, YouTube's chief business officer, described the platform's approach as cautious and vigilant.
We have significant investment in this area in terms of making sure that first and foremost we are raising authoritative content and then we are removing or reducing things that might represent misinformation.
December 2020, YouTube banned content that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of 2020 election.But in June 2023, they reversed course.Would you like to present anywhere where I have ever made that claim?
What I've mostly said is that Democrats had better ground game, the enthusiasm against Trump was much, much better, and this resulted in a series of unfortunate events for Republicans.That is,
Democrats utilized ballot harvesting, a legal practice in most states, to rally votes for Joe Biden.With people locked down, it was relatively easy to knock on doors and people got ballots sent to their homes.That really is it.
They're going to mention that YouTube removed only three of the videos that Media Matters found and placed information labels that linked to factual information on 21 of them, though most of the election labels were later removed.
Some of the commentators seized on the news events. These moments included Trump's conviction of felony counts, et cetera, et cetera.Said it was rigged.Kash Patel, Giuliani, RFK.You see, the funny thing is, what do I have to do with any of this?
Why am I involved in this?They're going to mention.
YouTube's approach to the presidential race garnered attention in September when two Russians working for state-run media outlet RT were indicted in connection with an effort to spread disinformation on the video platform.
RT allegedly funneled the money through tenant media, and that's actually factually incorrect.
The actual indictment says that RT employees funneled through various Ukrainian accounts before arriving with tenant, which calls into question a lot about who knew what and when.We don't know.
but they're skipping over important points of that story.They say Lieutenant Media operated a YouTube channel with more than 16 million views.They paid popular pundits to create content, including Benny Johnson and Tim Pool.Wrong!
also factually false.We had, and this is plainly visible in the indictment, a non-exclusive distribution license.The Culture War podcast over at youtube.com slash timcast was never receiving money for the creation of content.
It was receiving money for a license on content we were already creating and still make.Before Tenet, during, and after, we have controlled publishing.It has always been published on Apple, Spotify, Google, et cetera, without any issues.
Tenet purchased a non-exclusive license to broadcast it live on their channel.But they had no say in what we produced.So that is false.Mr. Johnson and Poole and others have said they had no knowledge about the true source of payments.
YouTube deleted Tenet's channel but did not terminate Johnson's and Mr. Poole's accounts.And there's tons of other individuals they didn't mention as well.I'm not going to name them.
Johnson said his channel provided a valuable access point for independent thought and journalism, and reiterated his stance that the 2020 election was stolen.
Mr. Poole did not respond to a request for comment, because he didn't ask me to comment on anything.Also, notice in this story, never does he accuse me of any wrongdoing.Come on, buddy, why am I even in this story?
Seriously, dude, let me ask you again, why am I in this story?I wonder, seriously. Then they go on to mention Benny Johnson and then nothing about me.
Political commentators on YouTube use Mr. Trump's conviction to claim that his legal troubles were concerted effort, blah, blah, blah.There's more.That's it. Why am I even in this?Why was I asked to comment?I'm not accused of any wrongdoing.
I'm not accused of spreading any misinformation.He shows Benny Johnson.Nothing in this has anything to do with me.They put my name in these stories to get clicks on Google.Dude, I know what you're doing.This is what they're all doing.
Because surprise, surprise, I guess when you're a milquetoast fence sitter, there's not a whole lot to say about you, is there?So this is the game they play. Ridiculous.
Johnson did not directly address whether suggesting that Democrats were trying to get $30 million in legal amends to go up was misinformation, when YouTube last barred creators, blah, blah, blah.
Since then, the company's public stance... I wonder why they put my picture in this, but then never say that I had anything to do with any of it.Or Michael Knowles, for that matter.What a waste of time. Lies and manipulations.
I think that factual error needs to be corrected.Timcast and The Culture War were never paid to produce content.Because, let me tell you, my friends, I have a policy here.We don't take outside investment.
We don't allow people to buy seats on Timcast's IRL.We take sponsorships and license agreements.We're working on licensing music.I've licensed content to Discovery in the past, and I believe Nat Geo
So when an American company asks for a license, we say, sure.We say, okay, we give it to our lawyers, that's it.Never have I accepted money in exchange for producing news content.
I get people and they say, hey, would you, we get asked about like, would you run a segment on Tim Cast IRL will pay you?No, we won't do it. I don't do it.I choose what I think is important and we do not get paid by people to produce things.
The culture war existed at YouTube.com slash Timcast.Tenet approached and said, we'd be interested in buying a license to this.Okay.We continued to produce and run the show as we did.That's it.Thank you and have a nice day.Nice try though, dude.
Next segment's coming up at 8 p.m.Smash that like button, share the show with everyone you know.We'll see you all tonight. Hey, Tim Pool here.My new show, The Culture War, dives deep into the most controversial issues of our time.
No topic is off limits, and I bring on guests with unique perspectives to explore the cultural landscape in today's politically charged climate.If you're looking for real conversations and bold insights, this is the show for you.
Tune into The Culture War on Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your shows, and get ready for the tough discussions.
Sign in
