What do you feel in your body when you hear the term white people?
I feel like a cringe about it.
White, straight, cisgender man is the top of the pile.
I'm on the top of the pile.It's me.Can I just propose a toast?Raise a glass if you're racist.It's a racist.
Don't deny that you're racist.Try not to be racist, but also don't realize that you're.Until we're willing to talk about these things, healing can't really begin.My daughter's four years old.
She's still watching Disney movies and choosing a white princess.
Have you talked to her about that?
Is racism inherent to whiteness?Yes.Yep.
Yeah, probably.Well, yeah.Joining us now is Matt, certified DEI expert.
Did race exist as a reality before?
We made race exist.Does that make sense?
It does make sense.What do you mean?What you're doing is you're stretching out of your whiteness.This is more for you and less for you.
Am I racist?Now streaming only on Daily Wire Plus.Rated PG-13.
Today on The Matt Wall Show, I have uncovered incontrovertible proof that Donald Trump is in fact a Nazi and literally Hitler.The media has been right all along, it turns out.I'll lay out the evidence today.
Also, Tim Walz is really leaning into his football coach persona, and it just has not gone well so far.60 Minutes warns that Trump's immigration policies may break up illegal immigrant families.Is that actually true?And if it is, should we care?
Plus, readers of The Washington Post are outraged after the paper declines to endorse any candidate this election cycle.We'll talk about all that and more today on the Matt Wall Show. We have a big election coming up, and there is a lot at stake.
Regardless of who's sitting in the White House, though, or in Congress, the fuse on the economy has already been lit.Four years of a conservative presidency will not be enough to turn the tide on our $35 trillion national debt.And if the left wins,
It's like throwing gas on a dumpster fire.You don't have much control over the election's outcome, but you can protect your savings by diversifying now into gold from my friends at Birch Gold.That's right.
For millennia, gold has stood firm in the face of greedy governments, economic upheavals, and global strife. and it can protect you right now.Birch Gold will help you convert an IRA or 401k into an IRA in physical gold.
And the best news, it doesn't cost you a penny out of pocket.Think about this.In the past four years, the buying power of the US dollar has declined, and the price of gold has increased, though, 40%. Coincidence?I don't think so.Text Walsh to 989898.
Get your free info kit on gold, then diversify.As the exclusive gold partner of The Daily Wire for the past eight years, you can trust Birch Gold as I do to protect your savings.Text Walsh to 989898 today.Again, that's Walsh to 989898 today.
Well, as you've probably heard by now, Donald Trump held a Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden on Sunday.Now, sure, it wasn't a Nazi rally by name.He didn't call it a Nazi rally.There wasn't any Nazi paraphernalia or Nazi flags or swastikas.
It really wasn't anything Nazi-related at all, but he did hold his rally in a venue where Nazis held a rally back in 1939.Is that a coincidence?
The Nazis rallied at Madison Square Garden, and then suddenly, practically the very next day, or like 31,000 days later, give or take, but who's counting, Donald Trump and his MAGA minions are gathering at the exact same spot.
What other conclusions can we draw here?I mean, if Nazis were in a certain venue, then 85 years later, other people are also in that venue.Are we not forced to conclude that the second group of people must also be Nazis?
Is it conceivable that two different groups separated by nearly a century could gather in the same building for different reasons? No, it's not conceivable.It is in fact, I would say impossible.
Now that's the math that the media and the Kamala Harris campaign are doing.Here was Tim Walz sending up the warning flag before the rally even took place, watch.
Donald Trump has descended into madness over the last few weeks.And I think some of you don't miss on this, go do your Google on this.Donald Trump's got this big rally going at Madison Square Garden.
There's a direct parallel to a big rally that happened in the mid 1930s at Madison Square Garden.And don't think that he doesn't know for one second exactly what they're doing there.
A direct parallel, he says.What is the parallel?Well, how much more explicit can it be?There were Nazis in that building 85 years ago.And then on Sunday, other people were in the building, the Nazi building.
I mean, what were they doing there except Nazi stuff?This is the point that many high profile Democrats made.Hillary Clinton denounced the rally as a Nazi gathering.In fact, as she put it, Trump is reenacting the Nazi rally.Watch.
Now, one other thing that you'll see next week, Caitlin, is Trump actually reenacting the Madison Square Garden rally in 1939.I write about this in my book.
President Franklin Roosevelt was appalled that neo-Nazis, fascists in America were lining up to essentially pledge their support for the kind of government that they were seeing in Germany.
Well, we can't ignore it.She's right.And MSNBC, while the rally was going on, made the case as well.
But that jamboree happening right now, you see it there on your screen, in that place, is particularly chilling.
Because in 1939, more than 20,000 supporters of a different fascist leader, Adolf Hitler, packed the garden for a so-called pro-America rally.A rally where speakers voiced anti-Semitic rhetoric from a stage draped with Nazi banners.
When a Jewish protester rushed the stage, the Associated Press reported, quote, instantly, a dozen or more storm troopers set upon him, knocking him down and beating him as he held his head in his arms.Most of his clothing was torn from his body.
Later, he was booked for disorderly conduct.
Now, against that backdrop of history, Donald Trump, the man who has threatened to use the military against opponents he calls enemies from within, who has threatened to use the troops to quell what he says are lawless cities, and to use those troops to carry out mass deportations of immigrants, is once again turning Madison Square Garden into a staging ground for extremism.
Well, there you have it.And if you aren't convinced, you can read the Washington Post column published on Monday with this headline, Another Night at the Garden, How Trump's Rally Echoed One in 1939.
And you should read the piece, of course, it's very important journalism.But in case you don't have time, it echoed the Nazi rally because it was in the same place as a Nazi rally. That's the whole argument.And what other argument needs to be made?
It is utterly decisive.Meanwhile, Mika Brzezinski appeared as a guest on The View on Monday, where she nearly brought the collective IQ at the table to room temperature level.It was slightly above room temperature before she got there.
Mika warned that we are in the final hours, quote-unquote, and must do everything we can to stop the man who holds, quote, Nazi-type rallies.
You need to believe him.And these are the final hours.We need you.We need you, you, you, you, you, and all of you to vote.Yep.There you go.
I think you heard us before you came out.We were talking earlier about yesterday's Trump rally from hell at Madison Square Garden.So what did you make of it?
Well, I think it was everything that you need to know about Donald Trump in one weird white nationalist Nazi type rally.And of course, there's historic parallels to where and when this happened.
The rally from hell. And it was.I mean, there were even jokes.There were offensive jokes, as we heard at this rally.Just like the Nazis.The Nazis, well known for their sense of humor.
Now, you might ask, isn't Madison Square Garden a major venue where lots of events are held every week? Well, yes, and that should tell you the scope of the problem.In fact, I went on Ticketmaster this morning just to see how bad it really is.
And I saw that there's a concert for Sidney Lauper, the Girls Just Want to Have Fun tour, happening in Madison Square Garden this week.This is tragic news for her fans, but the conclusion is inescapable.Sidney Lauper is a Nazi.
Girls just want to be Nazis, apparently.Duran Duran is holding a Nazi rally the very next day at Madison Square Garden.So Nazism is absolutely rife in the 80s music scene.90s bands aren't much better, I'm very sorry to report.
And you can see if you check the event schedule, Dave Matthews Band and Creed are having their own Nazi rallies at Madison Square Garden in November. And I'm not surprised about Creed, frankly, but I'm very disappointed in Dave Matthews.
Now, here's an interesting and really disturbing note.The New York Knicks are having 41 Nazi rallies at Madison Square Garden in the next few months.Nazism is alive and well among NBA players, just as we always suspected.
This is the way it works now.Every large gathering of people is a Nazi rally if it happens at a place where there was once a large gathering of Nazis.
Now, of course, needless to say, that doesn't count the 1992 DNC held at the Madison Square Garden or the Ralph Nader Green Party rally in 2000, which was also at Madison Square Garden.There are exceptions to every rule.Let's not dwell on those.
Let's get back to the main point, which is that Donald Trump is literally a Nazi.Now, maybe you aren't convinced yet.
Maybe your wild imagination has allowed you to concoct fanciful hypothetical scenarios where Trump held a rally in Madison Square Garden because it's a really big arena that fits lots of people and not because Nazi sympathizers gathered there eight and a half decades ago.
Yeah, I find that sort of speculation to be ludicrous, but fine, let's just go with that for a moment. Then how do you explain the other parallels between Trump and Hitler?Consider this.
Donald Trump, as you may have noticed, almost always wears suits.It seems kind of odd.You know, in an era where most politicians are dressing more casually, Trump insists on wearing a suit all the time.Kind of a strange quirk.
Doesn't really make sense until you connect the dots. And as you can see, someone else has also been documented wearing suits. Now, the parallels run even deeper.
Recall that infamous photo of Trump eating a taco salad on Cinco de Mayo, obviously traumatizing already just for the cultural appropriation alone, not to mention the fact that he didn't even have guacamole on his taco salad, which is totally bizarre and inexplicable, and I don't get that.
But instead, don't think about that.Think about how he was eating the salad.He was sitting in a chair at a table. And again, it seems strange at first.You think to yourself, why is he eating at a table?Why a table of all things?Who eats at a table?
Well, turns out that someone else was also famously photographed eating dinner at a table. Have you seen enough yet?How many coincidences do you need?Hitler sat at a table.Trump sat at a table.Hitler wore a suit.Trump wore a suit.
People who liked Hitler went to Madison Square Garden once 85 years ago.Trump went to Madison Square Garden.The conclusion follows with mathematical certainty.Trump is a Nazi.Sidney Lauper is a Nazi. The Knicks are Nazis.The dots all connect.
Once you see it, you can't unsee it.Now, I think I've proven the case beyond any reasonable doubt at this point, but I do want to address the most outlandish rebuttal from the Nazi sympathizers.
They will sometimes point out that Trump was actually already president.You know, he was in office for an entire term.
And if he's a fascist dictator, then we should be able to look and see that he did a whole bunch of fascist dictator stuff while he was in office.But as these naysayers argue, he didn't do any of that.
In fact, Trump was the first president in decades to refrain from starting any new wars or invading any new countries. Trump did not use his presidential powers to install himself as a dictator for life.He did not end democracy.
He did not take any steps to make himself into the autocratic ruler of the country.In fact, Trump signed fewer executive orders than Obama, Bush, and Clinton before him.
If you're judging Trump by how he actually governed, you're forced to conclude that he was the least power hungry president in the past 100 years at least.He was remarkably restrained in his governance.At least that's how the argument goes.
I find it deeply unconvincing. Because just because Trump didn't do something in the past, that doesn't mean that he won't do it in the future.Indeed, the fact that he didn't do it in the past only means that he will do it in the future.
I mean, think about it.As an analogy, just consider it this way.This is an airtight analogy.Trump was the burglar casing the house before he makes his move.
Now, if there's a burglar case in your house, just because the burglar drives away without stealing anything, that doesn't mean you can't say, well, we're good, we're safe.Cuz it doesn't mean that he's not gonna steal in the future.
Now, of course, in this case, the burglar was actually in the house for four years and didn't do anything.
So actually, if a burglar is in your house for four years and doesn't steal anything at all, then it's really good evidence that he's not a burglar.So that analogy maybe isn't helpful, but so forget about that.
The point is that this is all part of Donald Trump's plan. He refrained from anointing himself Supreme Ruler during his first term only so that we would be lulled into a false sense of security.He's like a snake coiled up and waiting to strike.
He's a Hitler who didn't govern like Hitler so that later he could govern like Hitler.It's all part of the plan, part of the spell that he casts.And you know who else casts spells? Well, that's Voldemort actually, but also probably Hitler.
Think about it.Now let's get to our five headlines.You didn't vote for this recession, but you sure as heck pay for it at the pump, at the grocery store, and with that growing stack of unpaid bills.
If you're one of millions of Americans being crushed with financial stress right now, the solution is donewithdebt.com.Unlike some other guys, done with debt
has created new aggressive strategies designed to get you out of debt permanently without bankruptcy or loans.Done With Debt stands between you and bill collectors.
They negotiate with your creditors to write off balances, cut interest and stop penalties.They have a plan to put more money into your pocket month one and every month until your debt is gone.
And the best news is that Done With Debt is accepting new clients right now. but you need to hurry because some of their debt strategies are time sensitive and you don't want to miss out.
Let Done With Debt hit the debt reset button for you and make your money yours again.So you need to visit donewithdebt.com or call 1-888-322-1054.Right now, chat with one of their debt relief strategists for free.Go to donewithdebt.com.
That's donewithdebt.com. All right, we'll start with this.60 Minutes ran a segment about Trump's immigration policies and headlined, Trump vows to deport millions.Would it mean family separations?Let's watch a quick clip of this.
Monica Camacho Perez and her family worry about that.They have lived and worked in the country since coming illegally from Mexico more than 20 years ago.
What scares you the most?I think of my nieces and my nephews, that they're going to get separated from their parents.
They made a life in Baltimore, where Monica, who's 30, teaches English as a second language.
We are a normal family like anybody else.We go to church, we work every day. We pay taxes.
She's among the more than 500,000 undocumented immigrants brought to the country as children who are protected from deportation under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA.
I'm the only one right now that's protected while my parents are not, my brothers are not.My brothers have children that are born here.So if they were to get deported, what will happen to their kids?
Although I have my life here, I think that I would take the decision to go back with my parents, to take care of them.
You would?Yes.You own a home here.This is the city you grew up in.
But they're also part of my American dream.And I can't imagine living here without them.
Like Monica's nieces and nephews, more than 4 million U.S.-born children live with an undocumented parent.
Okay, so, and there's been a lot of fear-mongering about this, about the supposed mass deportations that Trump is going to enact when he's in office.And I hope he does enact the mass deportations, but I'm not sure if that's actually going to happen.
And what is the argument?What's the argument?Well, the argument is that this family, and we hear this kind of argument all the time, right?The argument is that this family has been breaking the law, living here illegally for 20 years.
And since they've been breaking the law for a really long time, we should just let them continue to break it.I mean, think about that argument.Well, they've been here for 20 years.
So if you break a law for a certain amount of time, it doesn't count anymore.
So if somebody is like a bank robber for 20 years and then they're finally caught, is the judge going to say, you've been doing it for how long you've been doing this, 20 years?Well, yeah, we can't send you to prison.
I mean, you've been doing this for too long.Like anything, doesn't that mean that the punishment is worse because you've been doing it for a long time? You'd think that's how it goes in.In this case, no one is even talking about a punishment.
We're just saying you have to go back to your home country.And why is that a punishment?Especially given that every single illegal immigrant who comes here, if you ask them about it, they'll tell you that their home country is a wonderful place.
If you dare speak ill of it, Let's say you make a joke about Puerto Rico, for example.They'll get very, very offended.Or at least we're told they'll be offended.Well, you love it so much, then going back to it is no punishment at all.
It's like, why are you even here in the first place?According to you, your home country is a wonderful, wonderful place.
And then we get this bit about how we're breaking up families, which is the, that's kind of the main argument against deportations and enforcing the border is that, well, we're gonna break up families and we get these kinds of teary eyed sob stories and so on.
And let me just say this, this is one of those issues that to me, it's not complicated. I mean, even a lot of people who get the issue right, ultimately, will still concede that, well, it's very complicated.It's a very complex, complicated issue.
It's actually not complicated.It's very uncomplicated, very simple.If you didn't come here legally, you need to leave.If you are not a legal citizen of this country, if you are not legally allowed to be here, then you need to leave. Really simple.
Every single person who is not a legal citizen, who is not legally allowed to be here, needs to be kicked out.It's the simplest thing in the world.Now, it's simple, but it may also be hard.It's like something can be hard but simple.Right?
Complicated and hard are not necessarily synonyms. So it can be hard, it can be hard emotionally if you're a sensitive person and you're an empathetic person, you might consider it emotionally sort of difficult.
because these people don't wanna go back to their home countries where they belong.And so telling them they have to go back means that they're gonna cry and be very upset.
And so that might be an emotionally hard thing to witness, but I have to confess, I don't personally find it that emotionally difficult, but maybe you do.And that's fine if you're a sensitive person, I don't hold that against you.
It's still not complicated. If you're here illegally, you need to go.You broke our law, we're enforcing the law.It's nothing personal.As I've said many times, I'm willing to say that I understand why you came, right?
I wouldn't wanna live in Mexico either, or whatever country you're coming from.I wouldn't wanna live there either.I'd also wanna be here.
And I'll even say that if I thought I could get away with, if I wanted to get out of my country of origin because it's a hell hole, and there's another country that I think is a lot better, and I thought I could get away with just going there illegally and not going through the whole process of getting a legal citizenship, that I'd probably do that.
Because why not?I don't care about that country's laws.It's not my country.I have no loyalty to it. So I can understand that from a kind of self-serving perspective.I can understand why somebody does that.But you still got to go back.
I can understand why you broke a particular law.You still broke the law.And we're going to enforce it.You can choose to take it personally or not.It's not personal.It's just the law.Simple as that. Are we breaking up families?
No, we're not breaking up families.The family arrangement is totally up to you.If you're a family where some members of the family are legal citizens and some are illegal immigrants, then it's up to you.
I mean, the entire family can go back to where they came from.That's probably the easiest thing for everybody. I totally believe in keeping families together.I think it's great to keep families together.
I think one thing that immigrant families tend to get right is they keep multi-generation households.They keep families together across, not just the nuclear family, but across generations.I think that's a great thing.I'm all for it.
And that's why I say when we deport them, yeah, deport the whole family.And I wish them luck. Send the whole family, send all 15 of them back to Guatemala or Mexico or wherever they came from.
And I wish them all the luck in the world back in their home countries.I really do.I don't even mean that sarcastically.But you don't belong here.You're not here legally.This is our country.It is not yours.
We have a right to the sovereignty of our country.We have a right to enforce our laws.And there's no amount of crying that you can do that will make me change my mind about that.
There's another thing too, and this is a point I know I've also made, but really can't be made enough about the illegal immigrants.
You can't help but notice when you see these sob stories where they're interviewing the illegal immigrants and they start talking about why they came here. It's always the same thing.It's always, well, it's a better economy.
I came here for the economic opportunities.I came here because I wanted to make more money.Once again, I get it, right?I understand why you'd want to come to a place for the economic opportunities.But that's it.Like, that's all we ever hear.
You notice what they don't say. They don't say, I love America.I love America's history.I love its traditions.I admire America and I admire the American people.And I've admired it for so long, I just wanted to be a part of it.
I'm so grateful to this country. I'm grateful for the opportunities I've been allowed to have.I'm asking, will you allow me to stay, please?
The answer would still be no, but that kind of humility and gratitude are the two things that are always missing from these sob stories, always. Now, there may be illegal immigrants out there who have humility and gratitude.
Again, even if they do, you still got to go.And if you're a humble, grateful person, you should understand that.But it's hard not to notice that it is always missing.Not only are we importing all of these people.
from other countries, and not only are they coming here illegally, but they have no love for the country that they're coming to.They see America as purely, purely, they see it purely in economic terms.
They see it as nothing but an economic opportunity.You know, to them it's like switching jobs.It's that kind of, it's like going from one company to another.
It's like seeing that the company that you're in is falling apart, and there's a company over here that's doing better, and so you change jobs from one company to another.That's how they see it.And what does that mean?
It means that the more of these kinds of people you allow into the country, the more you lose your national identity.Because you're bringing people in who don't even care about that identity.They have no appreciation for it.They don't care about it.
And in fact, I keep saying they're here for the economic opportunities, and even that is probably generous.
I'm probably being generous phrasing it that way, because the truth is that many of them are actually here, not even for the economic opportunities really, but for the entitlements, to be a part of the welfare state.
So yeah, they want the economic opportunity, but that is the economic opportunity they're here for, is the opportunity to live off of the taxpayers. who they don't care about, who they have no affinity for, they have no gratitude towards at all.
Which maybe is one of the reasons why, and you could say that I'm cruel and heartless, but it's one of the reasons why I don't get too emotional watching these things, because you don't care about me.You don't care about me and my family.
You don't care about the burden that you are to American citizens and American families and American children, you don't give a damn about that.And so I'm supposed to care that much about you?
I'm supposed to care more about you than I do about my own people, my own countrymen?I don't.And neither do you.So you know what?The feeling is mutual.
All right, so Tim Walls, the campaign really wants this guy to be the manly man, the average, everyday, working man's man, the regular Joe.And they're trying to make that brand stick. They're trying desperately, but it's just not working.
They just can't get around the fact that Tim Walz is, at the end of the day, a weird dork.That he's a dork and he's weird, and men don't respond well to weird dorks.That's the problem.
Yet they're pushing it anyway, and they're really leaning heavily into Tim Walz's alleged background as a football coach.They're trying to make Coach Walz happen.
But it's becoming very apparent that Tim has not only never coached football, but has probably never even seen a football game.Maybe he coached European football.
You know, he seems like the type maybe to coach soccer, but he definitely doesn't know anything about American football. So just as an example, I mean, this is a tweet that is going to live in infamy.
And it's so bad that Walls deleted it, but the internet is forever, as we know.So here was the tweet yesterday.Let's put it up. And just for the background on this, remember, and we played this yesterday, he played Madden with AOC.
And because this, again, was their attempt to appeal to young voters, especially young male voters.And then he posted a clip of them playing Madden, along with the caption, AOC can run a mean pick six, and I can call it audible on a play.
And we both know that if you take the time to draw up a playbook, you're gonna use it. Okay, so as about 90 million people have pointed out to Tim, run a mean pick six is not, that's not a phrase, that's not a phrase that anyone uses in football.
It has literally never been used ever in the history of the game.It certainly isn't, you're not gonna hear that on the field.You definitely won't hear it on the sideline
from a coach, the defensive coach is not gonna yell out to the defender, run a pick six, run the pick six play. Not going to happen.
A pick six for those who are not familiar with football is, which by the way, being unfamiliar with football and football lingo is fine.I'm not, you know, if you don't know anything about football, I'm not going to judge you for that.
Well, if you're a man, I'll judge you a little bit, but I won't judge you that harshly.Unless you pretend that you know something about football, that's when it becomes a problem.And Tim Walz is pretending.
So if you're not familiar, a pick-six happens when somebody on the defensive side of the ball intercepts the ball and runs it to the house, runs it in for a touchdown.That's what we call a pick-six.
Yeah, you do run when you have the interception, so you run the pick-six in a certain way, like nobody phrases it that way, but the point is a pick-six is not a play that you call.
And the way he phrases it, it makes it sound like it's a play that you call.Oh, you run the pick six.No, nobody, that's... If it was that easy, you would just run that play every time.You'd run the pick six play on every down.
And the other team would score 0-1.At the end of the game, it would be 172-0.Because you could just run the pick six every time. Now, it seems like a small thing, but it just goes to show how totally fraudulent this guy is.
He's pretending to be a football coach, just like he's pretending to have had combat experience.Everything about him is fake, everything about it.I mean, this nerd is just fake and phony and made up, everything about him.
Can't even get the football lingo down.He can't even fake it convincingly, but he keeps going.Even after this pick six debacle, he still tweeted this last night.Let's listen to this.
Eight days to go.This election's already started.People are voting across the country.And so you know what it means.This is where I've got to do it.Huddling up a little bit here.Time for a little bit of a pep talk.Look, we got to admit it.
This game is tied.Two minutes left on the clock.We got the ball.We're driving down the field.We're doing the blocking and everything we need to do.And I know you got a saying around here that came from Bo.The team, the team, the team.
And boy, do we have the right team. So all gas, no brakes for the next eight days.Plenty of time.Plenty of time to sleep when you're dead.Our time now.We're moving this thing over the next eight days.An inch at a time, a yard at a time.
One door at a time, one phone call at a time.One of those door knocks and one of those interactions.Because one or two extra votes per precinct in the state of Michigan will make Kamala Harris the president.
So they're just really trying to make it happen.They love the idea of having a guy on the ticket who can do the football coach pep talk at halftime routine, but he can't do it.Even the way he says it, let's huddle up a bit here.
Let's huddle up a bit here, folks.Let's huddle up a bit here, do a little pep talk here.
Yeah, we gotta run the blocking and the, you know, we gotta, let's go out there, folks, and, you know, do the blocking and do the touchdowns and run and do the runs and all of that.All right.Team on three.My God.And he posted that with this caption.
He says, it's a tied game.Two minutes on the clock.We've got the ball.We're driving down the field.Even if we move one inch at a time, one phone call at a time, one doorknock at a time, we will win this.
Now look, again, I'm not trying to be pedantic, but if you're going to use football analogies in order to appeal to football fans, the analogies have to make sense.
And so I have to point out that if you're running a two-minute offense, you got two minutes left on the clock. and the game is tied, you're trying to win the game in regulation so you don't go into overtime.
Even if you have all of your timeouts, and he hasn't told us do you have all your timeouts or not, but even if you do, you still need to pick up chunk plays to get into scoring range.
So the one inch at a time, no, if you go one inch at a time on the football field with two minutes left, you know, you're not even gonna make it past the 32-yard line. And the game will be over, at least it'll be into overtime.
So that's the, like, and I know it sounds pedantic, but if the drain, like, moving it slowly and methodically down the field, which is what he's talking about, that's what you do when you're trying to drain the clock.
So the better analogy would be, like, if this is what he's going with, you would say, okay, we got the lead, it's the fourth quarter, Let's not make any big mistakes here, folks.Let's keep the ball.Don't turn it over.Let's move it down the field.
Get some first downs.Stack some first downs.Let's run this thing out.I'm not sure that would even be the best analogy.I'm not sure that's the best message that you want to send a week before the election, but that's what it would be.
That's what the one-inch-at-a-time approach, that's what you do with it.If you're trying to win the game at the end, you need to pick up chunk yards. And besides, coach, what if the defense just runs a pick-six play?What if they run the pick-six?
Then you're screwed.So... I mean, it's like... And the thing is, even if he could... Even if he knew enough about football to do the football analogies so that they made sense, it still would be cheesy.Like, it still wouldn't work.
So we are just trying to explain to Tim how football is actually played and what kind of lingo and terminology you use and all that, and you need to know a little bit about situational football in order to make these analogies.
But even if he got it all down, it's still like, this is, it's bad enough that he can't do it right, but even worse, really, that this is their idea of how to appeal to men. I'm a big football fan.I don't need football analogies in politics.
In fact, I don't like football.I, there are scenarios where a football analogy works for me, but I don't need to hear that from politicians.I don't, I don't like football analogies in politics and I don't like them in church.Okay.
Those are the two places.I don't, I don't want to hear a politician doing football analogies and I don't want to hear a priest doing football analogies, even if they're doing them right.Um,
Because to me, what we're dealing with, whether in church or politics, it's more serious than that.To me, it advertises that you're not taking it seriously enough.And I say that as a football fan.
When you go for the analogies and you don't even know how to do them and you don't know anything about football, it just makes it all the more of a disaster.All right.I think we have time for this.
I have to give it some time because this tweet from Elon Musk that he put up over the weekend, I was tagged in it about 7,000 times for good reason.I had probably 11 or 12 people text this tweet to me in the span of like an hour or two.
And here it was, Musk tweeted, trust those who return the shopping cart.
And then there's a screenshot of the shopping cart theory that was originally posted to, I'm not sure what form it was posted to, but you've probably seen this post floating around.
A lot of people credit it as the origin of the shopping cart movement.The movement of people who recognized how important it is to return the shopping cart.And look, I don't wanna get into a pissing match here, I really don't.
I'm not somebody who demands credit for things, but I will say, I have to say, that this post is not the origin of the shopping cart movement.
In fact, I first wrote about shopping carts and the threat imposed by shopping cart ditchers way back in 2013.Okay, I wrote a whole blog post about it in 2013.Pretty lengthy one.This shopping cart theory post is from 2020.So that's seven years later.
I've been on this beat for more than a decade, okay?I was here fighting this battle before.I was here before Cartnerks, God love them, all due respect.I was here before this post.I was here before all of them, damn it, okay?
I do want that acknowledged.I want that on my gravestone when I die.I want it to say, here lies Matt Walsh, the founding father of the shopping cart movement.That's what I want.You give me credit for nothing else, I want credit for that.
I want credit for it. Anyway, so the screenshot that Elon posted, the post from 2020, just articulates the theory, the theory that this person did not come up with.
But the theory that you can tell whether somebody is fundamentally a member of civilization or a savage based on whether they return the shopping cart.And it's obviously correct, it's obviously true.
And the shopping cart ditchers and their apologists will always say that We over here on Team Return are making too much of a small thing.That's what they'll say.I get that all the time.
They'll tell me, man, it's not worth, like I've heard you talk about this on the show probably 50 times. You've written about it, you've tweeted about it.
There's no way that this issue is worth all of the time you've dedicated to it, that's what they say.But what they don't understand is that it's a big deal because it's not a big deal, okay?That's the point.
The fact that it's a small scale situation, relatively low stakes, with no reward for doing the right thing, and no punishment really for doing the wrong thing. That is what makes it a big deal.Okay?It's why it tells us so much about you.
Because in most other situations in life, when you do the right thing, there's at least the potential for some kind of reward.Even if the reward is just other people seeing you do the right thing and thinking highly of you.That's a form of reward.
And then on the flip side, when you do the wrong thing, very often in life, there's at least the threat of some kind of punishment, even if the punishment is just that other people see it and think less of you.
But the shopping cart situation is unique because it's a clear right versus wrong decision.It's a point in life where the morally correct path is clear, and yet if you follow it, Nobody will notice or cheer you on.
And if you go the other way, in most cases, nobody will notice and give you grief for it.They might notice later when your errant cart slams into their door panel, but by then you're long gone.So in the moment, there's very little risk or reward.
And it's those moments where a person is defined.That is where you reveal yourself to be a hero or a villain, a member of human civilization or a primeval beast unfit to live among us.That's what the shopping cart is all about.
And now, look, I say this as someone who I would like to see punishments.I think that there should be monitoring and punishing where shopping carts are concerned because the shopping cart is a test And many of you have failed the test.
And so now there should be punishment and shaming, even physical torture meted out, the shopping cart ditchers, nothing too severe.I think maybe, you know, maybe we just yank a couple of teeth, maybe we cut off a finger.
I'm not advocating violence here.I'm saying that we should, that should be in the law.Okay, I wanna be very clear.I'm saying that we should put into law That and the punishments should be carried out by a legal authority.
So just to be very clear about that Do not I'm not encouraging anyone to chase anyone else down and cut off their fingers because they didn't return their card I would understand if you did I would get it But don't do that don't do that
And shopping carts aren't the only situations like this.There are other situations that are similar to it, especially inside the home.In the home, in the family, you have all kinds of little moments where you have to make a moral decision.
Clear right, clear wrong, the distinction's very obvious.But there's no one around to reward or punish you if you do the right thing or the wrong thing. For example, you have a piece of trash and you go to throw it away.
Whatever, you have a napkin or a paper plate or something, and you go to the trash can to throw it away.And the trash can is at capacity.There's no room in the trash can for your piece of trash that you have.And so this is a moment of choosing.
This is the speech, as you can tell, I've given my kids this many times.This is a moment of choosing.
This is a moment that defines you as a person, because you can either perch your little piece of trash precariously on top of the mound of trash, and then walk away and wait for someone else to do it.
Or you could take the initiative to take the bag out, tie it up, bring it all the way out to the trash can outside, and then put a new bag inside the trash can.It takes about two minutes.
And that's a test that I will say that everyone in my family, except for me, fails every single time.I am the only one in my family who is physically capable of actually, I'm the only one who's ever put a trash bag in a can.
I don't think I've never known anyone else to do it except for me.But that's a complaint for another day, I suppose. Natural disasters are becoming more frequent and devastating.
Folks from the Maui fires to Hurricane Helene, we're seeing entire towns wiped out in 24 hours with barely any warning.And what happens?People are left without basic resources, scrambling to survive.
Now, I know you're thinking it's not gonna happen here.It's exactly what everyone thinks until they're in the middle of a catastrophe.Being prepared isn't just smart, it is absolutely essential.
And that is where the wellness company's emergency kits come in. These aren't your run-of-the-mill first aid kits.We're talking about a personalized mini pharmacy right in your own home.
No more relying on overworked doctors or understocked pharmacies when disaster strikes.Bacterial infections, staph, bite wounds, UTIs, strep throat, respiratory illnesses. These kits have you covered.
It's like having a doctor in your pocket, minus the liberal indoctrination from med school.Look, you keep a fire extinguisher handy, obviously, hopefully you do.Well, consider this your medical fire extinguisher.It's not paranoia, it's preparedness.
Here's how it works.Just fill out a form online, a pharmacist reviews it, and boom, your kit arrives in two weeks.It even comes with a medical board approved guidebook. It's very simple.
And right now, when you go to UrgentCareKit.com slash Walsh and use promo code Walsh, you'll get $60 plus free shipping.That's UrgentCareKit.com slash Walsh to save $60.
This is preparedness, simplified, invest in your family's self-managed insurance plan today.UrgentCareKit.com slash Walsh, USA residents only. My film, Am I Racist?
Yes, the comedy that's now the biggest documentary of the decade is streaming exclusively on DailyWirePlus.From what I hear, many of you already got the memo because it's now the biggest day one release in DailyWire history, which is incredible.
It even beat What Is A Woman.If you haven't watched Am I Racist on DailyWirePlus yet, because you think you saw it all in theaters, think again.
DailyWirePlus members are getting access to never before seen footage, a special deleted scene that you don't want to miss.
and an exclusive behind-the-scenes breakdown where I show you exactly how I pulled off the ultimate troll against the left armed with nothing but a man bun.
This is your chance to see how the whole thing came together with a step-by-step look at how we're taking on the culture war.If you're not a member yet, go to Amiracist.com, use code DEI for 35% off your Daily Wire Plus membership.
This isn't just a movie, it's a front row seat to the culture shift stream Amiracist right now on Daily Wire Plus.Now let's get to our daily cancellation. You know, there are a few things that are less interesting than media commentary.
When one media outlet comments on another media outlet, as a general rule, you get a level of nasal gazing, navel gazing rather, that's usually pretty hard to stomach.But every now and then, there's an exception to the rule.
And the complete meltdown at the Washington Post this week is one of those exceptions.For one thing, this is a meltdown that tells us a lot about how Democrats will react if Donald Trump wins the election in November.
And, as I'll explain in a moment, we can draw some lessons from the post's implosion also.Here's the background.Mayhem broke loose at the paper when the editorial board wasn't allowed to endorse Kamala Harris.
The paper's owner, Jeff Bezos, said that he wants the post to appear neutral because nobody trusts the corporate press anymore and so, therefore, no more endorsements.
In response to this new policy, several members of the editorial board at the post have quit And 20, or rather 200,000 readers, 200,000, around 10% of the paper's readership canceled their subscription in just a couple of days.
They've been fuming nonstop on social media and in the post comment section.And they're very, very angry.Some of it's pretty entertaining as readers find various unhinged ways to lash out at Jeff Bezos.
One comment read, quote, this was the final straw.I canceled my post subscription and will never shop at Whole Foods again.But I will keep my Prime membership because he owns MGM, which owns Hot Tub Time Machine.Hilarious flick.
Now, that comment raises all kinds of questions like, are you actually watching Hot Tub Time Machine multiple times?That's maybe the most bizarre reason anyone's ever had to not cancel their Amazon subscription.
In any case, essentially these people have been denied their daily dose of anti-Trump hysteria, so they're collapsing. Anything that doesn't reaffirm their belief that Trump is Hitler simply breaks their brains.They cannot process it.
They cannot handle it emotionally or intellectually.And at times like this, it's very easy to point and laugh at the lunacy.And we should be doing that because this situation is obviously worthy of mockery.
At the same time, it's probably worth using the post-meltdown as a teachable moment, as Barack Obama was so fond of saying.
Maybe it's a good idea for the rest of us, people whose sanity isn't tied to the endorsements of the Washington Post editorial board, to take stock of our own blind spots and preconceptions.
After all, unlike Washington Post readers, sane people are capable of self-reflection.They're capable of considering information that doesn't align with their previous beliefs.
So in that spirit, it's worth asking, is there some critical piece of information that we have been taking for granted?Is there some assumption that we have been making about this campaign that actually may not be totally true?
Turns out that indeed, there may be something we all got wrong, for the most part.All along, a lot of us assumed that Kamala Harris is merely an empty pantsuit, a word salad generator who serves as a puppet for far more powerful interests.
And all of that is true, of course, but we could be overlooking the possibility that in addition to being a tool for entrenched government interests and in addition to being a total moron, Kamala occasionally took the initiative and did her own thing.
And it's a shame that we may have overlooked that possibility because it turns out Kamala taking the initiative is far more embarrassing and humiliating than we could have ever imagined.
So this is a story that comes to us from the New York Times, and believe it or not, it's intended to make Kamala Harris look good.This is a positive, or at least it's supposed to be, positive Kamala Harris story.
The headline is this, the policy record Harris isn't talking about.The paper reports, quote, as vice president, Kamala Harris has targeted racial and gender gaps in healthcare, lending, and other areas.She isn't running on that part of her record.
What follows are some of the most remarkable paragraphs that have been written about what Kamala has actually been doing in the White House.
Admittedly, that's not a high bar to clear because no journalists have bothered to write anything about what Kamala Harris has been doing in the White House or what she did do in the White House.
And we assume that's because she really wasn't doing anything at all.But that's apparently not true.
Quoting from the article, paging through intelligence reports just weeks after she was sworn in as vice president, Kamala Harris was struck by the way two female foreign leaders were described.
The reports use adjectives that, in her view, were rarely used to describe male leaders.Ms.
Harris, the first woman to hold her office, ordered up a review that scrutinized multiple years of briefing reports from various intelligence agencies looking for possible gender bias.
The article continues, quote, the study found some questionable word choices, but no widespread pattern, according to a senior intelligence official, one of five who requested anonymity to discuss the review.
None would disclose the words flagged by Ms.Harris because the reports were classified.Still, the exercise had an impact.
Intelligence officials added a new training class for analysts on how to judge and assess female foreign leaders, according to another official. Yes, you heard that correctly.
When she first got access to highly classified intelligence reports, documents that are supposedly so sensitive almost no one's allowed to read them, Kamala's first thought was that the intel agencies needed sensitivity training.
And this is something that, again, this was done in a classified briefing.This was not virtue signaling for the sake of the public.This is just her being herself. And that was how she read this.That was her first reaction.
She didn't take the time to process all of this new information.She didn't ask a bunch of probing questions that could inform the foreign policy of the United States.
Instead, she determined that the people who spend most of their time overthrowing foreign regimes and planning assassinations should stop what they're doing and take sensitivity training.
Now the New York Times acts surprised that Kamala Harris isn't going on the campaign trail and talking about this moment as if it's not monumentally embarrassing.
They suggest that Kamala is just being cautious because of all the misogynists out there.And since we can assume that Kamala's team planted the story, the whole article implies a staggering lack of self-awareness on their part.
There's a much bigger concern here, which is that this anecdote demonstrates very clearly that Kamala is a malignant buffoon who, despite all appearances, is indeed capable of exercising some level of independent authority.
She doesn't just mindlessly repeat talking points that were written by left-wing activists, although, I mean, she does also do that.But she's, on top of that, a full-blown left-wing activist in her own right.
When she says she wants to implement equity across the entire federal government, that's exactly what she intends to do.
With that in mind, statements like this one, where Kamala Harris says it's important to allocate disaster relief on the basis of equity, become even more sinister and troubling.Watch.
It is our lowest income communities and our communities of color that are most impacted by these extreme conditions and impacted by issues that are not of their own making.
And so we have to address this in a way that is about giving resources based on equity, understanding that we fight for equality, but we also need to fight for equity, understanding not everyone starts out at the same place.
And if we want people to be in an equal place, sometimes we have to take into account those disparities. and do that work.
Now I played that clip in the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Helene when the Biden-Harris administration was interfering with relief efforts intended to save American citizens.
And while FEMA was busy allocating money to house illegal immigrants, it was clear at the time that Kamala had no problem with that outcome.In her mind, it was equity.
But this New York Times report makes it clear that Kamala Harris is indeed a primary driver for this ideology in the administration.
Quoting again from the article, Kamala Harris lobbied for billions in funding community banks that serve disadvantaged areas and frequently lend to people of color.
During the pandemic, she repeatedly asked her vice presidential staff for demographic breakdowns on COVID vaccination recipients and pressed the administration's health officials to address gaps.
She pushed the federal bureaucracy to incorporate concerns about equity into routine business, so much so that her advisors seldom briefed her on domestic policies without having prepared a ready answer about their impact on women, Black and Hispanic people, and other racial minorities.
Yes, she's concerned with the impacts of policies on women, Black and Hispanic people, and other racial minorities.Or to translate that, Kamala doesn't care about the impacts of policies on white men.
In other words, what she was asking is, she wants the information on how this impacts everybody but white men.Because the way it impacts them is irrelevant.That's the one demographic group that she isn't concerned about.
She wants to make sure that your bank can give you a loan, but only if you're not a white man.She wants to make sure the government helps you during a natural disaster, but only if you're not a white man.
We saw this approach many, many times during the Biden-Harris administration.
In 2021, their first year in power, the administration tried to deny white people access to the Restaurant Revitalization Fund, which was distributing more than $29 billion of federal money.
In one case, a white cafe owner in Texas said that he lost nearly $100,000 during the lockdown, so he applied for assistance, but the restaurant owner wasn't a woman or a socially disadvantaged person, quote-unquote.
Meaning he was a white man, so the Small Business Administration put him at the back of the line, and as a result, the fund was going to run out of cash before he got any money.
Now in that case, a judge ruled that the Biden-Harris administration had violated the Constitution, but the administration didn't stop there.
That same year, in 2021, the Biden-Harris administration attempted to establish a debt relief program that prioritized women and so-called farmers of color. Again, meaning no white men.And again, there was a lot of money involved.
We're talking about tens of billions of dollars.And after the program was announced, several white farmers applied for assistance.One of the farmers applied along with his wife.In the end, the man received just $7,200.
His wife received 10 times that amount, $72,000.And because they weren't minorities, neither one of them got any insurance repayments. A federal judge just shut down this program a few months ago saying, once again,
that it, of course, flagrantly violates the Constitution.And there are many more examples where this came from.
As the Washington Post reports, quote, in March, a Texas judge ordered a 55-year-old federal agency tasked with helping minority-owned businesses across access capital and government contracts to open its doors to all races.
And last summer, a federal judge ordered a small business administration program created to help minority-owned businesses access government contracts, serve all races, prompting the agency to require applicants to justify their social disadvantage through essays.
It goes on and on.The Biden-Harris administration has done everything it can to demonize white men and to deprive them as much as possible solely on the basis of their race and gender.
As bad as all this is, it gets worse when you realize that true believers in leftist ideology don't see the past four years as a model.
They see it as a foundation to enact even more policies intended to demonize and ultimately destroy anyone who disagrees with them, in particular white men. That's what these demented, spiteful activists want.
And as Kamala flipped through her intelligence briefing shortly after taking office, she made it very clear that for all her cluelessness, she is indeed one of those activists.
If she somehow gains full control of the White House, she'll take all these discriminatory policies to their logical extreme.Whatever that looks like exactly, it won't be pleasant for the tens of millions of Americans who happen to be white men.
A lot of people will be punished solely on the basis of characteristics that they can't control.And contrary to what many assumed, Kamala is not gonna do that because she's told to do it.
She'll do it because she wants to, because she believes in this stuff.It will be an administration essentially run by those jilted Washington Post readers, people who are rabidly ideological and incapable of rational thought outside of that.
And that is why, since Kamala has been canceled enough times in this segment, we'll circle back to the beginning and say that those angry Washington Post readers are today canceled.That'll do it for the show today.Thanks for watching.
Thanks for listening.Talk to you tomorrow.Have a great day.Godspeed.
Sign in
