This episode is brought to you by Shopify.Forget the frustration of picking commerce platforms when you switch your business to Shopify, the global commerce platform that supercharges your selling wherever you sell.
With Shopify, you'll harness the same intuitive features, trusted apps, and powerful analytics used by the world's leading brands.Sign up today for your $1 per month trial period at shopify.com slash tech, all lowercase.That's shopify.com slash tech.
Kamala Harris tweaks her stump speech to capitalize on Donald Trump's comments about women, while he tries to put more states in play.Plus Boeing makes a third attempt to end a strike that's hobbled its business for months.
And tech earnings show that big AI spending is starting to pay off, but how sustainable is a reliance on startups to keep renting expensive servers?
Those companies themselves are not profitable, and they're largely providing revenue for these services to Microsoft, Amazon, and Google, those so-called hyperscalers, from money they're getting from investors.
It's Friday, November 1st.I'm Luke Vargas for The Wall Street Journal, and here is the AM edition of What's News, the top headlines and business stories moving your world today.
Days after Donald Trump seized on negative remarks about his supporters by President Biden, Kamala Harris on the campaign trail last night quoted back her opponent's recent comments about being a guardian of women.
Speaking in Phoenix, Harris cited Trump's remarks from a day earlier in which he said that his advisers had urged him not to bring up an often-used line about protecting women before he stated that, quote, I'm going to do it whether the women like it or not.
I'm going to protect them.
He simply does not respect the freedom of women or the intelligence of women to know what's in their own best interest and make decisions accordingly.But we trust women.We trust women.
Surveys show that a wide gender gap has come to define the contours of the deadlocked presidential race, with Trump garnering the support of more men and Harris attracting more women.
Meanwhile, before ending his night in Nevada, Trump made a detour yesterday to New Mexico, the latest in a string of recent stops in states not typically seen as competitive, including New York, California and Montana.
Polls have consistently shown Trump trailing Harris in New Mexico.But at a rally in Albuquerque, he predicted he could pull off an upset and hinted at another goal of the visit.
So I'm here. For one simple reason, I like you very much and it's good for my credentials with the Hispanic or Latino community.
Trump is scheduled to visit Virginia tomorrow, another state that hasn't voted Republican in a presidential election since 2004.
And as for the candidates whereabouts today, Trump is due in Detroit and Milwaukee, while Harris concentrates her focus solely on Wisconsin.
Georgia's Secretary of State is asking social media platform X to remove a video purporting to show a Haitian immigrant claiming to have voted multiple times, calling it a fake.
Republican Brad Raffensperger said state and federal officials are looking into the origin of the video, which he described as likely a production of Russian troll farms and an example of targeted disinformation.
And a judge in Philadelphia has delayed ruling on whether Elon Musk's cash giveaways to voters are unlawful after Musk sought to move the case from state to federal court.
Musk had been ordered to attend yesterday's hearing but didn't appear, with a lawyer for him saying that he would attend future proceedings if required.The Philadelphia District Attorney's Office said it might seek penalties if Musk doesn't attend.
Well, this campaign cycle could be the costliest in U.S.history.According to research firm eMarketer, political ad spending will top $12 billion this year.
And that deluge of political messaging is forcing many consumer brands to compete for consumers' attention and contend with higher prices for ads.
We asked journal advertising and marketing reporter Megan Graham how companies are adjusting their strategies.
Some advertisers are choosing to avoid some of the states where there's higher volume of campaign ads.So avoiding swing states and choosing to advertise solely in states where the volume is a little bit less.
Some advertisers are biting the bullet and saying, we're just going to have to spend more than we ordinarily would.So increasing their budget on platforms such as Metas, Instagram, and Facebook.
Some marketers are choosing to try out different platforms. Some are moving advertising into platforms like Amazon, where they can avoid some of the political chatter.And on TikTok, which does not accept political advertising.
And in other business news, Boeing shares are moving higher off hours after it made a third attempt to end a strike that has halted most of its airplane production since mid-September.
The company and its machinists union reached a deal yesterday in which Boeing offered a 38 percent wage increase over four years. up from an original 25% offer that was overwhelmingly rejected.
The deal doesn't restore pensions, a key demand of many workers.However, Boeing says it will increase 401k contributions, keep paying annual bonuses, which were eliminated in its initial offer, and give workers $12,000 ratification bonuses.
The union plans to vote on the deal Monday. Bud Light owner AB InBev says its U.S.sales have bounced back after over a year of getting hammered in its largest market by a boycott that had caused it to lose its spot as the country's best-selling beer.
Those results only partially outweigh big sales drops for the company internationally, led by double-digit declines in volumes in Argentina and China, the latter of which the company blamed on Chinese consumers going out to bars and restaurants less and going on fewer vacations.
Well, a private gauge of China's manufacturing activity today paints a slightly rosier picture of the country's economic fortunes, showing the sector returning to growth in October.
That's a potential sign Beijing's more aggressive efforts to boost the economy are having an effect after a five-month run in which the Kaixin Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index was in contraction territory.
A separate index for China's construction and service industry also shows a return to expansion in October. Well, speaking of economic indicators, how's this for a pre-election data drop?The October jobs report is due out today.
Earnings from Exxon, Chevron and Dominion Energy are also due.While shares of Apple, Amazon and Intel will be in focus once trading gets underway after the tech giants reported results yesterday.
Apple stock is trading moderately lower off hours, while Amazon and Intel are up more than 5 percent.
And speaking of tech earnings, Journal Global Tech editor Jason Dean drops by to discuss whether big tech's AI bets are paying off, a key question for investors as spending shows no signs of slowing.That's after the break.
I'm Jimmy Vielkind from The Wall Street Journal, and I'm hitting the road again for a new series on the election, looking at how big campaign arguments are playing out on the ground.Like, how's the economy shaping people's thoughts?
My dollar went a lot further when Trump was in there.And how is Kamala Harris' sudden rise being received?
She's already proven herself to be a formidable opponent for Trump.
Join me for the ride.Look for Chasing the Vote in The Wall Street Journal's What's News feed.
Well, six of the magnificent seven group of big tech companies have now reported quarterly earnings, with Apple and Amazon providing results after the bell yesterday, and just NVIDIA still to come later this month.
Which makes this a perfect time to chat with journal global tech editor Jason Dean about what we can say about these tech industry heavyweights and how they're broadly faring. Jason, no surprises here really, right?
It's AI again, more specifically AI-related capital expenditure that's been the big theme this earnings season.So much money being spent out there in an environment in which investors are somewhat antsy, right?
That's right.Yeah, you can see in the executive comments in these earnings calls and in the stock reactions just how jittery
People are about this, specifically talking about Microsoft, Amazon, and Google, those so-called hyperscalers to build out these AI data centers and expand their cloud computing businesses.
We're talking tens upon tens of billions of dollars every quarter.
Jason, you told me off air that the good news was that all three of those companies did present some evidence that they're starting to see revenue from that business.
But I want to zoom in on Amazon, where the scale of the spending was just really huge when they gave this number last night, saying $75 billion is the projected capex for this year.
and that that will go up next year with CEO Andy Jassy saying the way this is just going to happen is that investments will need to come in advance of the company's ability to monetize those efforts.
If you're inclined to take a pessimistic view on all of this spending, that is the kind of comment that could make you nervous.
Yes, exactly.I mean, people are desperate to get a read on that question, like, when and how much is this all going to pay off?And the truth is, nobody knows.But the companies are all in a race right now.
And they're trying to be responsible, but they also feel like now is the time to be spending this money and to be trying to grab market share.So yeah, you hear that comment from Jassy, we've heard similar things from
other CEOs this quarter and in previous quarters saying, look, this is the right thing to be doing right now.We've got to get ahead of this.
Just staying with these three hyperscalers you mentioned, Jason, do we see a kind of formula in any of these companies for what they need to do or have in place for investors to not punish them for their AI spending?
Is there kind of a magic approach that goes over best?
People want to hear about how this is already bringing in new streams of revenue.You know, all these cloud businesses were quite sizable. before ChatGPT came out two years ago.Investors want to know, where's the money?
Show me the money for new sources of revenue from this.And all of them emphasize that they are seeing that even though it's nascent at this point.Investors were very well impressed with Google's results to that effect.
You take Microsoft, their guidance for revenue in the current quarter, was a bit lower than expected and the stock started going down.
But what was interesting there is the company said, big reason for that is they're not able to build new capacity in their data centers fast enough to meet demand.Not that there isn't demand for these types of products.
Just in terms of products, Jason, is it an issue for investors that in many cases there isn't a tangible or even kind of easy to understand AI product per se that they can see in return for all this spending?
And sometimes even when there is one, as with the case of Microsoft launching its AI assistant pretty early on within its office software, we've heard from some analysts, including at RBC Capital, who've expressed some disappointment that the products maybe didn't quite live up to their promise.
That's right.First of all, there are two categories.One is the products the companies themselves are offering, and that's where you get Microsoft's co-pilot products that you were alluding to.
The other thing is providing these cloud services, basically renting very expensive servers that have these very expensive GPU chips sold by Nvidia and others. to businesses that do AI functions, that provide AI services.
Companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, et cetera.Those companies themselves are not profitable, and they're largely providing revenue for these services to the hyperscalers from money they're getting from investors.
How that will play out is a big question.Will the revenue from those startups be sustainable?Will their own products catch on in a way that really they haven't yet for the most part?
All right.So it sounds like the question here is how long will venture capital keep funding these AI startups?And if they start pulling the plug, what would that mean for these hyperscalers?
That's right.And a decent share of that investment is actually coming from some of these hyperscalers themselves.Microsoft is by far the biggest investor in open AI.
A lot of that investment is round-tripping back to Microsoft in the form of cloud revenue for its cloud operation from open AI. and that's being repeated in other places too.
I don't think anybody credibly thinks that this AI wave is going to completely evaporate.This is not NFTs from a few years ago.
But whether these startups and the business lines of existing companies that are focused on AI will succeed in the long run, be profitable and sustainable, and continue to push revenue into the cloud operations,
I've been speaking to Wall Street Journal Global Tech Editor, Jason Dean.Jason, thanks so much for staying up for us, breaking down these results.
Thank you.And that's it for What's News for Friday morning.Today's show was produced by Daniel Bach and Kate Bullivant with supervising producer Christina Rocca.And I'm Luke Vargas for The Wall Street Journal.We will be back tonight with a new show.
Otherwise, have a great weekend and thanks for listening.
