Thank you for listening to The Rest Is History.For weekly bonus episodes, ad-free listening, early access to series, and membership of our much-loved chat community, go to therestishistory.com and join the club.That is therestishistory.com.
This episode is brought to you by Zip Recruiter.Now, Dominic, if you look at most successful businesses, you will notice one thing they all have in common.They all took a lot of hard work.Would you say that's true of us?
Would you say that's true of the rest of history?I think that is true actually, Tom.I think we both do work quite hard on it, don't we?We spend a lot of time preparing the episodes.It's not quite the effortless superiority that everybody imagines.
But I have to say it does help to have a good team.
It's a challenge, isn't it?That all companies face hiring.So this can be a daunting task, especially when you need to find someone right away and you have too many or too little options to choose from.That's right.
But Tom, there is a place where people can go to for help and that is ZipRecruiter.Now ZipRecruiter does the work for you to make hiring fast and easy. And one reason it works so quickly is because of ZipRecruiter's invite to apply feature.
So that lets you personally connect with your top choices to encourage them to apply for the role sooner.
Experience faster, easier hiring with ZipRecruiter.Try it free at ZipRecruiter.com slash history.That's ZipRecruiter.com slash h i s t o r y history.
Sephora stores are everywhere you are, so just pop in when you need a brown lip to match your 90s playlist, a confidence boost before your interview, or a last-minute gift for mom's birthday.There's always a Sephora near you.Just pop in.
Use our store locator to find your local Sephora or Sephora at Kohl's.
This is what you do when you've just found that statement handbag on eBay and you want to build an entire wardrobe around it.You start selling to keep buying.Yep, on eBay.Over that all-black everything phase, list it and buy all the color.
Feeling more vintage than ever?It's out with the new and in with the pre-loved.Next thing you know, you've refreshed your wardrobe basically without spending a dime.Yeah, eBay, the place to buy and sell new, pre-loved, vintage, and rare fashion.
Allons enfants de la patrie Le jour de croire est arrivé Contre nous de la tyrannie, L'étendard sanglant est levé.L'étendard sanglant est levé.Entendez-vous dans les campagnes Lugir ces féroces soldats ?
Qui viennent jusque dans vos bras Égorger vos fils, vos compagnes Aux armes, citoyens Formez vos bataillons, marchons, marchons Qu'un sang impur abreuve nos yeux
So that was our producer, Theo Young-Smith.They were his dulcet tones.He was singing La Marseillaise, the song par excellence of the French Revolution, or at least the one French Revolutionary song that everybody now remembers.
So, Tom, that was adopted as the official anthem of the French Republic in 1795, but Napoleon didn't like it.He didn't.He kind of pushed it back to the margins and then
After the revolution, after Napoleon, Louis XVI's brothers, Louis XVIII and Charles X, they come back.They obviously hate it, so they ban it completely.But the Marseillaise is never forgotten, and it ends up as the national anthem of France.
Theo sings it all the time as a proud Frenchman.Would you I mean, you are John Bull incarnate, but would you agree that it's the greatest, the most thrilling national anthem ever written?I mean, the most stirring?
Well, I saw you'd written this, and this is the sort of slack and lazy thing that people who know only two national anthems say.So they know their own, and they know one or two others.If they're American, they say it's the American one.
If they're British, a particular kind of Britain, they say it's the French national anthem.
But actually people who know a lot about national anthems know that the best national anthem by far, so our assistant producer Aliyah will back me up on this, is the anthem of the German Democratic Republic, Auf Erstanden, Aus Rienen, the anthem of East Germany, which was an absolute banger and unquestionably the greatest national anthem ever written.
Well, Dominic, for those of us who aren't familiar with it, would you like to sing it for us?No.No?No, I wouldn't.You're clearly afraid to pitch it up against Theo's magnificent singing.No, I just don't want to look like an absolute fool.
I don't think so.Because obviously, as an Englishman, my soul doesn't stir with patriotic fervor when I hear the Marseillaise, except in Casablanca.
that brilliant scene where the Germans are sat around the piano, and then Humphrey Bogart agrees that they can strike up the Marseillaise, and it's sung with such fervor.And you are identifying with this, and it's very, very stirring.
However, I mean, it is worth mentioning, for those who haven't looked closely at the lyrics, that they are incredibly martial.
Yeah, the bloody standard.
Yes.I mean, it's kind of blood everywhere and it is summoning the enfants de la patrie, the children of the fatherland to action.In that first verse that Theo sung so beautifully, France is menaced by ferocious soldiers who were marching beneath this
banner of tyranny, which has been steeped in blood.And they're coming to rip out the throats of patriotic Frenchmen, sons and wives.
And so this great summons to arm citizens, form your battalions, let's march, let's march and irrigate the soil with a tainted blood.And the tainted blood is the blood of the tyrants and their armies.
That tells you when it's written, so war has been declared, but it also tells you about the mood at the time.
So we've talked a fair bit about sort of paranoia, sense of conspiracy, sense of taint and impurity, invading the virtuous body of the French Republic. But tell us a little bit more, Tom.I know you've done some digging into this.
How it comes to be written and who by?
Well, it's written at a time when France is still a monarchy, just about.So it's written on the 25th of April, 1792, and that's five days after France has declared war on Austria.
And officers in Strasbourg, who are kind of pretty much on the front line, there's a dinner, a public dinner. It's hosted by the mayor of Strasbourg, who is a man called Philippe Dietrich.
In one sense, he is the absolute embodiment of the intellectual revolution, the enlightenment-infused revolution.So he's a Protestant.He is a distinguished scientist.He's a chemist.He's a geologist.He loves his enlightenment ideals.
He sounds such a bore.And he's a Freemason.Yeah, total bore.Go on. what makes it intriguing is that he is simultaneously the epitome of everything that the revolution is opposed to because he is an iron master and an industrialist.
Now I do like an iron master.I know you do.And his forges are being powered by all the timber and the wood that he's been harvesting and which the poor can no longer use to keep their pots boiling.And so they're all starving.So he
He's a figure of sinister wealth, and he's actually a former aristocrat.So he was the Baron de Dietrich.So he embraces all the contradictions and ambivalences of the revolution.
And it's not surprising that he should be keen on reinvention, the kind of reinvention that France itself in this period is having to undergo, the process of going from a monarchy to a republic.
And it's, of course, they are on the frontier of a country at war.And so at dinner, the toasts are offered exactly the kind that you can imagine.
So to the matri, to liberty, to the ruin of tyrants, to the fertilizing of the soil with their blood and the blood of tyrants, all of that.
And Dietrich, he finds all the words of these toasts stirring, and he comments to the table, to the assembled officers, how tragic it is that all the marching songs that the French army have are rife with feudalism and superstition that they derive from the Ancien Régime.
And he wishes that there was a marching song that would be appropriate to the new French army, an army of patriots and citizens.
And it so happens that at that dinner, there is a captain called Roger de Lisle, and he is almost a kind of mini Dietrich.He's a man of science, he's an engineer, he's a Freemason, but he's also a part-time composer.
So he spent quite a lot of time in Paris rustling up various forgettable songs that he's trying to kind of flog to theaters and so on. But that night, the muse descends on him, and he's inspired by Dietrich's suggestion.
He goes back to his quarters, and he spends all night writing a song that he very catchily calls the Song of the Army of the Rhine.And I think that if that had stayed its title, maybe it wouldn't be as successful as it proves to be.
And the next morning, he goes to the Dietrich. and he gives it to Dietrich himself, who's very, very taken with it.Dietrich's musical, and his wife sits down at the piano, plays the chords, and Dietrich bellows it out.They all say, this is amazing.
This is exactly what we need.Madame Dietrich scores it for a military band. the band strikes up, and it's kind of literally a revelation.
Because to quote David Andres in his wonderful book on the terror, he describes it as an almost millennial sense of drama.And there is that sense, I think, in which it's a kind of secular dies irae.Dies irae, the great medieval account of
souls being brought before the throne of God to be judged amid slaughter and chaos and bloodshed.And the lamb, the sheep, and the goats are separated out.
And this essentially is what is happening in the drama of what will come to be called the Marseillaise.
Well, it has that apocalyptic sense, right? That is so common in the political culture at this point so seventeen ninety two i read a great relish that the masses the music is probably not exactly plagiarized but it's derivative.
So the various antecedents there was an italian composer could be off the there was a an oratory by somebody cool grease on. And Mozart, Mozart Piano Concerto No.25, apparently, yes.Disturbingly similar, Tom.
Well, remember that Delisle has come to Strasbourg from Paris, where he's been stationed, and he's been hawking his stuff around all the concert halls and theatres.He's got a knockoff tune that he's trying to pass off to Dietrich.
I guess in the way that minor composers I gather, are often more prone to being influenced by things that they've heard, perhaps the very greatest composers.
He's clearly not a very great composer, but it wouldn't be surprising that he might kind of perhaps unconsciously plagiarize certain tunes that he's heard.Well, I mean, that's how musical composition works.
But the bottom line is it starts to kind of go viral because soldiers from Strasbourg, whenever they, for various reasons, they might be going back into the heartlands of France, and they take it with them.They start kind of singing it.
And one of the soldiers who does this is going to Montpellier in the south of France.And there on the 17th of June, a doctor by the name of Francois Mireur, here's it being sung by a soldier who's come from Strasbourg.
And he immediately recognizes it as something stirring, as something patriotic.And he finds himself humming it and then singing it.He gets the lyrics.And five days later, he is going to a meeting at the Jacobin headquarters in Marseilles.
So he himself is a Jacobin.He's a great enthusiast for the revolution.
He goes to the Jacquemain club in Marseille and he gives a very fiery speech and brilliantly he ends it by bursting into song and singing this tremendous song that he's heard from the soldier from Strasbourg.
And everyone at the club goes, yeah, this is fantastic.And asks for the words to be written down and to be printed and to be distributed.Quick question.
How does he know the song?Like there are multiple, multiple verses.
How has he learned it?He must have got the lyrics from the soldier, and the soldier must have got the lyrics because they've been printed off in Strasbourg.Oh, they've been printed, okay.So I assume that that's how it's been propagated.
We talked about how this great summons went out from the capital to enthusiasts for the revolution out in the provinces to come and celebrate the Fête de la Fédération, which has begun to be celebrated annually on the anniversary of the storming of the Bastille on the 14th of July on the Champs de Mars in Paris.
And so the people who come from the provinces to Paris to supplement the guards that are available to the revolutionary authorities in Paris come to be called federae.And Mira has already enrolled himself as a federae by this point.
And he is part of a band of about 500 volunteers who've been recruited in the South. and who are going to leave from Marseille and go to Paris to join the other Fédérés from across France.
And Mireille is appointed to the general staff of this contingent of Fédérés who are going to march north.And they duly leave on the 2nd of July.They are armed to the teeth.They are dragging artillery with them, heading off to Paris.
And as they march, they sing this song. The name that had been given to the song by De Lille, the Song of the Army of the Rhine, is obviously not suitable to a contingent of men coming from the south of France.
So they changed it to be even more catchily named the War Song of the Armies on the Borders. it's great.And they march through from Marseilles up towards Paris and everywhere they go, people absolutely love the song.
And by the time they come to Paris, I think that news of the song has preceded them.And so they march into the city and the sound of their singing is electrifying for a city that is already
on edge, excited, nervous, in a kind of apocalyptic mood, fearing the worst, hoping for the best.And it just strikes this incredible chord.
And it's a reminder of the fact that at this point with France poised between monarchy and a republic, there is a need for for anthems, for new anthems that can channel identity in a way that previous anthems hadn't.
So if you think of the British National Anthem, it's God Save the King.It's focused on the monarchy, but if you're going to get rid of a monarchy, you need new songs, new tunes.
But you know, what's interesting about it though, it's not entirely uncontested because in the next few months, there are lots of people who don't like the Marseillais and who you actually use it as a stick to beat other people with.
So I read in Peter McPhee's great history of the French revolution that as the tension, the few between the Girondins and the Jacobins.
became more intense this year on that actually had a parody of the masses they used as a kind of a distributed that later that year as a christmas carol.
Buy a guy called on twine joseph go sass and it began forward children of anarchy the shameful day is upon us the people blinded by their rage raise the bloody knife so that she turns all that stuff about bloods on its head and makes it a song about anarchy and basically tiring the jack about.
as these sort of blood crazed fiends.
I mean I think that an anxiety about the sanguinary quality of the lyrics has never entirely gone away.
There are still occasional proposals in France to this day that the lyrics perhaps should be rewritten to be slightly less carnivorous but conversely it's the fact that it is so aggressive.
that means that people who are caught up in the excitement of this new stage of the revolution, the second revolution, as you called it in previous episodes, that's exactly what you want.You want something that is no holds barred.
And this song that comes to be called the Marseillais after these people from Marseille, the Marseillais, clearly, I mean, it's absolutely what people on the more radical fringes of the revolution want.And I think that It's not just the lyrics.
It's not just the tune.It's also the fact of who is singing it.They're not professional soldiers.They're not people who you would expect under normal circumstances to be singing a marching song.These are citizens
who are answering the summons of their country in its hour of need.And of course, they are also implicitly Republican.There is no mention of kings, of crowns, of monarchy in the lyrics whatsoever.
And on the 14th of July, the date of the Fête de la Fédération, this great celebration of the fall of the Bastille and the coming of the revolution,
They have a position of honor on the Champ de Mars, and the name that is given to this great open space is redolent with a sense of antiquity.
The Champ de Mars in Latin is Campus Martius, and the Campus Martius in ancient Rome is where citizens would assemble to go to war as citizens, to defend their country in its hour of need.And the fact that the Maasai are singing this song of
violent enthusiasm for civic values.It's giving to what might seem terrifyingly novel, a kind of antique sheen because it's giving it a Roman quality.
So Simon Schama writing about the Marseillaise, he says of it, that it's a great swelling anthem of patriotic communion.
Nothing like the Marseillaise had ever been written that comes so near to expressing the comradeship of citizens in arms and nothing ever will.
But I think that for classically informed enthusiasts of the revolution, actually, there is a sense that perhaps when they're listening to it, they're listening to the kind of song that might have inspired the Romans or the Spartans to go to battle in shared citizenship.
So I wondered if the Romans were making an appearance.They have.Let's come back after the break to find out more about Rome in the French Revolution. This episode is brought to you by BetterHelp.It's spooky season.
Time to have a little fun with the things that scare us.But you know, history can be spooky too.Like the ghost of the Grey Lady who lives at Hampton Court Palace.But what about scary things that don't involve ghosts and zombies?
Well, therapy is a great tool to work past fears and overcome them. You know, therapy is great because you learn positive coping skills.You learn how to create, set and enforce boundaries.
You build the confidence to become the very best version of yourself.If you want to start therapy, BetterHelp is perfect because it's entirely online.So it's convenient, it is flexible, and it works with your schedule.
All you have to do is to fill out a brief questionnaire and you will be matched with a licensed therapist.Visit betterhelp.com slash restishistory today to get 10% off your first month.That is betterhelp.com slash restishistory.
Future you faces some big expectations.Work out more, go to bed earlier, and most importantly, make smart money decisions.Thankfully, today you has Bank of America.One place with tools and guidance to help balance tasks from budgeting to saving.
So you can just be you with big plans.Do more with the bank that asks, what would you like the power to do?Explore our tips and more at bankofamerica.com slash future you.
Get your holiday started with the perfect tree in your perfect style from The Home Depot.
Whether you want something that you can assemble in a few clicks, steal the show with over 2,000 color-changing bulbs, or a tree with lights that can be controlled by remote or foot pedal.
The Home Depot has it all in our huge assortment of premium trees.Plus, get free delivery on over 2 million items this holiday from The Home Depot.Subject to availability, see homedepot.com slash delivery for details.
Welcome back to The Rest is History.We are talking about the Marseillaise, which Tom obviously thinks is an absolute banger of an anthem.I was a bit more sceptical, wasn't I, Tom?You were.
But you've now turned to a very exciting dimension of this story, which is the Romans.So let's dig into this idea a little bit, because I think it's been such an interesting theme running through the first series he did on the French Revolution.
And this series that we're doing in the moment, which is about the interesting kind of paradox on the one hand, the revolution is think that they're beginning the world again.
And that's what makes it different from the american war of independence or from the english civil war or whatever that there's a real sense that you can kind of reboot history and reboot france and yet at the same time.
They're also very consciously role-playing as ancient Romans, as Roman Republicans.You know, the tennis court oath modeled on the oath of the Horatii.I know you're going to talk about David's paintings.
So this is an idea that has run through 18th century culture generally, hasn't it?Enlightenment culture, a fascination with Rome.I mean, Gibbon's decline and fall of the Roman empire, a great example of this.But it's not all Rome, right?
So there are particular aspects of Roman culture and particular time periods that fascinate them.
It's not Christian Rome.And I think a huge part of the appeal of Rome is that the revolutionaries and indeed people in the enlightenment identify with is the sense that this offers a glimpse of a pre-Christian order.Well, hence Gibbon, right?
So Gibbon is casting the Christian period as a dark age, that modernity becomes modern by going back to to antiquity, to the pre-Christian world.
So that's very important, and particularly for the revolution as it becomes more and more anti-clerical and indeed anti-Christian.But it's also not the Rome of the Caesars.
It's the Rome of the Republic and specifically the early Republic that is founded in the wake of the expulsion of the kings.
And the French revolutionaries kind of admiring that period of Roman history are obviously following in the footsteps of the American revolutionaries who had cast their expulsion of a king as something redolent of the spirit of Brutus and Horatius.
It's telling, I think, that even in the very earliest days of the revolution, long before anyone is really considering getting rid of the monarchy, you do have radicals, Demoulin would be a classic example, he's doing this all the time, who are comparing themselves to Brutus.
there are two Brutuses in the history of the Republic.There is the Brutus who leads the overthrow of the monarchy and the establishment of the Republic.
But there is also, of course, the Brutus who is descended from the first Brutus who murders Julius Caesar.And Julius Caesar is a product of the Republic who aspires to overthrow the republic.The Napoleon.
So Napoleon, yes, but also all these shadowy figures that true revolutionaries are anxious about hiding behind the mask of patriotism.So if you're playing Marat or Robespierre or whoever denouncing frauds, counter revolutionaries, you can do so
as a Brutus, as a patriot committed to the defense of your country against a tyrant.
What was the thing we talked about the other day?Cicero.It was Cicero who exposed the Catiline conspiracy, is that right?That's the big thing that Cicero... And they're obsessed with Cicero, aren't they?
Haven't they all studied Cicero's speeches and things at school, Des Milan?And actually you mentioned Robespierre, so I found this quote.
There's a woman called Rosalie Julien who's a Jacquemin sympathizer and her diaries and letters are always cited by all historians of the revolution.
She wrote of Robespierre, you'd enjoy this Tom, that he is, quote, a man who was devoted to the public with the generosity of the greatest men of antiquity.This Robespierre is a real Roman.
I mean, there could be no higher praise.You talk to Cicero and Timothy Tackett in his great book on the coming of the terror.
I mean, he quotes this amazing statistic that in speeches and newspapers during the revolution, Cicero would be cited 10 times more frequently than the contemporary philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
So you think of all the books and articles and essays that have been written about the influence of Rousseau on the revolution, but Cicero is being quoted 10 times more.
its influence is obviously, in one sense, elite.
I was about to ask that.Most people don't go to school for a long period of time and they don't study classics.To most people in France, this is just a mad babble.
I think it's kind of in the way that people might quote Darwin or Freud or Marx today without having read any of them.You have a vague sense, we would never do that, Tom.
It has been known that people might drop these names without having read them, right?It's that kind of thing.
But I think it's also, it becomes kind of the mood music, it becomes actually the colouring, literally the colouring, because this sense of what it is to be a Roman is fostered above all, I think, by someone that you've already mentioned, the great artist, Jacques-Louis David, who
is a painter who's obsessed by Rome and his paintings are austere and self-consciously impregnated with a sense of the nobility of the early age of the Roman Republic.
And again and again, his canvases are illustrating men who are prepared to devote their lives to their country, maybe even to sacrifice their own children in its cause, who put patriotism above all else.
and David is painting these even before the revolution breaks out.
So when the revolution happens and people look at his paintings, it's as though David has already been illustrating for the revolutionaries what they're doing before they had even begun to do it.
We've talked a little bit in this series, not enough for our American listeners.We've talked about the influence of
the american experiment so how much is this because in america people are already using that roman model because really it's if you've separated from britain and you're going to be a protestant republic on the shores of the atlantic doing something that's never been done before you've only got one historical analogy to grope for which is the kind of classical world so they're doing it in america are people in france do you think actively copying that are they informed by that
There clearly are people in France who are very, very influenced by what is happening in America.Lafayette, your friend, would be an obvious example.Big admirer of Lafayette, yeah.Jefferson is ambassador in that period.
Franklin had been a constant presence in Paris in the years before the revolution.And there are certainly overt revolutionaries who are influenced by the example of the Americans.
But so too are even people, say, in the train of Marie Antoinette, so the Princess de Lombard, who we'll be coming to in our next episode.
She was a great admirer of Franklin, and she saw no contradiction between serving Marie Antoinette and being very close to her, and admiring the founding fathers of America in the example of the American Republic.I think in David's case,
There are huge shenanigans in his youth about whether he's going to get a scholarship to go to Rome and kind of feeling that he should have had it, but he's always being kind of frustrated in the chance to go.
And so when he finally arrives there, it's the chance to roam the eternal city is all the more precious to him.I don't think that America stands between David and his imaginings of early Rome.
And I think that the look that you get in his paintings, which is kind of austere and lacking in any sense of kind of flummery and self-consciously antiquarian, I think this is his own.
And under the revolution, he brings this style to public display because people recognize that he's brilliant at the visuals. And as with so much else, in a revolutionary situation, people need a new look.
They need expressions of the revolution's identity that aren't drawing on what is being repudiated and rejected.And so he's the person who, for instance, is coordinating these great festivals that are being held on the Champ de Mars on Bastille Day.
And of course, David entirely recognizes the Roman connotations of this, the Roman echoes of it. He's organizing when Voltaire's remains are brought to the Pontillon.And the Pantheon is a great temple in Rome built by Hadrian.
Well, it's kind of originally built by Gripper and then rebuilt by Hadrian, but it's a very kind of Roman looking building. So again, it's a kind of classical ceremony and the Pantheon had originally been intended to be a church.
So it's this, again, this idea of replacing Christianity with something that is Roman and revolutionary simultaneously.And Lynn Hunt, who's written a lot about this, is brilliant on all this.
I mean, she says there is no government without rituals and without symbols.You need rituals, you need symbols, and therefore you need people who are able to create and invent it.
Sorry, you said replacing Christianity, but they're not overtly thinking about replacing Christianity at this point, surely.
There is an anti-clerical tinge to it, but they're not thinking, you know, we are going to wipe away every last taint of... Well, I mean, as we'll see when we do the next episode, hostility towards those priests who have refused to swear the oath of allegiance to the revolution, well, it's on the verge of becoming literally murderous.
Yes.And you talked yesterday about how legislation is brought in in the wake of the Tuileries forbidding even those priests who have sworn the oath to wear clerical garb in public.
And so it's part of the climate of ideas, I think, that hostility to the priesthood inevitably spills into hostility towards Christianity itself.
And the association of Christianity with reaction and superstition, throne and alter it will come to be called, is becoming a very, very powerful motivating factor.And as the monarchy starts to totter, so also does the church.
It was initially the church that had sanctioned the anointing of kings, that had enshrined the monarchy as a kind of God-given gift from the Almighty.
And so to contemplate destroying the monarchy is also to question the influence that the church has had and Christianity has had on centuries and centuries of French history.And so it becomes part of what is to be rejected.
And I think this is what is going on at this period. And so by rejecting the Osean regime, rejecting Christianity, ancient Rome is the obvious place that you turn to.
Yeah.So there are a lot of people who still can't read.So David's paintings, or reproductions of them, I guess, engravings and so on, must be very important in diffusing this kind of classical aesthetic.
But I read in your notes that there are also kind of souvenirs and things that people can buy.So brooches and stuff.
Yeah, so you can buy brooches which are stamped with the head of Brutus, and you can get pins in the form of the fasces, and the fasces are the rods that the lictors, who were the bodyguards of elected magistrates in the Roman Republic, would carry in front and before the magistrate as he walked through the forum or whatever.
So people are literally dressing up as fascists.
Right.So for us, fast jays have this kind of sinister connotation because they give the name to fascism.But you can see in the seats of government in Washington DC, the fast jays are there.
They're an inheritance from the American revolution and the establishment of a Roman type republic there in exactly the way that the fast jays are being used in the streets of revolutionary Paris.
Maybe that is an example of kind of an American influence, but again, I suspect not.
I think it's part of the same impulse that both American and French revolutionaries are reaching for this classical heritage because it's just kind of part of the air of what educated revolutionaries are breathing.
Now let's talk now about how people look, because obviously in some of these David paintings, he actually has people dressed in Roman style.So it looks like they might be wearing togas or whatever.
And obviously people aren't walking the streets of Paris.I mean, they'd look ludicrous, even by French revolutionary standards, but they are wearing Roman style hats, aren't they?
They are.Just before we come to the Roman style hats, I think David does actually struggle bringing the visuals of ancient Rome to the heroic moments of the revolution.
So you mentioned this great painting that he's attempting to do of the Oath in the Tennis Court, the moment when the third estate emancipates itself from feudalism and superstition. But he never finishes it.
And I think he's kind of struggling to show the third estate as Roman.He can't quite decide how to do it.
It's not also the problem that while he's painting it, people who were previously good people have since been either cancelled or executed.
Yeah, so it's like photographs in the Russian Revolution where people makes the Stalin suddenly vanish.So that is a problem.
But one aspect of classical dress, which you alluded to, which is a tremendous success, becomes kind of the emblematic symbol, the Republic. is the bonnet rouge, the red hat, the red bonnet, the red cap.
And it derives from a soft cap called by the Romans the pileus, which was given to slaves when they were set free.And it was used by the Brutus who assassinated Caesar.
He stamped it on his coins after Caesar's assassination to illustrate the fact that Rome, which had been enslaved by Caesar, had now been set free by the tyrannicides.
And it's conflated with a cap that had been worn by a people called the Phrygians who lived in what is now Turkey.So it's also known as the Phrygian cap.And it's adopted by the revolutionaries pretty much from the start.
I mean, certainly by 1790, they are saying this is the perfect symbol of liberty.So as early as August 1790, proposals are being made in revolutionary and patriotic journals
that say, you know, cocks on church steeples should be pulled down and replaced with the Bonnet Rouge.That would look absolutely ridiculous.That would look ludicrous.
And in the Cordeliers club, which is the most radical of all the Jacobin clubs, the rule is that no one can address the assembled delegates without putting on a Bonnet Rouge.And so in case you forget one, on the table, there are lots of Bonnet Rouge.
So if you have to step up, you can pick one up and put it on your head.
I think that's absolutely ridiculous.But anyway.
Well, yes.And so there are people who think it's ridiculous.And one of them actually is Robespierre because in spring 1792, a motion is brought before the Jacobin club that all Jacobins should wear the Bonnet Rouge all the time.
And Robespierre, who loves a wig, loves a powdered wig, he doesn't want to go around with a Bonnet Rouge on his perfectly coiffured wig.And so he says it's ridiculous.A cockade is fine.We don't need to go the full revolutionary bonnet.
would they have to wear them in bed?
I don't know.I mean, it's kind of a can of worms, isn't it?A can of worms.It retains its reputation as the emblem.But I suppose unlike the Kerkade, which is kind of like a rosette, isn't it?Yeah.It's like a political rosette.
A Kerkade is kind of more obvious as a marker of political loyalty.
But the Bonnet Rouge, if you were wearing the Bonnet Rouge, you were really kind of saying, this is what I am.This is what I'm about.
And so in a way, the emblematic moment of the second revolution is when the people break into the Tuileries and they corner Louis and they make him drink a toast to the Republic.
But before he does that, they make him wear the Bonnet Rouge, the red hat.
It's interesting isn't it how hats have this kind of political meaning.You would think that there aren't equivalents today, but of course there are.
It was very controversial because people would often use pictures of when they wanted to be disobedient about Jeremy Corbyn, they would have pictures of him wearing a kind of, you know, I don't know, a Maoist hat or whatever it is he used to wear or a kind of Russian star hat.
And hats do, I mean, think about top hats or bowler hats, top hats do actually have an oddly charged kind of political significance.And this is the greatest example of that.
Yeah, and it's recognized by contemporaries.So a contemporary observer is quoted by Aileen Ribeiro in her book on fashion in the French Revolution.So this is a contemporary writing in 1792.
The sight of a woollen bonnet rouge fills the sans-culottes with joy and let no one mock him for it. His enthusiasm is both praiseworthy and well-founded.
He has been told that in Greece and Rome, this woolen cap was the symbol of freedom and the rallying sign for all those who hated despotism.With this in mind, his first desire is to become the owner of a Bonnet Rouge and...
What is fascinating, I think, about that passage is the reference to Saint-Caulot because it suggests how a symbol that is drawn from classical antiquity, which presupposes a certain degree of education, to be classically educated is essentially to be educated.
is being paired with a style of dress that is emblematic of the slums of those who don't have the kind of classical education that the elites are expected to have.
And of course, we talked about the word sans-culotte, about how to be sans-culotte, the culotte of the knee breeches that have become associated with the rich and particularly with the aristocrats. This is to look working class.
So rather than culotte, you wear loose baggy trousers, pantalon, you wear wooden clogs, and you wear a short jacket, which in French is le camagnol.
And this I learned from Aileen Ribeiro, derived from Camagnola near Turin, which was home of Italians who had then settled in Marseille.So in other words, it's a particularly Marseillaise look.Like the song.
And again, it suggests the way in which the Marseillais are kind of perfect standard bearers for this new revolutionary spirit.
Yeah.A rough, tough port city where people, I guess, are seen as maybe as incarnating a different kind of France, but also a purer, more authentic France, perhaps. Yes.So, the sans-culottes, we talked about them a little bit last time.
They are the kind of urban working class radicals, aren't they, of Paris.
They're not the very poorest.Yeah.So, they're not just the working class.They're artisans, but they're also revolutionary artisans.Yeah.So, they have a class-based identity, but they also have an ideological identity.Yeah.
And I think that what is fascinating about this period is that just as you are getting the working masses, the sans-culottes, affecting a classical look that derives from the education of the elites.
So also, are you starting to get elites who are dressing like the masses?And this is such a suggestive kind of cross-fertilization.
And the key aspect of this is effectively trousers.If you're trying to pass yourself off as more proletarian than you are, and you could change your name or something or drop the D or whatever, but the best thing to do is put on a pair of trousers.
Yes.So the Girondins ministry, so that's Brisson and his allies who appointed as Louis ministers in March, 1792.They didn't last long.Louis Saxon in a disastrous move.But while they're in office, they are known as the sans-culottes ministry.
So these very, very educated men are being given the name of the sans-culottes.
And the most amazing example of this kind of class-based cross-dressing is the former Duke of Orléans, the cousin of Louis XVI himself, the man who had sponsored the early radicalism in the Palais Royal in the center of Paris, one of the richest, best-bred men in the whole kingdom, right the way in his blood,
And he has taken on the name Philippe Egalité, Philippe Equality.I'm just going to say it right now, he's one of the worst men in history.He's a terrible man.Well, he behaves very badly to his cousin.
But in the summer of 1792, so while the massacre at the Tuileries is kicking off, while the monarchy is in the process of collapse.
Philippe Egalité, the former C. Devon, Duke of Orleans, is spotted by Madame Tussauds, the person who will set up the wax works in London in due course.And she has a hilarious description of him.
She says, he was wearing a short jacket, pantaloons, and a round hat with a handkerchief worn sailor fashion loose around the neck with the ends long and hanging down the shirt collar seen above.
The hair cut short without powder, so no Rospierre powder for Philippe Egalité, and shoes tied with strings.So essentially, it's kind of quite 60s.It's becoming cool for the upper classes and the elites to dress in a kind of a demotic manner.Yeah.
He's the Theo of 1792, isn't he?Exactly.Except that, of course, Theo doesn't dress like a Roman.This is the thing.Right. plebeian, working class, revolutionary, and Roman because that detail, the hair cut short without powder.
Madame Tussaud's description, she specifies that this is a particular style and it's called the Titus style.And the name derives from the role of Titus in a play by Voltaire that he'd written several decades before.
And this had been restaged in May, 1791.It's a great celebration of kind of Republican liberty and so on.And had been played by France's greatest actor. And the name of this play is Brutus.
So this style of hair is simultaneously, it's what you wear in the slums, in the working class areas of Paris, but it's also what you wear if you want to affect a Roman look.And so this, I think, is why
The Marseillaise has the impact that it does because it comes at exactly this moment when the Roman and the working class are fusing in the broad culture of revolutionary Paris, and they're arriving in their
Carmanul, these jackets that are kind of emblematic of the working classes.
When they come to Paris, the first areas that they go through are those that are very self-consciously working class, particularly the area around where the Bastille had stood.
But they're singing a song that proclaims civic and martial virtue in a way that Romans might have done.And of course, as we said, they're then assembling on the Champ de Mars, the Campus Martius.
And you said how the Girondins in due course will be intimidated by it and put off by it and parody it. Even at the time, of course, there are plenty of people in Paris who were terrified by this display, so royalists in particular.
So there's an officer in the Royal Guards who sees the Marseillais coming into Paris singing this song, and he writes that there are 500 fanatics, three quarters of them drunk, followed by the dregs of the people.
But of course, Dominic, there writes a man who is on the wrong side of history.
So the wrong side of history, Tom.So there you've got an unnamed officer in the Royal Guards, a man of sense and discretion.He and I on the wrong side of history.Tom, you're on the right side of history, aren't you?Do gooder with Theo, our producer.
You're dressed in your street garb.
I love a Roman, Dominic.I love a Roman.
I look at you now in your street garb with your Roman haircut.Shocking scenes.So everybody knows where we stand.
So our plan was originally to get to the execution of the King, and we've obviously completely failed to do that because there is just too much drama.
So what we're going to do is we're going to bring down the curtain on season two of the French Revolution.But the good news is that we will be back in the spring with season three, and that will be more exciting than ever.
We will get into the September massacres, to the fall of the monarchy, to the rapidly changing fortunes on the battlefield. and most excitingly to the trial and execution of Louis XVI.
But next week we will be changing focus completely because we will be in America in 1968 for the fall of Lyndon Johnson, the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy, and in the long run, the great comeback of Richard Nixon.
And the good news for members of the Rest is History Club, you will get access to the entire America in 1968 series, all six episodes on Monday.
And of course, if you want to join the Rest is History Club and sign up, you just have to go to therestishistory.com.So on that bombshell, merci Tom, that was magnifique and à bientôt everybody.Au revoir.À bientôt. Everybody, Dominic here.
Now, I have some very good news for you, because if you've been enjoying the series that we're doing on America in 1968 and my tangled relationship with Eugene McCarthy, the news couldn't be better, actually, because on Tuesday, the 5th of November, thrilling news for people who like American politics.
I will be covering the American presidential election through the night, live from New York City.
Now, the downside of this for people who enjoy very poor American accents and stories about the Punic Wars, the Bannies, if you're one of that sort of embattled minority, Tom Holland will not be joining us.He's not allowed to come.
I will be joined by, unbelievably, Rory Stewart and Alistair Campbell from The Rest Is Politics. Anthony Scaramucci from The Rest is Politics US and Marina Hyde from The Rest is Entertainment.
Alan Shearer from The Rest is Football was invited, but he didn't want to come.We will be live on YouTube from 3 p.m.Eastern Time on Tuesday afternoon.
and we'll be back again, dementedly, at midnight, terrifying prospect, to take you through the early hours of Wednesday morning.We will be analysing all the events as they unfold, I read.
We will be comparing 2024 to elections past in American history, and we'll be reacting to the unveiling of the next President of the United States.
Now, I know that Rest History listeners are not necessarily the same persuasion as those of our sister podcasts, so to allay your fears, for every mention of Donald Trump or Boris Johnson that Alastair Campbell makes, I will ensure that viewers get at least six anecdotes about Hubert Humphrey or George Wallace.
For more information, why wouldn't you want more information on such a galaxy of stars?Just search for The Rest is Politics, America Decides on YouTube.
