Where Do Democrats Go from Here? AI transcript and summary - episode of podcast Honestly with Bari Weiss

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (Where Do Democrats Go from Here?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (Honestly with Bari Weiss) to view the AI-processed content of all episodes of this podcast.

Honestly with Bari Weiss episodes list: view full AI transcripts and summaries of this podcast on the blog

Episode: Where Do Democrats Go from Here?

Author: The Free Press
Duration: 00:59:40

Episode Shownotes

Throughout the election, we heard one warning, repeated ad infinitum: A Donald Trump victory would precipitate a fascist dictatorship, and the United States would soon resemble Nazi Germany. But Democrats didn’t take up arms to defend the ramparts of democracy. They didn’t repel Trump’s storm troopers who descended on Washington.

Instead, something more. . . traditional happened. President Joe Biden welcomed Donald Trump to the White House, congratulated him, and promised a “smooth transition.” (A courtesy, we should note, that Trump did not extend to Biden in 2020.) But now that Democrats have lost power—both in the White House and Congress—what changes should they make to regain it? Here to answer that question today are Freddie deBoer and Ruy Teixeira. Freddie is a writer, self-described Marxist, and longtime critic of “social justice” identity politics. Ruy is a political demographer, Democratic strategist, and co-author of the book, Where Have all the Democrats Gone? We talk about how Democrats became the party of elites, whether Kamala Harris’s loss is the death knell of identity politics, why abortion wasn’t enough to save the Democrats, and whether the party will learn any significant lessons from this historic defeat. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Summary

In this episode of 'Honestly with Bari Weiss', the discussion centers on the Democratic Party's recent electoral losses and the need for reevaluation in strategy. Guests Freddie deBoer and Ruy Teixeira analyze the party's struggle to connect with the white working class and the impact of identity politics on voter perception. The conversation addresses economic concerns, inflation, and the importance of a coherent identity and messaging. Ultimately, the discussion questions how the Democrats can redefine their approach and recover lost voter trust amid shifting political dynamics.

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (Where Do Democrats Go from Here?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Full Transcript

00:00:01 Speaker_02
This episode is brought to you by LifeLock. The holidays mean more travel, more shopping, more time online, and more personal info in places that could expose you to identity theft. That's why LifeLock monitors millions of data points every second.

00:00:15 Speaker_02
If your identity is stolen, their US-based restoration specialist will fix it, guaranteed, or your money back. Get more holiday fun and less holiday worry with LifeLock. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit LifeLock.com slash podcast. Terms apply.

00:00:30 Speaker_08
From the Free Press, this is Honestly. I'm Michael Moynihan. For the last few months, we've heard one warning repeated ad infinitum.

00:00:41 Speaker_08
A Donald Trump re-election would precipitate a fascist dictatorship, and the United States would soon resemble Nazi Germany. Then, on November 5th, Donald Trump, again, won the presidency.

00:00:55 Speaker_08
And Democrats didn't take up arms to defend the ramparts of democracy. They didn't repel Trump's stormtroopers who descended upon Washington. Something more quotidian happened.

00:01:07 Speaker_07
— Well, Mr. President-elect, and former president, and Donald, congratulations. And looking forward to having a, like we said, smooth transition. — Do everything we can to make sure you're accommodated, what you need.

00:01:21 Speaker_08
— Exit polls showed that working-class, non-college-educated, and minority voters, once the sturdy base of the Democratic Party, voted for Donald Trump by unheard-of margins. It was the most devastating defeat for the party in recent memory.

00:01:40 Speaker_08
And the question now is, why? Why did the Democrats lose? And what will 2024 mean for the future of the Democratic Party and the American left?

00:01:53 Speaker_08
Do Democrats need to move further left on economic issues and embrace something like the strident left-wing populism of Bernie Sanders? Was Kamala Harris simply an unlikable candidate?

00:02:04 Speaker_08
Or did she lose because she and the party lacked a coherent identity and message? And what is up with all those people who voted for AOC and Trump in New York City? Here today to discuss these questions with me are Freddy de Boer and Rui Teixeira.

00:02:21 Speaker_08
Freddy de Boer is a writer, self-described Marxist, and longtime critic of social justice identity politics. Ruy Teixeira is a political demographer, democratic strategist, and co-author of the book, Where Have All the Democrats Gone?

00:02:36 Speaker_08
We talk about how the Democrats have become the party of the elites, whether Harris's loss is the death knell of identity politics, why abortion wasn't enough to save the Democrats, and whether the party will learn any significant lessons from their historic defeat.

00:02:50 Speaker_08
Stay with us.

00:02:55 Speaker_06
The Credit Card Competition Act would help small business owners like Raymond. We asked Raymond why the Credit Card Competition Act matters to him.

00:03:02 Speaker_03
I'm Raymond Huff. I run Russell's Convenience in Denver, Colorado. I've ran this business for more than 30 years, but keeping it going is a challenge. One of the biggest reasons I've found is the credit card swipe fees we're forced to pay.

00:03:15 Speaker_03
That's because the credit card companies fix prices. It goes against the free market that made our economy great. The Credit Card Competition Act would ensure we have basic competition. It's one of the few things in Washington that both sides agree on.

00:03:31 Speaker_03
Please ask your member of Congress to pass the Credit Card Competition Act. Small businesses and my customers need it now.

00:03:38 Speaker_06
For more information on how the Credit Card Competition Act will help American consumers save money, visit MerchantsPaymentsCoalition.com and contact your member of Congress today. Paid for by the Merchants Payments Coalition.

00:03:49 Speaker_06
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. MerchantsPaymentsCoalition.com

00:03:55 Speaker_00
Think about a product that's selling through the roof. These businesses have a good product, outstanding marketing, and a great brand.

00:04:02 Speaker_00
But there's an often overlooked secret in business, and that's the businesses behind the business, the ones that make selling and buying simple. For millions of businesses, that business is Shopify.

00:04:15 Speaker_00
Shopify is the home of the number one checkout on the planet, with shop pay that boosts conversions up to 50%. That means way fewer carts are getting abandoned and way more sales are going.

00:04:28 Speaker_00
So, if you're into growing your business, your commerce platform, you better be ready to sell wherever your customers are, whether on the web, in your store, or in their feed. Businesses that sell more sell on Shopify.

00:04:40 Speaker_00
Sign up for your $1 per month trial period at shopify.comslashhonestly, all lowercase. Go to shopify.comslashhonestly to upgrade your selling today. Shopify.comslashhonestly.

00:04:55 Speaker_08
Rui Teixeira, Freddie DeBoer, welcome to Honestly.

00:04:58 Speaker_05
Thanks for having us. Thanks for having me.

00:05:00 Speaker_08
Rui, let's start with you. Obviously, the topic today is the future of the Democratic Party. I mean, the man who wrote The Coming Democratic Majority a couple of weeks out for the election.

00:05:12 Speaker_08
I mean, let's just start big and say what is the future of the democratic party and a party that Had its kind of ass handed to it What do they need to do? To get back to a democratic party. They could have a majority at some point Right.

00:05:26 Speaker_05
Well, uh, you know, that is a very very very big question You alluded to the book john judas and I wrote in 2002 called the emerging democratic majority which looked at the way the

00:05:38 Speaker_05
country was changing demographically, economically, ideologically, and said Democrats had a shot at becoming the dominant majority party if they played their cards right. Though he did flag what turned out to be a real warning sign.

00:05:54 Speaker_05
You got to watch out for the white working class because they're still a big part of the population. You've been losing ground among them and the math doesn't work for you if you start losing even more of these voters.

00:06:04 Speaker_05
Of course, that turned out to be true. did undercut the Democrats, that's why Trump. in an accounting sense, got elected in 2016. And then we saw the Democrats process that as sort of hashtag resistance.

00:06:19 Speaker_05
We've got to push back against the impending tide of fascism. There's no need for us to compromise in any of our social justice commitments.

00:06:29 Speaker_05
In fact, we're going to push the accelerator on that stuff because that's what good Democrats want, all of whom coincidentally are college-educated liberals.

00:06:37 Speaker_05
And we saw that kind of define the party more and more over the course of the teens and late teens and then into the 20s. Of course, it crested with the George Floyd summer.

00:06:46 Speaker_05
You know, John and I actually wrote another book that came out about a year ago called Where Have All the Democrats Gone?, which tried to tell the overarching story about how the Democrats were evolving away from being the party of the working class and evolving ever more toward being

00:07:00 Speaker_05
Party of College Educated Professionals. And this created, you know, huge contradictions in their coalition and put a real ceiling on their support.

00:07:08 Speaker_05
And we argued that while we didn't think Republicans were necessarily poised to have a total realignment, it made the Democrats very vulnerable.

00:07:17 Speaker_05
And we might continue to see this back and forth, 50-50 kind of toggling between the parties, depending on which negative aspects of which party were the most salient given election. I think that's what we saw. this election.

00:07:29 Speaker_05
So Democrats really got their hat handed to them on the basis of their economic performance, on the basis of their laxness at the border, their laxness on crime, their embrace of ideologies and even language that is foreign to, I think, most working class people in this country.

00:07:48 Speaker_05
And they thought they could not do anything about that by basically running the anti-fascist playbook. People didn't buy it. People didn't think Donald Trump was a Nazi, and they voted accordingly, and they wanted something different.

00:08:02 Speaker_05
So Democrats, I think, have to rectify those problems they have on the cultural front, and on making a more convincing economic offer to the American people that they find credible, and just basically stop acting like their values and priorities of their most activist, educated members are those that can be sold to the mass of the American public, because they can't.

00:08:26 Speaker_05
So they do have to rebrand the party as something closer to what ordinary working class people want.

00:08:32 Speaker_05
Of course, that's a tall order, but I think it can be done, but it can only be done if they basically decide that's what we need to do and sort of move in a unified manner to do that.

00:08:42 Speaker_05
I'm not so sure that's going to happen in the aftermath of this election.

00:08:46 Speaker_08
Freddie, I think really identifies as a Democrat. I mean, I've read your writing for years, and you've said that you're something of a Marxist. You have Marxist leanings on a lot of things.

00:08:56 Speaker_08
I mean, from that perspective, does the Democratic Party need to move left on economic issues? I mean, in the Clinton years, it was the party of what people derisively call neoliberalism.

00:09:08 Speaker_08
And I saw this video of AOC on her Instagram Live saying, how did I get voted back in with an overwhelming majority, but people are at the same time dashing towards Donald Trump in my district? And she's saying to her viewers, Explain it to me.

00:09:24 Speaker_08
I mean, do you think that sort of economic populism, which is what we call it on the right, I mean, there's left populism too, but is it economics that Democrats have to focus on to get voters back into their camp?

00:09:37 Speaker_04
First of all, I want to say that, like, yes, I am a Marxist, but it's about as meaningful as the fact that I'm a Gemini, meaning that neither has much tether to reality at this point. So I don't usually waste much time talking about it.

00:09:48 Speaker_04
But look, it is all about economics, except for when it's not. And we shouldn't sort of be overdeterministic. To me, the sort of foundational political moment in my life was the election of George W. Bush in 2000, where

00:10:02 Speaker_04
Al Gore, you know, Bill Clinton himself had become a divisive figure because of his scandals. But the Clinton administration was wildly popular.

00:10:11 Speaker_04
Even by the end of his presidency, he had very strong favorables for the presidency rather than for him personally. They were presiding over a really strong economy and they had a record of peace for those eight years.

00:10:23 Speaker_04
And he still managed to screw it up because he was such a horrifically bad candidate. I tell the story whenever I can, because everyone's forgotten it. But there was one of the debates, Bush was the shorter man.

00:10:34 Speaker_04
And apparently, Gore's people had read the little dictum that like 90% or whatever of the time the taller candidate is elected. So they said to him during the debate, find a way to get close to Bush. The voters can see that you're taller.

00:10:50 Speaker_04
But because it's Al Gore, and he's such an awkward human being, Bush is in the middle of giving a debate answer. And gorgeous, kind of like Sasso's up to him in the most bizarre way possible. He looks like a lunatic.

00:11:04 Speaker_04
And George W. Bush just gives him a look like that. And of course, it totally broken Bush's favor. You know, you can't just dismiss the salience of these personality elements. And I think I think a lot of people don't particularly like Kamala Harris.

00:11:18 Speaker_04
I think that people do notice that she was running as a San Francisco liberal in 2020 and then was tacking to I was the sort of the borders are and I sleep with a Glock under my pillow, that sort of stuff.

00:11:30 Speaker_04
But as far as sort of the economic thing goes, I do think we should Remember that there's really two biggest things that contributed to inflation, which really dominated the campaign, which was number one, COVID introduced serious supply shocks.

00:11:44 Speaker_04
So the supply chain was bottled up all over the world because they couldn't move things in and out of ports because of COVID.

00:11:50 Speaker_04
But also number two is that like the United States undertook a really aggressive fiscal and monetary response to COVID to try to prevent what legitimately could have become a worldwide depression. I mean, there was a real chance of that happening.

00:12:04 Speaker_04
And for the record, the person who started that stuff was Donald Trump, right? Donald Trump, when COVID broke out, was not preaching austerity. He was not saying, what about inflation? He was participating in this.

00:12:15 Speaker_04
There's a world where he wins in 2020, and it's the Republicans who are getting all this blowback because of the inflation of the past few years. I don't really know what to do about it because inflation obviously is a big deal.

00:12:26 Speaker_04
but wages have been increasing too.

00:12:29 Speaker_04
And the Democrats never found a way to sort of say to people, Hey, yes, inflation is bad, but if the average wage is going up at a rate that is commensurate in many, many areas of the country, it's not that big of a deal.

00:12:42 Speaker_04
I don't know how you make that message to the American people. And I just think that like sort of Obama era inflation and low rates really imprinted on a ton of people as like the basic economic reality. And it really hurt the Democrats.

00:12:55 Speaker_08
Freddie, I want to ask you something about this and then really get your opinion on this.

00:12:59 Speaker_08
I mean, I've seen a lot of people on the Democratic side and just sort of, you know, liberals in general talking about the voters and saying, well, they don't get it.

00:13:08 Speaker_08
They don't understand that inflation has gone down significantly, that crime isn't up. I mean, you saw Jon Stewart the other day.

00:13:16 Speaker_08
in his kind of autopsy saying, well, you know, people talk about this wokeness, but she didn't run a woke campaign, presuming that Americans don't have much of a memory of this stuff. I only have one problem with the woke theory.

00:13:30 Speaker_08
I just didn't recall seeing any Democrats running on woke shit. When people are doing their own autopsies, you see this a lot on MSNBC and stuff, and they say, what is wrong with the American people? They don't get it.

00:13:42 Speaker_08
What has to happen in the kind of professional classes of Democratic politics? Because they seem to really not understand their voters, it seems, in this kind of post-election couple of weeks. I say, God, really?

00:13:54 Speaker_08
You guys have no idea why Hispanic people would vote for a Republican?

00:13:58 Speaker_04
Yeah, so I would say like, look, sort of to extend the point you just made, look at the way that we talk about deindustrialization. So in 2016, you have this shock victory for Donald Trump.

00:14:09 Speaker_04
He wins the Rust Belt, the blue wall that were solidly Democratic, that Democrats thought they could campaign on. They were so confident that Hillary didn't campaign in Wisconsin or Whitmer, Michigan in 2016.

00:14:20 Speaker_04
And so the story sort of, this meme bubbles up, and you have a lot of like Bernie Sanders people, people like me, but also some people on the right saying, hey, you had NAFTA and all these free trade agreements, sort of neoliberal order and globalization kicked the stool out from under these people.

00:14:35 Speaker_04
You go to their towns or these devastated places, everybody's getting high on fentanyl. And so then a counter argument comes, right, from the sort of the Hillary people and establishment Dems, and they say, that's a racist argument.

00:14:45 Speaker_04
They say to talk about deindustrialization is inherently to privilege white people. Here's the problem with that. Nobody was more hurt by deindustrialization than the black middle class, right?

00:14:55 Speaker_04
Like, the reason why Detroit looks like it does, why it's so black, is because black people came in the Great Migration to Detroit, to that whole area, looking for industrial jobs and manufacturing jobs, right?

00:15:08 Speaker_04
And their way of life was really devastated by the things that happened. Now, you can have all the debate that was probably inevitable.

00:15:14 Speaker_04
But the point is, is that, like, the Democrat response to a very obvious sort of point about a real piece of financial and economic pain. being felt by all kinds of people was to find the identity angle to dismiss its salience, right?

00:15:29 Speaker_04
There's a lot of places on Twitter now, if you go and say, hey, I think that, you know, deindustrialization had something to do with this election, they'll immediately say, oh, so it's only white people who matter, huh?

00:15:39 Speaker_04
You just care about the white working class. Well, there's a reason why the black vote has been moving towards Donald Trump.

00:15:45 Speaker_04
And one of the big reasons why is the same conditions that are affecting the white working class are affecting the black middle class.

00:15:51 Speaker_08
Yeah, Rui, I mean, to that point, and to the follow-up book you did with John Judas, and we did an interview on Honestly About It, and you should listen to that.

00:16:00 Speaker_08
But if you look at these numbers, and a lot of people have gone over them quite a bit in the past week, but just to give you a few of them, 3 in 10 Black men under the age of 45 went for Trump. That's an astonishing number. 65% of Native Americans

00:16:16 Speaker_08
voted for Trump.

00:16:17 Speaker_05
Yeah, yeah. Most people don't know that's a really interesting one. I mean, you know, small sample, but still, boy.

00:16:23 Speaker_08
Yeah, I mean, Donald Trump had campaigned and said, we promised certain tribes, one in North Carolina, sovereignty from the federal government. The Biden administration didn't do it. We'll do it. This isn't land acknowledgments.

00:16:34 Speaker_08
No one cares about that stuff. This is federal recognition, which they do care about. Show me the money. Show me the money. 50% of Hispanic men voted for Trump. I've been banging the drum about this. What do you make of those numbers?

00:16:47 Speaker_08
Did it surprise you in any way, the sort of size of the movement?

00:16:52 Speaker_08
Or is that like, hey, we've been predicting this, and you guys took your eye off the ball, and you've been too involved in identity politics and less involved in what, you know, working class people of color, to use that kind of useless phrase, what their actual concerns are?

00:17:07 Speaker_05
Yeah, there's an opportunity cost to a political party when they focus on non-economic issues. It takes energy, time, resources away from economic issues. There's a limited bandwidth there.

00:17:19 Speaker_05
And I think that contributed to the problems they had because of it. economic issues. They weren't as focused on them as they should have been. They didn't really have the right perspective on them.

00:17:29 Speaker_05
I mean, back to what Freddie was saying about how 2016 was interpreted. I mean, I was gobsmacked, hanging out as I was in the left institutional world, about how quickly people who had been talking for

00:17:43 Speaker_05
30 or 40 years about the depredations of neoliberalism and how they were tearing communities apart, enriching the rich, impoverishing the poor, devastating the working class, leaving communities in ruins, and all of a sudden it's like there's this Trump election where a lot of these people voted for Trump and and delivered the election to him and it's like

00:18:03 Speaker_05
Well, okay, economic anxiety, come on, it's not really about that. It's all about the fact these people are racist and xenophobic, and so they're attracted to a horrible person like Trump, and that's really what it's about.

00:18:14 Speaker_05
And no matter how much I tried to argue with people, it was essentially useless, almost to make the argument that we should care. about the white working class and sort of factor that into how they voted was considered borderline racist.

00:18:28 Speaker_05
You know, as we evolve from that point and see the non-white working class, particularly Hispanics, but also blacks to some extent, moving away from the Democratic Party, I think there's the same cluelessness about not understanding that the way the American political economic model has evolved in the last

00:18:45 Speaker_05
40, 45, 50 years has been to the disadvantage of working class people of all races. And they remember, you know, they're sensitive to that.

00:18:54 Speaker_05
And then when you pile on top of that, a democratic administration that presided over a spike in inflation, which really did, reduce people's living standards for a few years.

00:19:04 Speaker_05
I mean, now they're starting to recover, but there was an actual diminution in the standard of living there for a while. And plus people expect things to get better over time, not basically to hold their nose above water.

00:19:16 Speaker_05
So, you know, the verdict on the Biden administration was they basically screwed up the economy and that comes on top.

00:19:23 Speaker_05
for a lot of working class people of decades of feeling like they're not getting ahead the way they would like to and that the way the people are getting ahead in this country, the people who live in Washington DC, Boston, Seattle, San Francisco, Chicago, you know, the big cities, the professionals, they're all fine and they look down on people like me.

00:19:44 Speaker_05
Their view when they look at people like me is like, We're basically, we don't get it.

00:19:48 Speaker_05
We don't understand how great things are getting, that we don't want to live in this wonderful, multicultural, multiracial America, and we're just under threat for our status. And, you know, we just need to get with the program.

00:20:01 Speaker_05
And I think that lands like a lead balloon. You can't get away with that kind of approach. And it doesn't even make any sense, given the historical view that Democrats and people on the left were taking. toward the evolution of the American economy.

00:20:16 Speaker_05
It does not compute.

00:20:18 Speaker_08
Freddie, on the cultural front, and we'll get back to economics, obviously, you know, something struck me the other day.

00:20:26 Speaker_08
Seth Moulton, congressman from Massachusetts, had talked about this on MSNBC, and he posted something about it on his Facebook page, and he said, you know, a lot of us don't understand that, you know, the trans sports issue, for instance, actually means something to us.

00:20:42 Speaker_08
and mean something to voters. Moulton said this and was attacked pretty ruthlessly. And he said, see, this proves my point. You can't have these conversations. In an interview on WBUR, they asked him to apologize.

00:20:54 Speaker_08
Tufts University today in Boston contacted his office and said, please do not contact us about internships. or any future cooperation between your office.

00:21:04 Speaker_05
Transphobic swine, yeah.

00:21:07 Speaker_08
And Moulton keeps on saying, this is my point.

00:21:09 Speaker_08
How much of this do you think is actually saddling the Democratic Party with issues that, you know, the average person not only doesn't concern themselves with, but just doesn't think the Democrats are right on?

00:21:22 Speaker_04
I mean, the first thing I would say is if I was someone like Seth Moulton, if I was sort of acting as a spokesperson for the Democrats,

00:21:29 Speaker_04
I might find it very tempting to grab onto that issue and say, this is why, this is the problem, rather than the party's complete lack of identity, its inability to build anything like a coherent economic policy.

00:21:42 Speaker_04
Last year, a video game came out, a Harry Potter video game. It was the biggest video game of the year. And of course, Harry Potter's creator, J.K. Rowling, is controversial because of things he says about trans people.

00:21:53 Speaker_04
And there were all these sort of debates in a sort of like some conservatives crowing and some liberals were lamenting, oh, all these people bought this game.

00:22:00 Speaker_04
And as I said to many people, I would be surprised if one in 10 people who bought that game had the slightest idea that there was any kind of trans controversy going on with J.K. Rowling. The reality is

00:22:12 Speaker_04
I think it is clear that Donald Trump was able to make some hay out of an unfortunate quote that Kamala gave at a ACLU meeting five years ago. I absolutely don't think that that's determinative of anything. I think what happens is that

00:22:27 Speaker_04
When you have shitty economic politics, right, you're opening the door for the other team to introduce divisive cultural issues. I have been saying this my entire adult life. I don't know what the Democrats are and what they stand for.

00:22:41 Speaker_04
And you can go issue by issue through the party and say, OK, what do Republicans stand for with immigration? Close the border. kick out the people, deport the people who are already here. It's America for Americans, right?

00:22:54 Speaker_04
Let's have a really harsh restrictionist approach to immigration. That's like a agenda that I don't agree with, but it's very coherent. You can soundbite that easily. What's the Democrats' immigration agenda? I have no idea.

00:23:10 Speaker_04
My job literally is to write about politics, right? And if I tried to sit down and say, okay, What the Democrats want is, especially after watching this election, right? Kamala is trying to out-Republican the Republicans. She's trying to be Ms.

00:23:22 Speaker_04
Tough immigration leader. It sounds completely disingenuous. No one who's voting on an immigration restrictionist urge is voting for her. They don't have any clear sense of this is what we stand for, right?

00:23:37 Speaker_04
Taxes, Democrats are not going to go out there and say, we want high taxes. But they also don't say, hey, we need to be able to have a system where everybody pays their fair share. Here's what we think.

00:23:47 Speaker_04
They're forever acting in a reactive fashion, whereas Republicans get to say, taxes as low as possible, cut them all, right?

00:23:55 Speaker_08
I mean, fair share is never really defined. But, Freddie, to the point about immigration, you mentioned Bernie Sanders and, you know, your politics being sort of similar to his. I mean, Bernie Sanders was once fairly restrictionist on immigration.

00:24:08 Speaker_08
The whole party was fairly restrictionist on immigration. Yes, from a working-class perspective, is that it pushes down working-class wages.

00:24:16 Speaker_08
How much do you think immigration, which is usually in the top three issues of people coming out of that polling booth, say in exit polls, these are the things that concern me, economy is usually top, immigration is usually within the top three or four.

00:24:27 Speaker_08
How much do you think that hurt Democrats? Because as Freddie says, I mean, the argument that I heard is, well, we've gotten tougher in the past couple of years. That's not a policy.

00:24:36 Speaker_08
That's saying, please don't attack us because we're actually, we're tightening up the border now.

00:24:41 Speaker_05
Right. No, I think immigration did really hurt them. I mean, as a general comment on these kinds of issues, very few people know this.

00:24:48 Speaker_05
It's not something I put in my bio, but I was once a Marxist and I was trained at the University of Wisconsin-Madison under Eric Olin Wright and people like that.

00:24:58 Speaker_05
And one thing I learned, or we would talk about in that program, is what I would call the relative autonomy of the cultural moment.

00:25:05 Speaker_05
There was a lot of big debates within Marxist academia at the time between people who would basically take essentially a quasi-economic determinist position, you know, there's a material base and there's a superstructure and the arrows only go one way, and people who basically like the structuralist Marxists from France

00:25:25 Speaker_05
Louis Althusser and Nikos Palantzos and people like that who talked about what they called the relative autonomy of the different moments of the social structure.

00:25:34 Speaker_05
And to take it out of graduate school ease, that means that you can't just reduce a cultural issue cultural problem, a cultural conflict to a question of economics. It's not as simple as that.

00:25:47 Speaker_05
So when people react, for example, about the trans issue, right, and they don't like it, they're basically opposed to it, and they think it represents how clueless the Democrats are in these kinds of issues and how far away from their values they are.

00:26:01 Speaker_05
And no, they don't think biological men should be on women's teams. No, they don't think gender-affirming care is like a great idea for 10-year-olds. These things are important. They're part of the way people look at the world.

00:26:11 Speaker_05
That's the prism through which they see life and politics. And the idea that we can reduce it all to economics, I think, is just wrong. And that's really true of something like immigration.

00:26:21 Speaker_05
which gets at very fundamental values people have about who should come into the country, what's fair and what's not fair, and actually does have an economic component as well, because mass immigration does undercut the low-wage labor market in unions.

00:26:34 Speaker_05
The Democrats used to believe that, and it does put a burden on a lot of different towns and municipalities to wind up absorbing these huge tranches of immigrants all at once.

00:26:43 Speaker_05
So these are real problems that are felt economically and have a very strong cultural component to them as well. And one thing I had the most difficulty with arguing with my fellow Democrats is taking that seriously.

00:26:55 Speaker_05
You cannot solve the cultural issue simply by turning up the volume on economic populism. It will not work. It has not worked. It's not going to work.

00:27:06 Speaker_08
After the break, does the future of the Democratic Party look more like AOC or Josh Shapiro? Our guests disagree. Stay with us. We'll be right back.

00:27:21 Speaker_00
Today's episode was made possible by Ground News. America's trust in the media has been on a long and steady decline, especially over the last few years. If you listen to this show, you know that's something that we care about and talk about a lot.

00:27:37 Speaker_00
Mainstream media often have their own agenda, which leads, and we've seen this many times, to bias coverage, public polarization, and ideological bubbles that reinforce readers' opinions rather than challenging them.

00:27:50 Speaker_00
That's why Ground News is so important. Their app and website allow us to access the world's news in one place to compare coverage with context behind each source.

00:28:01 Speaker_00
Reading the news this way helps you see discrepancies on how certain topics are covered or ignored so you can think critically about what you read and make up your own mind. Check it out at groundnews.com slash honestly

00:28:15 Speaker_00
to get 50% off the Ground News Vantage Plan for unlimited access. Ground News is subscriber funded. By subscribing, you're supporting transparency in media and our work in the meantime. Today's episode was made possible by Ground News.

00:28:30 Speaker_00
America's trust in the media has been on a long and steady decline. especially over the last few years. If you listen to this show, you know that's something that we care about and talk about a lot.

00:28:42 Speaker_00
Mainstream media often have their own agenda, which leads, and we've seen this many times, to bias coverage, public polarization, and ideological bubbles that reinforce readers' opinions rather than challenging them.

00:28:55 Speaker_00
That's why ground news is so important. Their app and website allow us to access the world's news in one place, to compare coverage with context behind each source.

00:29:06 Speaker_00
Reading the news this way helps you see discrepancies on how certain topics are covered or ignored, so you can think critically about what you read and make up your own mind.

00:29:16 Speaker_00
Check it out at groundnews.com slash honestly to get 50% off the Ground News Vantage Plan for unlimited access. Ground News is subscriber funded. By subscribing, you're supporting transparency in media and our work in the meantime.

00:29:33 Speaker_08
Rui, to this point that you hear from people like Jon Stewart, and I mention him because I just watched it this morning, saying, well, that was not the campaign that they ran.

00:29:41 Speaker_08
So don't pretend that it was about so-called wokeness, because they ran away from that stuff.

00:29:46 Speaker_05
It wasn't just about wokeness. It was about the economy, too. It was about a lot of things. It was about whether people trusted the Democrats or they didn't. So the idea that Democrats could solve their laxness on crime and on the border

00:29:59 Speaker_05
in the course of, you know, a short campaign, you know, building on the idea that I've got a clock under my pillow, you know, and I'm gonna, I'm gonna really gonna enforce the border, you can trust me on it this time.

00:30:10 Speaker_05
I mean, the idea that you could completely restructure the Democrats approach on the basis of a short campaign where you say things that are somewhat different than you said before, I think is ludicrous.

00:30:21 Speaker_05
If they wanted to send really strong signals on the border or on crime, they could have done it in a much more aggressive way, but they didn't do that. And it would have been hard to do anyway.

00:30:33 Speaker_05
I mean, the idea you can fix the problems of an entire four years in a couple of months by adopting a different rhetorical slogan, look, people aren't dumb. They know what you did and they know how you did it. They live in the real world.

00:30:45 Speaker_05
They saw what happened at the border. They did experience a spike in crime, which, you know, we could argue about how much it's gone down. The crime victim survey is really different than the FBI stats that have been collected.

00:30:57 Speaker_05
There's a lot of debate about that. But clearly people care a lot about crime and public safety, and they feel the Democrats just frigging dropped the ball in it. And you weren't going to convince them of anything different.

00:31:08 Speaker_05
simply by not running on bail reform or something, right? I mean, you don't say really stupid things, but you don't really convince people that you're smart in this either.

00:31:19 Speaker_04
I do think it's a complicated question. Let's look at abortion. That was the big motivator for the Democrats this election, what some people hoped would save the Democrats.

00:31:26 Speaker_04
We do have tremendous evidence that it has been an upward sort of push for Democrats since the end of Roe v. Wade. It's worth saying that that has been predicted for generations.

00:31:39 Speaker_04
Smart Republicans have been saying for many years, I know because they've told me that like,

00:31:44 Speaker_04
If you really cared only about Republican victory, you would never actually allow Roe to be overturned because it was such a powerful fundraising mechanism for Republicans, et cetera. But, I mean, that's an example of what's a cultural issue, right?

00:31:57 Speaker_04
But that is not in any sense sort of airy or immaterial. I've got a baby in me that I don't want is a very material sort of thing.

00:32:06 Speaker_04
Years ago, I briefly dated a woman who worked in a Planned Parenthood clinic, and she said the thing that always stayed with her was the number of women who would come in to get abortions, who the entire time would be telling everyone who would listen that they were personally pro-life.

00:32:22 Speaker_04
It was just different for them. That's a good example of a cultural issue in which there is a strong self-interest involved.

00:32:31 Speaker_04
I am frequently in the position as this big lefty where a lot of people interpret left politics or socialist politics as being like opposed to self-interest, in fact, right, to bring Uncle Carl back into this.

00:32:42 Speaker_04
The original Marxist doctrine was very, very clear that you appeal to people's best interest. And then that's the way that you build a mass movement. You convince people that their self-interest is shared with other people.

00:32:53 Speaker_04
I think Democrats have never found a way to do that with a lot of their core issues, right? And it's not intrinsically easy to do that with some of this stuff. I do care a lot about global warming.

00:33:04 Speaker_04
I think no Democrat should ever run anywhere near global warming as a sort of core.

00:33:12 Speaker_04
electoral thing, maybe if you're running for mayor of San Francisco or something, but you should try to keep that as that's the thing that we take care of once we achieve power first.

00:33:20 Speaker_04
Being able to, again, like to have coherent messages that the party says, this is what we believe in and here's how our agenda is better than yours remains something that's just really hard to articulate. And it gets back again to, you know,

00:33:34 Speaker_04
to just, we want that too, but less, right? Oh, we also are immigration restrictionists, but we're a little bit nicer about it. We also want to keep taxes low, but maybe not quite as low as the Republicans. You just don't have like an identity.

00:33:47 Speaker_04
I've been saying for years that the Democrats need to go through a Goldwater period, right? Meaning for those people listening at home, Barry Goldwater gets the Republican nomination in 1964.

00:33:57 Speaker_04
The previous presidential administration for the Republicans was the Eisenhower administration, which did not have what we would call a clear or coherent sort of ideological valence according to modern politics.

00:34:10 Speaker_04
The Goldwater moment is this crazy guy from Arizona. He gets the nomination with what's seen as an extremist or radical platform, and he loses a terrible blowout.

00:34:21 Speaker_04
And a lot of the smart people in politics, well, you'll never hear about American conservatism again, right? Or you'll never get that movement conservatism stuff again.

00:34:29 Speaker_04
20 years later, Ronald Reagan solidified the absolute dominance of movement conservatism in American political life. He only loses a single state to Walter Mondale. The Democrats start to rejigger their entire approach, right?

00:34:40 Speaker_04
The point that I'm making is that, like, they traded short-term electoral self-interest for having a coherent point of view. Barry Goldwater lost. Richard Nixon, whatever he was, he was not a doctrinaire conservative, right?

00:34:56 Speaker_04
That's the other part of the party sort of reasserting control, but the people kept working. The Democrats need something like that, a moment in which they say, okay, we're willing to lose in the short term to define what we are as a party.

00:35:10 Speaker_05
That seems basically kind of insane. Are you basically advocating that the Democrats should run someone like AOC in 2028?

00:35:16 Speaker_05
Get completely blown out as opposed to not a close election, and that would be better for them, say, than nominating Josh Shapiro, who ostentatiously moves to the center on a lot of these issues? I mean, you can't possibly believe that's a good idea.

00:35:29 Speaker_04
I can possibly believe that in 2016,

00:35:32 Speaker_04
Bernie Sanders, who had sky-high favorables across the country, who had a dramatically better polling against Donald Trump, including in key battleground states, would have mounted a better challenge than Hillary Clinton, and that he possibly could have won that election.

00:35:45 Speaker_04
But even if he lost, he would have lost defining an agenda, as opposed to Hillary, who defined nothing and lost anyway.

00:35:55 Speaker_05
Right? Well, OK. She was a bad candidate. I don't really buy the Sanders stuff. But, I mean, look, I don't know what to say. It seems like a very strange idea, and I think you'll have a hard time selling it. You know, what we need is our own Goldwater.

00:36:11 Speaker_05
Okay, maybe, but then again, maybe not.

00:36:16 Speaker_08
I think, Freddie, I think you like Goldwater because the extremism and defense of liberty is now vice was written by Carl Hess, who became a Marxist. He became a new left guy.

00:36:28 Speaker_04
I'm thinking only 20th century guy who went from right to Marxist instead of the other way around. I think that he's probably the only one. Yeah. Yeah. Look, I, look, I'll just say this, like, this is something I very sincerely believe.

00:36:38 Speaker_04
And I think that it is a core problem for the American left to center, which is politics is just a game of tug of war. You got the rope that is American politics and policy. you got your left and you got your right.

00:36:50 Speaker_04
There's no like transcendent center, right? There is no such place as like a center that is just like divine by God where center is. It's just wherever the rope is in the middle of these two parties that are pulling.

00:36:59 Speaker_04
And the problem is the Democrats don't pull, right? The problem is that the Republicans never stop tugging the rope to the right. If you will like watch a Republican election, they're constantly saying, I'm the real conservative.

00:37:12 Speaker_04
Whereas the Democrat will say, don't worry, I'm not that liberal.

00:37:16 Speaker_04
I've said this in debates with Matt Iglesias for years, for example, which is if you have one party that's trying to pull the country to the right and another party that keeps chasing the center, then the country moves right even when the center party wins, right?

00:37:30 Speaker_04
Because there's no countervailing balance.

00:37:33 Speaker_08
Rui, to Freddie's point, does the country move left even when the quote-unquote right-wing party wins? Because to his point about Bernie Sanders, in 2016 I was at a union hall in Indianapolis and everyone there was ready to vote for Bernie Sanders.

00:37:50 Speaker_08
They were, you know, Hillary said TPP was the gold standard and they hated free trade. And when they believed that he was unfairly knived by the DNC, they all voted for Donald Trump.

00:38:01 Speaker_08
I mean, there was that kind of glide between the Sanders people and the Trump people. And look, where does the Democratic Party go on economics if the Republican Party is now, you know, has the head of the Teamsters speaking at the RNC?

00:38:15 Speaker_08
You know, Josh Hawley is, like, opposed to right to work. He's a very sort of pro-union guy in Missouri. They seem to have taken their economic policies, I would say, to the center, if not to the center-left,

00:38:25 Speaker_08
How do the Democrats outflank them on economics at this point?

00:38:29 Speaker_05
Well, I think that's something they're going to have to deal with. You know, this is not your father's Republican Party. They're clearly a much more populous party under Trump and his ilk.

00:38:39 Speaker_05
There is a substantial segment of the Republican Party who is moving to the left on economics. But, you know, here's the problem they have. They're not dominant by any stretch of the imagination. There is not a coherent economic policy

00:38:53 Speaker_05
we could detect from the Trump campaign and that I think we're going to have a hard time detecting it in the early years of this administration as well. And they could easily like screw it up, right?

00:39:03 Speaker_05
I mean, look, if they basically put Orrin Cass in charge of economic policy, you know, that would be kind of interesting and maybe it would work. But I really doubt that they will.

00:39:13 Speaker_05
I think there are a lot of entrenched interests in the Republican Party who are very opposed to any sort of policy like that. They're still more interested in tax cuts than they are in other stuff.

00:39:23 Speaker_05
You know, it's not clear his tariff regime is going to work. I mean, whether and to what extent he tries to implement it. There's a lot of moving parts here, all of which may not mesh well together.

00:39:31 Speaker_05
So the Democrats therefore would have an opportunity, conceivably, promulgating a different economic policy that would stand in contrast to Trump's, that would actually put an emphasis on economic growth, which I think is very important, that would get off of this obsession with climate, which I think people are not interested in, and basically restructure the American regulatory and permitting regime so it was a lot easier to build and do stuff and hopefully spark an era of economic growth.

00:39:59 Speaker_05
I think the way to outflank them in economics is not to basically say, we're going to give people a lot more stuff. I mean, we saw what happened with what they tried to do under the.

00:40:08 Speaker_05
Biden administration, even the child care tax credit wasn't particularly popular after a while. You got to basically convince people you have a program for opportunity and growth and upward mobility. That's really what it's all about.

00:40:19 Speaker_05
And the devil's in the details about how you make that case. It could involve being tough on trade. It can involve some of the things that Donald Trump has talked about.

00:40:27 Speaker_05
And I think actually restrictionist immigration policy would be fine, would fit right into that. Controlling the borders more, having a skills oriented immigration system. These are all things that would, I think, help with economic growth.

00:40:38 Speaker_05
So you need a different look for the Democratic Party on economic issues that's simultaneously populist and growth-oriented. And I think that's possible, though, again, I think the unity of that, even on the Democratic side, is not high.

00:40:50 Speaker_05
And I think the whole debate around how much economic policy and industrial policy should focus around a transition to clean energy. It's a huge deal. And I think Democrats have not resolved that.

00:41:03 Speaker_05
And I don't think it's worked particularly well so far, nor do I think it will work very well.

00:41:07 Speaker_08
It was interesting in this AOC live Instagram feed in which she was saying that the Trump people don't understand that tariffs and the 20% tariffs, a tax on all Americans.

00:41:19 Speaker_08
Kamala Harris made, I mean, despite the fact they kept a lot of the Trump tariffs, was running against tariffs and saying, we need less regulation on building.

00:41:27 Speaker_08
And so there were times when it sounded like she was the more kind of classically liberal candidate in a way. Freddie, I wanted to ask you about foreign policy, which us people in the media, we talked about it quite a bit.

00:41:38 Speaker_08
We talked about Dearborn, which of course Donald Trump won, and after Donald Trump, it was neck and neck between Kamala Harris and Jill Stein. What do you think that the Democratic Party's foreign policy vision for the future should be?

00:41:53 Speaker_08
I mean, obviously, there was something kind of confused about the Biden administration. They were trying to have it both ways, right? support Israel, threaten Israel, support the Ukrainians, but no long-range missiles into Russia.

00:42:04 Speaker_08
The Trump appointments look equally as confused at this point to me. A lot of the people that were hoping that Donald Trump would be more anti-interventionist are a little annoyed at some of these picks so far.

00:42:15 Speaker_08
What do you think the Democrats should do in response?

00:42:18 Speaker_04
I mean, the first thing I'll say is, you know, as a lefty guy who's always been most motivated by foreign policy, I don't think Americans vote based on foreign policy. I think there's an act of war going on somewhere, and American kids are dying.

00:42:29 Speaker_04
They care very much. Beyond that, they just don't care. Look, in an electoral system that has the sort of weird dynamics that American politics do, if this had been a very close electoral vote election,

00:42:40 Speaker_04
Maybe you're born and people vote saying, you're not going to do anything about Gaza. We're not going to vote for you. Maybe that could have cost Kamala the election. Those are very rare sort of moments.

00:42:49 Speaker_04
I mean, I think the problem for either party is they've got to sort of preside over and manage relative American decline, which is literally inevitable without sort of admitting that that's what's happening.

00:43:02 Speaker_04
I've been saying this recently to people like, look, Putin invaded Ukraine in 2022. In 2012, he doesn't. The things that China is doing in the South China Sea, they wouldn't be doing in 2016.

00:43:14 Speaker_04
And it doesn't really matter how much money you put into defense or whatever.

00:43:18 Speaker_04
The simple reality is that as the world has caught up economically with the United States and we have more and more foreign powers that have the ability to project power, it's just inevitable that the unipolar American moment was going to end.

00:43:30 Speaker_04
And this is a very weird moment anyway, having a scenario with the few countries that can meaningfully challenge us, just a little bit unusual anyway. But Americans didn't grow up with it, right? Americans grew up with.

00:43:42 Speaker_04
we get whatever we want, we're the dominant power on the block. I often reflect on the fact that the whole American conception of your kids are going to do better than you do, a lot of that stuff came from like 30 years, right?

00:43:52 Speaker_04
Like the sort of post-World War II era of prosperity until like the mid-70s when stagflation sets in. Like we sort of really defined an American sort of vision of what progress looks like with that. The Soviet Union fell when I was 10 years old.

00:44:06 Speaker_04
So I don't even really know what it is to not be in the world with American hegemony, but If China wants the South China Sea bad enough, we're not going to change that.

00:44:16 Speaker_04
And so how do you create a foreign policy politics that is realistic about some of these things without going out there and saying, we're going to be less powerful than we used to, which is not going to be an electoral victory, you know.

00:44:29 Speaker_08
Freddie, to your point, I think that it's a very important one that people who remember the Cold War have a very, very different vision of what American foreign policy should be.

00:44:37 Speaker_08
I mean, I've always noticed that the hangar of the Cold War is very, very long and it still exists amongst people, even of my generation. Rui, on foreign policy, what do you make of Freddie's analysis and where do you think the Democrats should go?

00:44:50 Speaker_05
Well, I do think it does create difficulties for both parties coming to terms with the way overall geopolitical situation has changed. America's position in the world is not likely to ever change back to what it once was, right?

00:45:04 Speaker_05
That's just not in the cards. To me, the most salient foreign policy issue is competition with China. Clearly, they're the real threat economically and eventually probably militarily.

00:45:18 Speaker_05
And it's not clear that the country is really well set up to compete with the Chinese at this point in a lot of different areas. And I think that that is something that can both generate political support and could be very important economically.

00:45:31 Speaker_05
Right. That I think people realize they see China as the biggest enemy we have. They see China throwing its weight around. They see the economic competitor they represent and they think America needs to kind of get on the stick.

00:45:45 Speaker_05
So exactly what the components of that policy would be. in terms of promoting American competitiveness vis-a-vis China has yet to be worked out. But I think that's something people are very interested in.

00:45:57 Speaker_05
I think that Trump administration is committed to this. Obviously, Democrats are talking about it.

00:46:01 Speaker_05
I mean, if we're going to have an industrial policy, for example, there's a very reasonable argument that it should be centered around some of these ways in which we need to compete with China in terms of our defense industrial base and other things.

00:46:13 Speaker_05
You look at the way that America was built up after World War II, a lot of it was competition with the Russians. So I think that is in the cards, how we're going to compete with China. That's very important.

00:46:24 Speaker_05
I think that in a more short-term sense, big foreign policy issue here, I mean, Israel-Gaza is a mess. Who knows what's going to happen with that? But the Ukraine war is really over, right? The Ukrainians have lost.

00:46:38 Speaker_05
They're not going to be able to push the Russians out of the Donbass in Crimea. This is ludicrous. In the meantime, a lot of money is being spent. A lot of people are dying.

00:46:47 Speaker_05
And the Trump administration is clearly going to be oriented toward ending that conflict. Yes, you're not going to get everything you want, Ukraine. Yes, it's terrible you were invaded.

00:46:56 Speaker_05
But realistically, I think that ending that conflict will be a priority of the Trump administration. you know, will be worked out. But I mean, it can be done because basically America, to some extent, holds a whip hand on this stuff.

00:47:10 Speaker_05
So I think if we want to push the Ukrainians to end the conflict, the conflict will be ended. And that's probably something that American voters would welcome. They're not really that enthusiastic about the Ukrainian war. There's a lot of war fatigue.

00:47:23 Speaker_05
People are well aware it's costing a lot of money. So getting the United States uninvolved in a sort of endless conflict like that is probably a good foreign policy potential win for the Trump administration.

00:47:37 Speaker_05
What the implications of that are, you know, in the longer term, I'm not sure.

00:47:41 Speaker_05
I mean, obviously, people portrayed this as, well, if we don't draw the line in the sand with the Russians and help Ukrainians beat them, then, you know, they'll take over all of Eastern Europe or something, which has always struck me as completely ridiculous.

00:47:53 Speaker_05
But that was certainly, um, Out there. I think the trump administration will turn their backs on that logic And they'll figure out another way to get along with russia other than fighting them in the ukraine.

00:48:04 Speaker_05
So long-winded way of saying We will see probably peace in the ukraine and probably will be under the trump administration watch And that'll probably be good for them politically

00:48:13 Speaker_08
I've spoken to a lot of people who asked me the same question in the aftermath of this election, and it seems like a simple question, but it's obviously not.

00:48:22 Speaker_08
Does this spell the end of identity politics as we have known it in the past, say, you know, since 2014?

00:48:30 Speaker_08
You know, Ferguson to today really kicks up around Me Too and then George Floyd, and there's a certain mania after George Floyd where everyone kind of

00:48:42 Speaker_08
loses their minds, and, you know, you have Kamala Harris running away from some of the things, not addressing some of the things that she said during 2020.

00:48:48 Speaker_08
And obviously, when you have these shifts amongst certain demographics of voters, hey, this stuff doesn't work. Freddie, is it over, or is that maybe too optimistic for those of us who have found it to be a bit destructive?

00:49:04 Speaker_04
Well, there's a funny sort of personal point about this, which is, you know, my last book came out in October of 2023 called How Elites Ate the Social Justice Movement, and I sold it to Simon & Schuster in May of 2022.

00:49:18 Speaker_04
And by October of 2023, everything that the book had predicted had come true, but it had come true sufficiently that the book was out of date. And so I just think that contributed to its bad sales. So this stuff does move quickly.

00:49:29 Speaker_04
Look, you know, many a clever liberal writer has pointed out that Trump is practicing certain kind of identity politics, right? That's not going to go away.

00:49:37 Speaker_04
I think that there is really deep exhaustion among the kind of people who have practiced this stuff for a long time with a particularly corrosive kind of identity politics. That doesn't mean that it's gone forever, that it doesn't have influence.

00:49:51 Speaker_04
But you would be amazed at the number People are sometimes surprised to hear this, but I just have a really lefty academic slash activist personal and social network.

00:50:01 Speaker_04
Even the people who work at Yale, where I'm five miles away from Yale right now, who would ordinarily be ensconced in this stuff are experiencing a deep exhaustion with it.

00:50:12 Speaker_04
One of the things I've been saying for a long time is, you just can't live this way forever. You can't actually live under a system of self-censorship that's this intense for that long. And there really is a sense like, OK, fine.

00:50:25 Speaker_04
You can actually sort of make fun of people for going to work. Now, look, politics is always cyclical. So things will sort of go around in circles.

00:50:33 Speaker_04
But I do think that personally, I can say that there's a lot of things I get away with saying now that I couldn't get away with saying before. I still said them before, but I didn't get away with it because I was in trouble.

00:50:42 Speaker_04
The question is, you know, as always, like, can this sort of re-evaluation of elite norms and elite language and elite communication sort of be channeled in a constructive direction of how to talk to the country about their politics in a way that can sort of say, hey, we've got these good ideas we care about, and here's our values.

00:51:01 Speaker_04
Can we make them attractive to other people? And that remains to be seen.

00:51:04 Speaker_08
And just to add to that, you said you're close to Yale. I was reading a piece by a Yale professor named Marcy Schor, who was writing in the German left-wing newspaper, the Tageszeitung.

00:51:16 Speaker_08
And she ended the piece about why Americans voted for Donald Trump. And it just didn't seem like she was trying to understand. And the last line of the piece was, today I feel ashamed of being American and human alike.

00:51:28 Speaker_08
And it's just an interesting thing. And I wonder if people in academia, in the circles, Fred, that you say you socialize with activists and academics, I mean, if there'll be more introspection to say, why do these people vote this way?

00:51:44 Speaker_08
And is it something more than just racial bias or misogyny or something like that? Rui, what do you think that the future of the kind of identity politics that you wrote about with John Judas, do you think that has a half-life?

00:51:59 Speaker_08
Do you think it's dying?

00:52:01 Speaker_05
Yeah, I mean, I think it's maybe dying is too strong a term. It's definitely diminished. Basically, I think that kind of politics and that kind of cultural moment probably peaked 2020 to 2022, and we're now seeing its diminution over time.

00:52:17 Speaker_05
I mean, a couple things about that. I think one thing about this election is it sort of sends signals that, to the extent, you know, people are identified with identity politics, it isn't a winner. And nobody, people, people don't want to be losers.

00:52:35 Speaker_05
So I think that that is going to make an impression on a lot of people. You know, the kind of people Freddie hangs around with, lots of other people who might kind of exhausted by it already, right? Because it's really just not a fun way to live life.

00:52:48 Speaker_05
And it doesn't make any sense, you know, logically or in terms of evidence or, you know, sort of standard values about how we come to decisions. I mean, people are just sick of that. People are sick of saying stuff they don't believe.

00:52:59 Speaker_05
It gives them another push, right? Not only is this stuff dumb, but it doesn't even work politically. So I think that those two things together are really going to push people away from this. However,

00:53:11 Speaker_05
My caveat to this is I think there are tons of people out there like the woman who wrote in the German newspaper, like dead enders on this stuff, right?

00:53:19 Speaker_05
And they have power, they have position, they have money, they still occupy a good chunk of the commanding heights of cultural production, and I don't think they're gonna give up that easily.

00:53:28 Speaker_05
I think they may soften their approach for a while, but I don't think they've quite given up. You know, there's still HR departments, there's still big DEI bureaucracies, there's still a lot of people out there who are true believers in this stuff.

00:53:41 Speaker_05
They have a material position, and influence that they can leverage to kind of keep that stuff going. So I think we're actually fairly far away from being able to say it's dead or even dying. I just think it's weakened.

00:53:54 Speaker_08
Yeah, I don't think in the university it's going anywhere.

00:53:56 Speaker_05
Yeah, the universities are probably the bunker, the last bastion.

00:54:02 Speaker_08
One of the things that we saw, and one of you mentioned it earlier, is that in the last month of this campaign, there was a bit of desperation, it felt like, from these precincts, and there was a lot of reference to Nazism and fascism.

00:54:16 Speaker_08
This is, we will scare them into voting against These people coming in because it's just going to be like hitler and they're going to be camps.

00:54:23 Speaker_08
I mean, uh, molly jong fast the commentator on msnbc said She expected to be rounded up Um, and you know, I charlamagne the god said something very similar, but he actually walked that back the other day I mean, what did you make freddie of that campaign?

00:54:41 Speaker_08
to make the Republican Party and make Donald Trump's coalition seem like 75, 80 million people that would vote for either Nazis or fascists or Francoists or Mussolini-type figures.

00:54:55 Speaker_04
Yeah, I just think that it's terrible politics and it's also not true. I think this thing that Democrats have gotten into where they think that like being in a permanent state of panic is to their advantage is just not helping them.

00:55:06 Speaker_04
So somebody went through and they found for every presidential election since Kennedy's election, they found political people saying this is the most important election of our lifetime.

00:55:18 Speaker_04
And it's like, if it is true that everyone is, then it cannot be true that any of them are. Just constantly increasing the emotional salience hasn't worked. I don't think anyone cares about these abstract appeals to democracy.

00:55:29 Speaker_04
I think what you have to talk to people about is say, actually, life goes on, right? Rather than saying, oh, my God, it's the end of the world, life goes on. And if you look at things, look, I was 20 when 9-11 happened.

00:55:40 Speaker_04
And it looked for a long time like my life was going to be dominated by the politics of terrorism, right? If you watched the 2004 election between John Kerry and George Bush, there was only one issue, right?

00:55:52 Speaker_04
During the presidential debates, not only would half the questions be about terrorism and al-Qaeda, when they got to other questions, like about the economy, they'd say, well, that reminds me of terrorism, and they'd start talking about that again.

00:56:03 Speaker_04
There wasn't a single question about terrorism in the Biden debate or the Harris debate, because no one cares anymore, right? All of this stuff feels permanent at the moment that it's happening.

00:56:13 Speaker_04
But people live in reality, and they experience the fact that people said in 2012, they've built a permanent Obama coalition that will never lose. And how did that work out, right? So I think it's important to remind people this stuff always changes.

00:56:27 Speaker_04
Remain politically alive to these different things, instead of constantly saying, if Trump wins, it's all over. Because then the sun does rise the next day, and you look like a liar.

00:56:36 Speaker_08
In really, I think Americans also believe in the kind of robustness of American institutions that, you know, the American institutions won't fail. And also you hear the sky's falling stuff, as Freddie was mentioning, the most important election ever.

00:56:49 Speaker_08
I was reading Tim Snyder's book. I went back to his book on tyranny, which made him a ton of money. And at some point in the book, he mentions the 2018 midterm elections and almost as an aside says, if they happen, if we end up having these elections.

00:57:05 Speaker_05
Funny, aren't both Timothy Snyder and Jason Stanley, the great anti-fascists, don't they write down the pike from you there, Freddie, at Yale? I think both of them.

00:57:15 Speaker_05
So yeah, I mean, there's this substantial section of academics and other lefty types who really do treat, you know, the barbarians are at the gate. It's like two seconds to midnight. We must stand up, no pass or roll.

00:57:29 Speaker_05
And I think, yeah, for most people, it's like, That's not the way they experience the world. They do think the sun's going to come up the next morning. They do have some faith in the robustness of institutions. They do think America is not that fragile.

00:57:43 Speaker_05
And for people to stand up there and screaming bloody murder about how Trump literally is a fascist, it's not just a coincidence. He's having a rally at Madison Square Garden. Did you know Nazis had a rally? I mean, this stuff is so

00:57:58 Speaker_05
you know, sort of so out of control, so over the top that people just, oh, those crazy Democrats again.

00:58:03 Speaker_05
You know, we have to realize that the way those people see the world, or Democrats should realize, is not the way normal people see the world, that they live a material life that is

00:58:17 Speaker_05
much more mundane, much more day-to-day, and the idea they're going to be animated by these abstract prorations about the threat to democracy and the impending night of fascism was just a huge, huge mistake.

00:58:32 Speaker_05
And one hopes that they've learned from that, but you know what? I bet they don't. 2028, J.D. Vance, you know, the apostle of fascism. You heard it here first, so we'll see what happens.

00:58:44 Speaker_08
Well, if the Democrats want to win in 2028, it should be Freddie DeBoer and Rui Teixeira as co-chairs of the DNC.

00:58:53 Speaker_05
That's what you heard here first.

00:58:55 Speaker_08
Yeah, I'm sorry to give you that job. It's not one that I would envy. But Rui Teixeira, Freddie DeBoer, thank you guys so much for joining us on Honestly.

00:59:05 Speaker_05
Hey, thanks for having us. Thanks.

00:59:09 Speaker_08
Thanks for listening, and thanks so much to Freddie DeBoer and Rui Teixeira for coming on the show today. If you liked this conversation, please share this episode with your friends and family, and use it to have a conversation of your own.

00:59:20 Speaker_08
And if you want to support the work we do here, go to thefp.com and become a free press subscriber today. See you next time.

00:59:36 Speaker_01
Looking for excitement? Chumba Casino is here. Play anytime, play anywhere. Play on the train, play at the store, play at home, play when you're bored. Play today for your chance to win and get daily bonuses when you log in. So what are you waiting for?

00:59:49 Speaker_01
Don't delay. Chumba Casino is free to play.

00:59:51 Speaker_09
Experience social gameplay like never before. Go to Chumba Casino right now to play hundreds of games including online slots, bingo, slingo and more. Live the Chumba life at ChumbaCasino.com.