Skip to main content

14 posts tagged with "No Stupid Questions"

View All Tags

No Stupid Questions Podcast: all episodes' AI transcripts and summaries

· 81 min read

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (No Stupid Questions) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summaries, mindmaps, topics, takeaways, transcripts, keywords and highlights.

Podcast: No Stupid Questions

No Stupid Questions

Description: Research psychologist Angela Duckworth (author of "Grit") and tech and sports executive Mike Maughan really like to ask people questions, and they believe there’s no such thing as a stupid one. So they have a podcast where they can ask each other as many “stupid questions” as they want. New episodes each week. "No Stupid Questions" is a production of the Freakonomics Radio Network.

To get every show in our network without ads and a monthly bonus episode of Freakonomics Radio, sign up for SiriusXM Podcasts+ on Apple Podcasts at http://apple.co/SiriusXM.

Category: Society & Culture

All Episodes

223. What About All the Questions We Haven’t Answered? AI transcript and summary - episode of podcast No Stupid Questions

· 42 min read

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (223. What About All the Questions We Haven’t Answered?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (No Stupid Questions) to view the AI-processed content of all episodes of this podcast.

No Stupid Questions episodes list: view full AI transcripts and summaries of this podcast on the blog

Episode: 223. What About All the Questions We Haven’t Answered?

223. What About All the Questions We Haven’t Answered?

Author: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Duration: 00:43:42

Episode Shownotes

How can you learn to love uncertainty? Is it better to cultivate acceptance or strive for change? And, after 223 episodes, what is the meaning of life? SOURCES:Jessica Alquist, professor of psychology at Texas Tech University.Roy Baumeister, professor of psychology at The University of Queensland.Raymond Carver, 20th-century American short story

writer and poet.Stephen Colbert, comedian and late-night TV host.Matt Damon, actor and film producer.Viktor Frankl, 20th-century Austrian neurologist, psychiatrist, philosopher.Steve Heine, professor of psychology at University of British Columbia.Charles Krauthammer, journalist.Reinhold Niebuhr, 20th-century American theologian.Keanu Reeves, actor.Elisabeth Sifton, author, editor, and book publisher. RESOURCES:Start Making Sense: How Existential Psychology Can Help Us Build Meaningful Lives in Absurd Times, by Steve Heine (2025)."Learning to Love Uncertainty," by Jessica L. Alquist and Roy F. Baumeister (Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2024)."Confused or Curious? Openness/Intellect Predicts More Positive Interest-Confusion Relations," by Kirill Fayn, Paul J. Silvia, Egon Dejonckheere, Stijn Verdonck, and Peter Kuppens (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2019)."A Note to Readers," by Charles Krauthammer (The Washington Post, 2018)."Interest — The Curious Emotion," by Paul J. Silvia (Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2008).The Serenity Prayer: Faith and Politics in Times of Peace and War, by Elisabeth Sifton (2003)."Late Fragment," by Raymond Carver (A New Path to the Waterfall, 1989).Man's Search for Meaning, by Viktor Frankl (1946). EXTRAS:"What Makes an Idea Interesting?" by No Stupid Questions (2024)."Should You Get Out of Your Comfort Zone?" by No Stupid Questions (2024)."Do You Need Closure?" by No Stupid Questions (2024)."Secret o’ Life," by James Taylor (JT, 1977).

Full Transcript

00:00:04 Speaker_08
Hey there, I am Stephen Dubner. If you were listening last week, you know that this is the final new episode of No Stupid Questions. Everyone here at the Freakonomics Radio Network is proud of the five years worth of episodes we've made, and we are

222. What Makes an Idea Interesting? AI transcript and summary - episode of podcast No Stupid Questions

· 33 min read

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (222. What Makes an Idea Interesting?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (No Stupid Questions) to view the AI-processed content of all episodes of this podcast.

No Stupid Questions episodes list: view full AI transcripts and summaries of this podcast on the blog

Episode: 222. What Makes an Idea Interesting?

222. What Makes an Idea Interesting?

Author: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Duration: 00:34:38

Episode Shownotes

What do Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, and Malcolm Gladwell have in common? Are interesting theories more significant than true ones? And what has been keeping Angela up at night? Plus: an important announcement about the show. SOURCES:Charles Darwin, 19th-century naturalist and biologist.Murray Davis, cultural sociologist.Malcolm Gladwell, journalist and author.Adam Grant,

professor of management and psychology at the University of Pennsylvania.B. F. Skinner, 20th-century American psychologist. RESOURCES:Small Fry, by Lisa Brennan-Jobs (2018).Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance, by Angela Duckworth (2016)."Why Malcolm Gladwell’s Ideas Are So Interesting, Whether or Not They’re True," by Adam Grant (Quartz, 2015).David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants, by Malcolm Gladwell (2013).Curious?: Discover the Missing Ingredient to a Fulfilling Life, by Todd Kashdan (2009)."Interest — The Curious Emotion," by Paul J. Silvia (2008).Exploring the Psychology of Interest, by Paul J. Silvia (2006)."The Ketchup Conundrum," by Malcolm Gladwell (The New Yorker, 2004)."That's Interesting!: Towards a Phenomenology of Sociology and a Sociology of Phenomenology," by Murray S. Davis (Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1971).The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, by Charles Darwin (1872). EXTRAS:"How Do You Identify a Narcissist?" by No Stupid Questions (2024)."Is Screen Time as Poisonous as We Think?" by Freakonomics Radio (2024)."Abortion and Crime, Revisited (Update)," by Freakonomics Radio (2024).

Full Transcript

00:00:02 Speaker_00
Wait a minute.

Is It Weird for Adults to Have Imaginary Friends? (Replay) AI transcript and summary - episode of podcast No Stupid Questions

· 34 min read

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (Is It Weird for Adults to Have Imaginary Friends? (Replay)) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (No Stupid Questions) to view the AI-processed content of all episodes of this podcast.

No Stupid Questions episodes list: view full AI transcripts and summaries of this podcast on the blog

Episode: Is It Weird for Adults to Have Imaginary Friends? (Replay)

Is It Weird for Adults to Have Imaginary Friends? (Replay)

Author: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Duration: 00:36:27

Episode Shownotes

Why does listening to No Stupid Questions feel like you’re hanging out with your best friends? Why did the whole world take it personally when Princess Diana died? And how do “parasocial relationships” affect your mental health? SOURCES:Bradley Bond, professor of communication studies at the University of San Diego.John Cacioppo,

professor of psychology at the University of Chicago.Joe Cobbs, professor of marketing at Northern Kentucky University.Nick Epley, professor of behavioral science at the University of Chicago.Katy Milkman, professor of operations, information, and decisions at the University of Pennsylvania.Emily Oster, professor of economics at Brown University.Anuj Shah, professor of behavioral science at the University of Chicago. RESOURCES:"Knowledge About Others Reduces One’s Own Sense of Anonymity," by Anuj K. Shah and Michael LaForest (Nature, 2022)."Tragic but True: How Podcasters Replaced Our Real Friends," by Rachel Aroesti (The Guardian, 2021)."The Development and Influence of Parasocial Relationships With Television Characters: A Longitudinal Experimental Test of Prejudice Reduction Through Parasocial Contact," by Bradley J. Bond (Communication Research, 2020)."A Mind like Mine: The Exceptionally Ordinary Underpinnings of Anthropomorphism," by Nicholas Epley (Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2018)."Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance," by Angela Duckworth (TED, 2013)."How Soap Operas Changed the World," by Stephanie Hegarty (BBC, 2012)."The Power of TV: Cable Television and Women's Status in India," by Robert Jensen and Emily Oster (The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2009). EXTRAS:"Can A.I. Companions Replace Human Connection?" by No Stupid Questions (2024)."Rivalry," by Tell Me Something I Don't Know (2017).Behavior Change for Good Initiative.Everything Is Alive.The Know Rivalry Project.

Full Transcript

00:00:04 Speaker_05
Hi, NSQ listeners. If you've been following us for a while, you know that Stephen Dubner used to co-host the show. We're off this week, so we thought you might enjoy this classic episode in which he and Angela discuss parasocial relationships.

221. Why Are We So Pessimistic? AI transcript and summary - episode of podcast No Stupid Questions

· 37 min read

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (221. Why Are We So Pessimistic?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (No Stupid Questions) to view the AI-processed content of all episodes of this podcast.

No Stupid Questions episodes list: view full AI transcripts and summaries of this podcast on the blog

Episode: 221. Why Are We So Pessimistic?

221. Why Are We So Pessimistic?

Author: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Duration: 00:39:21

Episode Shownotes

Are things really as bad as they seem? Has Gen Z given up hope for the world? And why was the father of positive psychology a lifelong pessimist? SOURCES:Albert Bandura, professor of psychology at Stanford University.David Brooks, author and opinion columnist. Andrew Grove, former C.E.O. and chairman of Intel Corporation.Kalev

Leetaru, founder of the GDELT Project.Steven Maier, professor of behavioral neuroscience at the University of Colorado Boulder.Michelle Obama, attorney, author, and former first lady of the United States.Steven Pinker, professor of psychology at Harvard University.Amanda Ripley, journalist and author.Martin Seligman, professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania.Jean Twenge, professor of psychology at San Diego State University.Edward Zigler, professor emeritus of psychology at Yale University. RESOURCES:"Chicken Littles Are Ruining America," by David Brooks (The Atlantic, 2024).Generations, by Jean Twenge (2023).Enlightenment Now, by Steven Pinker (2018)."The Short History of Global Living Conditions and Why It Matters That We Know It," by Max Roser (Our World in Data, 2016)."Learned Helplessness at Fifty: Insights from Neuroscience," by Steven F. Maier and Martin E. P. Seligman (Psychological Review, 2016)."Short- and Long-Term Consequences of Stressor Controllability in Adolescent Rats," by Kenneth H. Kubala, John P. Christianson, Steven F. Maier, et al. (Behavioural Brain Research, 2012).The Better Angels of Our Nature, by Steven Pinker (2011)."Forecasting Large-Scale Human Behavior Using Global News Media Tone in Time and Space," by Kalev Leetaru (First Monday, 2011)."Motivational Aspects of Changes in IQ Test Performance of Culturally Deprived Nursery School Children," by Edward Zigler and Earl C. Butterfield (Child Development, 1968)."Failure to Escape Traumatic Shock," by Martin E. P. Seligman and Steven F. Maier (Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967).Upworthy. EXTRAS:"Why Is U.S. Media So Negative?" by Freakonomics Radio (2021).

Summary

In this episode, Angela Duckworth and Mike Maughan explore the growing pessimism in society, analyzing whether the world truly deserves its dire perception. They discuss findings such as the strikingly low percentage of Americans who believe the world is improving, particularly among Generation Z. Although notable experts highlight significant advancements in areas like health and poverty reduction, the cultural narrative maintains a sense of despair. The concept of agency and self-efficacy are emphasized as crucial in shaping optimism, with discussions on how fostering small wins could help individuals, especially the younger generation, combat feelings of helplessness and encourage a more hopeful outlook.

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (221. Why Are We So Pessimistic?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Full Transcript

00:00:03 Speaker_06
I am ready. Let's go. I'm Angela Duckworth.

220. Is Your Attention Span Shrinking? AI transcript and summary - episode of podcast No Stupid Questions

· 35 min read

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (220. Is Your Attention Span Shrinking?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (No Stupid Questions) to view the AI-processed content of all episodes of this podcast.

No Stupid Questions episodes list: view full AI transcripts and summaries of this podcast on the blog

Episode: 220. Is Your Attention Span Shrinking?

220. Is Your Attention Span Shrinking?

Author: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Duration: 00:37:11

Episode Shownotes

Does a surplus of information create a shortage of attention? Are today’s young people really unable to focus? And do goldfish need better PR? SOURCES:Neil Bradbury, professor of physiology at Rosalind Franklin University.Nicholas Carr, writer and journalist.Johann Hari, writer and journalist.Charles Howard, University Chaplain and Vice President for Social Equity

& Community at the University of Pennsylvania.Felicity Huntingford, emeritus professor of functional ecology at the university of Glasgow.Gloria Mark, professor of informatics at the University of California, Irvine.Rick Rubin, music producer and record executive.Herbert Simon, professor of computer science and psychology at Carnegie Mellon University. RESOURCES:Uncovering Your Path: Spiritual Reflections for Finding Your Purpose, by Charles Lattimore Howard (forthcoming 2025).Attention Span: A Groundbreaking Way to Restore Balance, Happiness and Productivity, by Gloria Mark (2023).The Creative Act: A Way of Being, by Rick Rubin (2023).Stolen Focus: Why You Can't Pay Attention — and How to Think Deeply Again, by Johann Hari (2022)."Quibi’s Founder and CEO Explain What Went Wrong," by Jessica Bursztynsky (CNBC, 2020)."Digital Democracy Survey, Eleventh Edition," by Deloitte (2017)."Busting the Attention Span Myth," by Simon Maybin (BBC News, 2017)."Attention Span During Lectures: 8 Seconds, 10 Minutes, or More?" by Neil Bradbury (Advances in Physiology Education, 2016)."Is Google Making Us Stupid?" by Nicholas Carr (The Atlantic, 2008)."Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World," by Herbert Simon (Computers, Communications, and the Public Interest, 1971). EXTRAS:"Multitasking Doesn’t Work. So Why Do We Keep Trying?" by Freakonomics Radio (2024)."Rick Rubin on How to Make Something Great," by People I (Mostly) Admire (2023).

Summary

In this episode of Freakonomics Radio, Angela Duckworth and Mike Maughan analyze whether attention spans are indeed shrinking due to modern distractions. They discuss the role of technology, including smartphones and streaming services, and question common assumptions about declining attention capacities. The hosts reference various studies that suggest attention spans may not have fundamentally changed but are influenced by external factors and teaching effectiveness. Notably, distractions overwhelm our ability to focus, and personal anecdotes illustrate the struggle to engage deeply with experiences in today's information-heavy environment.

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (220. Is Your Attention Span Shrinking?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Full Transcript

00:00:03 Speaker_02
I savored it. I absorbed it. I loved it. I'm Angela Duckworth.

219. How Do You Identify a Narcissist? AI transcript and summary - episode of podcast No Stupid Questions

· 38 min read

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (219. How Do You Identify a Narcissist?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (No Stupid Questions) to view the AI-processed content of all episodes of this podcast.

No Stupid Questions episodes list: view full AI transcripts and summaries of this podcast on the blog

Episode: 219. How Do You Identify a Narcissist?

219. How Do You Identify a Narcissist?

Author: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Duration: 00:40:48

Episode Shownotes

What’s the difference between narcissism and high self-esteem? Does social media fuel arrogance or self-consciousness? And do people get less toxic with age? SOURCES:Brené Brown, research professor at the University of Houston and visiting professor in management at the University of Texas at Austin.Jonathan Haidt, professor of social psychology at

the New York University Stern School of Business.Michael Lewis, author.Cooper McAllister, senior consultant at Booz Allen Hamilton.Jean Twenge, professor of psychology at San Diego State University. RESOURCES:"‘Narcissistic Abuse’ Has Gone Mainstream. But What Is It?" Abby Ellin (The Washington Post, 2024)."Development of Narcissism Across the Life Span: A Meta-Analytic Review of Longitudinal Studies," by Ulrich Orth, Samantha Krauss, and Mitja D. Back (Psychological Bulletin, 2024).The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness, by Jonathan Haidt (2024)."America Is Obsessed With Narcissists. Is Trump to Blame?" by Charles Trepany (USA Today, 2024)."Narcissism Today: What We Know and What We Need to Learn," by Joshua D. Miller, Mitja D. Back, Donald R. Lynam, and Aidan G. C. Wright (Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2021)."Egos Deflating With the Great Recession: A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis and Within-Campus Analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory, 1982–2016," by Jean M. Twenge, Sara H. Konrath, Cooper McAllister, et al. (Personality and Individual Differences, 2021)."Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Diagnostic and Clinical Challenges," by Eve Caligor, Kenneth N. Levy, and Frank E. Yeomans (American Journal of Psychiatry, 2015).Generation Me: Why Today's Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled — and More Miserable Than Ever Before, by Jean Twenge (2006).Cincinnatus and the Citizen-Servant Ideal: The Roman Legend's Life, Times, and Legacy, by Michael J. Hillyard (2001). EXTRAS:"Is Screen Time as Poisonous as We Think?" by Freakonomics Radio (2024)."Do 'Generations' Mean Anything?" by No Stupid Questions (2023)."Is Pride the Worst Sin?" by No Stupid Questions (2023).The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine, by Michael Lewis (2010).

Summary

In this episode, hosts Angela Duckworth and Mike Maughan discuss the complexities of narcissism, questioning whether it exists on a spectrum rather than as a binary condition. They differentiate between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, explaining their traits and societal implications. The discussion references historical insights, including the myth of Cincinnatus, and examines contemporary findings by Jean Twenge, who notes fluctuating trends in narcissism across generations. The role of social media and economic conditions in shaping narcissistic behaviors is also considered, alongside perspectives on how understanding these dynamics can inform our interactions with others.

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (219. How Do You Identify a Narcissist?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Full Transcript

00:00:03 Speaker_01
Hi, NSQ listeners. Before we start the show, we should note that today's conversation briefly touches on presidential politics, but it was recorded before the November 5th election. We hope you enjoy the episode.

How Can You Give Better Gifts? (Replay) AI transcript and summary - episode of podcast No Stupid Questions

· 38 min read

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (How Can You Give Better Gifts? (Replay)) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (No Stupid Questions) to view the AI-processed content of all episodes of this podcast.

No Stupid Questions episodes list: view full AI transcripts and summaries of this podcast on the blog

Episode: How Can You Give Better Gifts? (Replay)

How Can You Give Better Gifts? (Replay)

Author: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Duration: 00:38:06

Episode Shownotes

How many bottles of wine are regifted? What’s wrong with giving cash? And should Angela give her husband a subscription to the Sausage of the Month Club? SOURCES:Joel Waldfogel, professor of strategic management & entrepreneurship at the University of Minnesota. RESOURCES:“How to Become a Truly Excellent Gift Giver,” by Eliza

Brooke (Vox, 2022).“How to Calculate a Holiday Tip for the Doorman,” by Ronda Kaysen (The New York Times, 2022).“Least Favorite Gifts to Receive for Christmas in the United States in 2022, by Generation,” (Statista, 2022).“(Not) Giving the Same Old Song and Dance: Givers’ Misguided Concerns About Thoughtfulness and Boringness Keep Them From Repeating Gifts,” by Julian Givi (Journal of Business Research, 2020).“Does Anyone Really Buy the Giant Car Bows You See in Every Commercial?” by Aditi Shrikant (Vox, 2018).“It’s the Motive That Counts: Perceived Sacrifice Motives and Gratitude in Romantic Relationships,” by Mariko L. Visserman, Francesca Righetti, Emily A. Impett, Dacher Keltner, and Paul A. M. Van Lange (Emotion, 2018).“Why Certain Gifts Are Great to Give but Not to Get: A Framework for Understanding Errors in Gift Giving,” by Jeff Galak, Julian Givi, and Elanor F. Williams (Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2016).“The Girl Who Gets Gifts From Birds,” by Katy Sewall (B.B.C. News, 2015).“The Disappointing Gift: Dispositional and Situational Moderators of Emotional Expressions,” by Renée M. Tobin and William G. Graziano (Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2011).Scroogenomics: Why You Shouldn’t Buy Presents for the Holidays, by Joel Waldfogel (2009).“The Deadweight Loss of Christmas,” by Joel Waldfogel (The American Economic Review, 1993).United States Postal Service Employee Tipping and Gift-Receiving Policy. EXTRAS:“Have a Very Homo Economicus Christmas,” by Freakonomics Radio (2012).

Summary

In this episode, Angela Duckworth and Stephen Dubner explore the complexities of gift-giving, addressing a listener's dilemma about shopping for a difficult recipient. They discuss psychological insights on how gift-givers often overlook long-term appreciation in favor of immediate reactions. Anecdotes illustrate the common issue of mismatched gifts, and economist Joel Waldfogel's concept of 'deadweight loss' is introduced, highlighting the discrepancy between a gift's cost and its perceived value. Cultural norms around cash and the use of gift cards are examined, as well as the emotional impact of thoughtful gifts, emphasizing the importance of empathy and personal connection in enhancing relationships through meaningful presents.

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (How Can You Give Better Gifts? (Replay)) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Full Transcript

00:00:03 Speaker_02
Hi, NSQ listeners. If you've been following us for a while, you know that Stephen Dubner used to co-host the show.

218. Why Do Parents Overshare on Social Media? AI transcript and summary - episode of podcast No Stupid Questions

· 34 min read

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (218. Why Do Parents Overshare on Social Media?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (No Stupid Questions) to view the AI-processed content of all episodes of this podcast.

No Stupid Questions episodes list: view full AI transcripts and summaries of this podcast on the blog

Episode: 218. Why Do Parents Overshare on Social Media?

218. Why Do Parents Overshare on Social Media?

Author: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Duration: 00:34:37

Episode Shownotes

How does social media exploit our evolutionary instincts? How dangerous is it to post about your children online? And does Angela regret talking about her daughters on the podcast? SOURCES:Erin Carbone, visiting assistant professor of social and decision sciences at Carnegie Mellon University.Jimmy Kimmel, comedian and late-night television host.George Loewenstein,

professor of economics and psychology at Carnegie Mellon University.Taylor Swift, singer-songwriter.Christie Tate, essayist and author. RESOURCES:"Five Takeaways From The Times’s Investigation Into Child Influencers," by The New York Times (2024)."Online 'Sharenting': The Dangers of Posting Sensitive Information About Children on Social Media," by Pietro Ferrara, Ignazio Cammisa, Massimo Pettoello-Mantovani, et al. (The Journal of Pediatrics, 2023)."Privacy Preferences and the Drive to Disclose," by Erin Carbone and George Loewenstein (Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2023)."My Daughter Asked Me to Stop Writing About Motherhood. Here’s Why I Can’t Do That," by Christie Tate (The Washington Post, 2019)."When Kids Realize Their Whole Life Is Already Online," by Taylor Lorenz (The Atlantic, 2019)."'Sharenting' Puts Young at Risk of Online Fraud," by Sean Coughlan (BBC News, 2018)."Everything You Need to Know About the 'Right to be forgotten,'" fact sheet by the European Union. EXTRAS:"What Is Your Password?" by Jimmy Kimmel Live! (2015)."The Best Day," by Taylor Swift (2009).

Summary

In this episode of 'No Stupid Questions,' hosts Angela Duckworth and Mike Maughan explore the issue of 'sharenting,' where parents share extensive details about their kids on social media. They discuss the implications of such oversharing, including privacy invasion and the risk of identity theft, particularly for children. Angela reflects on the emotional impact on her own daughter and the realities of children discovering their parents' shared information. The hosts also address the primal 'drive to disclose' that motivates parents, contrasting it with ethical considerations and urging for more thoughtful sharing practices in the digital age.

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (218. Why Do Parents Overshare on Social Media?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Full Transcript

00:00:03 Speaker_05
Anyone who has you on their Christmas card list is so paranoid.

217. What Happens When You Put on a Costume? AI transcript and summary - episode of podcast No Stupid Questions

· 40 min read

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (217. What Happens When You Put on a Costume?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (No Stupid Questions) to view the AI-processed content of all episodes of this podcast.

No Stupid Questions episodes list: view full AI transcripts and summaries of this podcast on the blog

Episode: 217. What Happens When You Put on a Costume?

217. What Happens When You Put on a Costume?

Author: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Duration: 00:40:45

Episode Shownotes

Would you steal Halloween candy? Should people be required to identify themselves online? And why did Angela go trick-or-treating in a trash bag? SOURCES:Hajo Adam, professor of management at the University of Bath.Marianna Cerini, journalist.Edward Diener, professor emeritus of psychology at the University of Illinois.Adam Galinsky, professor of leadership and

ethics at Columbia Business School.J. Nathan Matias, assistant professor at the Cornell University Departments of Communication and Information Science.Lisa Morton, paranormal historian and author.Isaac Bashevis Singer, 20th-century Polish-American author.Philip Zimbardo, professor emeritus of psychology at Stanford University. RESOURCES:"Halloween Was Once So Dangerous That Some Cities Considered Banning It," by Christopher Klein (History, 2023)."Why Do People Sometimes Wear an Anonymous Mask? Motivations for Seeking Anonymity Online," by Lewis Nitschinsk, Stephanie J. Tobin, Deanna Varley, and Eric J. Vanman (Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2023)."From Pagan Spirits to Wonder Woman: A Brief History of the Halloween Costume," by Marianna Cerini (CNN, 2020)."The Real Name Fallacy," by J.Nathan Matias (Coral, 2017)."Can Your Employees Really Speak Freely?" by James R. Detert and Ethan Burris (Harvard Business Review, 2016)."'Mask Index' Helps Predict Election Day Outcome," by Adriana Diaz (CBS Evening News, 2016)."Enclothed Cognition," by Hajo Adam and Adam D. Galinsky (Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012)."Effects of Deindividuation Variables on Stealing Among Halloween Trick-or-Treaters," by Edward Diener, Scott C. Fraser, Arthur L. Beaman, and Roger T. Kelem (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976)."The Human Choice: Individuation, Reason, and Order Versus Deindividuation, Impulse, and Chaos," by Philip G. Zimbardo (Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1969). EXTRAS:"What Is Evil?" by No Stupid Questions (2024)."How to Maximize Your Halloween Candy Haul," by Freakonomics Radio (2012).

Summary

In episode 217 of 'No Stupid Questions', hosts Angela Duckworth and Mike Maughan explore the role of costumes in Halloween and their psychological implications. Angela recounts her childhood Halloween experience and the origins of Halloween from the Celtic festival of Samhain to its commercialization. The episode discusses how costumes historically impacted behavior, emphasizing de-individuation, with research by Ed Diener demonstrating that anonymity can lead to moral disengagement. They also discuss the effects of anonymity in online environments and student feedback, linking how clothing symbolism influences identity and cognitive processes.

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (217. What Happens When You Put on a Costume?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Full Transcript

00:00:03 Speaker_03
One star. I don't believe it. And it's boring. I'm Angela Duckworth.

216. Why Do We Make Excuses? AI transcript and summary - episode of podcast No Stupid Questions

· 36 min read

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (216. Why Do We Make Excuses?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (No Stupid Questions) to view the AI-processed content of all episodes of this podcast.

No Stupid Questions episodes list: view full AI transcripts and summaries of this podcast on the blog

Episode: 216. Why Do We Make Excuses?

216. Why Do We Make Excuses?

Author: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Duration: 00:37:58

Episode Shownotes

Is it better to explain a mistake or just accept responsibility? What’s the difference between an excuse and a justification? And why is it important to remember that you’re not a pizzeria on the Jersey Shore? SOURCES:Robert Cialdini, professor of psychology at Arizona State University.Raymond Higgins, professor emeritus of psychology

at University of Kansas.Martin Seligman, professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania.Rick Snyder, professor emeritus of psychology at University of Kansas. RESOURCES:"‘Explain, but Make No Excuses’: Service Recovery After Public Service Failures," by Matthias Döring (Public Management Review, 2022)."To Justify or Excuse?: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of Explanations," by John C. Shaw, Eric Wild, and Jason A. Colquitt (Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003)."Excuses: Their Effective Role in the Negotiation of Reality," by C. R. Snyder and Raymond L. Higgins (Psychological Bulletin, 1988)."The Attributional Style Questionnaire," by Christopher Peterson, Amy Semmel, Carl von Baeyer, Lyn Y. Abramson, Gerald I. Metalsky, and Martin E. P. Seligman (Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1982). EXTRAS:"How Can You Convince Someone They’re Wrong?" by No Stupid Questions (2021)."Under the Boardwalk," song by The Drifters (1964).

Summary

In this episode of 'No Stupid Questions,' Angela Duckworth and Mike Maughan explore the nuances behind why people make excuses instead of accepting personal responsibility. They distinguish between excuses, which shift blame, and justifications, which accept responsibility but mitigate moral implications. The discussion highlights the psychological impacts of excuses, such as cognitive closure and how habitual excuse-making can affect one's reputation. They emphasize reframing choices and behaviors in context, maintaining self-esteem, and recognizing how well-framed excuses can facilitate personal accountability and agency.

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (216. Why Do We Make Excuses?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Full Transcript

00:00:03 Speaker_01
I'm having an allergic reaction to this right now.

215. Is It Okay to Do the Right Thing for the Wrong Reason? AI transcript and summary - episode of podcast No Stupid Questions

· 36 min read

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (215. Is It Okay to Do the Right Thing for the Wrong Reason?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (No Stupid Questions) to view the AI-processed content of all episodes of this podcast.

No Stupid Questions episodes list: view full AI transcripts and summaries of this podcast on the blog

Episode: 215. Is It Okay to Do the Right Thing for the Wrong Reason?

215. Is It Okay to Do the Right Thing for the Wrong Reason?

Author: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Duration: 00:35:02

Episode Shownotes

What’s wrong with donating to charity for the tax write-off? Should we think less of people who do volunteer work to pad their resumes? And why is Angela stopping women in public parks to compliment them? SOURCES:Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.Geoffrey Goodwin, professor

of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania.Jon Huntsman, politician, diplomat, and businessman.Immanuel Kant, 18th-century German philosopher.Emrys Westacott, professor of philosophy at Alfred University. RESOURCES:"How Inferred Motives Shape Moral Judgements," by Ryan W. Carlson, Yochanan E. Bigman, Kurt Gray, Melissa J. Ferguson, and M. J. Crockett (Nature Reviews Psychology, 2022)."Just 2 Minutes of Walking After a Meal Is Surprisingly Good for You," by Rachel Fairbank (The New York Times, 2022)."Psychological Egoism," by Emrys Westacott (ThoughtCo, 2020)."A Meta-Analytic Review of Moral Licensing," by Irene Blanken, Niels van de Ven, and Marcel Zeelenberg (Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2015)."Selfish or Selfless? On the Signal Value of Emotion in Altruistic Behavior," by Alixandra Barasch, Emma E. Levine, Jonathan Z. Berman, and Deborah A. Small (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2014)."Greenwashing — the Deceptive Tactics Behind Environmental Claims," by the United Nations. EXTRAS:"Giving It Away," by People I (Mostly) Admire (2022)."How Can We Get More Virtue and Less ‘Virtue Signaling’?" by No Stupid Questions (2020)."Does Doing Good Give You License to Be Bad?" by Freakonomics Radio (2018).

Summary

In this episode of 'No Stupid Questions,' hosts Angela Duckworth and Mike Maughan examine the complexities of moral motivations in charitable actions, questioning whether self-serving reasons, such as tax benefits, diminish the value of good deeds. They discuss examples from notable philanthropists and philosophical frameworks like utilitarianism and deontological ethics, arguing that mixed motives often fuel positive social behaviors. The conversation highlights our tendency to judge moral character based on inferred intentions and evaluates the concept of moral licensing, ultimately emphasizing that the motivations behind altruistic acts can be both complex and beneficial.

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (215. Is It Okay to Do the Right Thing for the Wrong Reason?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Full Transcript

00:00:02 Speaker_03
Love it. Love the skirt. Amazing. I'm Angela Duckworth.

214. What Does It Take to Survive a Scandal? AI transcript and summary - episode of podcast No Stupid Questions

· 38 min read

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (214. What Does It Take to Survive a Scandal?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (No Stupid Questions) to view the AI-processed content of all episodes of this podcast.

No Stupid Questions episodes list: view full AI transcripts and summaries of this podcast on the blog

Episode: 214. What Does It Take to Survive a Scandal?

214. What Does It Take to Survive a Scandal?

Author: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Duration: 00:38:09

Episode Shownotes

How do you come back from being “canceled”? Are we more likely to forgive someone if they cry? And what makes a successful public apology? SOURCES:Karen Cerulo, professor emeritus of sociology at Rutgers University.Bill Clinton, former president of the United States.David Gergen, professor emeritus of public leadership at the Harvard

Kennedy School; former White House adviser to four U.S. presidents.Benjamin Ho, professor and chair of economics at Vassar College.Monica Lewinsky, activist.John List, professor of economics at the University of Chicago.Brandon Rottinghaus, professor of political science at the University of Houston. RESOURCES:"Slut-Shamed at 22, an Icon at 50 — How Monica Lewinsky Got Her Life Back," by Helen Rumbelow (The Times, 2024)."Do Scandals Matter?" by Brandon Rottinghaus (Political Research Quarterly, 2023)."Toward An Understanding of the Economics of Apologies: Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment," by Basil Halperin, Benjamin Ho, John List, and Ian Muir (The Economic Journal, 2022)."Embodied Remorse: Physical Displays of Remorse Increase Positive Responses to Public Apologies, but Have Negligible Effects on Forgiveness," by Matthew J. Hornsey, Michael J. A. Wohl, Emily A. Harris, Tyler G. Okimoto, Michael Thai, and Michael Wenzel (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2020)."Commentary: Time for Bill Clinton to Go Away," by Will Rahn (CBS News, 2018)."The Price of Shame," by Monica Lewinsky (TED Talk, 2015)."Apologies Demanded Yet Devalued: Normative Dilution in the Age of Apology," by Tyler G. Okimoto, Michael Wenzel, and Matthew J. Hornsey (Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2015)."Apologies of the Rich and Famous: Cultural, Cognitive, and Social Explanations of Why We Care and Why We Forgive," by Janet M. Ruane and Karen Cerulo (Social Psychology Quarterly, 2014). EXTRAS:"How to Optimize Your Apology," by Freakonomics Radio (2018)."Coal Digger," S1.E5 of Modern Family (2009).

Summary

In this episode of 'No Stupid Questions,' the hosts analyze the complexities of surviving a scandal, emphasizing the role of emotional responses and effective public apologies in reputation recovery. They discuss the polarized nature of modern morality influencing societal reactions, noting how public perception varies based on factors like power dynamics and context. Expert insights from figures such as Monica Lewinsky and Bill Clinton underscore the need for sincerity in apologies, which should prioritize the victim's experience. The episode culminates in exploring the intricate relationship between personal mistakes, public forgiveness, and the potential for redemption in a judgmental society.

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (214. What Does It Take to Survive a Scandal?) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Full Transcript

00:00:03 Speaker_03
Are you really going to make me do this?

Why Do People Love Horror Movies? (Replay) AI transcript and summary - episode of podcast No Stupid Questions

· 33 min read

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (Why Do People Love Horror Movies? (Replay)) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Go to PodExtra AI's podcast page (No Stupid Questions) to view the AI-processed content of all episodes of this podcast.

No Stupid Questions episodes list: view full AI transcripts and summaries of this podcast on the blog

Episode: Why Do People Love Horror Movies? (Replay)

Why Do People Love Horror Movies? (Replay)

Author: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Duration: 00:33:10

Episode Shownotes

When are negative emotions enjoyable? Are we all a little masochistic? And do pigs like hot sauce? SOURCES:Carol Dweck, professor of psychology at Stanford University.Sigmund Freud, neurologist and father of psychoanalysis.Paul Rozin, professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania.Robert Sapolsky, professor of biology, neurology, and neurosurgery at Stanford University.George

Vaillant, professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and Mass General Research Institute. RESOURCES:"The 10 Scariest Horror Movies Ever," by RT Staff (Rotten Tomatoes, 2022)."Box Office History for Horror," (The Numbers, 2022)."Around the World, Adolescence Is a Time of Heightened Sensation Seeking and Immature Self-Regulation," by Laurence Steinberg, Grace Icenogle, Hanan M. S. Takash, et al. (Developmental Science, 2018)."Why Taste Buds Dull As We Age," by Natalie Jacewicz (The Salt, 2017).Horror Literature Through History, edited by Matt Cardin (2017)."Why We Love the Pain of Spicy Food," by John McQuaid (The Wall Street Journal, 2014)."Glad to Be Sad, and Other Examples of Benign Masochism," by Paul Rozin, Lily Guillot, Katrina Fincher, Alexander Rozin, and Eli Tsukayama (Judgment and Decision Making, 2013)."The Ignorant and the Furious: Video and Catharsis," by the Association for Psychological Science (2010).Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, by Carol S. Dweck (2006)."Adaptive Mental Mechanisms: Their Role in a Positive Psychology," by George E. Vaillant (American Psychologist, 2000). EXTRAS:Terrifier 2, film (2022)."How to Change Your Mind (Update)," by Freakonomics Radio (2022)."Why Is U.S. Media So Negative?" by Freakonomics Radio (2021)."Why Is Academic Writing So Bad?" by No Stupid Questions (2021).Han Dynasty restaurant.

Summary

In this episode, Angela Duckworth and Mike Maughan explore the psychology behind why people enjoy horror movies despite the negative emotions they evoke. They introduce key concepts like 'benign masochism' to explain the pleasure derived from discomfort, particularly in experiences like watching horror films. The discussion also covers demographic trends in horror film audiences, the neurochemical responses associated with fear, and psychological theories such as Aristotle's catharsis and Freud's concepts. Ultimately, the episode encourages listeners to reflect on their personal experiences with horror and its complex emotional landscape.

Go to PodExtra AI's episode page (Why Do People Love Horror Movies? (Replay)) to play and view complete AI-processed content: summary, mindmap, topics, takeaways, transcript, keywords and highlights.

Full Transcript

00:00:03 Speaker_02
Hi, NSQ listeners. If you've been following us for a while, you know that Stephen Dubner used to co-host the show.